PDA

View Full Version : THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 [361] 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693

byron
01-16-2011, 12:27 AM
One other thing that Lomas said last night that was very interesting. He said the Giants could very well have a couple of SB championships if they had kept Phil Rivers.</P>


He said that there was no way he would have let the Eagles come back and win that game.</P>


I hate to say it but I agree.</P>


give me a break....


philip rivers plays defense and special teams?!?! =O
anti eli morehead is pissing me off. maybe hes doing on purpose. i dont know. BUT, and im not sure if its covered under the thee thread constitution, is this a ban-able offense? trashing eli SHOULD be up there.
MH lit the fuse on this one and left. Nice play MH!</P>


Sorry everyone.I was busy living my life.</P>


Yes, Lomas actually brought it up himself. As for his comment about the Philly game, I was under the impression that he meant that no way Rivers goes 3 and out withthe game on the line. he seems to like the strong leadership that Rivers has on the field.</P>


And Dezz is a little over sensative about Eli. Dezz is really a dear boy actually. Its very cute. But I like Eli just fine, but I do understand his weaknesses.</P>


He's pretty good in general but I admit that his poor decision making this season has me down on him right now.</P>I throught you was trying to stir the beans saving for the last post of the day and all...I meant harm

JPizzack
01-16-2011, 02:53 AM
Which highly thought of qb that is disrespected on here will have a big thread written about them and then procede to have an amazing year?? Two years ago it was brees(thank mmb) this year it was Rodgers, next year it will be ______

im sure we can bank on more Eli threads from MH. lol

Morehead State
01-16-2011, 08:57 AM
Which highly thought of qb that is disrespected on here will have a big thread written about them and then procede to have an amazing year?? Two years ago it was brees(thank mmb) this year it was Rodgers, next year it will be ______

im sure we can bank on more Eli threads from MH. lol
</P>


No, I made my point. Although if I see another "Its never Eli's fault" or "Eli is headed straight to the HOF" thread, I will respond.</P>

lttaylor56
01-16-2011, 09:55 AM
Which highly thought of qb that is disrespected on here will have a big thread written about them and then procede to have an amazing year?? Two years ago it was brees(thank mmb) this year it was Rodgers, next year it will be ______

im sure we can bank on more Eli threads from MH. lol
</P>


No, I made my point. Although if I see another "Its never Eli's fault" or <FONT color=#0000ff>"Eli is headed straight to the HOF"</FONT> thread, I will respond.</P>Isn't he?

dezzzR
01-16-2011, 12:37 PM
One other thing that Lomas said last night that was very interesting. He said the Giants could very well have a couple of SB championships if they had kept Phil Rivers.</p>


He said that there was no way he would have let the Eagles come back and win that game.</p>


I hate to say it but I agree.</p>


give me a break....


philip rivers plays defense and special teams?!?! =O
anti eli morehead is pissing me off. maybe hes doing on purpose. i dont know. BUT, and im not sure if its covered under the thee thread constitution, is this a ban-able offense? trashing eli SHOULD be up there.
MH lit the fuse on this one and left. Nice play MH!</p>


Sorry everyone.I was busy living my life.</p>


Yes, Lomas actually brought it up himself. As for his comment about the Philly game, I was under the impression that he meant that no way Rivers goes 3 and out withthe game on the line. he seems to like the strong leadership that Rivers has on the field.</p>


And Dezz is a little over sensative about Eli. Dezz is really a dear boy actually. Its very cute. But I like Eli just fine, but I do understand his weaknesses.</p>


He's pretty good in general but I admit that his poor decision making this season has me down on him right now.</p>sorry some of us work saturdays. were not retired and dont receive social security yet.
if rivers is so good and has such strong leadership why didnt they make the playoffs either? check and mate

JPizzack
01-16-2011, 12:54 PM
One other thing that Lomas said last night that was very interesting. He said the Giants could very well have a couple of SB championships if they had kept Phil Rivers.</p>


He said that there was no way he would have let the Eagles come back and win that game.</p>


I hate to say it but I agree.</p>


give me a break....


philip rivers plays defense and special teams?!?! =O
anti eli morehead is pissing me off. maybe hes doing on purpose. i dont know. BUT, and im not sure if its covered under the thee thread constitution, is this a ban-able offense? trashing eli SHOULD be up there.
MH lit the fuse on this one and left. Nice play MH!</p>


Sorry everyone.I was busy living my life.</p>


Yes, Lomas actually brought it up himself. As for his comment about the Philly game, I was under the impression that he meant that no way Rivers goes 3 and out withthe game on the line. he seems to like the strong leadership that Rivers has on the field.</p>


And Dezz is a little over sensative about Eli. Dezz is really a dear boy actually. Its very cute. But I like Eli just fine, but I do understand his weaknesses.</p>


He's pretty good in general but I admit that his poor decision making this season has me down on him right now.</p>sorry some of us work saturdays. were not retired and dont receive social security yet.
if rivers is so good and has such strong leadership why didnt they make the playoffs either? check and mate


the chargers are the eagles of the AFC. Sure they put up some wins...sure their players have nice statistics sometimes. But in the end even IF they make the playoffs...they arent going anywhere....
"There's no way Rivers goes 3 and out with the game on the line"...
uhh...lets look at all the games the chargers HAVEN'T won this year, and how many games they lost by less than a TD. Where was Rivers in those games?
bottom line...Rivers is a good qb in a awful divsion, and he is constantly playing from behind. of course he's going to LOOK good if he wins. HE SHOULD he's the QB!

MH,
Dezz should be sensitive about it maybe...it's his team right? We all know about your complaints...we get it...we know you wanna be the rebel, be heard...you saw it all, you know the deal with everything, rt? The true original pro of fanhood.
It's cool though, maybe you can go be a chargers fan, and enjoy all their rings, and Lombardi trophies.

Little Morehead(who also had a moustache) says,"GO YANKEES!!"

lttaylor56
01-16-2011, 01:07 PM
One other thing that Lomas said last night that was very interesting. He said the Giants could very well have a couple of SB championships if they had kept Phil Rivers.</P>


He said that there was no way he would have let the Eagles come back and win that game.</P>


I hate to say it but I agree.</P>


give me a break....


philip rivers plays defense and special teams?!?! =O
anti eli morehead is pissing me off. maybe hes doing on purpose. i dont know. BUT, and im not sure if its covered under the thee thread constitution, is this a ban-able offense? trashing eli SHOULD be up there.
MH lit the fuse on this one and left. Nice play MH!</P>


Sorry everyone.I was busy living my life.</P>


Yes, Lomas actually brought it up himself. As for his comment about the Philly game, I was under the impression that he meant that no way Rivers goes 3 and out withthe game on the line. he seems to like the strong leadership that Rivers has on the field.</P>


And Dezz is a little over sensative about Eli. Dezz is really a dear boy actually. Its very cute. But I like Eli just fine, but I do understand his weaknesses.</P>


He's pretty good in general but I admit that his poor decision making this season has me down on him right now.</P>sorry some of us work saturdays. were not retired and dont receive social security yet.
if rivers is so good and has such strong leadership why didnt they make the playoffs either? check and mate


the chargers are the eagles of the AFC. Sure they put up some wins...sure their players have nice statistics sometimes. But in the end even IF they make the playoffs...they arent going anywhere....
"There's no way Rivers goes 3 and out with the game on the line"...
uhh...lets look at all the games the chargers HAVEN'T won this year, and how many games they lost by less than a TD. Where was Rivers in those games?
bottom line...Rivers is a good qb in a awful divsion, and he is constantly playing from behind. of course he's going to LOOK good if he wins. HE SHOULD he's the QB!

MH,
Dezz should be sensitive about it maybe...it's his team right? We all know about your complaints...we get it...we know you wanna be the rebel, be heard...you saw it all, you know the deal with everything, rt? The true original pro of fanhood.
It's cool though, maybe you can go be a chargers fan, and enjoy all their rings, and Lombardi trophies.

Little Morehead(who also had a moustache) says,"GO YANKEES!!"
I don't know much, but I do know that Eli cannot be replaced by many qb's in the league that would yield better results than Eli currently does. I can only name a handful that I would prefer. That being said, Eli's our man.

