PDA

View Full Version : THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 [125] 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 02:50 PM
i need williams daven. my run game is **** even with him</P>


Dezz. I can give you Portis. What can you offer. (need WR)</P>

DavenIII
09-29-2009, 02:51 PM
Daven, sent counter offer.</p>



You are dealing with the devil after you chastised us yesterday?
</p>


Point well taken. But I'm staring into the sun and can't look away.</p>

it's because that's where the fun is.

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 02:51 PM
Landon- you should know as well as anyone here not to take me seriously..or at least with a grain of salt. lol.</p>

Your certainly going out on a limb picking us against the Ravens...This will be a very tough game against a very good team..</p>
I do know that, just not when it comes to the Pats. lol I was shocked you didn't know who Peter King was. I should have known you were joking.

I just have a feeling about the Pats this week. Plus I said 4-1 so I have to stick by it. If Tom can get his receivers healthy then it is a whole new ball game.

dezzzR
09-29-2009, 02:52 PM
i need williams daven. my run game is **** even with him</P>


what would it take Dez to get Williams from you.. </P>chris johnson

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 02:53 PM
Daven, sent counter offer.</P>



You are dealing with the devil after you chastised us yesterday?
</P>


Point well taken. But I'm staring into the sun and can't look away.</P>




it's because that's where the fun is.
</P>


Cut loose like a deuce another runner in the night.</P>

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 02:54 PM
i need williams daven. my run game is **** even with him</P>


How about Portis staight up for Jennings?</P>

dezzzR
09-29-2009, 02:54 PM
i need williams daven. my run game is **** even with him</P>


Dezz. I can give you Portis. What can you offer. (need WR)</P>ill give you hines ward for portis

dezzzR
09-29-2009, 02:54 PM
i need williams daven. my run game is **** even with him</P>


How about Portis staight up for Jennings?</P>cant do it.

DavenIII
09-29-2009, 02:55 PM
Benson and Manningham for Portis and_________</p>

ugg, really noone, I like Benson more then Portis I like Manningham about the "Same" as Driver.

I would think about Portis and Ray Rice, if I didn't already have too many RB's.

what about Fitz for Benson and Manningham....

I'm thinking about Benson and Manningham for Portis and Gonzo too ... but I'm not sure I want that.

dezzzR
09-29-2009, 02:55 PM
nope....Cassell SUCKS !</P>



Remember you said that after he carves up the Giants and beats them. [8-)]
how about i carve you up after a statement like that[:|]
I was joking, don't cut me. lol
</P>


dont say such things!!!lol</P>

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 02:58 PM
Benson and Manningham for Portis and_________</P>




ugg, really noone, I like Benson more then Portis I like Manningham about the "Same" as Driver.

I would think about Portis and Ray Rice, if I didn't already have too many RB's.

what about Fitz for Benson and Manningham....

<FONT size=4>I'm thinking about Benson and Manningham for Portis and Gonzo too</FONT> ... but I'm not sure I want that.
</P>


I'm sure you are. I'll give you Portis and V Davis for Benson and Manningham.</P>


I've also decided that Fitz is untouchable unless I can get another top 10 WR back.</P>


</P>

patsrule666
09-29-2009, 02:58 PM
Daven, sent counter offer.</P>



You are dealing with the devil after you chastised us yesterday?
</P>


Point well taken. But I'm staring into the sun and can't look away.</P>




it's because that's where the fun is.
</P>


Cut loose like a deuce another runner in the night.</P>


I always thought it was *****....lol Great song btw.</P>


Seems the bye week has you stirred right up Mr. State..You were the pillar of composure..what happened????</P>

patsrule666
09-29-2009, 03:00 PM
Anyone make any waiver claims this week ?? If so- Who ??

DavenIII
09-29-2009, 03:01 PM
Benson and Manningham for Portis and_________</p>




ugg, really noone, I like Benson more then Portis I like Manningham about the "Same" as Driver.

I would think about Portis and Ray Rice, if I didn't already have too many RB's.

what about Fitz for Benson and Manningham....

<font size="4">I'm thinking about Benson and Manningham for Portis and Gonzo too</font> ... but I'm not sure I want that.
</p>


I'm sure you are. I'll give you Portis and V Davis for Benson and Manningham.</p>


I've also decided that Fitz is untouchable unless I can get another top 10 WR back.</p>


</p>
Can we make Portis, Ray Rice instead? Portis is a Redskin and playing the Giants twice and I hate rooting for teams playing against the giants.

(Also...I'll PM you another thing)

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 03:03 PM
Daven, sent counter offer.</P>



You are dealing with the devil after you chastised us yesterday?
</P>


Point well taken. But I'm staring into the sun and can't look away.</P>




it's because that's where the fun is.
</P>


Cut loose like a deuce another runner in the night.</P>


I always thought it was *****....lol Great song btw.</P>


Seems the bye week has you stirred right up Mr. State..You were the pillar of composure..what happened????</P>


</P>


Thats the Manfred Mann version. (he only makes it sound like doush)</P>


In Manfred Mann's version its "Wrecked up like a duece"</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:06 PM
Anyone make any waiver claims this week ?? If so- Who ??
I got someone...

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 03:06 PM
Benson and Manningham for Portis and_________</P>




ugg, really noone, I like Benson more then Portis I like Manningham about the "Same" as Driver.

I would think about Portis and Ray Rice, if I didn't already have too many RB's.

what about Fitz for Benson and Manningham....

<FONT size=4>I'm thinking about Benson and Manningham for Portis and Gonzo too</FONT> ... but I'm not sure I want that.
</P>


I'm sure you are. I'll give you Portis and V Davis for Benson and Manningham.</P>


I've also decided that Fitz is untouchable unless I can get another top 10 WR back.</P>


</P>



Can we make Portis, Ray Rice instead? Portis is a Redskin and playing the Giants twice and I hate rooting for teams playing against the giants.

(Also...I'll PM you another thing)
</P>


I can give you Rice and__________ for benson and manningham. Not Davis because of bye considerations. I'm going to waive the kid next week anyway.</P>


Side note. How do we know the waiver order, Daven?</P>

DavenIII
09-29-2009, 03:08 PM
Benson and Manningham for Portis and_________</p>




ugg, really noone, I like Benson more then Portis I like Manningham about the "Same" as Driver.

I would think about Portis and Ray Rice, if I didn't already have too many RB's.

what about Fitz for Benson and Manningham....

<font size="4">I'm thinking about Benson and Manningham for Portis and Gonzo too</font> ... but I'm not sure I want that.
</p>


I'm sure you are. I'll give you Portis and V Davis for Benson and Manningham.</p>


I've also decided that Fitz is untouchable unless I can get another top 10 WR back.</p>


</p>



Can we make Portis, Ray Rice instead? Portis is a Redskin and playing the Giants twice and I hate rooting for teams playing against the giants.

(Also...I'll PM you another thing)
</p>


I can give you Rice and__________ for benson and manningham. Not Davis because of bye considerations. I'm going to waive the kid next week anyway.</p>


Side note. How do we know the waiver order, Daven?</p>

I believe it says it in the standings right next to where it shows our moves on the leagues front page.

patsrule666
09-29-2009, 03:09 PM
Anyone make any waiver claims this week ?? If so- Who ??
I got Garcon. The 2nd receiver for the Colts.
OK-i wasnt mad before, but now i really am....[:@] lol.</P>


I will have to check who has waiver priority...</P>


Besides- let the french guy have the french guy....[:D]</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:09 PM
Portis is a Redskin and playing the Giants twice and I hate rooting for teams playing against the giants.


We already played them once...

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:10 PM
Anyone make any waiver claims this week ?? If so- Who ??
I got Garcon. The 2nd receiver for the Colts.
OK-i wasnt mad before, but now i really am....[:@] lol.</p>


I will have to check who has waiver priority...</p>


Besides- let the french guy have the french guy....[:D]</p>
What is waiver priority? I don't understand. I tried to pick him up right when the game started on Sunday night. I don't understand the whole waiver thing. I released Boss.

JPizzack
09-29-2009, 03:14 PM
Anyone make any waiver claims this week ?? If so- Who ??
I got Garcon. The 2nd receiver for the Colts.
OK-i wasnt mad before, but now i really am....[:@] lol.</P>


I will have to check who has waiver priority...</P>


Besides- let the french guy have the french guy....[:D]</P>


</P>


lemme guess....
yer trying to pick up Coffee?</P>


Well guess what?! IT'S MY HANDCUFF *****!!!! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA</P>


made the request this morning, so come tomm, he'll be my frank gore 2.0 =P</P>


unelss you arent referring to him, in which case, that whole rant was for nothing lmfao</P>

DavenIII
09-29-2009, 03:14 PM
Portis is a Redskin and playing the Giants twice and I hate rooting for teams playing against the giants.


We already played them once...


still that was only half the reason.

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 03:15 PM
Anyone make any waiver claims this week ?? If so- Who ??
I got Garcon. The 2nd receiver for the Colts.
OK-i wasnt mad before, but now i really am....[:@] lol.</P>


I will have to check who has waiver priority...</P>


Besides- let the french guy have the french guy....[:D]</P>


</P>


I'm French too. I'll take Frenchy Fuqua.</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:16 PM
Portis is a Redskin and playing the Giants twice and I hate rooting for teams playing against the giants.


We already played them once...


still that was only half the reason.

LOL, I know. I still can't believe I took Westy but the deal was too good.

bandwgn86
09-29-2009, 03:16 PM
Anyone make any waiver claims this week ?? If so- Who ??
I got Garcon. The 2nd receiver for the Colts.
OK-i wasnt mad before, but now i really am....[:@] lol.</P>


I will have to check who has waiver priority...</P>


Besides- let the french guy have the french guy....[:D]</P>


</P>


grenouille</P>

ibleedblue85
09-29-2009, 03:17 PM
ughhhh back. sorry- meetings all morning then i was busy facebooking. miss anything good?

JPizzack
09-29-2009, 03:18 PM
Lando, waiver priority decides who can make the first move to pick up a guy who has been dropped.

Soooo since I havent made any moves, I moved to the top of the waiver this week.
Example: I wanted Glen Coffee for my handcuff to Gore who got hurt. Someone dropped him recently and it takes a few days before he just becomes a free agent, so I put my claim in today. Let's say 4 ppl try to get him by tomm(when his waiver time is up). Since I'm #1 in the waiver order currently, I get him by default instead of anyone else who tries.</P>


I hope that makes sense....
now that I read it, it prolly doesnt....youre a smart guy though, youll figure it out. lol</P>

DavenIII
09-29-2009, 03:19 PM
OK Morehead, I'll take the Portis/Davis for Benson and Manningham deal...you broke me [:P]

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 03:19 PM
Lando, waiver priority decides who can make the first move to pick up a guy who has been dropped.

Soooo since I havent made any moves, I moved to the top of the waiver this week.
Example: I wanted Glen Coffee for my handcuff to Gore who got hurt. Someone dropped him recently and it takes a few days before he just becomes a free agent, so I put my claim in today. Let's say 4 ppl try to get him by tomm(when his waiver time is up). Since I'm #1 in the waiver order currently, I get him by default instead of anyone else who tries.</P>


I hope that makes sense....
now that I read it, it prolly doesnt....youre a smart guy though, youll figure it out. lol</P>


</P>


What about players that weren't dropped this week? Are they subject to the same rules?</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:20 PM
Lando, waiver priority decides who can make the first move to pick up a guy who has been dropped.

Soooo since I havent made any moves, I moved to the top of the waiver this week.
Example: I wanted Glen Coffee for my handcuff to Gore who got hurt. Someone dropped him recently and it takes a few days before he just becomes a free agent, so I put my claim in today. Let's say 4 ppl try to get him by tomm(when his waiver time is up). Since I'm #1 in the waiver order currently, I get him by default instead of anyone else who tries.</p>


I hope that makes sense....
now that I read it, it prolly doesnt....youre a smart guy though, youll figure it out. lol</p>
That makes perfect sense.

