PDA

View Full Version : THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 [217] 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 10:27 AM
morning gents.
whos hung over today?!?! lol[+o(]

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 10:29 AM
lol u all walk by each other with a spark in ur eye like u all know whats up hahaha.. that is kinda funny

I had an ex or 4 years and an ex of 3 years all in the same tiny bar last night, which was WEIRD cuz it was around nowhere where any of us live. They both have boyfriends that apparently know me and aren't too fond of good ol meyerbud... it was funny. Also the two chicks hate each other, good thing they are cream filled
</p>


hahaha theyve seen better days!</p>


thats so random that you were all in the same place, nowhere near where you live though. Maybe the good Lord just wanted to ruin someones night for some reason. He's a crazy guy, that one....</p>




haha death stares from all around

2 dudes that would def like to snake me

then 2 broads cuz its always weird seeing ur ex talk to other chicks, lol it was funny
when you say cream filled do you mean they got fat?


na i mean their men...

they are cowards... they dont man up and shoot the 1s...

they wait for their big brothers to come... well Julia the recent ex i dunno about.. that was the first time we were face to face

but the ex ex's bf, hes a real scumbag. Never makes a move unless his brothers are there to back him up...

cream filled
</p>


KINDA wish I could say that about my brother....but, not so much. I hang out with him, and he's rip roarin ready to **** some people up...so im like yo this kid prolly doesnt say **** when im not around....</p>


NOPE....this mother****er....every monday i see him, kids got bloody knuckles, black eyes....wtf is wrong with you? he says ppl constantly start **** with him...im like yo, i used to use that line too.....i was usually full of **** lol</p>

yea but this kid don't say a ****in peep and just hard grills everybody. If his brother is in the room then he all of a sudden becomes braveheart...

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 10:31 AM
Every now and then
I get a little bit terrified
and then I see the f*ckin look in your eyes
Every now and then I fall apart ...</p>


And I neeed you now toniiiight, I f*ckin need ya moooore than ever!
</p>Ill take ya ta the candy shop, yeeeaaaa, dont stop till you hit the spot.
im going to hire them for my wedding.


did u ever get back with ur girl
of course. haha im still acting like a prick a bit though. i want to reign her in a lil bit. naaahiiimean?

we had a good time a the local pub last night, so what more can you ask for...

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 10:32 AM
yea but this kid don't say a ****in peep and just hard grills everybody. If his brother is in the room then he all of a sudden becomes braveheart...

</P>


****in meatgazers....</P>


I ever tell you guysabout the time a 500 lb Irishmen named Conan almost killed me?? It pains me to bring back that memory...</P>

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 10:33 AM
Every now and then
I get a little bit terrified
and then I see the f*ckin look in your eyes
Every now and then I fall apart ...</P>


And I neeed you now toniiiight, I f*ckin need ya moooore than ever!
</P>


Ill take ya ta the candy shop, yeeeaaaa, dont stop till you hit the spot.
im going to hire them for my wedding.


did u ever get back with ur girl
of course. haha im still acting like a prick a bit though. i want to reign her in a lil bit. naaahiiimean?

we had a good time a the local pub last night, so what more can you ask for...
</P>


actually i have no ****ing idea what you mean. is that even a term??</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 10:35 AM
yea but this kid don't say a ****in peep and just hard grills everybody. If his brother is in the room then he all of a sudden becomes braveheart...

</p>


****in meatgazers....</p>


I ever tell you guysabout the time a 500 lb Irishmen named Conan almost killed me?? It pains me to bring back that memory...</p>

http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/improvised-blog/conan_o_brien.jpg

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 10:36 AM
Every now and then
I get a little bit terrified
and then I see the f*ckin look in your eyes
Every now and then I fall apart ...</p>


And I neeed you now toniiiight, I f*ckin need ya moooore than ever!
</p>


Ill take ya ta the candy shop, yeeeaaaa, dont stop till you hit the spot.
im going to hire them for my wedding.


did u ever get back with ur girl
of course. haha im still acting like a prick a bit though. i want to reign her in a lil bit. naaahiiimean?

we had a good time a the local pub last night, so what more can you ask for...
</p>


actually i have no ****ing idea what you mean. is that even a term??</p>

can you blow me where the pampers is?

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 10:36 AM
morning gents. whos hung over today?!?! lol</P>


mornin!</P>


not me, I sloshed around for 3 hours: some jameson, some guiness and a a few green bottles, and then was good to go at midnight.....its become increasingly more difficult to stay sober while AT a bar... lol...but I was good. =] had a blast</P>


how bout you? wastey-face?</P>
wastey face!!!!!!! LMAO.. i love how ppl steal that word..

umm not wastey face but def felt good, we ended up playing like a 15 person thing of quarters at the bar... never played before last night but it was alotta fun lol.. needless to say i went to bed at 4:45... today is gonna be terrible.......

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 10:42 AM
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the Democrats'
health care bill will cost $940 billion over 10 years, a Democratic
source told CNN today.and now theyre trying to tie in student loans in the bill.....START OVER! and if it takes a few years to go into effect how can dems claim it will create over 400000 jobs immediately. theyre full of it.
and did anyone hear if this bill passes an estimated 40% of doctors will leave their practice? thats nuts

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 10:44 AM
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the Democrats'
health care bill will cost $940 billion over 10 years, a Democratic
source told CNN today.and now theyre trying to tie in student loans in the bill.....START OVER! and if it takes a few years to go into effect how can dems claim it will create over 400000 jobs immediately. theyre full of it.
and did anyone hear if this bill passes an estimated 40% of doctors will leave their practice? thats nuts




bro not today, im hungover

repost this tomorrow

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 10:44 AM
Every now and then
I get a little bit terrified
and then I see the f*ckin look in your eyes
Every now and then I fall apart ...</p>


And I neeed you now toniiiight, I f*ckin need ya moooore than ever!
</p>


Ill take ya ta the candy shop, yeeeaaaa, dont stop till you hit the spot.
im going to hire them for my wedding.


did u ever get back with ur girl
of course. haha im still acting like a prick a bit though. i want to reign her in a lil bit. naaahiiimean?

we had a good time a the local pub last night, so what more can you ask for...
</p>


actually i have no ****ing idea what you mean. is that even a term??</p>never seen scary movie?" left right left right, uhhhhh son, uhhh sonn, aiyo that jacket is tight son NAAAAHHIIMEAN!!, now run that ****."

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 10:46 AM
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the Democrats' health care bill will cost $940 billion over 10 years, a Democratic source told CNN today.and now theyre trying to tie in student loans in the bill.....START OVER! and if it takes a few years to go into effect how can dems claim it will create over 400000 jobs immediately. theyre full of it.
and did anyone hear if this bill passes an estimated 40% of doctors will leave their practice? thats nuts


</P>


Forgewt it Dezz. Its essentially a forgone conclusion.</P>


They will get their 216 in the house. They will get their 50 + 1 in the Senate and we will be living with the consequences for years.</P>


I hope to God I'm wrong, but the selling out of Dennis Kucinich was the last straw.</P>

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 10:50 AM
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the Democrats'
health care bill will cost $940 billion over 10 years, a Democratic
source told CNN today.and now theyre trying to tie in student loans in the bill.....START OVER! and if it takes a few years to go into effect how can dems claim it will create over 400000 jobs immediately. theyre full of it.
and did anyone hear if this bill passes an estimated 40% of doctors will leave their practice? thats nuts




bro not today, im hungover

repost this tomorrow
and im feeling fantastic. tell lando not to mess with the bull if he doesnt want to horns[:)]

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 10:54 AM
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the Democrats'
health care bill will cost $940 billion over 10 years, a Democratic
source told CNN today.and now theyre trying to tie in student loans in the bill.....START OVER! and if it takes a few years to go into effect how can dems claim it will create over 400000 jobs immediately. theyre full of it.
and did anyone hear if this bill passes an estimated 40% of doctors will leave their practice? thats nuts




bro not today, im hungover

repost this tomorrow
and im feeling fantastic. tell lando not to mess with the bull if he doesnt want to horns[:)]


i will start THE ONLY NBA argument debate all day today just to spite u if u want to play hardball

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 10:55 AM
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the Democrats' health care bill will cost $940 billion over 10 years, a Democratic source told CNN today.and now theyre trying to tie in student loans in the bill.....START OVER! and if it takes a few years to go into effect how can dems claim it will create over 400000 jobs immediately. theyre full of it.
and did anyone hear if this bill passes an estimated 40% of doctors will leave their practice? thats nuts


</p>


Forgewt it Dezz. Its essentially a forgone conclusion.</p>


They will get their 216 in the house. They will get their 50 + 1 in the Senate and we will be living with the consequences for years.</p>


I hope to God I'm wrong, but the selling out of Dennis Kucinich was the last straw.</p>i dont think it will. did you watch bill o go up and down napolitano? watched it before i went out. it was epic.
http://www.wikio.co.uk/video/2958992

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 10:56 AM
I just miss Daven, I thought that would bring him back. lol

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 10:58 AM
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the Democrats'
health care bill will cost $940 billion over 10 years, a Democratic
source told CNN today.and now theyre trying to tie in student loans in the bill.....START OVER! and if it takes a few years to go into effect how can dems claim it will create over 400000 jobs immediately. theyre full of it.
and did anyone hear if this bill passes an estimated 40% of doctors will leave their practice? thats nuts




bro not today, im hungover

repost this tomorrow
and im feeling fantastic. tell lando not to mess with the bull if he doesnt want to horns[:)]


i will start THE ONLY NBA argument debate all day today just to spite u if u want to play hardball
it wont happen again.........

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 11:01 AM
wastey face!!!!!!! LMAO.. i love how ppl steal that word.. umm not wastey face but def felt good, we ended up playing like a 15 person thing of quarters at the bar... never played before last night but it was alotta fun lol.. needless to say i went to bed at 4:45... today is gonna be terrible.......</P>


steal it? i just use it cuz my friend danielle says it all the time. why, do you use that term/?</P>


sounds awesome. anyone ever play Anchorman? It's like quarters only with teams, and a large pitcher of beer. You use teams of 3 or 4, everyone gets quarters...free for all bouncing your quarters into a pint glass, first team to finish their quarters wins, losers have to drink the pitcher...but theres a rotating order in who drinks from the pitcher last, so you can either drink as much as you can to help him out, or ***** out and **** him over with drinking more than everyone else. lol</P>


its fun, and gets REALLY competitive</P>

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:03 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:04 AM
Cromartie, 25, has seven children by six women in five states. He had
been past due on his support of them by around $25,000 to $50,000,
Bishop said.

LOL, what a loser...

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:07 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...


don't ever compare donating money to that situation again.. u look foolish

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:09 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...


don't ever compare donating money to that situation again.. u look foolish

It was not a donation. They owed him that money.

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 11:09 AM
Cromartie, 25, has seven children by six women in five states. He had been past due on his support of them by around $25,000 to $50,000, Bishop said.

LOL, what a loser...
</P>


lol they were talking about that on espn.com when all the trade talks etc. first started last month....scum</P>

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 11:11 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:13 AM
does anybody know the date the schedules get released?

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 11:13 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...


don't ever compare donating money to that situation again.. u look foolish

It was not a donation. They owed him that money.
and he said keep it. soooooooooo techically its a donation.[:)]

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:13 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

Wrong, Eli CHOSE not to take HIS money.

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:15 AM
does anybody know the date the schedules get released?

Middle of April. I don't think anyone knows the exact date. The primetime games for the opening weekend usually comes out at the beginning of April. When we see that then you know it's upon us. The Saints will be playing on Thursday Sep 9th of course but against who? Feel sorry for that team. lol

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 11:16 AM
<FONT color=#0000ff size=4>MATT:</FONT> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...


don't ever compare donating money to that situation again.. u look foolish
</P>


Well Matt, you have to admit its a poor example to any of his future children about the managing of money.</P>


I mean, he gave up $500M. <FONT color=#ff0000>What a chump!</FONT></P>

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:16 AM
Regardless of the motive or situation. There was money on the table and both people left it there...

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:17 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...


don't ever compare donating money to that situation again.. u look foolish
</p>


Well Matt, you have to admit its a poor example to any of his future children about the managing of money.</p>


I mean, he gave up $500K. <font color="#ff0000">What a chump!</font></p>
[:D]

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:18 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...


don't ever compare donating money to that situation again.. u look foolish
</p>


Well Matt, you have to admit its a poor example to any of his future children about the managing of money.</p>


I mean, he gave up $500M. <font color="#ff0000">What a chump!</font></p>

good point, declining 250k instead of just taking an extra year to get his degree....

makes total sense..

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:19 AM
Regardless of the motive or situation. There was money on the table and both people left it there...




no its not regardless of the situation...

thats the part ur not understanding

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 11:19 AM
Regardless of the motive or situation. There was money on the table and both people left it there...


</P>


does 500k at least get you a hospital wing named after you?? =P</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 11:22 AM
<FONT color=#0000ff size=4>MATT:</FONT> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...


don't ever compare donating money to that situation again.. u look foolish
</P>


Well Matt, you have to admit its a poor example to any of his future children about the managing of money.</P>


I mean, he gave up $500M. <FONT color=#ff0000>What a chump!</FONT></P>




good point, declining 250k instead of just taking an extra year to get his degree....

makes total sense..
</P>


I accept your apology.</P>

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 11:22 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

Wrong, Eli CHOSE not to take HIS money.
for the greater good of many. warren did it for himself. im not buying "i did it for my kids". like bandy said maybe hes lazy and doesnt want to do offseason workouts.