Morehead State
01-16-2011, 02:13 PM
One other thing that Lomas said last night that was very interesting. He said the Giants could very well have a couple of SB championships if they had kept Phil Rivers.</P>


He said that there was no way he would have let the Eagles come back and win that game.</P>


I hate to say it but I agree.</P>


give me a break....


philip rivers plays defense and special teams?!?! =O
anti eli morehead is pissing me off. maybe hes doing on purpose. i dont know. BUT, and im not sure if its covered under the thee thread constitution, is this a ban-able offense? trashing eli SHOULD be up there.
MH lit the fuse on this one and left. Nice play MH!</P>


Sorry everyone.I was busy living my life.</P>


Yes, Lomas actually brought it up himself. As for his comment about the Philly game, I was under the impression that he meant that no way Rivers goes 3 and out withthe game on the line. he seems to like the strong leadership that Rivers has on the field.</P>


And Dezz is a little over sensative about Eli. Dezz is really a dear boy actually. Its very cute. But I like Eli just fine, but I do understand his weaknesses.</P>


He's pretty good in general but I admit that his poor decision making this season has me down on him right now.</P>


sorry some of us work saturdays. were not retired and dont receive social security yet.
if rivers is so good and has such strong leadership why didnt they make the playoffs either? check and mate
</P>


I just told you what he said. </P>


Whining like schoolgirls won't change it.</P>


</P>

Kase-1
01-16-2011, 02:41 PM
Ugh, this is brutal...... We shoulda been playing rite now!!!!

byron
01-16-2011, 09:01 PM
being elite justdoesn't seem beenough.... are there any left in the playoffs?

JPizzack
01-16-2011, 09:10 PM
being elite justdoesn't seem beenough.... are there any left in the playoffs?

lol, i just made a FB status about that basically...
I've become pretty bored with the playoffs, I just feel like it's a battle of mediocrity at this point regardless of who makes it to the 'ship. I'ts cool when theres ONE underdog team....but when all the best teams are out of it, I lose interest quickly.

JPizzack
01-16-2011, 09:11 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!

byron
01-16-2011, 09:54 PM
being elite justdoesn't seem beenough.... are there any left in the playoffs?

lol, i just made a FB status about that basically...
I've become pretty bored with the playoffs, I just feel like it's a battle of mediocrity at this point regardless of who makes it to the 'ship. I'ts cool when theres ONE underdog team....but when all the best teams are out of it, I lose interest quickly.
To me we have seen this sort of play all year long teams losing games they should have won hence team winning games they shouldn't have...The packers record was far from the best but I think you can look at it as areal bottom lineassessment of that team with a lot of up side despite the record...as they say, theyare peekingat the right time...idk if that makes any sense....anyhow.**** the jets!!

lawl
01-16-2011, 11:12 PM
the Steelers were clearly the second best AFC team all year and they're still in it. The Pack have been thought of as a SB team since the offseason and they're still in it. So, theres still some teams.

I do, however, think the Bears and Jets have awful teams.

Morehead State
01-16-2011, 11:15 PM
being elite justdoesn't seem beenough.... are there any left in the playoffs?

lol, i just made a FB status about that basically...
I've become pretty bored with the playoffs, I just feel like it's a battle of mediocrity at this point regardless of who makes it to the 'ship. I'ts cool when theres ONE underdog team....but when all the best teams are out of it, I lose interest quickly.
</P>


I have to disagree completely. Both championship games look like potential blood baths. Pittsburgh and the Jets should be a great game. And Bears/Packers....thats as good as it gets (except for the Giants being in it)</P>


By the way, if we had beaten the Eagles, we would have had Seattle come to NY and would most certainly be hosting the Packers in NY next week.</P>


I guess Tom should have thought about using the hands team.</P>

Morehead State
01-16-2011, 11:16 PM
the Steelers were clearly the second best AFC team all year and they're still in it. The Pack have been thought of as a SB team since the offseason and they're still in it. So, theres still some teams. I do, however, think the Bears and Jets have awful teams.</P>


Aweful teams don't go into Indy and NE and kick the **** out of Peyton Manning and Tom Brady.</P>


Time to give the Jets their due.</P>

lawl
01-16-2011, 11:28 PM
the Steelers were clearly the second best AFC team all year and they're still in it. The Pack have been thought of as a SB team since the offseason and they're still in it. So, theres still some teams. I do, however, think the Bears and Jets have awful teams.</P>


Aweful teams don't go into Indy and NE and kick the **** out of Peyton Manning and Tom Brady.</P>


Time to give the Jets their due.</P>


</P>


The Jets need a true pass rushing OLB, then they will have a damn good team. Until then, they're whatever. </P>

Morehead State
01-16-2011, 11:38 PM
the Steelers were clearly the second best AFC team all year and they're still in it. The Pack have been thought of as a SB team since the offseason and they're still in it. So, theres still some teams. I do, however, think the Bears and Jets have awful teams.</P>


Aweful teams don't go into Indy and NE and kick the **** out of Peyton Manning and Tom Brady.</P>


Time to give the Jets their due.</P>


</P>


The Jets need a true pass rushing OLB, then they will have a damn good team. Until then, they're whatever. </P>


</P>


Well "whatever" is playing in their confernece championship while we are sitting at home whining about the Jets.</P>

bigblue4417
01-16-2011, 11:46 PM
By the way, if we had beaten the Eagles, we would have had Seattle come to NY and would most certainly be hosting the Packers in NY next week.


I guess Tom should have thought about using the hands team.</p>
<font size="6">OUCH</font>

lawl
01-16-2011, 11:46 PM
the Steelers were clearly the second best AFC team all year and they're still in it. The Pack have been thought of as a SB team since the offseason and they're still in it. So, theres still some teams. I do, however, think the Bears and Jets have awful teams.</P>


Aweful teams don't go into Indy and NE and kick the **** out of Peyton Manning and Tom Brady.</P>


Time to give the Jets their due.</P>


</P>


The Jets need a true pass rushing OLB, then they will have a damn good team. Until then, they're whatever. </P>


</P>


Well "whatever" is playing in their confernece championship while we are sitting at home whining about the Jets.</P>


</P>


theyd played in it last year too and sucked penis. big deal. I don't live in NY and never have, I don't reallycare at all about them one way or the other. What I do think, though, is that they're nothing special. The Packers, now thats a special team. </P>

byron
01-16-2011, 11:52 PM
Hell I'll watch the games but not with the same interest that I have forthe Giants games..And it wouldn't take much to draw meawayfrom a game...but thats probably normal for most of us G-Fans we wanted our team there</P>


And I agree MH those should be a couple of real good games ..I like Greenbay to win next week and I think the Jets will but because ofthe mouth I hope the don't...</P>

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 08:21 AM
As difficult as it is, I have to give the jets their due. They have gone thru two of the best in the afc over the past two weeks. There is no reason to believe that they will slow down for the Steelers. The Jet's are playing inspired football and got hot at the right time of the season. The Jets just beat the Steelers on 12/19 score 22-17. I like the pack to go all the way.

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 08:46 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 08:56 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</P>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</P>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</P>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</P>

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 09:05 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 09:09 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</P>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</P>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</P>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</P>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</P>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</P>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</P>

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 09:15 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 09:16 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 09:19 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</P>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</P>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</P>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</P>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</P>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</P>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</P>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</P>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</P>

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 09:31 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>ah crap MH, you are the logical voice of reason.

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 09:33 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>ah crap MH, you are the logical voice of reason.
That's a good thing, you help keep me in perspective. I guess it is more of a thing that I must wrestle with the Jet's being sucessful and NYG coming up short the past 2 years.

It was so much nicer(for me) when the Jets stunk it up for the past 30 some odd years.

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 09:36 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>

u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 09:37 AM
GO PACK GO

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 09:39 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</P>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</P>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</P>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</P>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</P>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</P>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</P>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</P>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</P>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</P>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</P>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</P>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 09:45 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</p>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</p>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</p>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</p>

VERY unhappy

i mean its any given sunday, but I dont think the offense wil be able to do **** against Pitt's defense.

Brady was due to have an off day. All that talking threw him off his game def.

I think Pitt wins

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 09:46 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</p>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</p>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</p>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</p>I give them an even better chance of victory in the steel city.