JPizzack
09-29-2009, 03:21 PM
ughhhh back. sorry- meetings all morning then i was busy facebooking. miss anything good?</P>


hmm i didnt recieve notification on FB....clearly you are not talking to the right ppl =((

what did you miss hmmm....

Dezzz whackin the bag...
Me drooling toothepaste on my johnson...........and rubbing my eyes after using purell
BW having a creepy av still....

Ummmm I cant think of much else off the top of my head</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:22 PM
What about players that weren't dropped this week? Are they subject to the same rules?</p>
Yeah, the guy I want was a FA.

JPizzack
09-29-2009, 03:22 PM
Lando, waiver priority decides who can make the first move to pick up a guy who has been dropped.

Soooo since I havent made any moves, I moved to the top of the waiver this week.
Example: I wanted Glen Coffee for my handcuff to Gore who got hurt. Someone dropped him recently and it takes a few days before he just becomes a free agent, so I put my claim in today. Let's say 4 ppl try to get him by tomm(when his waiver time is up). Since I'm #1 in the waiver order currently, I get him by default instead of anyone else who tries.</P>


I hope that makes sense....
now that I read it, it prolly doesnt....youre a smart guy though, youll figure it out. lol</P>


</P>


What about players that weren't dropped this week? Are they subject to the same rules?</P>


</P>


no....FA next to the + sign means, you click it, you get it....
having a (W) next to the name and a date means you are subject to the waiver rules at that point</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:27 PM
FA next to the + sign means, you click it, you get it...
HA HA HA

FRENCHIE IS MIIIIIIIINE!!!!

DavenIII
09-29-2009, 03:33 PM
you know, I think I'm gonna take my chances with what I have now Morehead, I do think Davis is gonna be big this season, I'm just not sure about Portis.

DavenIII
09-29-2009, 03:34 PM
whats up with Slaton Shocks.

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 03:34 PM
OK Morehead, I'll take the Portis/Davis for Benson and Manningham deal...you broke me [:P]
</P>


What is this fixation with Vernon Davis? I know I suggested this but I do need him. Who else would you want. How bout Clayton?</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:35 PM
whats up with Slaton Shocks.

I am also interested. Marshawn Lynch?

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 03:37 PM
you know, I think I'm gonna take my chances with what I have now Morehead, I do think Davis is gonna be big this season, I'm just not sure about Portis.
</P>


I thought you wanted Rice?</P>

DavenIII
09-29-2009, 03:40 PM
you know, I think I'm gonna take my chances with what I have now Morehead, I do think Davis is gonna be big this season, I'm just not sure about Portis.
</p>


I thought you wanted Rice?</p>

More then Portis yeah, but really I wanted Davis more then either of the RB's [:P]

you said you'd do Portis and Davis, so I sent it to you to accepted, but I changed my mind, I canceled it, I'm good with what I have I think...unless Fitz is offered [:P] and no Colston and Marshall are not for sale.

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:41 PM
I thought you wanted Rice?</p>
Maybe he is more of a spaghetti type of guy?

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:43 PM
Marshall not for sale.

No one wants him anyway. [:P]

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 03:44 PM
you know, I think I'm gonna take my chances with what I have now Morehead, I do think Davis is gonna be big this season, I'm just not sure about Portis.
</P>


I thought you wanted Rice?</P>




More then Portis yeah, but really I wanted Davis more then either of the RB's [:P]

you said you'd do Portis and Davis, so I sent it to you to accepted, but I changed my mind, I canceled it, I'm good with what I have I think...unless Fitz is offered [:P] and no Colston and Marshall are not for sale.
</P>


No problem with Marshall. I'd have to get Colston back for Fitz.</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:48 PM
I'd have to get Colston back for Fitz.


I've also decided that Fitz is untouchable

[*-)]

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 03:49 PM
I thought you wanted Rice?</P>



Maybe he is more of a spaghetti type of guy?
</P>


Landolincoln, are you still interested in Fitz?</P>

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 03:49 PM
I'd have to get Colston back for Fitz.


I've also decided that Fitz is untouchable

[*-)]
</P>


It is confusing. I meant not without a top WR back.</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:50 PM
Landolincoln, are you still interested in Fitz?</p>
I am, but not if it involves a guy with a last name that rhymes with pain.

VJack is on the market...

dezzzR
09-29-2009, 03:51 PM
did anyone see brandons td celebration. lol</P>


he was deff pretending to smasha chick and as he bustin his nut he puts the ball up to his junk and flings the ball.. lol priceless</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 03:53 PM
did anyone see brandons td celebration. lol</p>


he was deff pretending to smasha chick and as he bustin his nut he puts the ball up to his junk and flings the ball.. lol priceless</p>
It was awesome. I was laughin so hard. BOOOOOOOM at the end. He just humps the ball. LMAO

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 03:55 PM
Landolincoln, are you still interested in Fitz?</P>



I am, but not if it involves a guy with a last name that rhymes with pain.

VJack is on the market...
</P>


VJack for Portis?</P>


I'm actually a bit interested in Lynch.</P>

dezzzR
09-29-2009, 03:57 PM
can someone giff that for me. i NEED that as my sig

ibleedblue85
09-29-2009, 03:57 PM
ughhhh back. sorry- meetings all morning then i was busy facebooking. miss anything good?</P>


hmm i didnt recieve notification on FB....clearly you are not talking to the right ppl =((
</P>


</P>


i was uploading pics LOL SORRY JEEZ!</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 04:00 PM
I'm actually a bit interested in Lynch.</p>
Not a big fan of Portis to be honest with you.

What about Rice for Lynch?

I kind of want to see him in action though also. I was trying to work out something with JPizz but I guess that didn't work out.

Your team is hurting Sir. I think it would be a mistake to trade Fitz.

JPizzack
09-29-2009, 04:02 PM
ughhhh back. sorry- meetings all morning then i was busy facebooking. miss anything good?</P>


hmm i didnt recieve notification on FB....clearly you are not talking to the right ppl =((
</P>


</P>


i was uploading pics LOL SORRY JEEZ!</P>


</P>


=P</P>

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 04:03 PM
I'm actually a bit interested in Lynch.</P>



Not a big fan of Portis to be honest with you.

What about Rice for Lynch?

I kind of want to see him in action though also. I was trying to work out something with JPizz but I guess that didn't work out.

Your team is hurting Sir. I think it would be a mistake to trade Fitz.
</P>


Thought you were looking to trade Vjack.</P>

JPizzack
09-29-2009, 04:03 PM
can someone giff that for me. i NEED that as my sig</P>


thatd be awesome....i would def steal that from you.
Who used to make all thosegifs for us?! One of the girls last season used to make a bunch of gifs when we asked for a specific highlight. was pretty cool</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 04:07 PM
i was uploading pics LOL SORRY JEEZ!</p>
Good pics, Matt is so sexy.

You look pretty good to [:P]

ibleedblue85
09-29-2009, 04:09 PM
i was uploading pics LOL SORRY JEEZ!</P>



Good pics, Matt is so sexy.

You look pretty good to [:P]
</P>


thank lover. lol yeah it was a fun drunken evening... to give you a preview- your weekend here will be that times 1000 :o)</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 04:18 PM
your weekend here will be that times 1000 :o)</p>
10 days...[:D]

ibleedblue85
09-29-2009, 04:31 PM
your weekend here will be that times 1000 :o)</P>



10 days...[:D]
</P>


yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!!</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 04:59 PM
http://photos-b.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs245.snc1/9220_1218622738484_1016340073_683313_5851014_n.jpg

As some of you know my dad is a big Yankees fan and was born in NY. My cousin got this from my grandma and posted it on my Facebook. I just wanted to share. LMAO the things parents do to us kids.

WOW!!! Look at those sandals...LOL

ibleedblue85
09-29-2009, 05:06 PM
http://photos-b.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs245.snc1/9220_1218622738484_1016340073_683313_5851014_n.jpg

As some of you know my dad is a big Yankees fan and was born in NY. My cousin got this from my grandma and posted it on my Facebook. I just wanted to share. LMAO the things parents do to us kids.

WOW!!! Look at those sandals...LOL
</P>


is that your dad? it cant be you... that child is too damn cute! LMAO</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 05:10 PM
is that your dad? it cant be you... that child is too damn cute! LMAO</p>
No, that cute baby is all me. The shirt has to go...lol You damn hater!

ibleedblue85
09-29-2009, 05:15 PM
is that your dad? it cant be you... that child is too damn cute! LMAO</P>



No, that cute baby is all me. The shirt has to go...lol You damn hater!
</P>


you WERE precious. that shirt is god awful tho LOL</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 05:17 PM
is that your dad? it cant be you... that child is too damn cute! LMAO</p>



No, that cute baby is all me. The shirt has to go...lol You damn hater!
</p>


you WERE precious. that shirt is god awful tho LOL</p>
I can't get over the sandals. Good god!

BigBlueSeasontixx07
09-29-2009, 05:59 PM
Guys, check out this blog, its pretty awesome if your a Giants fan:

http://www.nygiantsjournal.com/

patsrule666
09-29-2009, 06:14 PM
FA next to the + sign means, you click it, you get it...
HA HA HA

FRENCHIE IS MIIIIIIIINE!!!!
YOU CRAPEAUX YOU....lol.</P>


And Bandy- grenouille is a female frog....[:@]</P>

bandwgn86
09-29-2009, 06:16 PM
FA next to the + sign means, you click it, you get it...
HA HA HA

FRENCHIE IS MIIIIIIIINE!!!!
YOU CRAPEAUX YOU....lol.</P>


And Bandy- grenouille is a female frog....[:@]</P>


</P>


hahahah didn't think you saw it..and yes it is.. lol</P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 06:17 PM
FA next to the + sign means, you click it, you get it...
HA HA HA

FRENCHIE IS MIIIIIIIINE!!!!
YOU CRAPEAUX YOU....lol.</p>


And Bandy- grenouille is a female frog....[:@]</p>
Donald Brown comes to mind....

bandwgn86
09-29-2009, 06:22 PM
FA next to the + sign means, you click it, you get it...
HA HA HA

FRENCHIE IS MIIIIIIIINE!!!!
YOU CRAPEAUX YOU....lol.</P>


And Bandy- grenouille is a female frog....[:@]</P>



Donald Brown comes to mind....
</P>


i think he called you a toad.. i think, i stink at French.. </P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 06:23 PM
hahahah didn't think you saw it..and yes it is.. lol</p>
Pats sees all

patsrule666
09-29-2009, 06:55 PM
FA next to the + sign means, you click it, you get it...
HA HA HA

FRENCHIE IS MIIIIIIIINE!!!!
YOU CRAPEAUX YOU....lol.</P>


And Bandy- grenouille is a female frog....[:@]</P>
Donald Brown comes to mind....
And for some crazy reason, Dwayne Bowe is on the brain...

bandwgn86
09-29-2009, 07:00 PM
Pats.. whoare the Bruins playingin thereopener? Toronto Maple Leafs get Canadiens de Montreal</P>

shocknaweny
09-29-2009, 07:11 PM
Hey Bandy&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Flacco 4 S.Jackson</P>


pass.. Flaccos not much better than Edwards to lose SJack</P>


</P>


</P>


He has 82 points Bandy and like 832 yards...but ok.</P>

bandwgn86
09-29-2009, 07:17 PM
Hey Bandy&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Flacco 4 S.Jackson</P>


pass.. Flaccos not much better than Edwards to lose SJack</P>


</P>


</P>


He has 82 points Bandy and like 832 yards...but ok.</P>


</P>


check pm</P>

patsrule666
09-29-2009, 07:25 PM
Pats.. whoare the Bruins playingin thereopener? Toronto Maple Leafs get Canadiens de Montreal</P>