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:23 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...


don't ever compare donating money to that situation again.. u look foolish
</p>


Well Matt, you have to admit its a poor example to any of his future children about the managing of money.</p>


I mean, he gave up $500M. <font color="#ff0000">What a chump!</font></p>




good point, declining 250k instead of just taking an extra year to get his degree....

makes total sense..
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>

well when u get one i'll let u know...

sorry that it makes NO SENSE. The same goals of respect and setting the example could of been done WHILE living up to his contract and doing whta he had to do to get the bonus...

no respect for it

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:23 AM
Regardless of the motive or situation. There was money on the table and both people left it there...




no its not regardless of the situation...

thats the part ur not understanding

Eli could have spread that money out to and been paid off. Warren could have spread his education out and graduated. What is the difference?

You are the one not understanding sir...

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:24 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

Wrong, Eli CHOSE not to take HIS money.
for the greater good of many. warren did it for himself. im not buying "i did it for my kids". like bandy said maybe hes lazy and doesnt want to do offseason workouts.


actually Eli took his money then re-routed it...

just declining 250k is ridic

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:24 AM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>
Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 11:24 AM
<FONT color=#0000ff size=4>MATT:</FONT> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

Wrong, Eli CHOSE not to take HIS money.
for the greater good of many. warren did it for himself. im not buying "i did it for my kids". like bandy said maybe hes lazy and doesnt want to do offseason workouts.
</P>


im sure it was something planned that he talked to the coaches about....not like he just didnt show up and someone brought it up later. Are we still talking about this as if it matters AT ALL?!?!?? lol</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:25 AM
Regardless of the motive or situation. There was money on the table and both people left it there...




no its not regardless of the situation...

thats the part ur not understanding

Eli could have spread that money out to and been paid off. Warren could have spread his education out and graduated. What is the difference?

You are the one not understanding sir...


if I really have to explain to you the difference between giving a hospital 500k and decling 250k then we're not gonna get anywhere with this.

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:25 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

Wrong, Eli CHOSE not to take HIS money.
for the greater good of many. warren did it for himself. im not buying "i did it for my kids". like bandy said maybe hes lazy and doesnt want to do offseason workouts.
</p>


im sure it was something planned that he talked to the coaches about....not like he just didnt show up and someone brought it up later. Are we still talking about this as if it matters AT ALL?!?!?? lol</p>

actually the Pats were pissed i think

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:26 AM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>
Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:26 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

Wrong, Eli CHOSE not to take HIS money.
for the greater good of many. warren did it for himself. im not buying "i did it for my kids". like bandy said maybe hes lazy and doesnt want to do offseason workouts.

As I said, regardless of the motive or situation. It is the same thing...they both left money on the table

Who cares if you are not buying it. lol

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:28 AM
and nobody wants to talk about the negative example he is setting for his children by doing this:

A) Lack of understanding the true value of money

B) Living up to a contract, something you said you'd do

I know plenty of people that haven't finished college and are successful..... nobody made themselves successful by not understanding the value of a dollar

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:29 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

Wrong, Eli CHOSE not to take HIS money.
for the greater good of many. warren did it for himself. im not buying "i did it for my kids". like bandy said maybe hes lazy and doesnt want to do offseason workouts.

As I said, regardless of the motive or situation. It is the same thing...they both left money on the table

Who cares if you are not buying it. lol


again.. no.. motive and situation has EVERYTHING to do wtih it..

Eli never left ANY money on the table...

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:30 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

Wrong, Eli CHOSE not to take HIS money.
for the greater good of many. warren did it for himself. im not buying "i did it for my kids". like bandy said maybe hes lazy and doesnt want to do offseason workouts.
</p>


im sure it was something planned that he talked to the coaches about....not like he just didnt show up and someone brought it up later. Are we still talking about this as if it matters AT ALL?!?!?? lol</p>

actually the Pats were pissed i think

Not at all man. He is not missing anything mandatory. It is voluntary...

1st time in his 8 year career with the Pats he has not been there.

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:31 AM
Eli never left ANY money on the table...



Bull****, you have no idea what you are talking about...Eli signed a contract with the hospital. The hospital had financial problems. He told them don't worry about paying me the rest of what you owe me. If that is not leaving money on the table then please tell me what is?

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 11:32 AM
</P>


I accept your apology.</P>



Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well
</P>


OHHHHH!! he just brought up the mormanism!!! Kick his *** Lando!....or have one of your 8 wives do it!!!!</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:32 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

Wrong, Eli CHOSE not to take HIS money.
for the greater good of many. warren did it for himself. im not buying "i did it for my kids". like bandy said maybe hes lazy and doesnt want to do offseason workouts.
</p>


im sure it was something planned that he talked to the coaches about....not like he just didnt show up and someone brought it up later. Are we still talking about this as if it matters AT ALL?!?!?? lol</p>

actually the Pats were pissed i think

Not at all man. He is not missing anything mandatory. It is voluntary...

1st time in his 8 year career with the Pats he has not been there.


yea im not positive i caught an article out of a Chicago newspaper about it and said the Pats were pissed, it didn't seem to reliable

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:32 AM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>
Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well

When Matt starts taking personal shots you know you have won. [:)]

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:33 AM
Eli never left ANY money on the table...



Bull****, you have no idea what you are talking about...Eli signed a contract with the hospital. The hospital had financial problems. He told them don't worry about paying me the rest of what you owe me. If that is not leaving money on the table then please tell me what is?


thats donating money... do u really need an explanation of donating and leaving money on the table?

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:34 AM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>
Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well

When Matt starts taking personal shots you know you have won. [:)]


that means i've lost every argument i've ever had... so thats false too

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:36 AM
and nobody wants to talk about the negative example he is setting for his children by doing this:

A) Lack of understanding the true value of money

B) Living up to a contract, something you said you'd do


So what is the issue then? Cause know you are changing your story. Before it was he could have got his education and strecthed it out. He didn't have to finish it right now.

Then it is the understanding of money (which he has millions of ****ing dollars for him and his family) which he understands better than any of us.

OR

Living up to his contract which he is. It is voluntary meaning he can go if he wants and choose to get that money if he wants to. He CHOSE not to to pursue his education. He is not missing anything mandatory.

Will there be a 4th issue or is that all of them?

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 11:36 AM
<font color="#0000ff" size="4">MATT:</font> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

Wrong, Eli CHOSE not to take HIS money.
for the greater good of many. warren did it for himself. im not buying "i did it for my kids". like bandy said maybe hes lazy and doesnt want to do offseason workouts.

As I said, regardless of the motive or situation. It is the same thing...they both left money on the table

Who cares if you are not buying it. lol
eli had a great reason. warren doesnt. its laaame. why not play your heart out on the football field, thats a better lesson to show your kids then "stay in school". school doesnt mean ****....i know a lot of people who dropped out of highschool or never went to college that are very successful.

patsrule666
03-18-2010, 11:39 AM
<FONT color=#0000ff size=4>MATT:</FONT> I'm curious to know how you feel about Eli giving back 500k to that hospital in NY? That is double the amount of money Warren gave up...
thats donating. and its a very noble deed. warren CHOOSE not to take HIS money

Wrong, Eli CHOSE not to take HIS money.
for the greater good of many. warren did it for himself. im not buying "i did it for my kids". like bandy said maybe hes lazy and doesnt want to do offseason workouts.
</P>


im sure it was something planned that he talked to the coaches about....not like he just didnt show up and someone brought it up later. Are we still talking about this as if it matters AT ALL?!?!?? lol</P>




actually the Pats were pissed i think

Not at all man. He is not missing anything mandatory. It is voluntary...

1st time in his 8 year career with the Pats he has not been there.


yea im not positive i caught an article out of a Chicago newspaper about it and said the Pats were pissed, it didn't seem to reliable
Ha- You can take the butchers word. or...................</P>


</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:39 AM
and nobody wants to talk about the negative example he is setting for his children by doing this:

A) Lack of understanding the true value of money

B) Living up to a contract, something you said you'd do


So what is the issue then? Cause know you are changing your story. Before it was he could have got his education and strecthed it out. He didn't have to finish it right now.

Then it is the understanding of money (which he has millions of ****ing dollars for him and his family) which he understands better than any of us.

OR

Living up to his contract which he is. It is voluntary meaning he can go if he wants and choose to get that money if he wants to. He CHOSE not to to pursue his education. He is not missing anything mandatory.

Will there be a 4th issue or is that all of them?


my points are still the same... the post u responded to doesn't change it, i just added to my argument to discredit the points made in yours

Hes a millionaire - oh so he doesn't need or want 250k... lack of value of a dollar, great signal to send to your kids

He wants to get his degree - he still could of done it without making sure its done by the spring

He wants to show his kids a good example - he could of shown them a better example by living up to his contract, still getting his degree, and doing what he had to do to get that 250k...

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 11:40 AM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>
Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well

When Matt starts taking personal shots you know you have won. [:)]
yea i learned that, but i dont know why hes taking shots now. hes right. hahaaaaaaaa

ughhh it feeels like mike tyson took a luisville slugger to my head multiple times. and.....i have loogie stuck in the back of my throat and if i try to hawk it up or swallow im going to boot everywhere. lol sick story right???

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:41 AM
Eli never left ANY money on the table...



Bull****, you have no idea what you are talking about...Eli signed a contract with the hospital. The hospital had financial problems. He told them don't worry about paying me the rest of what you owe me. If that is not leaving money on the table then please tell me what is?


thats donating money... do u really need an explanation of donating and leaving money on the table?

I don't but it looks like you could use a refresher.

If I sign a contract with you to give me a $100 a week and at the end of the month you only paid me for 3 and I tell you to keep the rest and it's ok, I donated that to you? lol

St. Vincent's hospital in New York has a little bit of a debt problem -- about $700 million worth, according to the New York Post (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/giant_hearted_eli_EHqghWNE8ibcPRROb6ltoI). They also owed New York Giants (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/nyg/) quarterback <span class="ysp-player">Eli Manning (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6760/)(notes) (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6760/news)</span> over $500,000 for marketing work he's done for them, but Eli, aware of their debt problems, told them no thanks.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Eli-Manning-won-t-take-broke-hospital-s-money?urn=nfl,223215

There is the article, the funny thing is the word "donate" is not found in the entire thing...[*-)]

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:42 AM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>
Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well

When Matt starts taking personal shots you know you have won. [:)]
yea i learned that, but i dont know why hes taking shots now. hes right. hahaaaaaaaa

ughhh it feeels like mike tyson took a luisville slugger to my head multiple times. and.....i have loogie stuck in the back of my throat and if i try to hawk it up or swallow im going to boot everywhere. lol sick story right???


one of the pleasures of wasting time on these boards is calling somebody a moron and explaining why they are a moron...

which i always aim to do... especially when somebody tries to start an argument with me in the AM when im hungover (LANDO)

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:43 AM
eli had a great reason. warren doesnt.
In your opinion sure...but to him it was more important than any amount of money for his kids to see their dad with a college degree. I don't see why that is so hard to understand regardless of if he could have stretched it out or not. He wants to get it done now and has the lockout on his mind and after his career is said and done. A life and career after football, who woulda thunk it?

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:44 AM
Ha- You can take the butchers word. or...................</p>


</p>
Talk some sense into this man Mr. Pats. Please, I can't get through.

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:44 AM
Eli never left ANY money on the table...



Bull****, you have no idea what you are talking about...Eli signed a contract with the hospital. The hospital had financial problems. He told them don't worry about paying me the rest of what you owe me. If that is not leaving money on the table then please tell me what is?


thats donating money... do u really need an explanation of donating and leaving money on the table?

I don't but it looks like you could use a refresher.

If I sign a contract with you to give me a $100 a week and at the end of the month you only paid me for 3 and I tell you to keep the rest and it's ok, I donated that to you? lol

St. Vincent's hospital in New York has a little bit of a debt problem -- about $700 million worth, according to the New York Post (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/giant_hearted_eli_EHqghWNE8ibcPRROb6ltoI). They also owed New York Giants (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/nyg/) quarterback <span class="ysp-player">Eli Manning (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6760/)(notes) (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6760/news)</span> over $500,000 for marketing work he's done for them, but Eli, aware of their debt problems, told them no thanks.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Eli-Manning-won-t-take-broke-hospital-s-money?urn=nfl,223215

There is the article, the funny thing is the word "donate" is not found in the entire thing...[*-)]


oh well u said he donated it before i wans't aware of the story, i was just going by what u said

but that would be considered donating time actually... to do something for free to help out someone else...

thats not a form of charity?

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 11:44 AM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>



Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well
</p>


OHHHHH!! he just brought up the mormanism!!! Kick his *** Lando!....or have one of your 8 wives do it!!!!</p> id pay to watch that fight.....

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:44 AM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>



Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well
</p>


OHHHHH!! he just brought up the mormanism!!! Kick his *** Lando!....or have one of your 8 wives do it!!!!</p> id pay to watch that fight.....


me too

[;)]

i want all 8 at once tho

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 11:48 AM
eli had a great reason. warren doesnt.
In your opinion sure...but to him it was more important than any amount of money for his kids to see their dad with a college degree. I don't see why that is so hard to understand regardless of if he could have stretched it out or not. He wants to get it done now and has the lockout on his mind and after his career is said and done. A life and career after football, who woulda thunk it?
i dont have a problem with him wanting to go to school. but hes passing up on a large sum of money to do something he could do AFTER football....