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 09:49 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</P>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</P>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</P>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</P>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</P>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</P>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</P>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</P>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</P>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</P>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</P>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</P>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</P>




VERY unhappy

i mean its any given sunday, but I dont think the offense wil be able to do **** against Pitt's defense.

Brady was due to have an off day. All that talking threw him off his game def.

I think Pitt wins
</P>


There was no "any given Sunday" factor in that game last night. The Jets were the better team. They already won in Pittsburgh this season and quite hoestly, this Pittsburgh team isn't as good as some of the more recent teams they've had.</P>


The O line of the Steelers is a HUGE problem. Really its going to come down the whether or not Ben can get out of the pocket and extend and make plays. He's going to be running for his life all day.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 09:52 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</p>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</p>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</p>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</p>I give them an even better chance of victory in the steel city.


i dont.. Pitt is the only complete team in the AFC

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 09:54 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</p>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</p>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</p>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</p>




VERY unhappy

i mean its any given sunday, but I dont think the offense wil be able to do **** against Pitt's defense.

Brady was due to have an off day. All that talking threw him off his game def.

I think Pitt wins
</p>


There was no "any given Sunday" factor in that game last night. The Jets were the better team. They already won in Pittsburgh this season and quite hoestly, this Pittsburgh team isn't as good as some of the more recent teams they've had.</p>


The O line of the Steelers is a HUGE problem. Really its going to come down the whether or not Ben can get out of the pocket and extend and make plays. He's going to be running for his life all day.</p>

didnt say it was... i was referring to this up coming game.

Personally, they caught NE in bad circumstances. Brady was missing balls to open WRs, that never happens.

The achilles heel of NE, is what i've been pointing out all year with them - their defense. If there offense is going to sputter they will lose.

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 09:54 AM
Pittsburgh's O line is horrible, Matt.

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 10:00 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</p>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</p>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</p>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</p>




VERY unhappy

i mean its any given sunday, but I dont think the offense wil be able to do **** against Pitt's defense.

Brady was due to have an off day. All that talking threw him off his game def.

I think Pitt wins
</p>


There was no "any given Sunday" factor in that game last night. The Jets were the better team. They already won in Pittsburgh this season and quite hoestly, this Pittsburgh team isn't as good as some of the more recent teams they've had.</p>


The O line of the Steelers is a HUGE problem. Really its going to come down the whether or not Ben can get out of the pocket and extend and make plays. He's going to be running for his life all day.</p>

didnt say it was... i was referring to this up coming game.

Personally, they caught NE in bad circumstances. Brady was missing balls to open WRs, that never happens.

<font color="#ff0000">The achilles heel of NE, is what i've been pointing out all year with them - their defense.</font> If there offense is going to sputter they will lose.
This is true. Early in the season, I said they would go no where because of the defense. Then Belli-groomed the young squad to come together, but it was all based on Brady continuing to score. When Brady falters, the defense's weakness if much more obvious.

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 10:02 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</P>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</P>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</P>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</P>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</P>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</P>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</P>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</P>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</P>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</P>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</P>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</P>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</P>




VERY unhappy

i mean its any given sunday, but I dont think the offense wil be able to do **** against Pitt's defense.

Brady was due to have an off day. All that talking threw him off his game def.

I think Pitt wins
</P>


There was no "any given Sunday" factor in that game last night. The Jets were the better team. They already won in Pittsburgh this season and quite hoestly, this Pittsburgh team isn't as good as some of the more recent teams they've had.</P>


The O line of the Steelers is a HUGE problem. Really its going to come down the whether or not Ben can get out of the pocket and extend and make plays. He's going to be running for his life all day.</P>




didnt say it was... i was referring to this up coming game.

Personally, they caught NE in bad circumstances. Brady was missing balls to open WRs, that never happens.

<FONT color=#ff0000>The achilles heel of NE, is what i've been pointing out all year with them - their defense.</FONT> If there offense is going to sputter they will lose.
This is true. Early in the season, I said they would go no where because of the defense. Then Belli-groomed the young squad to come together, but it was all based on Brady continuing to score. When Brady falters, the defense's weakness if much more obvious.
</P>


It really came down to the drive after the Pats got within 3. If the D makes that stop, I think the Pats would have won the game. The Holmes play was tremendous.</P>

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 10:06 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</p>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</p>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</p>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</p>




VERY unhappy

i mean its any given sunday, but I dont think the offense wil be able to do **** against Pitt's defense.

Brady was due to have an off day. All that talking threw him off his game def.

I think Pitt wins
</p>


There was no "any given Sunday" factor in that game last night. The Jets were the better team. They already won in Pittsburgh this season and quite hoestly, this Pittsburgh team isn't as good as some of the more recent teams they've had.</p>


The O line of the Steelers is a HUGE problem. Really its going to come down the whether or not Ben can get out of the pocket and extend and make plays. He's going to be running for his life all day.</p>

didnt say it was... i was referring to this up coming game.

Personally, they caught NE in bad circumstances. Brady was missing balls to open WRs, that never happens.

<font color="#ff0000">The achilles heel of NE, is what i've been pointing out all year with them - their defense.</font> If there offense is going to sputter they will lose.
This is true. Early in the season, I said they would go no where because of the defense. Then Belli-groomed the young squad to come together, but it was all based on Brady continuing to score. When Brady falters, the defense's weakness if much more obvious.
The Ravens did get to Ben quite a bit. It is going to be a long day for Ben. Who would you say is better at extending plays, Ben or Brady?

JPizzack
01-17-2011, 10:07 AM
Pittsburgh's O line is horrible, Matt.

yea but their defense is rapetastic. Their LBs got 4 sacks on Saturday. I knew NE had a mediocre defense, but pittsburgh is no slouch in comparison

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 10:10 AM
Agreed, the Holmes play was huge. A clutch throw by Sanchez. I give him credit for that. Sanchez is capable of that type of play, providing you take the pressure of doing it every single play off of him and this is only temporary, the kid is only in his second year.

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 10:10 AM
Pittsburgh's O line is horrible, Matt.

while they are not great, thats also an exaggerated knock on them

They have one of the best centers in the league and its probably an overall better line than it was when they won in 08.

Offensively they can hang with anybody, especially the Jets offense when it comes to facing Pitt's defense.

They've had an off year, but they have the weapons and they've done it before. Experience speaks volumes in this situation and they just put 31 points on Baltimore. Time to get hot is now

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 10:11 AM
Pittsburgh's O line is horrible, Matt.

yea but their defense is rapetastic. Their LBs got 4 sacks on Saturday. I knew NE had a mediocre defense, but pittsburgh is no slouch in comparison

This one will be a big defensive game. I have to say that the Jets O-line is better than Pitty's.

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 10:11 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</p>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</p>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</p>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</p>




VERY unhappy

i mean its any given sunday, but I dont think the offense wil be able to do **** against Pitt's defense.

Brady was due to have an off day. All that talking threw him off his game def.

I think Pitt wins
</p>


There was no "any given Sunday" factor in that game last night. The Jets were the better team. They already won in Pittsburgh this season and quite hoestly, this Pittsburgh team isn't as good as some of the more recent teams they've had.</p>


The O line of the Steelers is a HUGE problem. Really its going to come down the whether or not Ben can get out of the pocket and extend and make plays. He's going to be running for his life all day.</p>




didnt say it was... i was referring to this up coming game.

Personally, they caught NE in bad circumstances. Brady was missing balls to open WRs, that never happens.

<font color="#ff0000">The achilles heel of NE, is what i've been pointing out all year with them - their defense.</font> If there offense is going to sputter they will lose.
This is true. Early in the season, I said they would go no where because of the defense. Then Belli-groomed the young squad to come together, but it was all based on Brady continuing to score. When Brady falters, the defense's weakness if much more obvious.
</p>


It really came down to the drive after the Pats got within 3. If the D makes that stop, I think the Pats would have won the game. The Holmes play was tremendous.</p>

yea but thats the thing, NE relies on the offense to score 35 every game. Giving up 28 points to the Jets is pathetic

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 10:12 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</p>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</p>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</p>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</p>




VERY unhappy

i mean its any given sunday, but I dont think the offense wil be able to do **** against Pitt's defense.