The Caps..</P>


I was thinking of trying some fantasy hockey..not sure i can handle it, with all the football teams i have.....</P>

shocknaweny
09-29-2009, 07:27 PM
Hey gang should I trade Kurt Warner and Adrian Peterson away in my $50 ( keeper ) league</P>


for</P>


</P>


Peyton Manning, Brandon Jacobs and Felix Jones ( already have M.Barber so it's a handcuff )</P>


</P>

bandwgn86
09-29-2009, 07:34 PM
Pats.. whoare the Bruins playingin thereopener? Toronto Maple Leafs get Canadiens de Montreal</P>


The Caps..</P>


I was thinking of trying some fantasy hockey..not sure i can handle it, with all the football teams i have.....</P>


</P>


yah i saw that.. i posted in another thread that it shoulda been arranged so you get Montreal and Toronto gets Ottawa..openinggameagainst rivalries..priceless </P>

shocknaweny
09-29-2009, 07:35 PM
Daven countered...Bandy PM.

patsrule666
09-29-2009, 07:38 PM
Hey gang should I trade Kurt Warner and Adrian Peterson away in my $50 ( keeper ) league</P>


for</P>


</P>


Peyton Manning, Brandon Jacobs and Felix Jones ( already have M.Barber so it's a handcuff )</P>


</P> ooooh thats a tough one without seeing the rest of your team....

shocknaweny
09-29-2009, 07:41 PM
Slatons already going to Daven bandy if he accepts.

patsrule666
09-29-2009, 07:44 PM
Pats.. whoare the Bruins playingin thereopener? Toronto Maple Leafs get Canadiens de Montreal</P>


The Caps..</P>


I was thinking of trying some fantasy hockey..not sure i can handle it, with all the football teams i have.....</P>


</P>


yah i saw that.. i posted in another thread that it shoulda been arranged so you get Montreal and Toronto gets Ottawa..openinggameagainst rivalries..priceless </P>


Other than our money, the NHL doesnt care about the fans......lol.</P>


I usually dont get into hockey too much until football is over.</P>


4-1, Morehead is not liking you guys team right now. lol.</P>

patsrule666
09-29-2009, 07:45 PM
Slatons already going to Daven bandy if he accepts. Whats the deal ?? talk to me....

bandwgn86
09-29-2009, 07:47 PM
Pats.. whoare the Bruins playingin thereopener? Toronto Maple Leafs get Canadiens de Montreal</P>


The Caps..</P>


I was thinking of trying some fantasy hockey..not sure i can handle it, with all the football teams i have.....</P>


</P>


yah i saw that.. i posted in another thread that it shoulda been arranged so you get Montreal and Toronto gets Ottawa..openinggameagainst rivalries..priceless </P>


Other than our money, the NHL doesnt care about the fans......lol.</P>


I usually dont get into hockey too much until football is over.</P>


4-1, Morehead is not liking you guys team right now. lol.</P>


</P>


the nhl is probably the worst for not caring.. its all buttmans fault..he can go back to NBA anytime soon!! </P>


and its 5-1 AARON HILL!!!!</P>

bandwgn86
09-29-2009, 07:48 PM
Slatons already going to Daven bandy if he accepts. Whats the deal ?? talk to me....</P>


please share!! </P>

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 08:08 PM
Slatons already going to Daven bandy if he accepts.
Slaton plays the Raiders this week Shock. I am beginning to question you. Again, you have not lost yet...

bandwgn86
09-29-2009, 08:12 PM
Slatons already going to Daven bandy if he accepts.
Slaton plays the Raiders this week Shock. I am beginning to question you. Again, you have not lost yet...
</P>


ohh shush you! he should give him to me..lol.he can afford a loss[;)] </P>

Morehead State
09-29-2009, 09:56 PM
OK Lando. You say that you want to trade VJack. I need another WR. Sounds perfect. What do you want?

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 10:01 PM
OK Lando<font size="4" color="#0000ff">(lincoln)</font>. You say that you want to trade VJack. I need another WR. Sounds perfect. What do you want?
What happened to my nickname?

I sent you a PM. See what you think....

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 10:29 PM
http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q111/myias39/RedSoxHappyHumpDaySexyLady.jpg

bigblue4417
09-29-2009, 10:30 PM
http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u137/redsox22-2007/Erica_Mari_Yankees_Suck.jpg

Kase-1
09-29-2009, 11:30 PM
http://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u137/redsox22-2007/Erica_Mari_Yankees_Suck.jpgWOW looks like she hit her self in the face with that bat a few times

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 12:44 AM
Slatons already going to Daven bandy if he accepts.
Slaton plays the Raiders this week Shock. I am beginning to question you. Again, you have not lost yet...


he was trying to pawn off Chris Brown at me which isn't going to happen...I sent a counter offer which I think is fair.

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 03:46 AM
After a long night of drinking sometimes it is best just to have sex in the car instead of wasting time to go downstairs. Some of you old timers might not be able to pull that off though. lol

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 08:06 AM
After a long night of drinking sometimes it is best just to have sex in the car instead of wasting time to go downstairs. Some of you old timers might not be able to pull that off though. lol
</P>


have no idea where this was coming from, but congrats i think! lol</P>

Morehead State
09-30-2009, 08:26 AM
OK Lando<FONT color=#0000ff size=4>(lincoln)</FONT>. You say that you want to trade VJack. I need another WR. Sounds perfect. What do you want?
What happened to my nickname?

I sent you a PM. See what you think....
</P>


http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Speedway/1151/IL/SA-IL-1968.jpg</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 08:48 AM
http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q111/myias39/RedSoxHappyHumpDaySexyLady.jpg

what a double whammy if she takes her top off

patsrule666
09-30-2009, 09:01 AM
One of the girls here in the office just told me a funny story..</P>


Her husband is taking her son and daughter to the Sox game tonight. They are leaving early, so they can go check out the sites, and walk around Yawkey way.</P>


The husband said that he would buy each of the kids a tee shirt before the game. He asked the son who his favorite player is, and he said Yoook.</P>


When he asked the daughter who her favorite player was, she said Tom Brady...LOL.</P>

patsrule666
09-30-2009, 09:04 AM
Matt- who are you taking this week ? and make sure you put it in...</P>


I think i am going with the 49ers....</P>

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 09:05 AM
The husband said that he would buy each of the kids a tee shirt before the game. He asked the son who his favorite player is, and he said Yoook.


When he asked the daughter who her favorite player was, she said Tom Brady...LOL.</P>


</P>


lol he musta conditioned her to say that. now it doesnt matter what they are even talking about!</P>

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 09:14 AM
Dammit, who played the Cranberries......
every time I hear a cranberries song its stuck in my head for like a week...
in my head?

IN YOUR HEEEAAAAAADDDD in your HeeeEEEAAAAaaaDDDD...

DAMMIT!

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 09:25 AM
Matt- who are you taking this week ? and make sure you put it in...</p>


I think i am going with the 49ers....</p>

**** thanks for reminding me.. i gotta go peak

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 09:26 AM
Dammit, who played the Cranberries......
every time I hear a cranberries song its stuck in my head for like a week...
in my head?

IN YOUR HEEEAAAAAADDDD in your HeeeEEEAAAAaaaDDDD...

DAMMIT!

ZOOOOMBIE

ZOOOMBIE

ZOOOMBIE-BIE-BIE-BIE

patsrule666
09-30-2009, 09:26 AM
The husband said that he would buy each of the kids a tee shirt before the game. He asked the son who his favorite player is, and he said Yoook.


When he asked the daughter who her favorite player was, she said Tom Brady...LOL.</P>


</P>


lol he musta conditioned her to say that. now it doesnt matter what they are even talking about!</P>


LOL. its a new england thing...lol.</P>


She is one up on my daughter...She was watching a Pats game with me one day and asked- who is our team ? the Ankees ?? [:'(]</P>

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 09:27 AM
Matt- who are you taking this week ? and make sure you put it in...</P>


I think i am going with the 49ers....</P>




**** thanks for reminding me.. i gotta go peak

</P>


guys doing survival/suicide?

I think I took Chicago this week. I try to get all the difficult picks out of the way....meaning like, the shaky teams you cant really count on.
That way if I get to mid season, I can take the sure things more often. At least thats the thought behind it. Seem like a good theory?</P>

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 09:28 AM
Dammit, who played the Cranberries......
every time I hear a cranberries song its stuck in my head for like a week...
in my head?

IN YOUR HEEEAAAAAADDDD in your HeeeEEEAAAAaaaDDDD...

DAMMIT!

ZOOOOMBIE

ZOOOMBIE

ZOOOMBIE-BIE-BIE-BIE
</P>


=]</P>

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 09:28 AM
double post FTL</P>

patsrule666
09-30-2009, 09:32 AM
Matt- who are you taking this week ? and make sure you put it in...</P>


I think i am going with the 49ers....</P>




**** thanks for reminding me.. i gotta go peak

</P>


guys doing survival/suicide?

I think I took Chicago this week. I try to get all the difficult picks out of the way....meaning like, the shaky teams you cant really count on.
That way if I get to mid season, I can take the sure things more often. At least thats the thought behind it. Seem like a good theory?</P>


I agree with that theory to a certain extent...Matt forgot to get his pick in last week, and knowing he wanted the G-men, i sooo wanted to put the Pats in for him.....lol.</P>


Just under 500 bucks up for grabs in this one...</P>

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 09:33 AM
Dammit, who played the Cranberries......
every time I hear a cranberries song its stuck in my head for like a week...
in my head?

IN YOUR HEEEAAAAAADDDD in your HeeeEEEAAAAaaaDDDD...

DAMMIT!

ZOOOOMBIE

ZOOOMBIE

ZOOOMBIE-BIE-BIE-BIE
</P>


=]</P>ayy uh ayyy uh ayy uh

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 09:34 AM
Matt- who are you taking this week ? and make sure you put it in...</p>


I think i am going with the 49ers....</p>




**** thanks for reminding me.. i gotta go peak

</p>


guys doing survival/suicide?

I think I took Chicago this week. I try to get all the difficult picks out of the way....meaning like, the shaky teams you cant really count on.
That way if I get to mid season, I can take the sure things more often. At least thats the thought behind it. Seem like a good theory?</p>


I agree with that theory to a certain extent...Matt forgot to get his pick in last week, and knowing he wanted the G-men, i sooo wanted to put the Pats in for him.....lol.</p>


Just under 500 bucks up for grabs in this one...</p>

goin with the Texans this week

Morehead State
09-30-2009, 09:38 AM
Matt- who are you taking this week ? and make sure you put it in...</P>


I think i am going with the 49ers....</P>




**** thanks for reminding me.. i gotta go peak

</P>


guys doing survival/suicide?

I think I took Chicago this week. I try to get all the difficult picks out of the way....meaning like, the shaky teams you cant really count on.
That way if I get to mid season, I can take the sure things more often. At least thats the thought behind it. Seem like a good theory?</P>


I agree with that theory to a certain extent...Matt forgot to get his pick in last week, and knowing he wanted the G-men, i sooo wanted to put the Pats in for him.....lol.</P>


Just under 500 bucks up for grabs in this one...</P>


</P>


Pats, you son of a gun. You stole Fred Taylor out from under me.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 09:39 AM
Matt- who are you taking this week ? and make sure you put it in...</p>


I think i am going with the 49ers....</p>




**** thanks for reminding me.. i gotta go peak

</p>


guys doing survival/suicide?