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:48 AM
especially when somebody tries to start an argument with me in the AM when im hungover (LANDO)


I am not trying, I did. I am right / you are wrong. Admit it and move
on. Eli and Ty did the same exact thing if you look at it as vanilla as
possible. Both had money on the table, both didn't take it for their
own reason. PERIOD



P.S. I don't like your tone. lol

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 11:50 AM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>



Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well
</p>


OHHHHH!! he just brought up the mormanism!!! Kick his *** Lando!....or have one of your 8 wives do it!!!!</p> id pay to watch that fight.....


me too

[;)]

i want all 8 at once tho
lol you and lando first, if you take on the wives first youll have no juice left for lando. hahaha that sounds hysterical

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:50 AM
Eli never left ANY money on the table...



Bull****, you have no idea what you are talking about...Eli signed a contract with the hospital. The hospital had financial problems. He told them don't worry about paying me the rest of what you owe me. If that is not leaving money on the table then please tell me what is?


thats donating money... do u really need an explanation of donating and leaving money on the table?

I don't but it looks like you could use a refresher.

If I sign a contract with you to give me a $100 a week and at the end of the month you only paid me for 3 and I tell you to keep the rest and it's ok, I donated that to you? lol

St. Vincent's hospital in New York has a little bit of a debt problem -- about $700 million worth, according to the New York Post (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/giant_hearted_eli_EHqghWNE8ibcPRROb6ltoI). They also owed New York Giants (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/nyg/) quarterback <span class="ysp-player">Eli Manning (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6760/)(notes) (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6760/news)</span> over $500,000 for marketing work he's done for them, but Eli, aware of their debt problems, told them no thanks.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Eli-Manning-won-t-take-broke-hospital-s-money?urn=nfl,223215

There is the article, the funny thing is the word "donate" is not found in the entire thing...[*-)]


oh well u said he donated it before i wans't aware of the story, i was just going by what u said

but that would be considered donating time actually... to do something for free to help out someone else...

thats not a form of charity?

Sure, if you want to get reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeal technical. Doesn't change the fact that both left money on the table. Eli obviously has more than Ty but that is irrelevant. It's all about the value of a dollar in your argument.

patsrule666
03-18-2010, 11:51 AM
Ha- You can take the butchers word. or...................</P>


</P>



Talk some sense into this man Mr. Pats. Please, I can't get through.
Even a hung over William Wallace is a formidable adversary.........</P>


Ty donated to the Patriots....lol. What better organization to do so??[:D]</P>


Bottom line- they both took money out of thier pockets...</P>


500k = Two kicks for Eli......lol.</P>

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 11:52 AM
Eli agreed to release St. Vincent's from their obligation

Ty agreed to leave his bonus on the table to go to college

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 11:52 AM
P.S. I don't like your tone. lol</P>


dont you ****ing look at me in that tone of voice!</P>


=]</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:52 AM
Eli never left ANY money on the table...



Bull****, you have no idea what you are talking about...Eli signed a contract with the hospital. The hospital had financial problems. He told them don't worry about paying me the rest of what you owe me. If that is not leaving money on the table then please tell me what is?


thats donating money... do u really need an explanation of donating and leaving money on the table?

I don't but it looks like you could use a refresher.

If I sign a contract with you to give me a $100 a week and at the end of the month you only paid me for 3 and I tell you to keep the rest and it's ok, I donated that to you? lol

St. Vincent's hospital in New York has a little bit of a debt problem -- about $700 million worth, according to the New York Post (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/giant_hearted_eli_EHqghWNE8ibcPRROb6ltoI). They also owed New York Giants (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/nyg/) quarterback <span class="ysp-player">Eli Manning (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6760/)(notes) (http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/6760/news)</span> over $500,000 for marketing work he's done for them, but Eli, aware of their debt problems, told them no thanks.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Eli-Manning-won-t-take-broke-hospital-s-money?urn=nfl,223215

There is the article, the funny thing is the word "donate" is not found in the entire thing...[*-)]


oh well u said he donated it before i wans't aware of the story, i was just going by what u said

but that would be considered donating time actually... to do something for free to help out someone else...

thats not a form of charity?

Sure, if you want to get reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeal technical. Doesn't change the fact that both left money on the table. Eli obviously has more than Ty but that is irrelevant. It's all about the value of a dollar in your argument.


what do u mean real techinical, ur trying to say passing on the bonus in ur contract is the same as donating time to a hospital lol

its not that technical, its pretty straight forward and obvious that the two are totally different

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 11:53 AM
Matt and Dezz are way off base on this Ty Warren thing.</P>


First of all, its a personal decision, and only he knows whats important in his life.</P>


Second, whenever you see a guy turn down something that appears to be in his personal interest, its is almost always a good thing for others.</P>


Third, forget your argument about "honoring the contract". There are no guaranteed contracts in the NFL and a team will terminate a contract at the drop of a hat.</P>


Fourth, when you get right down to it, football is a game. This guy clearly want something more meaningful in his life after football. Only a fool would look at that and see something negative.</P>


</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:53 AM
Eli agreed to release St. Vincent's from their obligation

Ty agreed to leave his bonus on the table to go to college


talk about stretching lol

he donated his time... end of story

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 11:55 AM
Matt and Dezz are way off base on this Ty Warren thing.</p>


First of all, its a personal decision, and only he knows whats important in his life.</p>


Second, whenever you see a guy turn down something that appears to be in his personal interest, its is almost always a good thing for others.</p>


Third, forget your argument about "honoring the contract". There are no guaranteed contracts in the NFL and a team will terminate a contract at the drop of a hat.</p>


Fourth, when you get right down to it, football is a game. This guy clearly want something more meaningful in his life after football. Only a fool would look at that and see something negative.</p>


</p>


sorry but it was a dumb move to pass it up and everything he could of set to accomplish with it he could of still did if he just took an extra semester to do it....

thats just how it is at the end of the day

patsrule666
03-18-2010, 11:57 AM
Eli agreed to release St. Vincent's from their obligation

Ty agreed to leave his bonus on the table to go to college


talk about stretching lol

he donated his time... end of story
Obviously Elis time equates to oh-half a mil..........

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 11:58 AM
yo im goin to multiple NYY games this year, but i already booked one..the May 29th 1pm vs. Cleveland. Just in case any of the NY/NJers were lookin for a game to see YOURS TRULY =P

I'm sure I'll go to many more of the games, but jsut throwing that out there</P>


time for early lunch be back in a bit</P>

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 11:59 AM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>



Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well
</p>


OHHHHH!! he just brought up the mormanism!!! Kick his *** Lando!....or have one of your 8 wives do it!!!!</p> id pay to watch that fight.....


me too

[;)]

i want all 8 at once tho

according to lando im wifey #2 and you know your ***** *** aint making it past me.....

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 12:01 PM
Matt and Dezz are way off base on this Ty Warren thing.</p>


First of all, its a personal decision, and only he knows whats important in his life.</p>


Second, whenever you see a guy turn down something that appears to be in his personal interest, its is almost always a good thing for others.</p>


Third, forget your argument about "honoring the contract". There are no guaranteed contracts in the NFL and a team will terminate a contract at the drop of a hat.</p>


Fourth, when you get right down to it, football is a game. This guy clearly want something more meaningful in his life after football. Only a fool would look at that and see something negative.</p>


</p>he has his whole life "to find something meaningful after football". and not every one know whats important in life. theyre call **** ups. not calling warren a **** up but hes ****ing up on this decision. how is him going to school good for anyone, even his kids. his kids might grow up to be street pharmacists for all we know. your third reason should be screaming in your ear, and proves our point, its stupid to pass up that kinda money when his contracts not guaranteed

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 12:07 PM
yo im goin to multiple NYY games this year, but i already booked one..the May 29th 1pm vs. Cleveland. Just in case any of the NY/NJers were lookin for a game to see YOURS TRULY =P

I'm sure I'll go to many more of the games, but jsut throwing that out there</p>


time for early lunch be back in a bit</p>i havnt even been there yet and im ashamed to say so. deff going to make a few games this year
ill start looking on ebay for the cleveland game

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 12:12 PM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>



Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well
</p>


OHHHHH!! he just brought up the mormanism!!! Kick his *** Lando!....or have one of your 8 wives do it!!!!</p> id pay to watch that fight.....


me too

[;)]

i want all 8 at once tho

according to lando im wifey #2 and you know your ***** *** aint making it past me.....

haha with 8 chicks... they would all got broken off an equal piece

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 12:14 PM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>



Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well
</p>


OHHHHH!! he just brought up the mormanism!!! Kick his *** Lando!....or have one of your 8 wives do it!!!!</p> id pay to watch that fight.....


me too

[;)]

i want all 8 at once tho

according to lando im wifey #2 and you know your ***** *** aint making it past me.....

haha with 8 chicks... they would all got broken off an equal piece

rumor has it, after lando we would all be too tired for you...........

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 12:18 PM
Trying to get Matt to see your side of things or understand is like trying to knock drown a brick wall with a thumb tack and a feather...

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 12:20 PM
Trying to get Matt to see your side of things or understand is like trying to knock drown a brick wall with a thumb tack and a feather...



your telling me like i dont know this already... LOL if anything i know this better then anyone... TRUST ME!!!

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 12:28 PM
</p>


I accept your apology.</p>



Yeah me to, you just conceded Matt. lol


i guess when ur old and/or mormon, sarcasm doesn't land very well
</p>


OHHHHH!! he just brought up the mormanism!!! Kick his *** Lando!....or have one of your 8 wives do it!!!!</p> id pay to watch that fight.....


me too

[;)]

i want all 8 at once tho

according to lando im wifey #2 and you know your ***** *** aint making it past me.....

haha with 8 chicks... they would all got broken off an equal piece

rumor has it, after lando we would all be too tired for you...........

thats alrite they dont even gotta move, just face down *** up thats the way i like toooooooooooo

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 12:28 PM
Trying to get Matt to see your side of things or understand is like trying to knock drown a brick wall with a thumb tack and a feather...



your telling me like i dont know this already... LOL if anything i know this better then anyone... TRUST ME!!!
Don't start woman

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 12:31 PM
Trying to get Matt to see your side of things or understand is like trying to knock drown a brick wall with a thumb tack and a feather...



your telling me like i dont know this already... LOL if anything i know this better then anyone... TRUST ME!!!

sorry i don't cave into "chick reasoning" aka anarchy of sense

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 12:34 PM
Trying to get Matt to see your side of things or understand is like trying to knock drown a brick wall with a thumb tack and a feather...



your telling me like i dont know this already... LOL if anything i know this better then anyone... TRUST ME!!!
Don't start woman

he knows im kidding, relaxxxxxxxxxx

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 12:34 PM
Are the Yankees and Lakers still defending champs?

Just curious...since the season and spring training has started.

Are the Saints since football is over?

I am still confused

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 12:35 PM
Trying to get Matt to see your side of things or understand is like trying to knock drown a brick wall with a thumb tack and a feather...



your telling me like i dont know this already... LOL if anything i know this better then anyone... TRUST ME!!!
Don't start woman

he knows im kidding, relaxxxxxxxxxx
I was jk. lol

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 12:37 PM
Are the Yankees and Lakers still defending champs?

Just curious...since the season and spring training has started.

Are the Saints since football is over?

I am still confused


the lakers are defending champs...

they aren't champs of this year because nobody has been crowned...


yanks are still champs until opening day, then they are defending champs

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 12:42 PM
Are the Yankees and Lakers still defending champs?

Just curious...since the season and spring training has started.

Are the Saints since football is over?

I am still confused


the lakers are defending champs...

they aren't champs of this year because nobody has been crowned...


yanks are still champs until opening day, then they are defending champs
stiiiiill champs, champ

patsrule666
03-18-2010, 12:45 PM
Are the Yankees and Lakers still defending champs?

Just curious...since the season and spring training has started.

Are the Saints since football is over?

I am still confused


the lakers are defending champs...

they aren't champs of this year because nobody has been crowned...


yanks are still champs until opening day, then they are defending champs
A couple good buddies of mine asked if i wanted to go see the Yanks on opening day with them....Last time i saw the Yanks at Fenway, Donnie Baseball was still playing...lol.</P>


btw- The buddies are brothers...both Cowboys fans, one is a Yankee fan and the other is a Sox fan...</P>


I said no................................................ ........................................</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 12:47 PM
Are the Yankees and Lakers still defending champs?

Just curious...since the season and spring training has started.

Are the Saints since football is over?

I am still confused


the lakers are defending champs...

they aren't champs of this year because nobody has been crowned...


yanks are still champs until opening day, then they are defending champs
</P>


<FONT size=6>WRONG!!!!</FONT></P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 12:48 PM
Are the Yankees and Lakers still defending champs?

Just curious...since the season and spring training has started.

Are the Saints since football is over?

I am still confused


the lakers are defending champs...

they aren't champs of this year because nobody has been crowned...


yanks are still champs until opening day, then they are defending champs
</p>


<font size="6">WRONG!!!!</font></p>

sorry but there is no current chapmion of the 2009-2010 season in the NBA, theres only last years champ

aka defending champ

they didn't win this year so they can't be the current champs

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 12:53 PM
Are the Yankees and Lakers still defending champs?

Just curious...since the season and spring training has started.

Are the Saints since football is over?