Brady was due to have an off day. All that talking threw him off his game def.

I think Pitt wins
</p>


There was no "any given Sunday" factor in that game last night. The Jets were the better team. They already won in Pittsburgh this season and quite hoestly, this Pittsburgh team isn't as good as some of the more recent teams they've had.</p>


The O line of the Steelers is a HUGE problem. Really its going to come down the whether or not Ben can get out of the pocket and extend and make plays. He's going to be running for his life all day.</p>

didnt say it was... i was referring to this up coming game.

Personally, they caught NE in bad circumstances. Brady was missing balls to open WRs, that never happens.

<font color="#ff0000">The achilles heel of NE, is what i've been pointing out all year with them - their defense.</font> If there offense is going to sputter they will lose.
This is true. Early in the season, I said they would go no where because of the defense. Then Belli-groomed the young squad to come together, but it was all based on Brady continuing to score. When Brady falters, the defense's weakness if much more obvious.
The Ravens did get to Ben quite a bit. It is going to be a long day for Ben. Who would you say is better at extending plays, Ben or Brady?


Ben no doubt and the Jets WILL get ot him, but i doubt as well as the Ravens did.

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 10:15 AM
Pittsburgh's O line is horrible, Matt.

yea but their defense is rapetastic. Their LBs got 4 sacks on Saturday. I knew NE had a mediocre defense, but pittsburgh is no slouch in comparison

This one will be a big defensive game. I have to say that the Jets O-line is better than Pitty's.


definitly, but the Jets front 7 on defense is not as good as Pitt's. And ALOT of people are saying Pouncy is better than Mangold. And Mangold is a beast. Can't say i've really seen too much of Pouncey tho

and honestly JEts have the better corners and Pitt has the better safties

And if ur going to compare whose better at what they do with Pitt's corners vs Jets safties, i'd give the nod to Pitt's corners

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 10:17 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</p>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</p>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</p>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</p>




VERY unhappy

i mean its any given sunday, but I dont think the offense wil be able to do **** against Pitt's defense.

Brady was due to have an off day. All that talking threw him off his game def.

I think Pitt wins
</p>


There was no "any given Sunday" factor in that game last night. The Jets were the better team. They already won in Pittsburgh this season and quite hoestly, this Pittsburgh team isn't as good as some of the more recent teams they've had.</p>


The O line of the Steelers is a HUGE problem. Really its going to come down the whether or not Ben can get out of the pocket and extend and make plays. He's going to be running for his life all day.</p>

didnt say it was... i was referring to this up coming game.

Personally, they caught NE in bad circumstances. Brady was missing balls to open WRs, that never happens.

<font color="#ff0000">The achilles heel of NE, is what i've been pointing out all year with them - their defense.</font> If there offense is going to sputter they will lose.
This is true. Early in the season, I said they would go no where because of the defense. Then Belli-groomed the young squad to come together, but it was all based on Brady continuing to score. When Brady falters, the defense's weakness if much more obvious.
The Ravens did get to Ben quite a bit. It is going to be a long day for Ben. Who would you say is better at extending plays, Ben or Brady?


Ben no doubt and the Jets WILL get ot him, but i doubt as well as the Ravens did.
Matt, you wage a good argument for Pitty to win this one. I want to believe it. Experience goes to Pitty. The Jets got lucky ALOT this year. The last game on Dec 19 vs Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh got the Jets a W.

I'm just hoping the Jet's getting as hot as they are right now doesn't catapult them into the SB. If the Jet's win, it will be due to their defense.

dezzzR
01-17-2011, 10:20 AM
a big reason the jets won last night was their corners played press the whole game and viciously attacked brady, something the giants use to be very good at

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 10:37 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</P>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</P>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</P>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</P>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</P>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</P>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</P>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</P>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</P>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</P>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</P>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</P>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</P>




VERY unhappy

i mean its any given sunday, but I dont think the offense wil be able to do **** against Pitt's defense.

Brady was due to have an off day. All that talking threw him off his game def.

I think Pitt wins
</P>


There was no "any given Sunday" factor in that game last night. The Jets were the better team. They already won in Pittsburgh this season and quite hoestly, this Pittsburgh team isn't as good as some of the more recent teams they've had.</P>


The O line of the Steelers is a HUGE problem. Really its going to come down the whether or not Ben can get out of the pocket and extend and make plays. He's going to be running for his life all day.</P>




didnt say it was... i was referring to this up coming game.

Personally, they caught NE in bad circumstances. Brady was missing balls to open WRs, that never happens.

<FONT color=#ff0000>The achilles heel of NE, is what i've been pointing out all year with them - their defense.</FONT> If there offense is going to sputter they will lose.
This is true. Early in the season, I said they would go no where because of the defense. Then Belli-groomed the young squad to come together, but it was all based on Brady continuing to score. When Brady falters, the defense's weakness if much more obvious.
The Ravens did get to Ben quite a bit. It is going to be a long day for Ben. Who would you say is better at extending plays, Ben or Brady?


Ben no doubt and the Jets WILL get ot him, but i doubt as well as the Ravens did.
Matt, you wage a good argument for Pitty to win this one. I want to believe it. Experience goes to Pitty. The Jets got lucky ALOT this year. The last game on Dec 19 vs Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh got the Jets a W.

I'm just hoping the Jet's getting as hot as they are right now doesn't catapult them into the SB. If the Jet's win, it will be due to their defense.
</P>


Of course Matt essentially "guaranteed" a Jets loss vs. the Pats on Facebook. So consider the source.</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 10:38 AM
The Steelers win next week. </P>


But I will say, the Jets are for real =(</P>

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 10:47 AM
The Steelers win next week. </p>


But I will say, the Jets are for real =(</p>Dezz--I agree. The jets are big time for real.

<div id="column3"><div class="title">Conference Championships
</div><div class="afc-block"><div class="game-tile"><div class="time">Sun., Jan. 23, 6:30 PM ET CBS</div><div class="cell">New York Jets </div><div class="cell">Pittsburgh </div></div></div><div class="nfc-block"><div class="game-tile"><div class="time">Sun., Jan. 23, 3:00 PM ET FOX</div><div class="cell">Green Bay </div><div class="cell">Chicago </div></div></div></div>

byron
01-17-2011, 11:01 AM
I can understand the dis stain that's between the Jets fans andGiants fans I see it all the time up here with Pats fan</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>


here is a post made to me during a discussion yesterday about their loss to the Jets...The poster eventually was saying the Pats gave the game away..discounting anything the Jets done...</P>


".And I'm still pissed off about the 07 Superbowl that the Pats handed to the Giants screwing up their perfect season. I don't think I will ever recover from that loss" </P>


I here this sort of **** all the time up here..and let it roll off..but that poster was my sister and I couldn't let it slide</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 11:05 AM
I can understand the dis stain that's between the Jets fans andGiants fans I see it all the time up here with Pats fan</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>


here is a post made to me during a discussion yesterday about their loss to the Jets...The poster eventually was saying the Pats gave the game away..discounting anything the Jets done...</P>


<FONT size=4>".And I'm still pissed off about the 07 Superbowl that the Pats handed to the Giants screwing up their perfect season. I don't think I will ever recover from that loss" </FONT></P>


I here this sort of **** all the time up here..and let it roll off..but that poster was my sister and I couldn't let it slide</P>


</P>


Hah! Thats music to my ears.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 11:08 AM
I have one big question. How bad will our lives be as Giant's fans if the Jets win the SB this year?
</p>


Since I don't have a single Jets fan friend...... Not bad at all.</p>


Does anyone here even entertain the idea of actually congratulating Jet fan friends if they win it?</p>


I mean how small are we for God's sake? When the Giants beat the Pats I got plenty of calls from some of my Pats fan friends with congratulations. And i would have done the same if they had won.</p>


I have four Jet fan friends. I congratulated each and every one of them today. I told my buddy I can relate to how he feels and there is nothing better. These fan's are not the problem for me personally. It is the Fireman Ed type who is proclaiming the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's House on Saturday that bother's me.