I think I took Chicago this week. I try to get all the difficult picks out of the way....meaning like, the shaky teams you cant really count on.
That way if I get to mid season, I can take the sure things more often. At least thats the thought behind it. Seem like a good theory?</p>


I agree with that theory to a certain extent...Matt forgot to get his pick in last week, and knowing he wanted the G-men, i sooo wanted to put the Pats in for him.....lol.</p>


Just under 500 bucks up for grabs in this one...</p>

goin with the Texans this week


actually i forgot to save her emails, i suck i lost all the info. She even gave me her number to call it in but i lost htat. Can you jus tell her im down with HOUUUUSSSSTONNNN

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 09:40 AM
Matt- who are you taking this week ? and make sure you put it in...</p>


I think i am going with the 49ers....</p>




**** thanks for reminding me.. i gotta go peak

</p>


guys doing survival/suicide?

I think I took Chicago this week. I try to get all the difficult picks out of the way....meaning like, the shaky teams you cant really count on.
That way if I get to mid season, I can take the sure things more often. At least thats the thought behind it. Seem like a good theory?</p>


I agree with that theory to a certain extent...Matt forgot to get his pick in last week, and knowing he wanted the G-men, i sooo wanted to put the Pats in for him.....lol.</p>


Just under 500 bucks up for grabs in this one...</p>


</p>


Pats, you son of a gun. You stole Fred Taylor out from under me.</p>

i say next year we do a waiver bidding system... its more money for league and more fun

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 09:44 AM
wish the media wouldshut the **** upabout sanchez.

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 09:47 AM
wish the media wouldshut the **** upabout sanchez.</P>


hateraid for breakfast? </P>

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 09:47 AM
wtf is with my double posts today? ****ing website! lol</P>

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 09:50 AM
wish the media wouldshut the **** upabout sanchez.</P>


hateraid for breakfast? </P>yeaaa a little bit. i dont know man. dont like him. the media did the same thing to romo. theyre already comparing him to namath. give me a ****in break

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 09:50 AM
wish the media wouldshut the **** upabout sanchez.</P>


hateraid for breakfast? </P>yeaaa a little bit. i dont know man. dont like him. the media did the same thing to romo. theyre already comparing him to namath. give me a ****in break

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 09:52 AM
yo guys see this ****</P>


<FONT color=#020f42>http://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/index.php?mode=2&amp;thread=350519&amp;show_all=l</FONT> (http://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/index.php?mode=2&amp;thread=350519&amp;show_all=l)
</P>


i would of flipped if i was peppers...</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 09:55 AM
yo guys see this ****</p>


<font color="#020f42">http://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/index.php?mode=2&amp;thread=350519&amp;show_all=l</font> (http://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/index.php?mode=2&amp;thread=350519&amp;show_all=l)
</p>


i would of flipped if i was peppers...</p>

something needs tyo be done abotu this *******

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 09:55 AM
wish the media wouldshut the **** upabout sanchez.</P>


hateraid for breakfast? </P>


yeaaa a little bit. i dont know man. dont like him. the media did the same thing to romo. theyre already comparing him to namath. give me a ****in break</P>


ehh...listen...
the one thing I do have to agree with the media about is the track record the jets have had with new QBs. Theyve had pretty awful luck.
Even friends of mine who are bigger NCAAF fans than NFL fans say that Sanchez is the most nfl ready QB to come into the league in quite a few years.
I realize some Giants fans for some reason jsut dont like the Jets(idk why, it's not like we play them more than once every handful of years), but the guy is good....in fact he's pretty damn good. He's def franchise material. It's good that we can have 2 local teams that we can say that about.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 09:56 AM
wish the media wouldshut the **** upabout sanchez.</p>


hateraid for breakfast? </p>yeaaa a little bit. i dont know man. dont like him. the media did the same thing to romo. theyre already comparing him to namath. give me a ****in break



i'll eat crow on him, i thought he was gonna suck.

But yea, the BJs have to stop

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 09:56 AM
did anyone notice if rouse got some playing time in vs the bucs??

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 10:00 AM
yo guys see this ****</P>


<FONT color=#020f42>http://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/index.php?mode=2&amp;thread=350519&amp;show_all=l</FONT> (http://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/index.php?mode=2&amp;thread=350519&amp;show_all=l)
</P>


i would of flipped if i was peppers...</P>




something needs tyo be done abotu this *******
</P>


seriuously.....learn to play the game or get the **** out of it.
the worst part about it is this: ok...I can understand someone who constantly gets facemask penalties, or horsecollar calls and **** like that....cuz at least they are trying to make a play.
But Flozell Adams, who constantly does this ****, is basically admitting that he sucks at his position so bad that this is how he has to play in order to have any impact at all. he should ****ing be embarassed.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 10:01 AM
yo guys see this ****</p>


<font color="#020f42">http://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/index.php?mode=2&amp;thread=350519&amp;show_all=l</font> (http://corner.bigblueinteractive.com/index.php?mode=2&amp;thread=350519&amp;show_all=l)
</p>


i would of flipped if i was peppers...</p>




something needs tyo be done abotu this *******
</p>


seriuously.....learn to play the game or get the **** out of it.
the worst part about it is this: ok...I can understand someone who constantly gets facemask penalties, or horsecollar calls and **** like that....cuz at least they are trying to make a play.
But Flozell Adams, who constantly does this ****, is basically admitting that he sucks at his position so bad that this is how he has to play in order to have any impact at all. he should ****ing be embarassed.</p>

the worst was his qoute in reference to the tuck situation: "tell him to stay on his feet"

******bag, it isn't like ur knocking him over, your illegally tripping him because you can't pancake him... i don't want to say Adams sucks cuz he can't handle tuck, because really who can, but **** that scumbag.

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 10:03 AM
wish the media wouldshut the **** upabout sanchez.</P>


hateraid for breakfast? </P>


yeaaa a little bit. i dont know man. dont like him. the media did the same thing to romo. theyre already comparing him to namath. give me a ****in break</P>


ehh...listen...
the one thing I do have to agree with the media about is the track record the jets have had with new QBs. Theyve had pretty awful luck.
Even friends of mine who are bigger NCAAF fans than NFL fans say that Sanchez is the most nfl ready QB to come into the league in quite a few years.
I realize some Giants fans for some reason jsut dont like the Jets(idk why, it's not like we play them more than once every handful of years), but the guy is good....in fact he's pretty damn good. He's def franchise material. It's good that we can have 2 local teams that we can say that about.</P>i agree with all of that and ill pull for the jets. my momsplitsseason tickets with my uncle. buthes proved nothing yet. lets see what he does in the playoffs.

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 10:05 AM
wish the media wouldshut the **** upabout sanchez.</p>


hateraid for breakfast? </p>


yeaaa a little bit. i dont know man. dont like him. the media did the same thing to romo. theyre already comparing him to namath. give me a ****in break</p>


ehh...listen...
the one thing I do have to agree with the media about is the track record the jets have had with new QBs. Theyve had pretty awful luck.
Even friends of mine who are bigger NCAAF fans than NFL fans say that Sanchez is the most nfl ready QB to come into the league in quite a few years.
I realize some Giants fans for some reason jsut dont like the Jets(idk why, it's not like we play them more than once every handful of years), but the guy is good....in fact he's pretty damn good. He's def franchise material. It's good that we can have 2 local teams that we can say that about.</p>i agree with all of that and ill pull for the jets. my momsplitsseason tickets with my uncle. buthes proved nothing yet. lets see what he does in the playoffs.

forget the playoffs.. lets see how hes holdin up week 10

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 10:05 AM
i agree with all of that and ill pull for the jets. my momsplitsseason tickets with my uncle. buthes proved nothing yet. lets see what he does in the playoffs.</P>


lol ok, well can we agree that he doesnt suck? That's basically what the Jets are looking for lol</P>

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 10:08 AM
wish the media wouldshut the **** upabout sanchez.</P>


hateraid for breakfast? </P>


yeaaa a little bit. i dont know man. dont like him. the media did the same thing to romo. theyre already comparing him to namath. give me a ****in break</P>


ehh...listen...
the one thing I do have to agree with the media about is the track record the jets have had with new QBs. Theyve had pretty awful luck.
Even friends of mine who are bigger NCAAF fans than NFL fans say that Sanchez is the most nfl ready QB to come into the league in quite a few years.
I realize some Giants fans for some reason jsut dont like the Jets(idk why, it's not like we play them more than once every handful of years), but the guy is good....in fact he's pretty damn good. He's def franchise material. It's good that we can have 2 local teams that we can say that about.</P>


i agree with all of that and ill pull for the jets. my momsplitsseason tickets with my uncle. buthes proved nothing yet. lets see what he does in the playoffs.

forget the playoffs.. lets see how hes holdin up week 10
</P>


haha yea i was going to say lets see how he does in december but the playoffs sounded better.</P>

ibleedblue85
09-30-2009, 10:09 AM
morning boys.

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 10:10 AM
<h3 class="UIIntentionalStory_Message" data-ft="{&quot;type&quot;:&quot;msg&quot;}"><span class="UIStory_Message">Question
of the day: Why is Tony Romo considered a young QB and getting a pass
for growing pains? Hes 29 and been in the league since 2000. More
blowjobs for the cowboys from the national media. Eli was a bust after
taking his team to the playoffs fo<span class="text_exposed_hide">...</span><span class="text_exposed_show">r 3 years in a row within his first 4 years. Simple fact: ROMO AINT **** WITHOUT TO</span></span></h3>

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 10:11 AM
i agree with all of that and ill pull for the jets. my momsplitsseason tickets with my uncle. buthes proved nothing yet. lets see what he does in the playoffs.</p>


lol ok, well can we agree that he doesnt suck? That's basically what the Jets are looking for lol</p>

he doesn't suck, but i have no faith... Tony Romo started off good too lol

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 10:13 AM
haha nice question matt...idk....im sure you dont have to preach here how awful romo is....

gmorning Amanda</P>

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 10:13 AM
i agree with all of that and ill pull for the jets. my momsplitsseason tickets with my uncle. buthes proved nothing yet. lets see what he does in the playoffs.</P>


lol ok, well can we agree that he doesnt suck? That's basically what the Jets are looking for lol</P>


and i can respect that. but dont start comparing the guy to namath. i know jet fans are excited they finally have a decent qb but</P>


http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_q7ouHgxbIiw/SYefxGUzmHI/AAAAAAAAAIE/j5t_quXTGGs/s320/kirk.jpg"pump ya breaks kid"</P>

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 10:16 AM
morning boys.</P>


morning gorgeous[;)]</P>

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 10:17 AM
Downey Jr shoulda won an academy award for that ****!

ibleedblue85
09-30-2009, 10:20 AM
morning boys.</P>


morning gorgeous[;)]</P>


</P>


[;)]</P>

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 10:23 AM
Downey Jr shoulda won an academy award for that ****!</P>


i liked cruz.</P>


http://images.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/20081211/425.cruise.tom.tropicthunder.lc.121108.jpg</P>


"apple bottom jeeeans, jeans</P>


boots with the fuRRRRRR, with the fuRRRRRR"</P>

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 10:25 AM
lol i feel like that was just tom cruise in makeup....like no acting involved...he's just that ****ing crazy

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 10:29 AM
After a long night of drinking sometimes it is best just to have sex in the car instead of wasting time to go downstairs. Some of you old timers might not be able to pull that off though. lol
</p>


have no idea where this was coming from, but congrats i think! lol</p>
Uhhhhhh Thanks!!! lol

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 10:31 AM
Matt- who are you taking this week ? and make sure you put it in...</p>


I think i am going with the 49ers....</p>
As did I in the one we did online. I was going to pick the Giants but I wanted to save that one for when I am at the game.

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 10:33 AM
but the guy is good....in fact he's pretty damn good. He's def franchise material. It's good that we can have 2 local teams that we can say that about.</p>
Sounds like we have a closet Jets fan here...

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 10:34 AM
morning boys.</P>


morning gorgeous[;)]</P>


</P>


[;)]</P>howd the move go?

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 10:35 AM
lets see what he does in the playoffs.
Playoffs??? Playoffs!!!

http://www.starvalleyindependent.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/jimmora.jpg

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 10:35 AM
<span class="UIStory_Message"><span class="text_exposed_show">Simple fact: ROMO AINT **** WITHOUT TO</span></span>
You might be able to say the same about TO with Romo...