I am still confused


the lakers are defending champs...

they aren't champs of this year because nobody has been crowned...


yanks are still champs until opening day, then they are defending champs
</P>


<FONT size=6>WRONG!!!!</FONT></P>




sorry but there is no current chapmion of the 2009-2010 season in the NBA, theres only last years champ

aka defending champ

they didn't win this year so they can't be the current champs
</P>


The Lakers organization are the champs. Since a few of the players are different than last year its silly to say they are defending, although it can be said that the organization is "defending".</P>


They are current champs until (God willing) another champion is crowned.</P>


Morehead has spoken.</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 12:55 PM
Are the Yankees and Lakers still defending champs?

Just curious...since the season and spring training has started.

Are the Saints since football is over?

I am still confused


the lakers are defending champs...

they aren't champs of this year because nobody has been crowned...


yanks are still champs until opening day, then they are defending champs
</p>


<font size="6">WRONG!!!!</font></p>




sorry but there is no current chapmion of the 2009-2010 season in the NBA, theres only last years champ

aka defending champ

they didn't win this year so they can't be the current champs
</p>


The Lakers organization are the champs. Since a few of the players are different than last year its silly to say they are defending, although it can be said that the organization is "defending".</p>


They are current champs until (God willing) another champion is crowned.</p>


Morehead has spoken.</p>

they've won nothing this year.. they are not the champs of this year

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:00 PM
Are the Yankees and Lakers still defending champs?

Just curious...since the season and spring training has started.

Are the Saints since football is over?

I am still confused


the lakers are defending champs...

they aren't champs of this year because nobody has been crowned...


yanks are still champs until opening day, then they are defending champs
</P>


<FONT size=6>WRONG!!!!</FONT></P>




sorry but there is no current chapmion of the 2009-2010 season in the NBA, theres only last years champ

aka defending champ

they didn't win this year so they can't be the current champs
</P>


The Lakers organization are the champs. Since a few of the players are different than last year its silly to say they are defending, although it can be said that the organization is "defending".</P>


They are current champs until (God willing) another champion is crowned.</P>


Morehead has spoken.</P>




they've won nothing this year.. they are not the champs of this year
</P>


It seems we've been through this before.</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:03 PM
have we?


ya know moorehead, you should try and not agree with the rest of the thread every once in a while

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 01:04 PM
Yes we have Morehead, and we are still right.

It's the dynasty thing where you are a little confused.

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:05 PM
Are the Yankees and Lakers still defending champs?

Just curious...since the season and spring training has started.

Are the Saints since football is over?

I am still confused


the lakers are defending champs...

they aren't champs of this year because nobody has been crowned...


yanks are still champs until opening day, then they are defending champs
A couple good buddies of mine asked if i wanted to go see the Yanks on opening day with them....Last time i saw the Yanks at Fenway, Donnie Baseball was still playing...lol.</p>


btw- The buddies are brothers...both Cowboys fans, one is a Yankee fan and the other is a Sox fan...</p>


I said no................................................ ........................................</p>

lol how could u not want to go an dbe in the middle of that

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:09 PM
have we?


ya know moorehead, you should try and not agree with the rest of the thread every once in a while
</P>


I agree with most everybody else on a lot of things. Buts its more fun to talk about the things where I disagree.</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:11 PM
have we?


ya know moorehead, you should try and not agree with the rest of the thread every once in a while
</p>


I agree with most everybody else on a lot of things. Buts its more fun to talk about the things where I disagree.</p>

amen just no politics today lol...

im dark meyerbud, hungover and lando is annoying me thru aim ...


well i think its really daven under landos screen name, but either was its aggravating

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 01:12 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 01:13 PM
im dark meyerbud, hungover and lando is annoying me thru aim ...


well i think its really daven under landos screen name, but either was its aggravating

[{]

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:13 PM
have we?


ya know moorehead, you should try and not agree with the rest of the thread every once in a while
</P>


I agree with most everybody else on a lot of things. Buts its more fun to talk about the things where I disagree.</P>




amen just no politics today lol...

im dark meyerbud, hungover and lando is annoying me thru aim ...


well i think its really daven under landos screen name, but either was its aggravating
</P>


What other kind of Meyerbud is there.</P>


I've never seen "light" Meyerbud.</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:13 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:14 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.
</P>


I never suggested that they are the champs of 2010. I only said that they are the current champs. And will be throughout the season until the Sox replace them.</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:16 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
</P>


If a team wins five championships in a row, there is never a point during that time when they aren't the champs. There is never a time where there is "no champ".</P>

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 01:16 PM
until the Sox replace them.</p>
There is no replacing the Yanks Morehead. You know that...[;)]

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 01:18 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
</p>


If a team wins five championships in a row, there is never a point during that time when they aren't the champs. There is never a time where there is "no champ".</p>
I totally agree. Matt has set his own parameters on this one. There is and has always been a champ until another one was crowned. But would that be a dynasty?

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 01:19 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.
</p>


I never suggested that they are the champs of 2010. I only said that they are the current champs. And will be throughout the season until the Sox replace them.</p>it sounds so sexy coming from you. say theyre the current champs again, just one more time.[:D]

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:20 PM
until the Sox replace them.</P>



There is no replacing the Yanks Morehead. You know that...[;)]
</P>


For buying championships?....I agree.</P>


Look, in June, if you ask 100 baseball fans "Who's the current champ of MLB?" All 100 would say "The Yankees".</P>


Not one, not even dark Meyerbud would answer..."Well you know there really is no current champion because technically the championship is vacated when the first pitch is throw in April"</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:21 PM
have we?


ya know moorehead, you should try and not agree with the rest of the thread every once in a while
</p>


I agree with most everybody else on a lot of things. Buts its more fun to talk about the things where I disagree.</p>




amen just no politics today lol...

im dark meyerbud, hungover and lando is annoying me thru aim ...


well i think its really daven under landos screen name, but either was its aggravating
</p>


What other kind of Meyerbud is there.</p>


I've never seen "light" Meyerbud.</p>

happy go lucky meyerbud is ball breaking but in a funny way.. today i'll bite if i have to

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:22 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
</P>


If a team wins five championships in a row, there is never a point during that time when they aren't the champs. There is never a time where there is "no champ".</P>



I totally agree. Matt has set his own parameters on this one. There is and has always been a champ until another one was crowned. But would that be a dynasty?
</P>


All your lives are better because I started that dynasty debate.</P>


The definition of a sports dynasty is a matter of opinion. The identity of a current champ of a given sport is an indisputable fact. (except in college football)</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:24 PM
have we?


ya know moorehead, you should try and not agree with the rest of the thread every once in a while
</P>


I agree with most everybody else on a lot of things. Buts its more fun to talk about the things where I disagree.</P>




amen just no politics today lol...

im dark meyerbud, hungover and lando is annoying me thru aim ...


well i think its really daven under landos screen name, but either was its aggravating
</P>


What other kind of Meyerbud is there.</P>


I've never seen "light" Meyerbud.</P>




happy go lucky meyerbud is ball breaking but in a funny way.. today i'll bite if i have to
</P>


Who the **** is "happy go lucky" Meyerbud?</P>

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 01:25 PM
until the Sox replace them.</p>



There is no replacing the Yanks Morehead. You know that...[;)]
</p>


For buying championships?....I agree.</p>


Look, in June, if you ask 100 baseball fans "Who's the current champ of MLB?" All 100 would say "The Yankees".</p>


Not one, not even dark Meyerbud would answer..."Well you know there really is no current champion because technically the championship is vacated when the first pitch is throw in April"</p>
http://jensorganizedwriter.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/winner-win.jpg

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 01:25 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:25 PM
until the Sox replace them.</p>



There is no replacing the Yanks Morehead. You know that...[;)]
</p>


For buying championships?....I agree.</p>


Look, in June, if you ask 100 baseball fans "Who's the current champ of MLB?" All 100 would say "The Yankees".</p>


Not one, not even dark Meyerbud would answer..."Well you know there really is no current champion because technically the championship is vacated when the first pitch is throw in April"</p>

dude im saying it right now lol, the hell are u talking about....

we didn't win 2010 season... yet..
we're not the champs of 2010 , were the defending champs in the 2010 season

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:26 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 01:27 PM
until the Sox replace them.</p>



There is no replacing the Yanks Morehead. You know that...[;)]
</p>


For buying championships?....I agree.</p>


Look, in June, if you ask 100 baseball fans "Who's the current champ of MLB?" All 100 would say "The Yankees".</p>


Not one, not even dark Meyerbud would answer..."Well you know there really is no current champion because technically the championship is vacated when the first pitch is throw in April"</p>idk that sounds like exactly something he would say. haha

sox have money.......write the front office and tell them to stop being cheap, ya hypocrite.

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 01:30 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 01:31 PM
until the Sox replace them.</P>



There is no replacing the Yanks Morehead. You know that...[;)]
</P>


For buying championships?....I agree.</P>


Look, in June, if you ask 100 baseball fans "Who's the current champ of MLB?" All 100 would say "The Yankees".</P>


Not one, not even dark Meyerbud would answer..."Well you know there really is no current champion because technically the championship is vacated when the first pitch is throw in April"</P>


</P>


hey who wasis it that spent the 2nd most amount of money in the MLB until last yearand has only won 2 championships in the past 90 years? I already know the answer but i wanna hear you say it.</P>


maybe the redsox should actually ACQUIRE the talent they try to get instead of sucking at managing a baseball team?</P>

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 01:31 PM
Joslyn James pulled the trigger on her website, splashing more than 100 text messages Tiger Woods allegedly sent her --
<div id="TixyyLink" style="border: medium none ; overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">
The site, sextingjoslynjames.com, includes texts that say:
</div>
- OK, I would like to have a threesome with you and another girl you trust.
- I want to treat you rough, throw you around, spank and slap you
- Have you ever had a golden shower done to you? ... just morbid curiosity.
- You are my f**king *****. Hold you down while I choke you

It's
interesting ... Joslyn has omitted the messages she sent to Tiger, so
we don't know what she said that may have egged him on.

<iframe style="margin: 5px; float: right;" border="0" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1099&amp;view=184600&amp;pollId=18489 2&amp;channel=tmz.com2" frameborder="0" height="120" scrolling="no" width="175"></iframe>And
then there's this, on September 8, 2009: "Having a few issues at home.
Might be a little later before I see you tonight." That text is
followed by "parent hood melt down :)"

And the last message is
dated October 4, 2009. It says, "Don't f**king talk to me. You almost
just ruined my whole life. If my agent and these guys would have seen
you there, F**k."<div id="TixyyLink" style="border: medium none ; overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">
</div><div id="TixyyLink" style="border: medium none ; overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">

</div>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:31 PM
I never said you were. Being the champions of the 2009 season makes you the current champs until another champion is crowned.

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:35 PM
until the Sox replace them.</P>



There is no replacing the Yanks Morehead. You know that...[;)]
</P>


For buying championships?....I agree.</P>


Look, in June, if you ask 100 baseball fans "Who's the current champ of MLB?" All 100 would say "The Yankees".</P>


Not one, not even dark Meyerbud would answer..."Well you know there really is no current champion because technically the championship is vacated when the first pitch is throw in April"</P>


</P>


hey who wasis it that spent the 2nd most amount of money in the MLB until last yearand has only won 2 championships in the past 90 years? I already know the answer but i wanna hear you say it.</P>


maybe the redsox should actually ACQUIRE the talent they try to get instead of sucking at managing a baseball team?</P>


</P>


I believe the Sox spent something like $80MM less than the Yankees. The Yankshad a bad organization, they had a poor farm system, poor GM, bad ownership and the only way they could win was via checkbook.</P>


I get it...its OK. You can root for that if you want.</P>


Unfortunately, they are still the champs.</P>

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 01:35 PM
I never said you were. Being the champions of the 2009 season makes you the current champs until another champion is crowned.
Thumb tack and a feather. Start knocking down the wall...

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:36 PM
Joslyn James pulled the trigger on her website, splashing more than 100 text messages Tiger Woods allegedly sent her --
<div id="TixyyLink" style="border: medium none ; overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">
The site, sextingjoslynjames.com, includes texts that say:
</div>
- OK, I would like to have a threesome with you and another girl you trust.
- I want to treat you rough, throw you around, spank and slap you
- Have you ever had a golden shower done to you? ... just morbid curiosity.
- You are my f**king *****. Hold you down while I choke you

It's
interesting ... Joslyn has omitted the messages she sent to Tiger, so
we don't know what she said that may have egged him on.