Yes-I had several Pat's fans congratulate me after SB 42 as well.
</p>


The Jets have been to the conference championship game 2 years in a row while the Giants have self destructed both years. Fireman Ed has a point. If the Giants want to claim that the new stadium is ours, they need to start playing better.</p>


Right now, the Jets have earned the attention.</p>


I agree, the Jet's have earned it with their play. Here's the part I do not understand. What do the Giants have to do with anything the Jet's are doing right now? What is the need to mention NYG or that the New Meadowlands Stadium is the Jet's house? It's not like this was a home game yesterday and the Jet's were sending a message this is our house type of thing.
It seems needless to me - for Jet fans to bring us into the picture.
</p>


Have you not read all the anti-Jets posts and threads here? Some Giants fan think its an affirmation of the Giants to see the Jets fail. It seems to me that Giants fans are playing that game as much or more than Jets fans.</p>




u don't live around here u dont know what they are like...

they if Hines Ward was WR 1A and Santonio Holmes was WR 1B

The Eagles fans are WR 1A and Jets fans are WR 1B

i wish i could cheer for them, but i cna't due to the scumness of their fans
</p>


You must be very unhappy right now Matt.</p>


I hate to say it, but they have a decent chance of beating the Steelers too. The Steelers were lucky that Baltimore disintegrated in the 3rd quarter on saturday.</p>


I give the Jets a 47% chance of winning on Sunday.</p>




VERY unhappy

i mean its any given sunday, but I dont think the offense wil be able to do **** against Pitt's defense.

Brady was due to have an off day. All that talking threw him off his game def.

I think Pitt wins
</p>


There was no "any given Sunday" factor in that game last night. The Jets were the better team. They already won in Pittsburgh this season and quite hoestly, this Pittsburgh team isn't as good as some of the more recent teams they've had.</p>


The O line of the Steelers is a HUGE problem. Really its going to come down the whether or not Ben can get out of the pocket and extend and make plays. He's going to be running for his life all day.</p>




didnt say it was... i was referring to this up coming game.

Personally, they caught NE in bad circumstances. Brady was missing balls to open WRs, that never happens.

<font color="#ff0000">The achilles heel of NE, is what i've been pointing out all year with them - their defense.</font> If there offense is going to sputter they will lose.
This is true. Early in the season, I said they would go no where because of the defense. Then Belli-groomed the young squad to come together, but it was all based on Brady continuing to score. When Brady falters, the defense's weakness if much more obvious.
The Ravens did get to Ben quite a bit. It is going to be a long day for Ben. Who would you say is better at extending plays, Ben or Brady?


Ben no doubt and the Jets WILL get ot him, but i doubt as well as the Ravens did.
Matt, you wage a good argument for Pitty to win this one. I want to believe it. Experience goes to Pitty. The Jets got lucky ALOT this year. The last game on Dec 19 vs Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh got the Jets a W.

I'm just hoping the Jet's getting as hot as they are right now doesn't catapult them into the SB. If the Jet's win, it will be due to their defense.
</p>


Of course Matt essentially "guaranteed" a Jets loss vs. the Pats on Facebook. So consider the source.</p>

dont mistake **** talking on facebook to real talk in here. u know better than that

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 11:10 AM
I love it when you're sensative. Makes you more attractive....in a vulnerable, pathetic kind ofway.

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 11:10 AM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>

not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL

byron
01-17-2011, 11:10 AM
I can understand the dis stain that's between the Jets fans andGiants fans I see it all the time up here with Pats fan</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>


here is a post made to me during a discussion yesterday about their loss to the Jets...The poster eventually was saying the Pats gave the game away..discounting anything the Jets done...</P>


<FONT size=4>".And I'm still pissed off about the 07 Superbowl that the Pats handed to the Giants screwing up their perfect season. I don't think I will ever recover from that loss" </FONT></P>


I here this sort of **** all the time up here..and let it roll off..but that poster was my sister and I couldn't let it slide</P>


</P>


Hah! Thats music to my ears.</P>so you think the Pats handed it to us? .of coarse I love what we did derailing the perfect season and all

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 11:12 AM
</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
</P>


He played lousy for part of the game but his reciever's didn't help him at all. He put that 4th and 18 pass right on the money and Housh dropped it.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 11:13 AM
I love it when you're sensative. Makes you more attractive....in a vulnerable, pathetic kind ofway.

stop lying... if i was anymore attractive i'd make the world bi-sexual

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 11:13 AM
I can understand the dis stain that's between the Jets fans andGiants fans I see it all the time up here with Pats fan</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>


here is a post made to me during a discussion yesterday about their loss to the Jets...The poster eventually was saying the Pats gave the game away..discounting anything the Jets done...</P>


<FONT size=4>".And I'm still pissed off about the 07 Superbowl that the Pats handed to the Giants screwing up their perfect season. I don't think I will ever recover from that loss" </FONT></P>


I here this sort of **** all the time up here..and let it roll off..but that poster was my sister and I couldn't let it slide</P>


</P>


Hah! Thats music to my ears.</P>


so you think the Pats handed it to us? .of coarse I love what we did derailing the perfect season and all</P>


No I don't. Its the whining that I love.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 11:13 AM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
</p>


He played lousy for part of the game but his reciever's didn't help him at all. He put that 4th and 18 pass right on the money and Housh dropped it.</p>

na all game he was drastically missing WRs too..

but ur def right that Housh and Boldin teabagged him....

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 11:14 AM
I love it when you're sensative. Makes you more attractive....in a vulnerable, pathetic kind ofway.

stop lying... if i was anymore attractive i'd make the world bi-sexual
</P>


I thought and thought but I got nothin'.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 11:14 AM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
</p>


He played lousy for part of the game but his reciever's didn't help him at all. He put that 4th and 18 pass right on the money and Housh dropped it.</p>

na all game he was drastically missing WRs too..

but ur def right that Housh and Boldin teabagged him....

byron
01-17-2011, 11:20 AM
</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....</P>


</P>


ps I watched the game with a Pats fan who was up from Mass I was pulling for the Pats he saidat some point thePats didn't deserve to win...anyhow </P>

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 11:30 AM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>

not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 11:34 AM
</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</P>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</P>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</P>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</P>

JPizzack
01-17-2011, 11:35 AM
This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents.</p>

lol?

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 11:37 AM
This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents.</P>




lol?
</P>


The Jets dominated the Pats yesterday. The score was closer than the game actually was.</P>

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 11:42 AM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!

Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end

byron
01-17-2011, 11:43 AM
</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>

not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
I hear ya Matt there were drops by wr's but all stuff that happens in games the Jets made mistakes also..then I throught the fake punt was a bit stupid also not taking a shot at the long field goal at around 2 mins...whatever..I think its going to be a close game that could goeither way... probably the one who makes the least amount of mistakes wins ;) I do think Greenbay gets thebears again

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 11:46 AM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!
Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end</P>


Landon. You are the only sports fan in America talking about basketball today. Its nice to see someone who doesn't go along with the croud.</P>


I'm sure your family is proud of your free spirit. </P>

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 11:50 AM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</p>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</p>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</p>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</p>

the truth of the matter about the Pats is that its based on Brady playing by his standards... if that doesn't happen then they dont't win. Branch and Welker (who i admit i was wrong about) just aren't top notch WRs in the NFL that can take over a game. BGE declined. Woodhead is ur best offensive weapon.

I mean okay, I really like the guy and all but he can't be ur #1 weapon.

I think the score was perfect. Jets offense really shouldn't of scored 4 TDs. They barely broke 100 yards collectively rushing and and threw for under 200 yards. They really weren't impressive at all and NEs defense relaly is sub-par

And like I said the Jets did a nice job of hitting Brady and taking him out of his game, but other then that I just dont think they looked overly impressive on defense either. I feel like everybody is calling them serious now. They won two huge games, nobody can take that away from them. I just didn't see the quality of play that everyone else is saying they saw.

Pitt double digit victory

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 11:52 AM
This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents.</p>




lol?
</p>


The Jets dominated the Pats yesterday. The score was closer than the game actually was.</p>

i think thats so ridiculous to say dominating. This is why im standing by my opinion, Jets won - in NO WAY was there dominating going on

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 11:53 AM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!

Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end

first Brook Lopez ****s on Bynum

then the Clippers show everyone who the REAL LA team is...

damn it must suck to be a laker fan....

a lil surprised by Odom to be honest, i felt like that was out of character. Kind of punk move, it seemed unprovoked

byron
01-17-2011, 11:53 AM
</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</P>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</P>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</P>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</P>Again I don't care about either team..I do have a problem with a lot of Pats fans up here tho...I watched thegamewith a good friend and Pats fan and I was pulling for the Pats....But I agree with MH's points here they beat them plain and simple with good Def football...

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 11:54 AM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>

not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
I hear ya Matt there were drops by wr's but all stuff that happens in games the Jets made mistakes also..then I throught the fake punt was a bit stupid also not taking a shot at the long field goal at around 2 mins...whatever..I think its going to be a close game that could goeither way... probably the one who makes the least amount of mistakes wins ;) I do think Greenbay gets thebears again

as much as i love ballsy and trick plays and all of that stuff... horrible idea to do it with under aminute to go in the half...

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 11:55 AM
<h1>Jets joyride turns deadly for Staten Island fan</h1>


<h5>Published: Monday, January 17, 2011, 9:39 AM Updated: Monday, January 17, 2011, 9:39 AM</h5>STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. -- A 46-year-old man, who rooted the New York Jets
to victory, took a celebratory sled ride down his driveway in Great
Kills that turned deadly last night, when he veered into the path of a
car driving down his block, police said.

Police say Raymond
Larsen was sledding down his driveway at 286 Cleveland Ave., which is
steeply inclined toward the street, and went careening into the roadway
as a 2006 Hyundai Santa Fe drove past, at about 8:52 p.m.

The
car struck Larsen, and when police and emergency workers arrived, he was
unconscious and unresponsive. Larsen was taken to Staten Island
University Hospital, Prince’s Bay, where he was pronounced dead, police
said.

Read More:
http://www.silive.com/southshore/index.ssf/2011/01/sled_ride_turns_deadly_in_grea.html (http://)

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 11:56 AM
</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</P>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</P>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</P>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</P>




the truth of the matter about the Pats is that its based on Brady playing by his standards... if that doesn't happen then they dont't win. Branch and Welker (who i admit i was wrong about) just aren't top notch WRs in the NFL that can take over a game. BGE declined. Woodhead is ur best offensive weapon.

I mean okay, I really like the guy and all but he can't be ur #1 weapon.

I think the score was perfect. Jets offense really shouldn't of scored 4 TDs. They barely broke 100 yards collectively rushing and and threw for under 200 yards. They really weren't impressive at all and NEs defense relaly is sub-par

And like I said the Jets did a nice job of hitting Brady and taking him out of his game, but other then that I just dont think they looked overly impressive on defense either. I feel like everybody is calling them serious now. They won two huge games, nobody can take that away from them. I just didn't see the quality of play that everyone else is saying they saw.

Pitt double digit victory
</P>


Total yards is not the indicator here. The difference was that the Jets made the plays they had to and the Pats didn't. Santonio makes the great play for a TD and Crumpler drops a TD pass. Thats a microcosm of that game. The same is true last week at Indy. </P>


This Jetsteam makes plays.</P>


No reason to think that won't continue next week.</P>

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 11:57 AM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</p>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</p>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</p>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</p>Again I don't care about either team..I do have a problem with a lot of Pats fans up here tho...I watched thegamewith a good friend and Pats fan and I was pulling for the Pats....But I agree with MH's points here they beat them plain and simple with good Def football...MH-I am very concerned that the Jet's have the tools to go all the way.

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 11:57 AM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</p>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</p>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</p>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</p>Again I don't care about either team..I do have a problem with a lot of Pats fans up here tho...I watched thegamewith a good friend and Pats fan and I was pulling for the Pats....But I agree with MH's points here they beat them plain and simple with good Def football...

i dunno.. their defense did a very good job on one of the best offenses in the league. An offense that was due for a down time... but still they did it....

but im sorry i dont think the Jets dominated at all and I dont think NE played their best football by any means. Obviously the Jets had something to do wtih it cuz their DE played good (i would NOT say dominating) but I think the Pats would of had an off game if they played the Raiders yesterday. They didn't seem to be coheasive.

Jets offense got the points on the board, but they did not look that good imo. They had one drive that went the length of the field, the rest o f their scores came from good field position. Which is a tribute to the defense and special teams

JPizzack
01-17-2011, 12:01 PM
This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents.</p>




lol?
</p>


The Jets dominated the Pats yesterday. The score was closer than the game actually was.</p>

i think thats so ridiculous to say dominating. This is why im standing by my opinion, Jets won - in NO WAY was there dominating going on


yea wtf lol...were we watching the same game?? Brady was def. off....like threw it away alot yesterday...Jets did a good job with pressure. Other than that....it was a plain game. there last score was just a fluke gimme....cant really argue otherwise.
There was really nothing impressive about either performance, cept some nice footwork by Holmes and Braylon.

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:02 PM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</p>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</p>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</p>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</p>Again I don't care about either team..I do have a problem with a lot of Pats fans up here tho...I watched thegamewith a good friend and Pats fan and I was pulling for the Pats....But I agree with MH's points here they beat them plain and simple with good Def football...MH-I am very concerned that the Jet's have the tools to go all the way.


im gonna tell u right now.. Sanchez will BLOW it for them

They wont' be able to run on Pitt like they did on NE and Indy.... collectively Green and LdT have averaged about 4.5 a carry over the past two games.. this will NOT happen vs Pitt. They WILL hit Sanchez and im predicting 2 turnovers by him

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 12:07 PM
</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</P>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</P>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</P>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</P>


Again I don't care about either team..I do have a problem with a lot of Pats fans up here tho...I watched thegamewith a good friend and Pats fan and I was pulling for the Pats....But I agree with MH's points here they beat them plain and simple with good Def football...MH-I am very concerned that the Jet's have the tools to go all the way.
</P>


Could it be Jets/Packers?</P>


No matter which of the 4 teams remaining make it to the SB, the game should be very interesting.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:08 PM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</p>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</p>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</p>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</p>


Again I don't care about either team..I do have a problem with a lot of Pats fans up here tho...I watched thegamewith a good friend and Pats fan and I was pulling for the Pats....But I agree with MH's points here they beat them plain and simple with good Def football...MH-I am very concerned that the Jet's have the tools to go all the way.
</p>


Could it be Jets/Packers?</p>


No matter which of the 4 teams remaining make it to the SB, the game should be very interesting.</p>

if theres one truth about the 4 teams left, something my real pappy always told me

offense may win games, but defense wins championships

byron
01-17-2011, 12:09 PM
</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</P>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</P>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</P>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</P>Again I don't care about either team..I do have a problem with a lot of Pats fans up here tho...I watched thegamewith a good friend and Pats fan and I was pulling for the Pats....But I agree with MH's points here they beat them plain and simple with good Def football...

i dunno.. their defense did a very good job on one of the best offenses in the league. An offense that was due for a down time... but still they did it....

but im sorry i dont think the Jets dominated at all and I dont think NE played their best football by any means. Obviously the Jets had something to do wtih it cuz their DE played good (i would NOT say dominating) but I think the Pats would of had an off game if they played the Raiders yesterday. They didn't seem to be coheasive.

Jets offense got the points on the board, but they did not look that good imo. They had one drive that went the length of the field, the rest o f their scores came from good field position. Which is a tribute to the defense and special teams
Idn its seem like a lot of the teams that get bye weeks don't do well coming back..and these are do or die games maybe that focus in lost a little during byeIdk...

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 12:12 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!
Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end</P>


Landon.* You are the only sports fan in America talking about basketball today.* Its nice to see someone who doesn't go along with the croud.</P>


I'm sure your family is proud of your free spirit.* </P>
First of all, football is over.

Secondly, as I have said before, I will defend my team as would you.

Ben with his 9-2 playoff record and 2 rings is making you look good (not like that is hard). I would rather see the Jets win not living in New York. I am sick of hearing about the Steelers.and don't want Ben to win another ring. I hope the Packers win it all.