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 10:44 AM
<span class="UIStory_Message"><span class="text_exposed_show">Simple fact: ROMO AINT **** WITHOUT TO</span></span>
You might be able to say the same about TO with Romo...


TO did it with Garcia, Bledsoe, and McNabb...

i'd hardly say it has ANYTHING to do with Romo. Infact to say what ur saying, would mean that Romo made TO.. which is humorous.

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 10:45 AM
bradshawstarted as cornerbackin highschool. now you know....

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 10:46 AM
but the guy is good....in fact he's pretty damn good. He's def franchise material. It's good that we can have 2 local teams that we can say that about.</P>



Sounds like we have a closet Jets fan here...
</P>


lol....nah
I dont mind them...never did anything to bother me. traditionally, I've always felt bad for them haha
kinda like being a yankee fan and feeling bad for the mets. neither of those teams bother me.</P>

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 10:47 AM
<span class="UIStory_Message"><span class="text_exposed_show">Simple fact: ROMO AINT **** WITHOUT TO</span></span>
You might be able to say the same about TO with Romo...


TO did it with Garcia, Bledsoe, and McNabb...

i'd hardly say it has ANYTHING to do with Romo. Infact to say what ur saying, would mean that Romo made TO.. which is humorous.

MMB is right here....that said you CAN say TO is old and can't do it anymore...but he did it with many different QB's Romo did not make TO better...TO made Romo better, there is no doubt about it.

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 10:47 AM
morning boys.</p>


morning gorgeous[;)]</p>


</p>


[;)]</p>howd the move go?

****in great... im still sore

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 10:48 AM
<span class="UIStory_Message"><span class="text_exposed_show">Simple fact: ROMO AINT **** WITHOUT TO</span></span>
You might be able to say the same about TO with Romo...


TO did it with Garcia, Bledsoe, and McNabb...

i'd hardly say it has ANYTHING to do with Romo. Infact to say what ur saying, would mean that Romo made TO.. which is humorous.

MMB is right here....that said you CAN say TO is old and can't do it anymore...but he did it with many different QB's Romo did not make TO better...TO made Romo better, there is no doubt about it.


i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game, that OC should be shot. They aren't even giving Evans his touches and hes been the main man there for a couple of years now...

Its confusing cuz tehy finally got a solid running game and defense now too

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 10:51 AM
but the guy is good....in fact he's pretty damn good. He's def franchise material. It's good that we can have 2 local teams that we can say that about.</P>



Sounds like we have a closet Jets fan here...
</P>


lol....nah
I dont mind them...never did anything to bother me. traditionally, I've always felt bad for them haha
kinda like being a yankee fan and feeling bad for the mets. neither of those teams bother me.</P>im the same way. my moms always been adiehard for both teams so

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 10:52 AM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 10:53 AM
I hate people who think they are funny....****ing hate them!
this guy, im helping him with a loan...
asking him the basic questions about employment, living expense **** like that....
then out of nowhere after like 2 minutes of silence, he asks me if I need to know if he's left or right handed and the size of his ****? then he starts laughing...
wtf...then I gotta do that awkward laugh that really means "hey youre a ****ing ******, and I hope you get hit my a car on the way out"
****, I hate ppl.....

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 10:54 AM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.


honestly not only should he be complaining, but so should Evans... such a shame that can be such a high powered offense

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 10:54 AM
<span class="UIStory_Message"><span class="text_exposed_show">Simple fact: ROMO AINT **** WITHOUT TO</span></span>
You might be able to say the same about TO with Romo...


TO did it with Garcia, Bledsoe, and McNabb...

i'd hardly say it has ANYTHING to do with Romo. Infact to say what ur saying, would mean that Romo made TO.. which is humorous.

I said might, not can. TO never played better than when he had Romo. That can't be denied. They hooked up for more TD passes over a 3 year period than anyone else. I would have to say they are both losing. Roy Williams is garbage by the way. God I hate Romo. You are so right about that, the media just loves pumpin him up. It is disgusting.

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 10:55 AM
I hate people who think they are funny....****ing hate them!
this guy, im helping him with a loan...
asking him the basic questions about employment, living expense **** like that....
then out of nowhere after like 2 minutes of silence, he asks me if I need to know if he's left or right handed and the size of his ****? then he starts laughing...
wtf...then I gotta do that awkward laugh that really means "hey youre a ****ing ******, and I hope you get hit my a car on the way out"
****, I hate ppl.....

U shoulda said well all i know is that its under 8 inches, cuz ur wife told me shes never had someone as big as me

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 10:56 AM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.
</P>


yea but....he complained about something different....about how the media wants him to be an ******* so he gets booed out of town. and that he doesnt want to let that bother him. Maybe he's trying to turn a new leaf lol. Kinda late in the career for that isnt it? lol</P>

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 10:56 AM
I hate ppl.....
I love your work stories. I can look forward to one solid one a day. Thanks.

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 10:57 AM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.
didnt TO call out trent already? he just doesnt get it. lol

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 10:57 AM
<span class="UIStory_Message"><span class="text_exposed_show">Simple fact: ROMO AINT **** WITHOUT TO</span></span>
You might be able to say the same about TO with Romo...


TO did it with Garcia, Bledsoe, and McNabb...

i'd hardly say it has ANYTHING to do with Romo. Infact to say what ur saying, would mean that Romo made TO.. which is humorous.

I said might, not can. TO never played better than when he had Romo. That can't be denied. They hooked up for more TD passes over a 3 year period than anyone else. I would have to say they are both losing. Roy Williams is garbage by the way. God I hate Romo. You are so right about that, the media just loves pumpin him up. It is disgusting.


Well thats not true either, he had better years in San Fran and a comparable year in philly to his best year in dallas

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 10:58 AM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.
didnt TO call out trent already? he just doesnt get it. lol

na he didn't. He was asked if he likes the playcalling and he said im not gonna answer because your going to twist my words around.

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 10:58 AM
"It doesn't matter how you get in as long as you get in" Dustin Pedroia

Agree or Disagree?

ibleedblue85
09-30-2009, 11:00 AM
morning boys.</P>


morning gorgeous[;)]</P>


</P>


[;)]</P>


howd the move go?</P>


ughh it was frusterating but its done for now... just TONS of clothes to unpack</P>

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 11:00 AM
I hate ppl.....
I love your work stories. I can look forward to one solid one a day. Thanks.
</P>


yea idk man....doesnt it seem like i have exposure to some weird *** people!?!?</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:01 AM
"It doesn't matter how you get in as long as you get in" Dustin Pedroia

Agree or Disagree?


totally agree... its a new season now...

the only difference is that its much shorter, but with the same end result: the yanks have the best record [;)]

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 11:02 AM
"It doesn't matter how you get in as long as you get in" Dustin Pedroia

Agree or Disagree?
</P>


R@pe or consentual....?

This just proves my point that all of the red sox are either rapist or child molestors....
Look at Youk, Varitek, Drew, Lowell, and now even Pedroia and tell them that they couldnt easily be in a lineup of sex offenders or kid touchers.</P>

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:03 AM
I hate ppl.....
I love your work stories. I can look forward to one solid one a day. Thanks.
</p>


yea idk man....doesnt it seem like i have exposure to some weird *** people!?!?</p>
For sure man. It is pretty damn funny though to be hoenst.

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:03 AM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.
didnt TO call out trent already? he just doesnt get it. lol

na he didn't. He was asked if he likes the playcalling and he said im not gonna answer because your going to twist my words around.
i could of swore he said he didnt think buffalo was throwing as much as hed like last week

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:03 AM
MMB, I think you are frustrated with TO due to his lack of fantasy production...

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:03 AM
"It doesn't matter how you get in as long as you get in" Dustin Pedroia

Agree or Disagree?
</p>


R@pe or consentual....?

This just proves my point that all of the red sox are either rapist or child molestors....
Look at Youk, Varitek, Drew, Lowell, and now even Pedroia and tell them that they couldnt easily be in a lineup of sex offenders or kid touchers.</p>

LMAO

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:04 AM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.
didnt TO call out trent already? he just doesnt get it. lol

na he didn't. He was asked if he likes the playcalling and he said im not gonna answer because your going to twist my words around.
i could of swore he said he didnt think buffalo was throwing as much as hed like last week

isn't that the definition of playcalling? lol

and how is that a shot at edwards?

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:05 AM
"It doesn't matter how you get in as long as you get in" Dustin Pedroia

Agree or Disagree?
</P>


R@pe or consentual....?

This just proves my point that all of the red sox are either rapist or child molestors....
Look at Youk, Varitek, Drew, Lowell, and now even Pedroia and tell them that they couldnt easily be in a lineup of sex offenders or kid touchers.</P>hahahahahaha yessssss

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:07 AM
dont forget paplebon</P>


http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2007/10/26/alg_sox-papelbon.jpg</P>


"i can almost reach iiiiiit"</P>

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:09 AM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.
didnt TO call out trent already? he just doesnt get it. lol

na he didn't. He was asked if he likes the playcalling and he said im not gonna answer because your going to twist my words around.
i could of swore he said he didnt think buffalo was throwing as much as hed like last week

isn't that the definition of playcalling? lol

and how is that a shot at edwards?
we all know what TO means when he says that matt. they could throw the ball +40 and hed still think that wasnt enough.

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 11:09 AM
I've been campaigning the Red Sox as "the All- Rapist Team" for about a year now. Can't believe you guys havent seen me mention it before!!

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:11 AM
I've been campaigning the Red Sox as "the All- Rapist Team" for about a year now. Can't believe you guys havent seen me mention it before!!
I think that you are taking the **** talking to a whole new level. Talking **** is cool and banter is fine but rapers and child molesters? I think you have a little more class than that JPizz. I could be wrong???

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:12 AM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.
didnt TO call out trent already? he just doesnt get it. lol

na he didn't. He was asked if he likes the playcalling and he said im not gonna answer because your going to twist my words around.
i could of swore he said he didnt think buffalo was throwing as much as hed like last week

isn't that the definition of playcalling? lol

and how is that a shot at edwards?
we all know what TO means when he says that matt. they could throw the ball +40 and hed still think that wasnt enough.

no i dont, what do u think it means. If anything its a shot at the OC, which it honestly should be.

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:12 AM
I've been campaigning the Red Sox as "the All- Rapist Team" for about a year now. Can't believe you guys havent seen me mention it before!!
I think that you are taking the **** talking to a whole new level. Talking **** is cool and banter is fine but rapers and child molesters? I think you have a little more class than that JPizz. I could be wrong???
</P>


you just loooove ruining everything.... dont ya, DONT YA??! lol</P>

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:13 AM
http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/09/28/gal_yankees_al_1.jpg (javascript:LoadGallery(nextImage, false))

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 11:13 AM
I've been campaigning the Red Sox as "the All- Rapist Team" for about a year now. Can't believe you guys havent seen me mention it before!!
I think that you are taking the **** talking to a whole new level. Talking **** is cool and banter is fine but rapers and child molesters? I think you have a little more class than that JPizz. I could be wrong???
</P>


I'm merely making reference to their looks. If anyone finds it offensive(and I know that it very easily could) I'll drop it.
I know some of you guys have kids. youre right. its not cool. sorry</P>

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:13 AM
isn't that the definition of playcalling? lol

and how is that a shot at edwards?


that's not the definition of playcalling, they don't call a play to go to one receiver, it's up to Trent to throw it to the receiver that's open, and when TO ALWAYS thinks he's open and is complaining about not getting the ball he's saying (read between the lines) that Trent isn't throwing him the ball enough.

he actually did say something like that last week I remember them showing a clip and talking about it during the pregame show, don't remember the exact words....thats probably why he was so anti-media this week.