<iframe style="margin: 5px; float: right;" border="0" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1099&amp;view=184600&amp;pollId=18489 2&amp;channel=tmz.com2" frameborder="0" height="120" scrolling="no" width="175"></iframe>And
then there's this, on September 8, 2009: "Having a few issues at home.
Might be a little later before I see you tonight." That text is
followed by "parent hood melt down :)"

And the last message is
dated October 4, 2009. It says, "Don't f**king talk to me. You almost
just ruined my whole life. If my agent and these guys would have seen
you there, F**k."<div id="TixyyLink" style="border: medium none ; overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">
</div><div id="TixyyLink" style="border: medium none ; overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">

</div>

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 01:37 PM
until the Sox replace them.</p>



There is no replacing the Yanks Morehead. You know that...[;)]
</p>


For buying championships?....I agree.</p>


Look, in June, if you ask 100 baseball fans "Who's the current champ of MLB?" All 100 would say "The Yankees".</p>


Not one, not even dark Meyerbud would answer..."Well you know there really is no current champion because technically the championship is vacated when the first pitch is throw in April"</p>



</p>


hey who wasis it that spent the 2nd most amount of money in the MLB until last yearand has only won 2 championships in the past 90 years? I already know the answer but i wanna hear you say it.</p>


maybe the redsox should actually ACQUIRE the talent they try to get instead of sucking at managing a baseball team?</p>


</p>


I believe the Sox spent something like $80MM less than the Yankees. The Yankshad a bad organization, they had a poor farm system, poor GM, bad ownership and the only way they could win was via checkbook.</p>


I get it...its OK. You can root for that if you want.</p>


Unfortunately, they are still the champs.</p>bad farm system? ok now we know your talking out of your butt. the sox
can go toe to toe with yanks on and off the field, especially cash
wise. they chose not to spend the money. be mad at the sox not the
yanks.

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:37 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:41 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?
</P>


You're being silly. As I have said three times, I never said that they are the champions of the 2010 season. That champion will not be crowned until November. Until then the Yankees are the champs.</P>


In your little scenario, the team who wins the championship in Novenmber was actually the champions for all of 2010, but didn't know it.</P>

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 01:41 PM
until the Sox replace them.</P>



There is no replacing the Yanks Morehead. You know that...[;)]
</P>


For buying championships?....I agree.</P>


Look, in June, if you ask 100 baseball fans "Who's the current champ of MLB?" All 100 would say "The Yankees".</P>


Not one, not even dark Meyerbud would answer..."Well you know there really is no current champion because technically the championship is vacated when the first pitch is throw in April"</P>


</P>


hey who wasis it that spent the 2nd most amount of money in the MLB until last yearand has only won 2 championships in the past 90 years? I already know the answer but i wanna hear you say it.</P>


maybe the redsox should actually ACQUIRE the talent they try to get instead of sucking at managing a baseball team?</P>


</P>


I believe the Sox spent something like $80MM less than the Yankees. The Yankshad a bad organization, they had a poor farm system, poor GM, bad ownership and the only way they could win was via checkbook.</P>


I get it...its OK. You can root for that if you want.</P>


Unfortunately, they are still the champs.</P>


</P>


Say what you will, you'll never win the argument with me because the Red Sox do the same thing as the Yanks. Actually let me rephrase....
The redsox TRY to do the same thing as the Yanks but fail miserably. They can never land the top free agent talent, are never willing to match contracts(although they have the money to do so but apparently have an extremely greedy organization, and everyone seems to think that nobody wants to play in Boston. So ask yourself...are you a fan of a quitting team? Are you fans ofa team that only tries half as hard to win? You should have stuck withpinstripes in the 70s when you switched to the Sox, youd have5 more rings than your current team!</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:43 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?
</p>


You're being silly. As I have said three times, I never said that they are the champions of the 2010 season. That champion will not be crowned until November. Until then the Yankees are the champs.</p>


In your little scenario, the team who wins the championship in Novenmber was actually the champions for all of 2010, but didn't know it.</p>

defending champs

there is no champs of 2010 yet

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:44 PM
big east having a bad start to the tourny

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 01:46 PM
Joslyn James pulled the trigger on her website, splashing more than 100 text messages Tiger Woods allegedly sent her --
<div id="TixyyLink" style="border: medium none ; overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">
The site, sextingjoslynjames.com, includes texts that say:
</div>
- OK, I would like to have a threesome with you and another girl you trust.
- I want to treat you rough, throw you around, spank and slap you
- Have you ever had a golden shower done to you? ... just morbid curiosity.
- You are my f**king *****. Hold you down while I choke you

It's
interesting ... Joslyn has omitted the messages she sent to Tiger, so
we don't know what she said that may have egged him on.

<iframe style="margin: 5px; float: right;" border="0" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1099&amp;view=184600&amp;pollId=18489 2&amp;channel=tmz.com2" width="175" frameborder="0" height="120" scrolling="no"></iframe>And
then there's this, on September 8, 2009: "Having a few issues at home.
Might be a little later before I see you tonight." That text is
followed by "parent hood melt down :)"

And the last message is
dated October 4, 2009. It says, "Don't f**king talk to me. You almost
just ruined my whole life. If my agent and these guys would have seen
you there, F**k."<div id="TixyyLink" style="border: medium none ; overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">
</div><div id="TixyyLink" style="border: medium none ; overflow: hidden; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: transparent; text-align: left; text-decoration: none;">

</div>first glance i thought it said "spank a skank" hahaha
tigers into golden showers ehh??? what a scumbag.

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 01:47 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?
</p>


You're being silly. As I have said three times, I never said that they are the champions of the 2010 season. That champion will not be crowned until November. Until then the Yankees are the champs.</p>


In your little scenario, the team who wins the championship in Novenmber was actually the champions for all of 2010, but didn't know it.</p>

defending champs

there is no champs of 2010 yet



Are the defending champs the champs?

Yes or No

I know it's virtually impossible for you to give one word answers but try?

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 01:48 PM
until the Sox replace them.</p>



There is no replacing the Yanks Morehead. You know that...[;)]
</p>


For buying championships?....I agree.</p>


Look, in June, if you ask 100 baseball fans "Who's the current champ of MLB?" All 100 would say "The Yankees".</p>


Not one, not even dark Meyerbud would answer..."Well you know there really is no current champion because technically the championship is vacated when the first pitch is throw in April"</p>


</p>


hey who wasis it that spent the 2nd most amount of money in the MLB until last yearand has only won 2 championships in the past 90 years? I already know the answer but i wanna hear you say it.</p>


maybe the redsox should actually ACQUIRE the talent they try to get instead of sucking at managing a baseball team?</p>


</p>


I believe the Sox spent something like $80MM less than the Yankees. The Yankshad a bad organization, they had a poor farm system, poor GM, bad ownership and the only way they could win was via checkbook.</p>


I get it...its OK. You can root for that if you want.</p>


Unfortunately, they are still the champs.</p>


</p>


Say what you will, you'll never win the argument with me because the Red Sox do the same thing as the Yanks. Actually let me rephrase....
The redsox TRY to do the same thing as the Yanks but fail miserably. They can never land the top free agent talent, are never willing to match contracts(although they have the money to do so but apparently have an extremely greedy organization, and everyone seems to think that nobody wants to play in Boston. So ask yourself...are you a fan of a quitting team? Are you fans ofa team that only tries half as hard to win? You should have stuck withpinstripes in the 70s when you switched to the Sox, youd have5 more rings than your current team!</p>morehead was a yankee fan!?!?!?! why wasnt i told?!? im taking my z's back morehead, i mean traitor.

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:50 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?
</p>


You're being silly. As I have said three times, I never said that they are the champions of the 2010 season. That champion will not be crowned until November. Until then the Yankees are the champs.</p>


In your little scenario, the team who wins the championship in Novenmber was actually the champions for all of 2010, but didn't know it.</p>

defending champs

there is no champs of 2010 yet



Are the defending champs the champs?

Yes or No

I know it's virtually impossible for you to give one word answers but try?


NO

there is no champs of the 2010 season yet

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:50 PM
whats the main purpose of a running back?

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 01:51 PM
I wonder why Matt is changing the subject? lol

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:51 PM
until the Sox replace them.</P>



There is no replacing the Yanks Morehead. You know that...[;)]
</P>


For buying championships?....I agree.</P>


Look, in June, if you ask 100 baseball fans "Who's the current champ of MLB?" All 100 would say "The Yankees".</P>


Not one, not even dark Meyerbud would answer..."Well you know there really is no current champion because technically the championship is vacated when the first pitch is throw in April"</P>



</P>


hey who wasis it that spent the 2nd most amount of money in the MLB until last yearand has only won 2 championships in the past 90 years? I already know the answer but i wanna hear you say it.</P>


maybe the redsox should actually ACQUIRE the talent they try to get instead of sucking at managing a baseball team?</P>


</P>


I believe the Sox spent something like $80MM less than the Yankees. The Yankshad a bad organization, they had a poor farm system, poor GM, bad ownership and the only way they could win was via checkbook.</P>


I get it...its OK. You can root for that if you want.</P>


Unfortunately, they are still the champs.</P>


bad farm system? ok now we know your talking out of your butt. the sox can go toe to toe with yanks on and off the field, especially cash wise. they chose not to spend the money. be mad at the sox not the yanks.</P>


I admit that post was a bit harsh. Point is they weren't good enough to win unless they bought C.C, Teixera and Burnett. They were an 85 win team, and had to overpay for all three.</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:53 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?
</P>


You're being silly. As I have said three times, I never said that they are the champions of the 2010 season. That champion will not be crowned until November. Until then the Yankees are the champs.</P>


In your little scenario, the team who wins the championship in Novenmber was actually the champions for all of 2010, but didn't know it.</P>




defending champs

there is no champs of 2010 yet



Are the defending champs the champs?

Yes or No

I know it's virtually impossible for you to give one word answers but try?


NO

there is no champs of the 2010 season yet
</P>


Finally you figured it out. I agree.</P>


There is only the 2009 champion, which is the current champ.</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:53 PM
I wonder why Matt is changing the subject? lol


actualyl that was the very first long dragged out debated from the members of THEE thread...

before ur time junior

it was me &amp; elitoshockey vs daven and jbgiants

daven and jb would go on to be arch nemisis...

it was like WWF

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:54 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?
</p>


You're being silly. As I have said three times, I never said that they are the champions of the 2010 season. That champion will not be crowned until November. Until then the Yankees are the champs.</p>


In your little scenario, the team who wins the championship in Novenmber was actually the champions for all of 2010, but didn't know it.</p>




defending champs

there is no champs of 2010 yet



Are the defending champs the champs?

Yes or No

I know it's virtually impossible for you to give one word answers but try?


NO

there is no champs of the 2010 season yet
</p>


Finally you figured it out. I agree.</p>


There is only the 2009 champion, which is the current champ.</p>

last years champ isn't currently champion... there is no current champion (once the season starts), thats why they are playing... to figure that all out

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:55 PM
I wonder why Matt is changing the subject? lol


actualyl that was the very first long dragged out debated from the members of THEE thread...

before ur time junior

it was me &amp; elitoshockey vs daven and jbgiants

daven and jb would go on to be arch nemisis...

it was like WWF
</P>


OMG, that debate went months. Friggin JB and Daven. The original odd couple.</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:56 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?
</P>


You're being silly. As I have said three times, I never said that they are the champions of the 2010 season. That champion will not be crowned until November. Until then the Yankees are the champs.</P>


In your little scenario, the team who wins the championship in Novenmber was actually the champions for all of 2010, but didn't know it.</P>




defending champs

there is no champs of 2010 yet



Are the defending champs the champs?

Yes or No

I know it's virtually impossible for you to give one word answers but try?


NO

there is no champs of the 2010 season yet
</P>


Finally you figured it out. I agree.</P>


There is only the 2009 champion, which is the current champ.</P>




last years champ isn't currently champion... there is no current champion (once the season starts), thats why they are playing... to figure that all out
</P>


So if someone came up to you in June and said.."Hey Matt, the champs are looking good this year", you would have no idea what they were talking about.</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 01:57 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?
</p>


You're being silly. As I have said three times, I never said that they are the champions of the 2010 season. That champion will not be crowned until November. Until then the Yankees are the champs.</p>


In your little scenario, the team who wins the championship in Novenmber was actually the champions for all of 2010, but didn't know it.</p>




defending champs

there is no champs of 2010 yet



Are the defending champs the champs?

Yes or No

I know it's virtually impossible for you to give one word answers but try?


NO

there is no champs of the 2010 season yet
</p>


Finally you figured it out. I agree.</p>


There is only the 2009 champion, which is the current champ.</p>




last years champ isn't currently champion... there is no current champion (once the season starts), thats why they are playing... to figure that all out
</p>


So if someone came up to you in June and said.."Hey Matt, the champs are looking good this year", you would have no idea what they were talking about.</p>

i would assume they meant defending champs and go on with my day

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 01:59 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?
</P>


You're being silly. As I have said three times, I never said that they are the champions of the 2010 season. That champion will not be crowned until November. Until then the Yankees are the champs.</P>


In your little scenario, the team who wins the championship in Novenmber was actually the champions for all of 2010, but didn't know it.</P>




defending champs

there is no champs of 2010 yet



Are the defending champs the champs?

Yes or No

I know it's virtually impossible for you to give one word answers but try?