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 12:12 PM
</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</P>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</P>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</P>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</P>


Again I don't care about either team..I do have a problem with a lot of Pats fans up here tho...I watched thegamewith a good friend and Pats fan and I was pulling for the Pats....But I agree with MH's points here they beat them plain and simple with good Def football...MH-I am very concerned that the Jet's have the tools to go all the way.
</P>


Could it be Jets/Packers?</P>


No matter which of the 4 teams remaining make it to the SB, the game should be very interesting.</P>




if theres one truth about the 4 teams left, something my real pappy always told me

offense may win games, but defense wins championships
</P>


Your fake Pappy says that too.</P>

byron
01-17-2011, 12:13 PM
</P>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </P>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</P>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</P>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</P>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</P>


Again I don't care about either team..I do have a problem with a lot of Pats fans up here tho...I watched thegamewith a good friend and Pats fan and I was pulling for the Pats....But I agree with MH's points here they beat them plain and simple with good Def football...MH-I am very concerned that the Jet's have the tools to go all the way.
</P>


Could it be Jets/Packers?</P>


No matter which of the 4 teams remaining make it to the SB, the game should be very interesting.</P>

if theres one truth about the 4 teams left, something my real pappy always told me

offense may win games, but defense wins championships
no doubt

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 12:14 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!
Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end</P>


Landon. You are the only sports fan in America talking about basketball today. Its nice to see someone who doesn't go along with the croud.</P>


I'm sure your family is proud of your free spirit. </P>


First of all, football is over. Secondly, as I have said before, I will defend my team as would you. Ben with his 9-2 playoff record and 2 rings is making you look good (not like that is hard). I would rather see the Jets win not living in New York. I am sick of hearing about the Steelers.and don't want Ben to win another ring. I hope the Packers win it all.</P>


Basketball season starts in April.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:16 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!
Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end</p>


Landon. You are the only sports fan in America talking about basketball today. Its nice to see someone who doesn't go along with the croud.</p>


I'm sure your family is proud of your free spirit. </p>
First of all, football is over.

Secondly, as I have said before, I will defend my team as would you.

Ben with his 9-2 playoff record and 2 rings is making you look good (not like that is hard). I would rather see the Jets win not living in New York. I am sick of hearing about the Steelers.and don't want Ben to win another ring. I hope the Packers win it all.

absolutely dont want Ben to win another one, but if i had to pick the lesser of two evils give me ben over sanchez.

LETS GO NFC

Kase-1
01-17-2011, 12:19 PM
Ah ha, you know what it is Black n Yellow, Black n Yellow, Black n Yellow

byron
01-17-2011, 12:21 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!
Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end</P>


Landon. You are the only sports fan in America talking about basketball today. Its nice to see someone who doesn't go along with the croud.</P>


I'm sure your family is proud of your free spirit. </P>


First of all, football is over. Secondly, as I have said before, I will defend my team as would you. Ben with his 9-2 playoff record and 2 rings is making you look good (not like that is hard). I would rather see the Jets win not living in New York. I am sick of hearing about the Steelers.and don't want Ben to win another ring. I hope the Packers win it all.</P>


Basketball season starts in April.</P> <FONT color=#ffa500 size=6>GO LAKERS !!!</FONT>

Kase-1
01-17-2011, 12:21 PM
Basketball season starts in April.</p>Hockey season started when Big BLue got eliminated from the playoffs........ And yea basketball isnt that bad, better than that tired *** oldman's game they call baseball, now if I wanted to nap id put on a cat stevens cd, LOL

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:24 PM
Basketball season starts in April.</p>Hockey season started when Big BLue got eliminated from the playoffs........ And yea basketball isnt that bad, better than that tired *** oldman's game they call baseball, now if I wanted to nap id put on a cat stevens cd, LOL


Soccer on Ice?

I heard Lion King on Ice is more entertaining

Kase-1
01-17-2011, 12:30 PM
Basketball season starts in April.</p>Hockey season started when Big BLue got eliminated from the playoffs........ And yea basketball isnt that bad, better than that tired *** oldman's game they call baseball, now if I wanted to nap id put on a cat stevens cd, LOL


Soccer on Ice?

I heard Lion King on Ice is more entertaining
I wish baseball was half as entertaining as Lion King on Ice, yo u kidding me son..... F' Burnett its all about Simba sennnnn!!!!!!!

At least the Lion King wont put me to sleep

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:34 PM
Basketball season starts in April.</p>Hockey season started when Big BLue got eliminated from the playoffs........ And yea basketball isnt that bad, better than that tired *** oldman's game they call baseball, now if I wanted to nap id put on a cat stevens cd, LOL


Soccer on Ice?

I heard Lion King on Ice is more entertaining
I wish baseball was half as entertaining as Lion King on Ice, yo u kidding me son..... F' Burnett its all about Simba sennnnn!!!!!!!

At least the Lion King wont put me to sleep


some people like the roar of the crowd, some people like the roar of a lion. To each their own

Kase-1
01-17-2011, 12:36 PM
Basketball season starts in April.</p>Hockey season started when Big BLue got eliminated from the playoffs........ And yea basketball isnt that bad, better than that tired *** oldman's game they call baseball, now if I wanted to nap id put on a cat stevens cd, LOL


Soccer on Ice?

I heard Lion King on Ice is more entertaining
I wish baseball was half as entertaining as Lion King on Ice, yo u kidding me son..... F' Burnett its all about Simba sennnnn!!!!!!!

At least the Lion King wont put me to sleep


some people like the roar of the crowd, some people like the roar of a lion. To each their own
...Which is why lion king on ice is where its at, you get best of both worlds!!!!

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:38 PM
Basketball season starts in April.</p>Hockey season started when Big BLue got eliminated from the playoffs........ And yea basketball isnt that bad, better than that tired *** oldman's game they call baseball, now if I wanted to nap id put on a cat stevens cd, LOL


Soccer on Ice?

I heard Lion King on Ice is more entertaining
I wish baseball was half as entertaining as Lion King on Ice, yo u kidding me son..... F' Burnett its all about Simba sennnnn!!!!!!!

At least the Lion King wont put me to sleep


some people like the roar of the crowd, some people like the roar of a lion. To each their own
...Which is why lion king on ice is where its at, you get best of both worlds!!!!


hahaha

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 12:38 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!

Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end

first Brook Lopez ****s on Bynum

then the Clippers show everyone who the REAL LA team is...

damn it must suck to be a laker fan....

a lil surprised by Odom to be honest, i felt like that was out of character. Kind of punk move, it seemed unprovoked

Yes he did, embarrassing...

Everyone knows who the best team in California is in all of sports so I am not trippin. And yeah, it sucks so bad being a back to back champ lol.

Odom was out of character and you could tell it really pissed him off obviously. He said there was no reason to get pushed like that with 9 seconds left and a 7 point lead but Kobe seemed to disagree. He said where I am from you play the same way from buzzer to buzzer. Griffin is going to be awesome, no way the Clippers keep him lol.

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:39 PM
glorious day for me today gentlemen. My Ex is moving out today. The movers should be at my house in 20 minutes and I will be out of work for the day, over seeing these dudes move her **** out. Im gonna help out as much as i can so that I dont have to see this ***** for any longer than i have to....

gonna be a good day. May have to go celebrate at the bar

Kase-1
01-17-2011, 12:41 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!

Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end

first Brook Lopez ****s on Bynum

then the Clippers show everyone who the REAL LA team is...

damn it must suck to be a laker fan....

a lil surprised by Odom to be honest, i felt like that was out of character. Kind of punk move, it seemed unprovoked

Yes he did, embarrassing...

Everyone knows who the best team in California is in all of sports so I am not trippin. And yeah, it sucks so bad being a back to back champ lol.

Odom was out of character and you could tell it really pissed him off obviously. He said there was no reason to get pushed like that with 9 seconds left and a 7 point lead but Kobe seemed to disagree. He said where I am from you play the same way from buzzer to buzzer. Griffin is going to be awesome, no way the Clippers keep him lol.Clippers, whta what!!!!!

LMAO, what a joke theyre like the Islanders of the NBA

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:41 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!

Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end

first Brook Lopez ****s on Bynum

then the Clippers show everyone who the REAL LA team is...

damn it must suck to be a laker fan....

a lil surprised by Odom to be honest, i felt like that was out of character. Kind of punk move, it seemed unprovoked

Yes he did, embarrassing...