It was something like, "We need to do this better We need to to that better, Trent needs to improve here"

he started off good ended up bad.

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:15 AM
http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/09/28/gal_yankees_al_8.jpg (javascript:LoadGallery(nextImage, false))

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:15 AM
you just loooove ruining everything.... dont ya, DONT YA??! lol</p>
LMAO, no. Shut up prick. lol

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:16 AM
isn't that the definition of playcalling? lol

and how is that a shot at edwards?


that's not the definition of playcalling, they don't call a play to go to one receiver, it's up to Trent to throw it to the receiver that's open, and when TO ALWAYS thinks he's open and is complaining about not getting the ball he's saying (read between the lines) that Trent isn't throwing him the ball enough.

he actually did say something like that last week I remember them showing a clip and talking about it, don't remember the exact words....thats probably why he was so anti-media this week.

It was something like, "We need to do this better We need to to that better, Trent needs to improve here"

he started off good ended up bad.


saying they don't throw the ball enough is playcalling. Hes not just saying in reference toh imself, he included Lee Evans in EVERYTHING he said and its something I 110% agree with. If Evans was getting his balls and TO was complaining i'd agree with you guys, but thats not the case.

Its also gameplanning Daven. Plays to free up either TO or Evans. Honestly you guys are just going off what you know and trying to read between the lines and this and that. I've seen two Buffalo games this year and i 110% agree with TO's assessment. I find it mind bottling. Ya know, when its so crazy it gets caught in ur head like a bottle

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:17 AM
http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/09/28/gal_yankees_al_12.jpg (javascript:LoadGallery(nextImage, false))</P>


lmao. poor kim</P>

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:19 AM
I've been campaigning the Red Sox as "the All- Rapist Team" for about a year now. Can't believe you guys havent seen me mention it before!!
I think that you are taking the **** talking to a whole new level. Talking **** is cool and banter is fine but rapers and child molesters? I think you have a little more class than that JPizz. I could be wrong???
</p>


I'm merely making reference to their looks. If anyone finds it offensive(and I know that it very easily could) I'll drop it.
I know some of you guys have kids. youre right. its not cool. sorry</p>
Not trying to be Mr. Prissy Pants and holier than thou. I know your hate for anything Boston runs deeper than anything I know. This is just a damn message board, maybe I take things too serious at times but the whole molester thing is too much for me. No need to apologize. It's all good JPizz, you my boy.

P.S. After looking at the team you might be right. It is kind of creepy. If you saw a guy that looked like Pedroia or Youk on To Catch a Predator it would not surprise you. lol

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:20 AM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.
didnt TO call out trent already? he just doesnt get it. lol

na he didn't. He was asked if he likes the playcalling and he said im not gonna answer because your going to twist my words around.
i could of swore he said he didnt think buffalo was throwing as much as hed like last week

isn't that the definition of playcalling? lol

and how is that a shot at edwards?
we all know what TO means when he says that matt. they could throw the ball +40 and hed still think that wasnt enough.

no i dont, what do u think it means. If anything its a shot at the OC, which it honestly should be.
it means "throw me the ball!!!!!!!!!!!!!" and you know it.

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:21 AM
http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/09/28/gal_yankees_al_8.jpg (javascript:LoadGallery(nextImage, false))
<font size="6">POP CHAMPAGNE OHHHHO</font>

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:22 AM
saying they don't throw the ball enough is playcalling. Hes not just saying in reference toh imself, he included Lee Evans in EVERYTHING he said and its something I 110% agree with. If Evans was getting his balls and TO was complaining i'd agree with you guys, but thats not the case.

Its also gameplanning Daven. Plays to free up either TO or Evans. Honestly you guys are just going off what you know and trying to read between the lines and this and that. I've seen two Buffalo games this year and i 110% agree with TO's assessment. I find it mind bottling. Ya know, when its so crazy it gets caught in ur head like a bottle


Saying they don't throw the ball enough TO HIM is not playcalling, and he specifically called out "TRENT EDWARDS" using his name, so your wrong.

JPizzack
09-30-2009, 11:22 AM
I've been campaigning the Red Sox as "the All- Rapist Team" for about a year now. Can't believe you guys havent seen me mention it before!!
I think that you are taking the **** talking to a whole new level. Talking **** is cool and banter is fine but rapers and child molesters? I think you have a little more class than that JPizz. I could be wrong???
</P>


I'm merely making reference to their looks. If anyone finds it offensive(and I know that it very easily could) I'll drop it.
I know some of you guys have kids. youre right. its not cool. sorry</P>



Not trying to be Mr. Prissy Pants and holier than thou. I know your hate for anything Boston runs deeper than anything I know. This is just a damn message board, maybe I take things too serious at times but the whole molester thing is too much for me. No need to apologize. It's all good JPizz, you my boy.

P.S. After looking at the team you might be right. It is kind of creepy. If you saw a guy that looked like Pedroia or Youk on To Catch a Predator it would not surprise you. lol
</P>


nah man you got me all wrong. sure I hate Boston. I hate Philly too...
But i dont commit myself to run it thru the mud for no reason. Im not THAT into rivalries. lol</P>


but yes, now you see my point....the whole lineup thing...i dont know how else to describe them other than the names i used &gt;.&lt;
Im glad we can still be friends.
I love you bro montana</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:23 AM
http://www.prosportsdaily.com/comments/to-barely-contains-frustration-278346.html

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:23 AM
isn't that the definition of playcalling? lol

and how is that a shot at edwards?


that's not the definition of playcalling, they don't call a play to go to one receiver, it's up to Trent to throw it to the receiver that's open, and when TO ALWAYS thinks he's open and is complaining about not getting the ball he's saying (read between the lines) that Trent isn't throwing him the ball enough.

he actually did say something like that last week I remember them showing a clip and talking about it during the pregame show, don't remember the exact words....thats probably why he was so anti-media this week.

It was something like, "We need to do this better We need to to that better, Trent needs to improve here"

he started off good ended up bad.
</P>


i kneeeew he said something about trent!! matts always sooo quick on the draw. what now *****!!!!lmao</P>

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:23 AM
Im glad we can still be friends.
I love you bro montana</p>
Always man!!!

What is this bro montana ****. I don't understand all these references with you and Dezz.

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:26 AM
We are talking about the post game after the NE vs Buffalo game Matt, you know that right?

he didn't say anything too bad after the Saints Game.

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:27 AM
Im glad we can still be friends.
I love you bro montana</P>



Always man!!!

What is this bro montana ****. I don't understand all these references with you and Dezz.
</P>


listen bro namath. you need to chill, smoke a bowl and watch i love you man</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:29 AM
saying they don't throw the ball enough is playcalling. Hes not just saying in reference toh imself, he included Lee Evans in EVERYTHING he said and its something I 110% agree with. If Evans was getting his balls and TO was complaining i'd agree with you guys, but thats not the case.

Its also gameplanning Daven. Plays to free up either TO or Evans. Honestly you guys are just going off what you know and trying to read between the lines and this and that. I've seen two Buffalo games this year and i 110% agree with TO's assessment. I find it mind bottling. Ya know, when its so crazy it gets caught in ur head like a bottle


Saying they don't throw the ball enough TO HIM is not playcalling, and he specifically called out "TRENT EDWARDS" using his name, so your wrong.


http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2009/8/24/1000291/did-****-jauron-call-out-trent'

the worst thing abotu edwards, which wasn't even bad, came from the head coach.

Lol, TO actually said his FULL NAME. Damn, that means TO is startin ****.

He didn't say tohimself he said to him and Lee Evans... aka the top two WRs of the offense.. the play makers. Obviously he was right cuz he said this before this past game where he got no catches. Regardless if you think TO is done or not, teams are sticking their #1 cbs on him and he should NEVER go without a catch. Lee Evans didn't get a touch til a minute left in the 2nd half and it was a garbage pass... if u don't think there is an issue when TO and Evans combine for 4 catches for 31 yards and pretty much go a full half without a touch, then ur just in denial and looking to kill TO

Kase-1
09-30-2009, 11:30 AM
Im glad we can still be friends.
I love you bro montana</p>



Always man!!!

What is this bro montana ****. I don't understand all these references with you and Dezz.
</p>


listen bro namath. you need to chill, smoke a bowl and watch i love you man</p>Sounds like a real crackerfest........ Damn peckerwoods, LOL

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:30 AM
Im glad we can still be friends.
I love you bro montana</p>



Always man!!!

What is this bro montana ****. I don't understand all these references with you and Dezz.
</p>


listen bro namath. you need to chill, smoke a bowl and watch i love you man</p>
Is it a movie or show? What network?

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:32 AM
We are talking about the post game after the NE vs Buffalo game Matt, you know that right?

he didn't say anything too bad after the Saints Game.


he didn't say anything after the game except hes not going to answer questions lol

And give me the exact link and qoute where TO RIPPED Edwards... cuz i've yet to find it.

i hope ur not referring to the qoute where he said he and evans aren't getting the ball enough. Because if u are then ur obviously just in TO-hate mode. Cuz there is no reason why the two studs of the team shouldn't have a gameplan around them. Again, don't be a qoute reader and think u know teh story. Watch the game and realize taht Jauron has had more to say about Edwards than anyone

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:32 AM
Matt your just flat out wrong, he said the team need to improve in multiple area's and then singled out Edwards and said he needed to improve in particular area's Trent Dilfer and most of the guys on ESPN's pregame were floored, they said it's old TO again, they played the clip...you are wrong.

he specifically called out his QB and said he needs to improve....aka he threw his QB under the bus...already.

Kase-1
09-30-2009, 11:32 AM
TO's a clown, Buffalo's line is straight garbage and that alone wont allow WRs time to estblish routes, QBs check players before gunning it, and it wont allow time for a play to be created......Its like TO is a little kid that doesnt know the ins and outs of football, yo your line has 3 damn rookies ya cant expect a line like he had in Philly or Dallas

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:34 AM
Terrell Owens--"As I said earlier, there were some opportunities that we missed, and those are some of the things you're talking about. <span style="font-weight: bold;"><font size="4"><font color="#0000ff">Trent has to better assess what he's seeing out there and take some shots down the field."</font></font>

that's the quote.

that's playcalling matt?
</span>

ibleedblue85
09-30-2009, 11:35 AM
bandy PM

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:35 AM
Matt your just flat out wrong, he said the team need to improve in multiple area's and then singled out Edwards and said he needed to improve in particular area's Trent Dilfer and most of the guys on ESPN's pregame were floored, they said it's old TO again, they played the clip...you are wrong.

he specifically called out his QB and said he needs to improve....aka he threw his QB under the bus...already.


well if trent dilfer says it, it must be official. **** Jauron had more to say about Edwards improving as well.. lol i guess hes the new TO. ANd TO never just incluided himself, he also said Lee Evans.

Some just can't handle the truth.

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:36 AM
Im glad we can still be friends.
I love you bro montana</P>



Always man!!!

What is this bro montana ****. I don't understand all these references with you and Dezz.
</P>


listen bro namath. you need to chill, smoke a bowl and watch i love you man</P>
Is it a movie or show? What network?
movie. you got xboxlive or ps3 online? order it and download it from either one. all new movies and tv shows come out on those counsules. i think its like 3 bucks for a new movie. i saw wolverine in blueray the other day it was fantastic. the only marvel movie i feel that stuck to the comics somewhat. i want adamantium claws[:(]

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:36 AM
Terrell Owens--"As I said earlier, there were some opportunities that we missed, and those are some of the things you're talking about. <span style="font-weight: bold;"><font size="4"><font color="#0000ff">Trent has to better assess what he's seeing out there and take some shots down the field."</font></font>

that's the quote.

that's playcalling matt?
</span>

THATS throwing someone under the bus?

lol ur a clown

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:36 AM
he specifically called out his QB and said he needs to improve....aka he threw his QB under the bus...already.