NO

there is no champs of the 2010 season yet
</P>


Finally you figured it out. I agree.</P>


There is only the 2009 champion, which is the current champ.</P>




last years champ isn't currently champion... there is no current champion (once the season starts), thats why they are playing... to figure that all out
</P>


So if someone came up to you in June and said.."Hey Matt, the champs are looking good this year", you would have no idea what they were talking about.</P>




i would assume they meant defending champs and go on with my day
</P>


I knew you would say that.</P>


You lose.</P>


I'm drinking the milk and kissing the girl as we speak.</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 02:01 PM
drinking the milk and kissing the girl?

what the hell does that mean

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 02:02 PM
drinking the milk and kissing the girl?

what the hell does that mean
</P>


Its auto racing tradition.</P>


Kids Today!!!!</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 02:03 PM
drinking the milk and kissing the girl?

what the hell does that mean
</p>


Its auto racing tradition.</p>


Kids Today!!!!</p>

age has nothing to do with it, i'll never be "hip" to nascar lingo

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 02:04 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnn

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 02:06 PM
drinking the milk and kissing the girl?

what the hell does that mean
</P>


Its auto racing tradition.</P>


Kids Today!!!!</P>




age has nothing to do with it, i'll never be "hip" to nascar lingo
</P>


nor should any upstanding, respectable U.S. citizen.</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 02:07 PM
drinking the milk and kissing the girl?

what the hell does that mean
</p>


Its auto racing tradition.</p>


Kids Today!!!!</p>




age has nothing to do with it, i'll never be "hip" to nascar lingo
</p>


nor should any upstanding, respectable U.S. citizen.</p>

amen

bandwgn86
03-18-2010, 02:10 PM
afternoon folks.. just incase any of you have Nike-Bauer hockey sticks DO NOT eat them you may get lead poison.. lol

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 02:10 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?
</p>


You're being silly. As I have said three times, I never said that they are the champions of the 2010 season. That champion will not be crowned until November. Until then the Yankees are the champs.</p>


In your little scenario, the team who wins the championship in Novenmber was actually the champions for all of 2010, but didn't know it.</p>




defending champs

there is no champs of 2010 yet



Are the defending champs the champs?

Yes or No

I know it's virtually impossible for you to give one word answers but try?


NO

there is no champs of the 2010 season yet
</p>


Finally you figured it out. I agree.</p>


There is only the 2009 champion, which is the current champ.</p>

last years champ isn't currently champion... there is no current champion (once the season starts), thats why they are playing... to figure that all out
then what the hells a defending champ? lmao

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 02:11 PM
drinking the milk and kissing the girl?

what the hell does that mean
</P>


Its auto racing tradition.</P>


Kids Today!!!!</P>




age has nothing to do with it, i'll never be "hip" to nascar lingo
</P>


Its more of an open wheel racing tradition.</P>

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 02:12 PM
afternoon folks.. just incase any of you have Nike-Bauer hockey sticks DO NOT eat them you may get lead poison.. lol</P>


ooooooh...dont swing that at someone's mouth lol</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 02:12 PM
defending champ means your still the champ until someone proves otherwise. but matts right the yankee are not the champs of 2010, but theyre still the current champs until someone else wins the ws.


they were last years champs... they are about to start the process of defending the title this year
what are they defending if theyre no longer champs? defending champs still means your the champ.
in boxing, on fight night, floyds the champ. hes defending HIS title as champion.


they are defending last years championship
aaand they still wear the crown until someone else wins. defending champ=champ.

im done.haha


how can they be champ of a year wher enobody was crownd champ?
</p>


You're being silly. As I have said three times, I never said that they are the champions of the 2010 season. That champion will not be crowned until November. Until then the Yankees are the champs.</p>


In your little scenario, the team who wins the championship in Novenmber was actually the champions for all of 2010, but didn't know it.</p>




defending champs

there is no champs of 2010 yet



Are the defending champs the champs?

Yes or No

I know it's virtually impossible for you to give one word answers but try?


NO

there is no champs of the 2010 season yet
</p>


Finally you figured it out. I agree.</p>


There is only the 2009 champion, which is the current champ.</p>

last years champ isn't currently champion... there is no current champion (once the season starts), thats why they are playing... to figure that all out
then what the hells a defending champ? lmao

im not going in circles with this again

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 02:13 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnn</P>


Pizzle Stick saying something negative about the Sox. What a shock.</P>


</P>


Not worth reacting to. If you say something less predictable, I'm glad to respond.</P>

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 02:13 PM
ughhh it got crazy here... i miss anything exciting?

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 02:15 PM
ughhh it got crazy here... i miss anything exciting?</P>


Just the usual Matt being wrong.</P>

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 02:16 PM
ughhh it got crazy here... i miss anything exciting?</P>


Just the usual Matt being wrong.</P>

LOL look what i found.... i forgot about this!
http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t287/mand8201/thefab5final.jpg

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 02:18 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 02:19 PM
ughhh it got crazy here... i miss anything exciting?</p>


Just the usual Matt being wrong.</p>

she agreed with the Ty Warren thing actually poppy

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 02:22 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnn</P>


Pizzle Stick saying something negative about the Sox. What a shock.</P>


</P>


Not worth reacting to. If you say something less predictable, I'm glad to respond.</P>


</P>


smells like defeat in this thread....</P>

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 02:25 PM
drinking the milk and kissing the girl?

what the hell does that mean
</p>


Its auto racing tradition.</p>


Kids Today!!!!</p>

age has nothing to do with it, i'll never be "hip" to nascar lingo

Its the Indy 500 tradition to the winner

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/7541/amilk.jpg

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 02:27 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</P>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</P>

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 02:27 PM
guess what guys. sandra bullock is single and im gonna wife that.
jesse james has been cheating on her. how the **** can anyone cheat on her? not only is she gorgeous, but she seems like a really cool woman and down to earth.

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 02:29 PM
http://l.yimg.com/g/images/spaceball.gif

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 02:29 PM
guess what guys. sandra bullock is single and im gonna wife that.

UT OHHH MATTY..........

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 02:29 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</p>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</p>for what? back then all you had to say is "1918, eat my dong". ohhh morehead......

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 02:31 PM
guess what guys. sandra bullock is single and im gonna wife that.

UT OHHH MATTY..........youd hit it too dont lie.[:P]

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 02:32 PM
4 minutes away from the biggest upset of the tourney...

<h1 class="matchup" id="matchup-ncb-300770222"><div class="team away"><div class="logo-medium"><font size="3">http://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/ncaa/50x50/2523.png</font></div><div class="team-info"><h3><font size="3"><span class="rank">(15)</span> Robert Morris (http://scores.espn.go.com/ncb/clubhouse?teamId=2523) <span>55</span></font></h3>

<font size="3">(23-11, 15-3 NEC)</font></p></div></div><div class="team home"><div class="logo-medium"><font size="3">http://a.espncdn.com/i/teamlogos/ncaa/50x50/222.png</font></div><div class="team-info"><h3><font size="3"><span class="rank">(2)</span> Villanova (http://scores.espn.go.com/ncb/clubhouse?teamId=222) <span>47</span></font></h3>

<font size="3">(24-7, 13-5 Big East)</font></p></div></div></h1>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 02:34 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</P>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</P>


for what? back then all you had to say is "1918, eat my dong". ohhh morehead......
</P>


They were a laughing stock in 67 and 68. They finished (I believe) ninth in both years and the Sox won the pennant in 67. Which started a run of 17 straight winning seasons.</P>


As a matter of fact no team in MLB during the period of 1967 thru today has had more winning seasons than the Red Sox.</P>

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 02:39 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</P>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</P>


</P>


So basically you were tired of kids picking on you? You never got into fights over your favorite teams? you *****</P>


lol</P>

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 02:40 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</p>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</p>


for what? back then all you had to say is "1918, eat my dong". ohhh morehead......
</p>


They were a laughing stock in 67 and 68. They finished (I believe) ninth in both years and the Sox won the pennant in 67. Which started a run of 17 straight winning seasons.</p>


As a matter of fact no team in MLB during the period of 1967 thru today has had more winning seasons than the Red Sox.</p>is that how you deal with all those postseason failures?[:)]

so to put it politely your a front running bandwagoned bastad

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 02:41 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</P>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</P>


for what? back then all you had to say is "1918, eat my dong". ohhh morehead......
</P>


They were a laughing stock in 67 and 68. They finished (I believe) ninth in both years and the Sox won the pennant in 67. Which started a run of 17 straight winning seasons.</P>


As a matter of fact no team in MLB during the period of 1967 thru today has had more winning seasons than the Red Sox.</P>


</P>


I kinda wish you just said "I didn't watch any baseball for 20 years" at least than I could relate without caring. I just find it difficult to understand switching favorite teams just cuz one sucks.</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 02:45 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</P>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</P>


</P>


So basically you were tired of kids picking on you? You never got into fights over your favorite teams? you *****</P>


lol</P>


</P>


CT shoreline was Red Sox/Giants country. I also liked the pathetic Yankees too. There was no Red Sox/Yankees rivalry at that time.</P>


The Yanks were just a bad team.</P>

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 02:46 PM
CT shoreline was Red Sox/Giants country. I also liked the pathetic Yankees too. There was no Red Sox/Yankees rivalry at that time.


The Yanks were just a bad team.</P>


</P>


the skins suck...do we not have adivision rivalry with them?</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 02:46 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</P>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</P>


for what? back then all you had to say is "1918, eat my dong". ohhh morehead......
</P>


They were a laughing stock in 67 and 68. They finished (I believe) ninth in both years and the Sox won the pennant in 67. Which started a run of 17 straight winning seasons.</P>


As a matter of fact no team in MLB during the period of 1967 thru today has had more winning seasons than the Red Sox.</P>


</P>


I kinda wish you just said "I didn't watch any baseball for 20 years" at least than I could relate without caring. I just find it difficult to understand switching favorite teams just cuz one sucks.</P>


</P>


Be careful.</P>


I was a Red Sox fan 10 years before you were born.</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 02:47 PM
CT shoreline was Red Sox/Giants country. I also liked the pathetic Yankees too. There was no Red Sox/Yankees rivalry at that time.


The Yanks were just a bad team.</P>


</P>


the skins suck...do we not have adivision rivalry with them?</P>


</P>


There were no divisions then. Just 10 team leagues.</P>

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 02:51 PM
CT shoreline was Red Sox/Giants country. I also liked the pathetic Yankees too. There was no Red Sox/Yankees rivalry at that time.


The Yanks were just a bad team.</p>


</p>


the skins suck...do we not have adivision rivalry with them?</p>


</p>


There were no divisions then. Just 10 team leagues.</p>yea my great uncle was real big into baseball and stopped watching after they introduced the divisions. he was a brookyn dogder fan so i guess that was the last straw. i remember one 4th of july party he was just going off on wild card games (for football too) and all the divion series.

bandwgn86
03-18-2010, 02:52 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</P>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</P>


for what? back then all you had to say is "1918, eat my dong". ohhh morehead......
</P>


They were a laughing stock in 67 and 68. They finished (I believe) ninth in both years and the Sox won the pennant in 67. Which started a run of 17 straight winning seasons.</P>


As a matter of fact no team in MLB during the period of 1967 thru today has had more winning seasons than the Red Sox.</P>is that how you deal with all those postseason failures?[:)]

so to put it politely your a front running <FONT color=#0000ff>bandwagon</FONT>ed <FONT color=#0000ff>bastad</FONT>
oh really

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 02:57 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</P>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</P>


for what? back then all you had to say is "1918, eat my dong". ohhh morehead......
</P>


They were a laughing stock in 67 and 68. They finished (I believe) ninth in both years and the Sox won the pennant in 67. Which started a run of 17 straight winning seasons.</P>


As a matter of fact no team in MLB during the period of 1967 thru today has had more winning seasons than the Red Sox.</P>


</P>


I kinda wish you just said "I didn't watch any baseball for 20 years" at least than I could relate without caring. I just find it difficult to understand switching favorite teams just cuz one sucks.</P>


</P>


Be careful.</P>


I was a Red Sox fan 10 years before you were born.</P>


</P>


Well I was born a Yankee and Giants fan, so theres the difference between us.</P>


And there's the age card again. I can make a quick hundred if I got $5 from you every time you pulled it.</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 02:57 PM
i never knew Bob Papa did college basketball. Hes on the radio with John Thompson right now

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 02:58 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</p>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</p>


for what? back then all you had to say is "1918, eat my dong". ohhh morehead......
</p>


They were a laughing stock in 67 and 68. They finished (I believe) ninth in both years and the Sox won the pennant in 67. Which started a run of 17 straight winning seasons.</p>


As a matter of fact no team in MLB during the period of 1967 thru today has had more winning seasons than the Red Sox.</p>is that how you deal with all those postseason failures?[:)]

so to put it politely your a front running <font color="#0000ff">bandwagon</font>ed <font color="#0000ff">bastad</font>
oh reallyi knew youd nitpick that. haha. ok how about fair weather fan

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 03:00 PM
so to put it politely your a front running <FONT color=#0000ff>bandwagon</FONT>ed <FONT color=#0000ff>bastad</FONT>
oh really</P>


=O he forgot canadian....how dare he!</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 03:03 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</P>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</P>


for what? back then all you had to say is "1918, eat my dong". ohhh morehead......
</P>


They were a laughing stock in 67 and 68. They finished (I believe) ninth in both years and the Sox won the pennant in 67. Which started a run of 17 straight winning seasons.</P>


As a matter of fact no team in MLB during the period of 1967 thru today has had more winning seasons than the Red Sox.</P>


</P>


I kinda wish you just said "I didn't watch any baseball for 20 years" at least than I could relate without caring. I just find it difficult to understand switching favorite teams just cuz one sucks.</P>


</P>


Be careful.</P>


I was a Red Sox fan 10 years before you were born.</P>


</P>


Well I was born a Yankee and Giants fan, so theres the difference between us.</P>


And there's the age card again. I can make a quick hundred if I got $5 from you every time you pulled it.</P>


</P>


No, not at all. I was suggesting that my fandom should not be questioned.</P>


That would create a huge problem with us.</P>

bandwgn86
03-18-2010, 03:07 PM
I write a paragraph flaming the sox and nobody says a word....damn either you guys are STILL arguing over the stupidest **** like you always are, or im losing my touch. daaaammmnnnnwell i agreed with everything you said soo. and i was shocked to learn moreheads a former yankee fan
</P>


When I was a little kid. I liked the Red Sox at the same time. In 67 and 68 the Yankees were not good. The Sox fans laughed at Yankee fans at that time.</P>


for what? back then all you had to say is "1918, eat my dong". ohhh morehead......
</P>


They were a laughing stock in 67 and 68. They finished (I believe) ninth in both years and the Sox won the pennant in 67. Which started a run of 17 straight winning seasons.</P>


As a matter of fact no team in MLB during the period of 1967 thru today has had more winning seasons than the Red Sox.</P>is that how you deal with all those postseason failures?[:)]

so to put it politely your a front running <FONT color=#0000ff>bandwagon</FONT>ed <FONT color=#0000ff>bastad</FONT>
oh reallyi knew youd nitpick that. haha. ok how about fair weather fan
lol.. whats so wrong with bandwagon fans, everyones gotta start somewhere..

bandwgn86
03-18-2010, 03:09 PM
the J's are puting an *** whoopin on the O's lol 11-2.. be afraid!