"As I said earlier, there were some opportunities that we missed, and those are some of the things you're talking about. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Trent has to better assess what he's seeing out there and take some shots down the field."</span>

I would hardly call that throwing him under the bus...

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:37 AM
Im glad we can still be friends.
I love you bro montana</P>



Always man!!!

What is this bro montana ****. I don't understand all these references with you and Dezz.
</P>


listen bro namath. you need to chill, smoke a bowl and watch i love you man</P>Sounds like a real crackerfest........ Damn peckerwoods, LOL
yeaa its pretty good. the fiance is ****in slaaamin

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:37 AM
Some just can't handle the truth.


If by "Some" you mean yourself, yup your totally right...unless you consider TO saying Trent needs to better asses whats going on and take more shots down field as a "Playcalling" issue rofl....your a fool, you almost never have a clue what your talking about around here.

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:39 AM
THATS throwing someone under the bus?

lol ur a clown


oh this is your schtick now? when proven wrong you decided what TO said "isn't that bad" please fool.

he specifically called out his QB and said he needs to improve his play...not a playcalling issue, you are wrong, admit it an move on.

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:39 AM
Terrell Owens--"As I said earlier, there were some opportunities that we missed, and those are some of the things you're talking about. <SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"><FONT size=4><FONT color=#0000ff>Trent has to better assess what he's seeing out there and take some shots down the field."</FONT></FONT>

that's the quote.

that's playcalling matt?
</SPAN>

THATS throwing someone under the bus?

lol ur a clown
matt......if he said this about romo last year wed all be laughing and saying how theyre ****ed

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:41 AM
I would hardly call that throwing him under the bus...

I would, who is TO to be saying Trent Edwards needs to improve his play, is TO a QB Coach or a coach at all? is he even a QB? no, he's a WR and has no business talking about a teammate like that.

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:41 AM
I would hardly call that throwing him under the bus...

I would, who is TO to be saying Trent Edwards needs to improve his play, is TO a QB Coach or a coach at all? is he even a QB? no, he's a WR and has no business talking about a teammate like that.

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:41 AM
dp

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:44 AM
Some just can't handle the truth.


If by "Some" you mean yourself, yup your totally right...unless you consider TO saying Trent needs to better asses whats going on and take more shots down field as a "Playcalling: issue rofl....your a fool.



Davens world

http://artx399.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/padded-room5.jpg

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:46 AM
I would hardly call that throwing him under the bus...

I would, who is TO to be saying Trent Edwards needs to improve his play, is TO a QB Coach or a coach at all? is he even a QB? no, he's a WR and has no business talking about a teammate like that.


so lets see.. the head coach called Edwards play TIMID after that game AND said that they do need to take more shots down field...

Owens also was qouted to saying that not honly he, but Lee Evans need to be more involved with this offense with the running game established


"I know I can play this game at a high level," Owens added during the
interview. "We've just got to find some ways to get myself and Lee
[Evans] more involved in the offense. Our run game is right where it
needs to be. We just got to complement our run game with the pass game."

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:46 AM
for once im with daven on this. how many times has TO done this guys. why give hime the benifite of the the doubt or defend him. like i said if he said the same thing last year(which he did)wed all be laughing. only this time it took him 2 games.....

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:47 AM
Terrell Owens--"As I said earlier, there were some opportunities that we missed, and those are some of the things you're talking about. <span style="font-weight: bold;"><font size="4"><font color="#0000ff">Trent has to better assess what he's seeing out there and take some shots down the field."</font></font>

that's the quote.

that's playcalling matt?
</span>

THATS throwing someone under the bus?

lol ur a clown
matt......if he said this about romo last year wed all be laughing and saying how theyre ****ed

whaaaat lol...

na im realistic no matter where a player plays. That was SO not an attack, its just the hate for TO blinding u

the head coach came out and said pretty much the same thing, only in a worse way by calling Edwards Timid. Is he throwing edwards under hte bus too?

patsrule666
09-30-2009, 11:47 AM
1-8-7-7-**** the Jets. 1-8-7-7-**** the Jets.[8][8]</P>


Matt- you would probably lose your balls, if you didnt carry them around in a bag all day long...lol.</P>


I will give her your pick and tell her to send you a e-mail...you want the Bills right??? hahaha.</P>

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:47 AM
Davens world

you and morehead both, you lose an argument and just decide to post funny pictures and make funny comments, that's fine you and me both know your wrong here...

TO specifically called out his QB, you said he only talked about playcalling, you are Incorrect, you were wrong, mark it up again.

it's gotta be DavenIII 20 MMB 0 by this point, you'd think you'd learn not to just pop off talking about shi tyou know nothing about, but nope, you never stop...keep on looking stupid though, its fun to watch.

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:48 AM
1-8-7-7-**** the Jets. 1-8-7-7-**** the Jets.[8][8]</p>


Matt- you would probably lose your balls, if you didnt carry them around in a bag all day long...lol.</p>


I will give her your pick and tell her to send you a e-mail...you want the Bills right??? hahaha.</p>

TEXANS BASTAGE!!!

Kase-1
09-30-2009, 11:48 AM
OMG any of you guys see the new MNF commercial???

With Monday comes MNF, which makes you ask would Hank think my friends are rowdy 'Game's on boys' (I hereby cast a level 2 charm spell) So no matter how many damage points you suffer on Monday, come MOnday night you'll be ready to party

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:49 AM
I would hardly call that throwing him under the bus...

I would, who is TO to be saying Trent Edwards needs to improve his play, is TO a QB Coach or a coach at all? is he even a QB? no, he's a WR and has no business talking about a teammate like that.

TO is one of the greatest receivers to ever play the game. He has been in the league ALOT longer than Trent and knows way more about offense than he does. He gets a bad wrap for past transgressions.

Talking about a teammate like what? Saying he needs to look down the field and better assess the defense. What is so wrong about that. Newsflash: HE DOES!!! When you have Evans and TO and are playing like that there is a problem. Look what the Eagles offense did to the Saints, granted they lost but Kolb threw for almost 400 yards. Edwards should have done a much better job.

TO also had his streak of a hundred and whatever games with a catch snapped. That is pathetic that the QB can't get him the ball. You need to give TO more credit. He has been very good with what he has said and has watched how he said it.

You are on the record as saying you say things to intentionally get an argument started so you can pass the time in your day. You did it again...congrats! You might not even feel that way and are just arguing about it to argue.

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:50 AM
Is he throwing edwards under hte bus too?


YES!

you don't specifically call out a players name and say they need to improve, it's an unwritten rule, have you ever seen a Giants player say {Well Jacobs needs to run more vertical and stop trying to find holes} {Boss needs to Improve his blocking} {Shockey needs to shut his mouth} etc etc etc...

No you NEVER see that because its something that should never be said in public....coaches can say it, but not players.

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:50 AM
Davens world

you and morehead both, you lose an argument and just decide to post funny pictures and make funny comments, that's fine you and me both know your wrong here...

TO specifically called out his QB, you said he only talked about playcalling, you are Incorrect, you were wrong, mark it up again.

it's gotta be DavenIII 20 MMB 0 by this point, you'd think you'd learn not to just pop off talking about shi tyou know nothing about, but nope, you never stop...keep on looking stupid though, its fun to watch.


only in davens world is that the score

lol "he needs to make better reads/assessments"

that damn TO lol. And he never says only to himself he also includes Evans... and not only is he 100% right, but his coach also agrees... aka ur wrong

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:51 AM
that damn TO lol. And he never says only to himself he also includes Evans... and not only is he 100% right, but his coach also agrees... aka ur wrong


whether he's right or not doesn't even matter matt, you don't call out your QB as a player....EVER...and that's exactly what he did.

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:52 AM
Is he throwing edwards under hte bus too?


YES!

you don't specifically call out a players name and say they need to improve, it's an unwritten rule, have you ever seen a Giants player say {Well Jacobs needs to run more vertical and stop trying to find holes} {Boss needs to Improve his blocking} {Shockey needs to shut his mouth} etc etc etc...

No you NEVER see that because its something that should never be said in public....coaches can say it, but not players.


if somebody says Jacobs needs to find the holes better NOBODY would cry that he was being thrown under the bus...

ur wrong as usual... not gonna get into it with u all day, its more annoying than entertaining to hear how ignorant u actually are

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:52 AM
for once im with daven on this. how many times has TO done this guys. why give hime the benifite of the the doubt or defend him
Because maybe he has learned from his past and is not doing it anymore. People can change...

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:53 AM
that damn TO lol. And he never says only to himself he also includes Evans... and not only is he 100% right, but his coach also agrees... aka ur wrong


whether he's right or not doesn't even matter matt, you don't call out your QB as a player....EVER...and that's exactly what he did.


he didn't call him out, he was asked a question and that was that.

He didn't come out and bash him... his response was yea hes gotta find us down field... thats not an attack, its a fact.

Kase-1
09-30-2009, 11:54 AM
Well Trent cant make plays when they have virtually no running game (til Lynch comes back) and he's constantly on his back.... Bottom line is that he was unhappy with the situation in Buffalo and is now running his yapper, hes done it in SF, Philly, and Dallas. Whats to say he isnt gonna burn it down in Western NY????

Hell its only week 3

ibleedblue85
09-30-2009, 11:55 AM
for once im with daven on this. how many times has TO done this guys. why give hime the benifite of the the doubt or defend him. like i said if he said the same thing last year(which he did)wed all be laughing. only this time it took him 2 games.....</P>


i personal dont see him CALLING out trent edwards on this... and i think hes stating the truth. TO needs to be targeted more and the team in general needs to take more shots.. that has nothign to do with edwards at all... and the statement was no where near throwing trent under the bus... because its TO thats how you look at it..</P>


if it was say carolina and steve smith said "i get open, we need to take more shots down field and punch in some TDs" NO ONE would say a word or take it as throwin scrub delhomme under the bus... its cause its TO and only TO... smith flat out said i love you as a person but hate you as a QB and no one said a word about that......</P>

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 11:55 AM
Owens would only say: "I'm going with the plays that are called."

Owens was thrown to only once in the first half. He had four passes go his way in the second half.

"We have to get him the football, obviously," coach **** Jauron said of Owens. "Clearly he's a big part of the offense."

OMG, **** Jauron threw the OC under the bus!!!

dezzzR
09-30-2009, 11:55 AM
Terrell Owens--"As I said earlier, there were some opportunities that we missed, and those are some of the things you're talking about. <SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold"><FONT size=4><FONT color=#0000ff>Trent has to better assess what he's seeing out there and take some shots down the field."</FONT></FONT>

that's the quote.

that's playcalling matt?
</SPAN>

THATS throwing someone under the bus?

lol ur a clown
matt......if he said this about romo last year wed all be laughing and saying how theyre ****ed

whaaaat lol...

na im realistic no matter where a player plays. That was SO not an attack, its just the hate for TO blinding u

the head coach came out and said pretty much the same thing, only in a worse way by calling Edwards Timid. Is he throwing edwards under hte bus too?
</P>


lol i have no more hate for TO. hes dead to me. haha. and lets be real about this. a coach calling aqb out is COMPLETLY different than TO calling his qb and you know it. listen hes done this everywhere hes played, what makes buffalo different???</P>

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 11:56 AM
Talking about a teammate like what? Saying he needs to look down the field and better assess the defense.

He's got no business saying that, he's breaking all types of rules by doing so.


What is so wrong about that. Newsflash: HE DOES!!!


whether he does or doesn't makes no difference, its not TO's place to mention it at all.


When you have Evans and TO and are playing like that there is a problem. Look what the Eagles offense did to the Saints, granted they lost but Kolb threw for almost 400 yards. Edwards should have done a much better job.

Yeah he should have, but TO is out of line saying that in public.


TO also had his streak of a hundred and whatever games with a catch snapped. That is pathetic that the QB can't get him the ball. You need to give TO more credit. He has been very good with what he has said and has watched how he said it.