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 03:10 PM
i question ur fanhood moorehead

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 03:12 PM
i question ur fanhood moorehead

LOL define predictable.

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 03:12 PM
i question ur fanhood moorehead
</P>


Yeah but you know better.</P>

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 03:13 PM
WTF is villanova doing... if they lose my brackets is royally ****ed.

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 03:13 PM
the J's are puting an *** whoopin on the O's lol 11-2.. be afraid! </P>


If only every month was March, Bandy!</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 03:16 PM
i question ur fanhood moorehead
</p>


Yeah but you know better.</p>

i dunno, makin the switch from yanks to sox.... anything is possible with that on the resume

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 03:21 PM
i question ur fanhood moorehead
</P>


Yeah but you know better.</P>




i dunno, makin the switch from yanks to sox.... anything is possible with that on the resume
</P>


Tell me more.</P>

bandwgn86
03-18-2010, 03:22 PM
the J's are puting an *** whoopin on the O's lol 11-2.. be afraid! </P>


If only every month was March, Bandy!</P>


i didn't mind April May June last year, after that not so much [:(] ohh but then we did have a real good Sept, where we kicked Bostons butt in a sweep.. </P>


its all i got MH please let me havethis lol</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 03:27 PM
the J's are puting an *** whoopin on the O's lol 11-2.. be afraid! </P>


If only every month was March, Bandy!</P>


i didn't mind April May June last year, after that not so much [:(] ohh but then we did have a real good Sept, where we kicked Bostons butt in a sweep.. </P>


its all i got MH please let me havethis lol</P>


</P>


Well, since you asked nicely.....</P>

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 03:32 PM
instead of finishing a debate with morehead with my usual "fair nuff" closing....i'm gonna totally change it up with:

That'll do h0nkey, that'll do</P>


edit- wtf, you cant say h0nkey?? lmao</P>

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 03:33 PM
so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 03:34 PM
i question ur fanhood moorehead
</p>


Yeah but you know better.</p>




i dunno, makin the switch from yanks to sox.... anything is possible with that on the resume
</p>


Tell me more.</p>

u may end up a pats fan, who knows

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 03:34 PM
so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</P>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 03:35 PM
i question ur fanhood moorehead
</P>


Yeah but you know better.</P>




i dunno, makin the switch from yanks to sox.... anything is possible with that on the resume
</P>


Tell me more.</P>




u may end up a pats fan, who knows
</P>


I hate you.</P>

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 03:39 PM
so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</p>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</p>he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 03:40 PM
thats not very nice

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 03:41 PM
so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</P>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</P>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</P>


Bobby Murcer was going to be the next Micky Mantle. It was a dumb trade. My little heart was broken.</P>

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 03:42 PM
so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</P>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</P>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</P>


i LOVED Bobby Murcer!!! I dont mind Michael Kay at all thought.
Generally speaking, I like all the yankees broadcasters, tv and radio both. can't complain. Except that one woman on the radio...cant remember her name, but she annoys me.</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 03:45 PM
s






so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</p>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</p>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</p>


i LOVED Bobby Murcer!!! I dont mind Michael Kay at all thought.
Generally speaking, I like all the yankees broadcasters, tv and radio both. can't complain. Except that one woman on the radio...cant remember her name, but she annoys me.</p>

susan waldman

blehhhh

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 03:47 PM
so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</p>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</p>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</p>


Bobby Murcer was going to be the next Micky Mantle. It was a dumb trade. My little heart was broken.</p>stat wise no way. icon wise..........no way

patsrule666
03-18-2010, 03:48 PM
i question ur fanhood moorehead
</P>


Yeah but you know better.</P>




i dunno, makin the switch from yanks to sox.... anything is possible with that on the resume
</P>


Tell me more.</P>




u may end up a pats fan, who knows
He already is....It just hasnt hit home yet..............</P>


Could be worse, he could be a Eagles or Jets fan.....</P>

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 03:50 PM
s






so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</p>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</p>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</p>


i LOVED Bobby Murcer!!! I dont mind Michael Kay at all thought.
Generally speaking, I like all the yankees broadcasters, tv and radio both. can't complain. Except that one woman on the radio...cant remember her name, but she annoys me.</p>

susan waldman

blehhhh
yea cant do it.

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 03:55 PM
s






so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</P>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</P>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</P>


i LOVED Bobby Murcer!!! I dont mind Michael Kay at all thought.
Generally speaking, I like all the yankees broadcasters, tv and radio both. can't complain. Except that one woman on the radio...cant remember her name, but she annoys me.</P>




susan waldman

blehhhh
yea cant do it.
</P>


THE WORST!!!!

I was driving home from mass this september from a wedding, listening to a yanks/rays game on the radio(to get the boston accent the **** out of my head, and welcome myself back to NY), and she was like, well it's michaels birthday, and i actually made a cake today, and they were talking about it for awhile, and you could HEAR them eating cake which was kinda funny...but all I kept thinking was Get your *** BACK to the kitchen and stay there!!! =P</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 03:56 PM
so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</P>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</P>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</P>


Bobby Murcer was going to be the next Micky Mantle. It was a dumb trade. My little heart was broken.</P>


stat wise no way. icon wise..........no way
</P>


As I said, he "was" going to be the next Micky Mantle. That was the line back in '69. He was going to be the next evolution of centerfielders. DiMaggio/Mantle/Murcer.</P>


Kind of like Williams/Yastzremski/Rice in left at Fenway. (our guys were better)</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 03:58 PM
s






so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</P>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</P>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</P>


i LOVED Bobby Murcer!!! I dont mind Michael Kay at all thought.
Generally speaking, I like all the yankees broadcasters, tv and radio both. can't complain. Except that one woman on the radio...cant remember her name, but she annoys me.</P>




susan waldman

blehhhh
yea cant do it.
</P>


THE WORST!!!!

I was driving home from mass this september from a wedding, listening to a yanks/rays game on the radio(to get the boston accent the **** out of my head, and welcome myself back to NY), and she was like, well it's michaels birthday, and i actually made a cake today, and they were talking about it for awhile, and you could HEAR them eating cake which was kinda funny...but all I kept thinking was Get your *** BACK to the kitchen and stay there!!! =P</P>


</P>


Susan Waldman is a Red Sox fan.</P>


I'm not joking. Thats actually true.</P>

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 03:59 PM
so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</P>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</P>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</P>


Bobby Murcer was going to be the next Micky Mantle. It was a dumb trade. My little heart was broken.</P>


stat wise no way. icon wise..........no way
</P>


As I said, he "was" going to be the next Micky Mantle. That was the line back in '69. He was going to be the next evolution of centerfielders. DiMaggio/Mantle/Murcer.</P>


Kind of like Williams/Yastzremski/Rice in left at Fenway. (our guys were better)</P>


</P>


you mean Jim Rice, the most overrated player of all time? hmm, i will confidently disagree due to that. lol</P>

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 04:01 PM
so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</P>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</P>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</P>


Bobby Murcer was going to be the next Micky Mantle. It was a dumb trade. My little heart was broken.</P>


stat wise no way. icon wise..........no way
</P>


As I said, he "was" going to be the next Micky Mantle. That was the line back in '69. He was going to be the next evolution of centerfielders. DiMaggio/Mantle/Murcer.</P>


Kind of like Williams/Yastzremski/Rice in left at Fenway. (our guys were better)</P>


</P>


you mean Jim Rice, the most overrated player of all time? hmm, i will confidently disagree due to that. lol</P>


</P>


For a 10 year period, he was the best power hitter in the AL. You have no idea how good he was.</P>

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 04:03 PM
i wont be here to finish this argument unfortunately, but I leave you with this:

If Rice was so good, then why did Red Sox Nation have to petition and campaign their asses off EVERY YEAR he was eligible to get him into the hall? I rest my case.</P>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jim_Rice_Jersey_Sign.JPG</P>


i like how they included some minor league stats in there...lmao</P>

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 04:05 PM
im up out this mutha****a! talk to you guys tomorrow. im in serious need of a nap when I get home lol</P>


love yas lots! nohomo, son...nohomo</P>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 04:06 PM
so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</p>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</p>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</p>


Bobby Murcer was going to be the next Micky Mantle. It was a dumb trade. My little heart was broken.</p>


stat wise no way. icon wise..........no way
</p>


As I said, he "was" going to be the next Micky Mantle. That was the line back in '69. He was going to be the next evolution of centerfielders. DiMaggio/Mantle/Murcer.</p>


Kind of like Williams/Yastzremski/Rice in left at Fenway. (our guys were better)</p>


</p>


you mean Jim Rice, the most overrated player of all time? hmm, i will confidently disagree due to that. lol</p>


</p>


For a 10 year period, he was the best power hitter in the AL. You have no idea how good he was.</p>

did he ever make it into the hall

Morehead State
03-18-2010, 04:07 PM
i wont be here to finish this argument unfortunately, but I leave you with this:

If Rice was so good, then why did Red Sox Nation have to petition and campaign their asses off EVERY YEAR he was eligible to get him into the hall? I rest my case.</P>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jim_Rice_Jersey_Sign.JPG</P>


i like how they included some minor league stats in there...lmao</P>


</P>


Because Jim Rice was cranky. The media hated him. Thats why it took so long for him to get into the Hall of Fame.</P>


From 75 thru 86, he had 100 RBI's 8 times and hit .300 7 times. </P>


Ended with a career .298 average.</P>


Just happens to be the exact same as a particular Yankee great.</P>


And this was before the steroid era.</P>

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 04:09 PM
so morehead, is there any strand of that childhood loyalty left for the yanks?
</p>


Not since they traded Bobby Murcer for Bobby Bonds.</p>


he came back!!!you missed all those years of him announcing because of your stubbornness, tisk tisk morehead.

i miss his knowledge. michael kay can only keep my attention for so long.
</p>


Bobby Murcer was going to be the next Micky Mantle. It was a dumb trade. My little heart was broken.</p>


stat wise no way. icon wise..........no way
</p>


As I said, he "was" going to be the next Micky Mantle. That was the line back in '69. He was going to be the next evolution of centerfielders. DiMaggio/Mantle/Murcer.</p>


Kind of like Williams/Yastzremski/Rice in left at Fenway. (our guys were better)</p>ok i can see what your saying there. im not touching the last part as its pure rubbishhhh.
but ill give you this one
http://artfiles.art.com/5/p/LRG/9/936/17TX000Z/ted-williams-mickey-mantle.jpg


CRUSHHH
http://blog.cleveland.com/startingblocks/2009/07/medium_mickey-mantle.jpg

http://www.themick.com/Ramoshr.gif
<p style="margin-bottom: 5px;" align="left"><font><font><font><font color="#000080" face="Times New Roman" size="4">"Pedro and I were friends. He used to challenge me to a
foot race before games. In one game one of our pitchers, I don't remember who,
knocked down one of the Washington players – you could tell it was a knockdown –
and Ramos had to knock down one of our players to protect his guys.</font>
</font></font></font></p><p style="margin-bottom: 5px;" align="left"><font><font><font><font color="#000080" face="Times New Roman" size="4">"I was leading off the next inning and I didn't even
think about the knockdown. Everybody on our bench and everybody on their bench
and even some of the fans knew I was gonna get a knockdown, but I didn't even
think about it.</font>
</font></font></font></p><p style="margin-bottom: 5px;" align="left"><font><font><font><font color="#000080" face="Times New Roman" size="4">"Sure enough, Pedro hit me with his first pitch. It
didn't make me mad – he didn't try to hit me in the head or anything, you know,
just in the butt – but after the game he came up to me and said, 'Meekie, I'm
sorry I have to do that.' I said, 'That's okay. But the next time you do it I'm
gonna drag a bunt toward first base and run right up your back.' He said, 'You
would really do that?'</font>
</font></font></font></p><p style="margin-bottom: 5px;" align="left"><font><font><font><font color="#000080" face="Times New Roman" size="4">"The funny thing about it was that the next time up was
the time I almost hit one out of Yankee Stadium. It hit the façade. After the
game he came up to me and said, 'I'd rather have you run up my back than to hit
one over the roof!'"</font></font></font></font></p><p style="margin-bottom: 5px;" align="left"><font><font><font><font color="#000080" face="Times New Roman" size="4">
</font></font></font></font></p><font color="#000000">http://www.themick.com/10homers.html
great article
</font>

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 04:14 PM
im up out this mutha****a! talk to you guys tomorrow. im in serious need of a nap when I get home lol</P>


love yas lots! nohomo, son...nohomo</P>
rest up pizzy... have a good night!!

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 04:18 PM
http://mmod.ncaa.com/video/std?ts=1268943371&amp;t=b244a4340f4bf59b2c687e2084e4e7 fa&amp;w=90

You can watch the tourney from here if you are work like me...[:)]

Joe Morrison
03-18-2010, 04:19 PM
Saw Bobby Murcer drill some kid with a liner. he went to the hospital to check on him, real class player, was a shame to see the Yanks trade him.

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 04:26 PM
i wont be here to finish this argument unfortunately, but I leave you with this:

If Rice was so good, then why did Red Sox Nation have to petition and campaign their asses off EVERY YEAR he was eligible to get him into the hall? I rest my case.</p>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jim_Rice_Jersey_Sign.JPG</p>


i like how they included some minor league stats in there...lmao</p>

James Edward Rice (born March 8, 1953) is a former <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_fielder" title="Left fielder">left
fielder</a> in Major League Baseball (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball). Rice was inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Baseball_Hall_of_Fame_and_Museum)
on July 26, 2009 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baseball_Hall_of_Fame_balloting,_2009), as the 103rd
member elected in by the BBWAA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBWAA).</p>


Jim Rice played his entire career for the Boston Red Sox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Red_Sox) from 1974 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1974_in_baseball) to 1989 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_in_baseball). An 8-time American League (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_League) (AL) All-Star (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_All-Star_Game), he was named
the AL's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MLB_Most_Valuable_Player_Award" title="MLB Most Valuable Player Award" class="mw-redirect">Most Valuable
Player</a> in 1978 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_in_baseball) after becoming the first major league
player in 19 years to hit for 400 total bases (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_bases), and went on to become the ninth
player to lead the major leagues in total bases in consecutive seasons,
and join <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ty_Cobb" title="Ty Cobb">Ty
Cobb</a> as one of two players to lead the AL in total bases three
years in a row. He batted (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batting_average) .300 seven times, collected 100 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run_batted_in" title="Run batted in">runs
batted in</a> (RBI) eight times and 200 hits (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hit_%28baseball%29) four times, and had eleven seasons with 20 home runs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_run),
also leading the league in home runs three times, RBIs and slugging average (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slugging_average) twice each.</p>


In the late 1970s he was part of one of the sport's great outfields
along with Fred Lynn (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Lynn) and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_Evans" title="Dwight Evans">Dwight
Evans</a>, who was his teammate for his entire career; Rice continued
the tradition of his predecessors <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Williams" title="Ted Williams">Ted
Williams</a> and Carl Yastrzemski (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Yastrzemski) as a power-hitting left fielder who
played his entire career for the Red Sox. He ended his career with a
.502 slugging average, and then ranked tenth in AL history with 382 home
runs; his career marks in homers, hits (2,452), RBI (1,451) and total
bases (4,129) remain Red Sox records for a right-handed hitter, with
Evans eventually surpassing his Boston records for career runs scored (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run_%28baseball%29), at bats (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At_bat)
and extra base hits (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_base_hit) by a right-handed hitter. When Rice
retired, his 1,503 career games in left field ranked seventh in AL
history.</p>

----------</p>

sorry pizzand matt but thats a hof career. gotta give credit where its due. think he also won the al triple crown too. i want to see someone win triple crown. i dont think it will ever happen again though.
</p>

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 04:28 PM
Saw Bobby Murcer drill some kid with a liner. he went to the hospital to check on him, real class player, was a shame to see the Yanks trade him.

thats a great story

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 04:37 PM
http://mmod.ncaa.com/video/std?ts=1268943371&t=b244a4340f4bf59b2c687e2084e4e7fa&w=90

You can watch the tourney from here if you are work like me...[:)]

thanks lover!! i will do just that.

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 04:46 PM
1st 4 games of the tourney decided by a total of 12 points.

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 04:49 PM
upset city today....

Nova should of lossed too

ibleedblue85
03-18-2010, 04:50 PM
1st 4 games of the tourney decided by a total of 12 points.

thats insane, im doing awful in my bracket. ****ing notre dame and vandy... im done. ughhhhh

patsrule666
03-18-2010, 04:52 PM
i wont be here to finish this argument unfortunately, but I leave you with this:

If Rice was so good, then why did Red Sox Nation have to petition and campaign their asses off EVERY YEAR he was eligible to get him into the hall? I rest my case.</P>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jim_Rice_Jersey_Sign.JPG</P>


i like how they included some minor league stats in there...lmao</P>


James Edward Rice (born March 8, 1953) is a former left fielder (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_fielder) in Major League Baseball (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball). Rice was inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Baseball_Hall_of_Fame_and_Museum) on July 26, 2009 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baseball_Hall_of_Fame_balloting,_2009), as the 103rd member elected in by the BBWAA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBWAA).</P>


Jim Rice played his entire career for the Boston Red Sox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Red_Sox) from 1974 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1974_in_baseball) to 1989 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_in_baseball). An 8-time American League (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_League) (AL) All-Star (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_All-Star_Game), he was named the AL's Most Valuable Player (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MLB_Most_Valuable_Player_Award) in 1978 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_in_baseball) after becoming the first major league player in 19 years to hit for 400 total bases (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_bases), and went on to become the ninth player to lead the major leagues in total bases in consecutive seasons, and join Ty Cobb (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ty_Cobb) as one of two players to lead the AL in total bases three years in a row. He batted (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batting_average) .300 seven times, collected 100 runs batted in (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run_batted_in) (RBI) eight times and 200 hits (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hit_%28baseball%29) four times, and had eleven seasons with 20 home runs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_run), also leading the league in home runs three times, RBIs and slugging average (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slugging_average) twice each.</P>


In the late 1970s he was part of one of the sport's great outfields along with Fred Lynn (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Lynn) and Dwight Evans (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_Evans), who was his teammate for his entire career; Rice continued the tradition of his predecessors Ted Williams (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Williams) and Carl Yastrzemski (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Yastrzemski) as a power-hitting left fielder who played his entire career for the Red Sox. He ended his career with a .502 slugging average, and then ranked tenth in AL history with 382 home runs; his career marks in homers, hits (2,452), RBI (1,451) and total bases (4,129) remain Red Sox records for a right-handed hitter, with Evans eventually surpassing his Boston records for career runs scored (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run_%28baseball%29), at bats (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At_bat) and extra base hits (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_base_hit) by a right-handed hitter. When Rice retired, his 1,503 career games in left field ranked seventh in AL history.</P>


----------</P>


sorry pizzand matt but thats a hof career. gotta give credit where its due. think he also won the al triple crown too. i want to see someone win triple crown. i dont think it will ever happen again though.
</P>


Yaz was the one with triple crown...back in 67 i believe...</P>


http://blacksportsonline.com/index/2009/01/jim-rice-always-a-hall-of-fame.html</P>


</P>


</P>

patsrule666
03-18-2010, 04:54 PM
1st 4 games of the tourney decided by a total of 12 points.
How did florida do???

dezzzR
03-18-2010, 04:56 PM
i wont be here to finish this argument unfortunately, but I leave you with this:

If Rice was so good, then why did Red Sox Nation have to petition and campaign their asses off EVERY YEAR he was eligible to get him into the hall? I rest my case.</p>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jim_Rice_Jersey_Sign.JPG</p>


i like how they included some minor league stats in there...lmao</p>


James Edward Rice (born March 8, 1953) is a former left fielder (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_fielder) in Major League Baseball (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball). Rice was inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Baseball_Hall_of_Fame_and_Museum) on July 26, 2009 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baseball_Hall_of_Fame_balloting,_2009), as the 103rd member elected in by the BBWAA (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBWAA).</p>


Jim Rice played his entire career for the Boston Red Sox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Red_Sox) from 1974 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1974_in_baseball) to 1989 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_in_baseball). An 8-time American League (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_League) (AL) All-Star (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Baseball_All-Star_Game), he was named the AL's Most Valuable Player (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MLB_Most_Valuable_Player_Award) in 1978 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_in_baseball) after becoming the first major league player in 19 years to hit for 400 total bases (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_bases), and went on to become the ninth player to lead the major leagues in total bases in consecutive seasons, and join Ty Cobb (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ty_Cobb) as one of two players to lead the AL in total bases three years in a row. He batted (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batting_average) .300 seven times, collected 100 runs batted in (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run_batted_in) (RBI) eight times and 200 hits (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hit_%28baseball%29) four times, and had eleven seasons with 20 home runs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_run), also leading the league in home runs three times, RBIs and slugging average (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slugging_average) twice each.</p>


In the late 1970s he was part of one of the sport's great outfields along with Fred Lynn (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Lynn) and Dwight Evans (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_Evans), who was his teammate for his entire career; Rice continued the tradition of his predecessors Ted Williams (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Williams) and Carl Yastrzemski (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Yastrzemski) as a power-hitting left fielder who played his entire career for the Red Sox. He ended his career with a .502 slugging average, and then ranked tenth in AL history with 382 home runs; his career marks in homers, hits (2,452), RBI (1,451) and total bases (4,129) remain Red Sox records for a right-handed hitter, with Evans eventually surpassing his Boston records for career runs scored (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run_%28baseball%29), at bats (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/At_bat) and extra base hits (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_base_hit) by a right-handed hitter. When Rice retired, his 1,503 career games in left field ranked seventh in AL history.</p>


----------</p>


sorry pizzand matt but thats a hof career. gotta give credit where its due. think he also won the al triple crown too. i want to see someone win triple crown. i dont think it will ever happen again though.
</p>


Yaz was the one with triple crown...back in 67 i believe...</p>


http://blacksportsonline.com/index/2009/01/jim-rice-always-a-hall-of-fame.html</p>


</p>


</p>yea i knew that but it says rice won one in pizz's link too.

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 04:56 PM
1st 4 games of the tourney decided by a total of 12 points.
How did florida do???
Lost in double OT

BYU the Stormin Mormons baby!!! lol

TooEasy
03-18-2010, 04:57 PM
I filled out a bracket for the same group as last year from the MB.

Anyone who was in that group should come fill one out, i think this link will work....
<a href="http://tagf.mayhem.cbssports.com/brackets">http://tagf.mayhem.cbssports.com/brackets
</a>

patsrule666
03-18-2010, 05:01 PM
1st 4 games of the tourney decided by a total of 12 points.
How did florida do???
Lost in double OT

BYU the Stormin Mormons baby!!! lol
By less than 4.5 i hope..</P>


I took the $20 that Matt was too scared to bet last night, and parleyed it .....</P>


Took the Celts giving 10.5 and Florida getting 4.5.......</P>


Please tell me i won $80.......lol.</P>

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 05:06 PM
1st 4 games of the tourney decided by a total of 12 points.
How did florida do???
Lost in double OT

BYU the Stormin Mormons baby!!! lol
By less than 4.5 i hope..</p>


I took the $20 that Matt was too scared to bet last night, and parleyed it .....</p>


Took the Celts giving 10.5 and Florida getting 4.5.......</p>


Please tell me i won $80.......lol.</p>
They lost by 7. I am sorry my friend.

MattMeyerBud
03-18-2010, 05:22 PM
1st 4 games of the tourney decided by a total of 12 points.
How did florida do???
Lost in double OT

BYU the Stormin Mormons baby!!! lol
By less than 4.5 i hope..</p>


I took the $20 that Matt was too scared to bet last night, and parleyed it .....</p>


Took the Celts giving 10.5 and Florida getting 4.5.......</p>


Please tell me i won $80.......lol.</p>

lol when did u try n bet me? i dindt see it

bandwgn86
03-18-2010, 06:14 PM
I filled out a bracket for the same group as last year from the MB.

Anyone who was in that group should come fill one out, i think this link will work....
<A href="http://tagf.mayhem.cbssports.com/brackets">http://tagf.mayhem.cbssports.com/brackets
</A>
heh, how have you been? </P>


i don't understand March Madness..the brackets is that who make it to final 4? </P>

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 08:48 PM
http://media.skullcandy.com/shop/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/5e06319eda06f020e43594a9c230972d/l/a/lakers_blk_glamor_2.jpg

Kase-1
03-18-2010, 09:03 PM
I know Ive been saying this all year, but watching the NY Rangers is like watching the Giants last season..... Horrible and extremely painful

bigblue4417
03-18-2010, 09:14 PM
I know Ive been saying this all year, but watching the NY Rangers is like watching the Giants last season..... Horrible and extremely painful

<font color="#ff0000">Hopefully the Yankees will do the same thing. </font>lol

Kase-1
03-18-2010, 09:23 PM
I know Ive been saying this all year, but watching the NY Rangers is like watching the Giants last season..... Horrible and extremely painful

<font color="#ff0000">Hopefully the Yankees will do the same thing. </font>lol
Every Tri-State sports team has been playing like hot garbage..... The Jankees better shake it up a bit

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 10:10 PM
http://news.silveroakcasino.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/deer-hunter-roulette-300x239.jpg

JPizzack
03-18-2010, 10:10 PM
oh....watched Deer Hunter tonight....not jut posting some otherwise creepy pic lol

bandwgn86
03-18-2010, 10:56 PM
oh....watched Deer Hunter tonight....not jut posting some otherwise creepy pic lol
great movie... Walkens a scary looking dude