No he hasn't and TO is old his career is near its end...and why does anyone care about his :catch Streak" shouldn't he be more concerned about winning football games?



You are on the record as saying you say things to intentionally get an argument started so you can pass the time in your day. You did it again...congrats! You might not even feel that way and are just arguing about it to argue.


That true, but MMB started this one by saying something completely incorrect, he specificlly said TO only complained about playcalling, that is 100% NOT TRUE even you can see that...even assuming you don't think this is throwing the QB under the bus.... is this about playcalling Landon IS IT? no...you know its not so Matt was wrong.

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:56 AM
for once im with daven on this. how many times has TO done this guys. why give hime the benifite of the the doubt or defend him
Because maybe he has learned from his past and is not doing it anymore. People can change...


who cares if he cahnged or not, im not even gonna say he changed... all im gonna say is that thisn't an attack period. He could very well comer back and say that Edwards sucks next week, i wouldn't be that surprised about it... but this isn't an attack.

When you have two pro-bowl caliber WRs not getting hte ball 4 3 weeks in a row, there is an issue with that

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 11:57 AM
Terrell Owens--"As I said earlier, there were some opportunities that we missed, and those are some of the things you're talking about. <span style="font-weight: bold;"><font size="4"><font color="#0000ff">Trent has to better assess what he's seeing out there and take some shots down the field."</font></font>

that's the quote.

that's playcalling matt?
</span>

THATS throwing someone under the bus?

lol ur a clown
matt......if he said this about romo last year wed all be laughing and saying how theyre ****ed

whaaaat lol...

na im realistic no matter where a player plays. That was SO not an attack, its just the hate for TO blinding u

the head coach came out and said pretty much the same thing, only in a worse way by calling Edwards Timid. Is he throwing edwards under hte bus too?
</p>


lol i have no more hate for TO. hes dead to me. haha. and lets be real about this. a coach calling aqb out is COMPLETLY different than TO calling his qb and you know it. listen hes done this everywhere hes played, what makes buffalo different???</p>

saying he needs to assess the field better cuz him and Evans are open is not a throwing under the bus.. no matter how udice it.

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 12:02 PM
He's got no business saying that, he's breaking all types of rules by doing so.


Never seen these rules you speak of?

So just to clarify, your issue is with the fact that TO should not be saying things about his QB right?

Would you agree that the playcalling has not been good and TO should be targeted more than 5 times in a whole game?

Fitz was complaining about Warner

Smith was complaining about Jake

WR's are divas. They need the ball. It is only because his name is Terrell Owens.

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 12:02 PM
Talking about a teammate like what? Saying he needs to look down the field and better assess the defense.

He's got no business saying that, he's breaking all types of rules by doing so.


What is so wrong about that. Newsflash: HE DOES!!!


whether he does or doesn't makes no difference, its not TO's place to mention it at all.


When you have Evans and TO and are playing like that there is a problem. Look what the Eagles offense did to the Saints, granted they lost but Kolb threw for almost 400 yards. Edwards should have done a much better job.

Yeah he should have, but TO is out of line saying that in public.


TO also had his streak of a hundred and whatever games with a catch snapped. That is pathetic that the QB can't get him the ball. You need to give TO more credit. He has been very good with what he has said and has watched how he said it.


No he hasn't and TO is old his career is near its end...and why does anyone care about his :catch Streak" shouldn't he be more concerned about winning football games?



You are on the record as saying you say things to intentionally get an argument started so you can pass the time in your day. You did it again...congrats! You might not even feel that way and are just arguing about it to argue.


That true, but MMB started this one by saying something completely incorrect, he specificlly said TO only complained about playcalling, that is 100% NOT TRUE even you can see that...even assuming you don't think this is throwing the QB under the bus.... is this about playcalling Landon IS IT? no...you know its not so Matt was wrong.


LOL he didn't attack anybody, hence he dind't break any rules.

He didn't mention it, he was asked a question and answered it lightly and straighforward.

Yes you should be concerned about his catch streak, because whether u think hes old or not hes still requiring top coverage from defense and i'll take DC's opinions over urs daven. The fac that ur not getting the ball to a player of his caliber is a serious issue for that offense.

And no, i didn't say anyhting. Edwards has to assess things better is not a throwing under teh bus. And no Lando agrees that that qoute was not throwing Edwards under the bus. Throwing somebody under the bus is attacking them or blaming them. TO saying Trent needs to improve on something is neither. And :


"I know I can play this game at a high level," Owens added during the
interview. "We've just got to find some ways to get myself and Lee
[Evans] more involved in the offense. Our run game is right where it
needs to be. We just got to complement our run game with the pass game."

is what i was referring to. And since u and dezz are the only ones considered to that throwing under the bus, i am 100% right.

If two years ago Plax said eli has to assess things down field better NOBODY would of killed him for it.. but becasue its TO u guys are

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 12:03 PM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.
didnt TO call out trent already? he just doesnt get it. lol

na he didn't. He was asked if he likes the playcalling and<font color="#0000ff" size="4"> he said im not gonna answer because your going to twist my words around.</font>


Really Matt... so THAT'S what TO did...he didn't say something like

"As I said earlier, there were some opportunities that we missed, and those are some of the things you're talking about. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Trent has to better assess what he's seeing out there and take some shots down the field."

at all did he....nope never he said he wasn't answering the questions.

twist it all you want, say it is or isn't calling out the QB, the FACT is you said he wasn't answering the question, you later went on to say he only talked about playcalling now your saying that he's not "Really" calling out his QB....

you are just going back back back back on what you said, your wrong and won't admit it, as per your norm, go ahead, make fun of me and try to rally your lackeys...I personally don't care because I know your wrong...and that's good enough for me.
</span>

Kase-1
09-30-2009, 12:03 PM
Bufflo needs a Line that doesnt have 3 rookies on the interior.....

If they had experience on the line it would give time to Trent Edwards\

If Edwards had time then he could settle the ball

If he could settle the ball then it would let WR Routes establish

If the routes establish then he could throw his WRs the ball

If he could throw his WRs the ball then TO would be less dissatisfied

....Simple as that yo

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 12:06 PM
So just to clarify, your issue is with the fact that TO should not be saying things about his QB right?

My Issue is that MMB said that TO was only talking about playcalling an never said anything about Edwards at all...he's wrong, he did say something about edwards, I provided the quote...period end of story end of the discussion MMB = wrong game over.


Would you agree that the playcalling has not been good and TO should be targeted more than 5 times in a whole game?

I don't CARE.... ALLLLLLL I care about is that MMB said TO never complained or talked about Trent Edwards... and he DID, and I proved that he did by provided the quote, game over I win.

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 12:06 PM
Bufflo needs a Line that doesnt have 3 rookies on the interior.....

If they had experience on the line it would give time to Trent Edwards\

If Edwards had time then he could settle the ball

If he could settle the ball then it would let WR Routes establish

If the routes establish then he could throw his WRs the ball

If he could throw his WRs the ball then TO would be less dissatisfied

....Simple as that yo


yea but that isn't even what we're debating

if this was ANY other WR in the league saying his QB needs to assess things better down field it owuldn't be an issue, btu because its TO its made a big deal of

bigblue4417
09-30-2009, 12:09 PM
if this was ANY other WR in the league saying his QB needs to assess things better down field it owuldn't be an issue, btu because its TO its made a big deal of

EXAAAAAAACTLY!!!

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 12:09 PM
i'd even argue about that. If you've watched any buffalo game

I didn't watch it, but I know he complained afterwards and that's not a good sign for him.
didnt TO call out trent already? he just doesnt get it. lol

na he didn't. He was asked if he likes the playcalling and<font color="#0000ff" size="4"> he said im not gonna answer because your going to twist my words around.</font>


Really Matt... so THAT'S what TO did...he didn't say something like

"As I said earlier, there were some opportunities that we missed, and those are some of the things you're talking about. <span style="font-weight: bold;">Trent has to better assess what he's seeing out there and take some shots down the field."

at all did he....nope never he said he wasn't answering the questions.

twist it all you want, say it is or isn't calling out the QB, the FACT is you said he wasn't answering the question, you later went on to say he only talked about playcalling now your saying that he's not "Really" calling out his QB....

you are just going back back back back on what you said, your wrong and won't admit it, as per your norm, go ahead, make fun of me and try to rally your lackeys...I personally don't care because I know your wrong...and that's good enough for me.
</span>

He admitted some frustration with the lack of pass attempts downfield
-- "We had some chances to go down the field and we didn't," he said --
but he sidestepped a question about whether the Bills and quarterback Trent Edwards (http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/profile?playerId=10536) are looking enough to the team's top receivers.

"No, I don't want to answer that," Owens said Sunday. "I don't want to
answer that, because whatever I say you guys are going to turn it to
however you want to say it."

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4514831

im not going back on ****. Thats the qoutes i was referring to, you consider the comment of him having to assess downfield better as throwing edwards under the bus, i dont.

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 12:10 PM
yea but that isn't even what we're debating

if this was ANY other WR in the league saying his QB needs to assess things better down field it owuldn't be an issue, btu because its TO its made a big deal of


yeah, but that isn't even what we're debating &gt;&gt;MATT&lt;&lt;

we are debating whether TO did or didn't talk about his QB...I don't know why the debate is even still going, I proved you incorrect, he DID talk about his QB, you want to say "It's not that bad" fine, whatever you say Matt...point is you said it didn't happen, it did, your wrong, game over.

DavenIII
09-30-2009, 12:13 PM
if this was ANY other WR in the league saying his QB needs to assess things better down field it owuldn't be an issue, btu because its TO its made a big deal of

EXAAAAAAACTLY!!!


agreed!!!!

But that's not what we were originally talking about Landon, he said TO didn't talk about his QB, MMB said he only talked about Play calling.

Trent Edwards needing the asses the field better has NOTHING to do with playcalling therefore MMB was wrong, he went on to say what TO said is not that bad and we shouldn't be complaining about it, and tricked you all into overlooking the fact that TO DID say something about his QB...how bad what he said was is irrelevant, the simply fact that he said something about Trent Edwards means MMB is wrong.

MattMeyerBud
09-30-2009, 12:13 PM
yea but that isn't even what we're debating

if this was ANY other WR in the league saying his QB needs to assess things better down field it owuldn't be an issue, btu because its TO its made a big deal of


yeah, but that isn't even what we're debating &gt;&gt;MATT&lt;&lt;

we are debating whether TO did or didn't talk about his QB...I don't know why the debate is even still going, I proved you incorrect, he DID talk about his QB, you want to say "It's not that bad" fine, whatever you say Matt...point is you said it didn't happen, it did, your wrong, game over.


wtf does that mean TALK about his QB lol.... so hes not allowed to mention him? No we are talking about whether he threw his QB under the bus or not...

false u have yet to prove me wrong. Only u and Dezz think its him throwing his QB under the bus, while Dezzz really admitted that its just cuz of his past...

again if any other WR said that it wouldn't be taken as throwing under the bus, btut cuz its TO it is

again, Meyerbud is undefeated in battles with daven

get on my level

ibleedblue85
09-30-2009, 12:13 PM
if this was ANY other WR in the league saying his QB needs to assess things better down field it owuldn't be an issue, btu because its TO its made a big deal of

EXAAAAAAACTLY!!!
</P>


hence my post earlier..if it was say carolina and steve smith said "i get open, we need to take more shots down field and punch in some TDs" NO ONE would say a word or take it as throwin scrub delhomme under the bus... its cause its TO and only TO... smith flat out threw jake under the bus and said i love you as a person but hate you as a QB and no one said a word about that...... but if it was TO hed be benched for 3 weeks...</P>


plug in those words coming out of Lee Evans mouth about the EXACT same situation and it would be completely overlooked.. because its TO stating the truth about how they need to take more down field shots its him starting problems in the locker room with edwards.</P>