Everyone knows who the best team in California is in all of sports so I am not trippin. And yeah, it sucks so bad being a back to back champ lol.

Odom was out of character and you could tell it really pissed him off obviously. He said there was no reason to get pushed like that with 9 seconds left and a 7 point lead but Kobe seemed to disagree. He said where I am from you play the same way from buzzer to buzzer. Griffin is going to be awesome, no way the Clippers keep him lol.

i dont think he was really pushed that he was going for the ball... it was weak by Odom.

best team in Cali? Warriors?

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:42 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!

Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end

first Brook Lopez ****s on Bynum

then the Clippers show everyone who the REAL LA team is...

damn it must suck to be a laker fan....

a lil surprised by Odom to be honest, i felt like that was out of character. Kind of punk move, it seemed unprovoked

Yes he did, embarrassing...

Everyone knows who the best team in California is in all of sports so I am not trippin. And yeah, it sucks so bad being a back to back champ lol.

Odom was out of character and you could tell it really pissed him off obviously. He said there was no reason to get pushed like that with 9 seconds left and a 7 point lead but Kobe seemed to disagree. He said where I am from you play the same way from buzzer to buzzer. Griffin is going to be awesome, no way the Clippers keep him lol.Clippers, whta what!!!!!

LMAO, what a joke theyre like the Islanders of the NBA


not with Griffin, they may end up being pretty good. I mean Lakers have it locked down now, but Kobe ain't getting younger. Clippers may be the new era of LA in a few years

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 12:43 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!
Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end</P>


Landon.* You are the only sports fan in America talking about basketball today.* Its nice to see someone who doesn't go along with the croud.</P>


I'm sure your family is proud of your free spirit.* </P>


First of all, football is over. Secondly, as I have said before, I will defend my team as would you. Ben with his 9-2 playoff record and 2 rings is making you look good (not like that is hard). I would rather see the Jets win not living in New York. I am sick of hearing about the Steelers.and don't want Ben to win another ring. I hope the Packers win it all.</P>


Basketball season starts in April.</P>
So you watch the Celtics like Matt watches the Yankees...you guys have more in common every day. Except baseball is twice as long. B'ball is my 2nd fav sport to watch.

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 12:47 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!
Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end</P>


Landon.* You are the only sports fan in America talking about basketball today.* Its nice to see someone who doesn't go along with the croud.</P>


I'm sure your family is proud of your free spirit.* </P>


First of all, football is over. Secondly, as I have said before, I will defend my team as would you. Ben with his 9-2 playoff record and 2 rings is making you look good (not like that is hard). I would rather see the Jets win not living in New York. I am sick of hearing about the Steelers.and don't want Ben to win another ring. I hope the Packers win it all.</P>


Basketball season starts in April.</P>** <FONT color=#ffa500 size=6>GO LAKERS !!!</FONT>
YEAH BUDDY!!!

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 12:51 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!
Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end</P>


Landon. You are the only sports fan in America talking about basketball today. Its nice to see someone who doesn't go along with the croud.</P>


I'm sure your family is proud of your free spirit. </P>


First of all, football is over. Secondly, as I have said before, I will defend my team as would you. Ben with his 9-2 playoff record and 2 rings is making you look good (not like that is hard). I would rather see the Jets win not living in New York. I am sick of hearing about the Steelers.and don't want Ben to win another ring. I hope the Packers win it all.</P>


Basketball season starts in April.</P>


<FONT color=#008000 size=6>GO CELTICS!!!</FONT> YEAH BUDDY!!!</P>


We all agree.</P>

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 12:51 PM
glorious day for me today gentlemen. My Ex is moving out today. The movers should be at my house in 20 minutes and I will be out of work for the day, over seeing these dudes move her **** out. Im gonna help out as much as i can so that I dont have to see this ***** for any longer than i have to....

gonna be a good day. May have to go celebrate at the bar

CONGRATULATIONS!!! The turtle?

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 12:52 PM
glorious day for me today gentlemen. My Ex is moving out today. The movers should be at my house in 20 minutes and I will be out of work for the day, over seeing these dudes move her **** out. Im gonna help out as much as i can so that I dont have to see this ***** for any longer than i have to....

gonna be a good day. May have to go celebrate at the bar
CONGRATULATIONS!!! The turtle?</P>


By the way, your team stole our coach.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:54 PM
glorious day for me today gentlemen. My Ex is moving out today. The movers should be at my house in 20 minutes and I will be out of work for the day, over seeing these dudes move her **** out. Im gonna help out as much as i can so that I dont have to see this ***** for any longer than i have to....

gonna be a good day. May have to go celebrate at the bar

CONGRATULATIONS!!! The turtle?

got rid of it friday to the bartender at Blvd lol

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:56 PM
wow 6k* pages

I leave an * at the end of that because THEE thread was actually started in a Ben vs Eli thread that went like 150 pages...

not many people know or remember that

i call them THEE LOST PAGES

byron
01-17-2011, 12:56 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!
Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end</P>


Landon. You are the only sports fan in America talking about basketball today. Its nice to see someone who doesn't go along with the croud.</P>


I'm sure your family is proud of your free spirit. </P>


First of all, football is over. Secondly, as I have said before, I will defend my team as would you. Ben with his 9-2 playoff record and 2 rings is making you look good (not like that is hard). I would rather see the Jets win not living in New York. I am sick of hearing about the Steelers.and don't want Ben to win another ring. I hope the Packers win it all.</P>


Basketball season starts in April.</P>


<FONT color=#008000 size=6>GO CELTICS!!!</FONT> YEAH BUDDY!!!</P>


We all agree.</P> big baby's on that team

MattMeyerBud
01-17-2011, 12:57 PM
alrite ****ers, im out. Time to get rid of the evil one....

ta-ta

byron
01-17-2011, 12:59 PM
alrite ****ers, im out. Time to get rid of the evil one....

ta-ta
good luck Matt

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 01:02 PM
@Lando

Not to beat a dead horse, but LAC is the best pro sports team in The City of Angels

THEEE MOST ELECTRIFYING TEAM IN SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT TODAY!

Big brother has to let little brother win once in a while. I am sure you did the same for yours. I liked the fight at the end

first Brook Lopez ****s on Bynum

then the Clippers show everyone who the REAL LA team is...

damn it must suck to be a laker fan....

a lil surprised by Odom to be honest, i felt like that was out of character. Kind of punk move, it seemed unprovoked

Yes he did, embarrassing...

Everyone knows who the best team in California is in all of sports so I am not trippin. And yeah, it sucks so bad being a back to back champ lol.

Odom was out of character and you could tell it really pissed him off obviously. He said there was no reason to get pushed like that with 9 seconds left and a 7 point lead but Kobe seemed to disagree. He said where I am from you play the same way from buzzer to buzzer. Griffin is going to be awesome, no way the Clippers keep him lol.

i dont think he was really pushed that he was going for the ball... it was weak by Odom.*

best team in Cali? Warriors?

I can see both sides of it. The game was over and there was no reason for Blake to do that but it's basketball and you play until thee game is over. No need for Lamar to do that either. Box out lol.

Kase-1
01-17-2011, 01:04 PM
alrite ****ers, im out. Time to get rid of the evil one....

ta-ta
Take it easy on Lando, all he wanted to do was give you his heart....... LOL

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 01:15 PM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</p>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</p>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</p>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</p>Again I don't care about either team..I do have a problem with a lot of Pats fans up here tho...I watched thegamewith a good friend and Pats fan and I was pulling for the Pats....But I agree with MH's points here they beat them plain and simple with good Def football...MH-I am very concerned that the Jet's have the tools to go all the way.


im gonna tell u right now.. Sanchez will BLOW it for them

They wont' be able to run on Pitt like they did on NE and Indy.... collectively Green and LdT have averaged about 4.5 a carry over the past two games.. this will NOT happen vs Pitt. They WILL hit Sanchez and im predicting 2 turnovers by him
Congrats on getting ex-out!!. If the Jets get handled by pitty-it will be something beautiful for my eyes to watch.

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 01:17 PM
</p>


yesterday all I heard was the Pats played like **** and gave the game away they should have never lost and on and on </p>




not gonna lie.. i can't say i totally disagree...

there were times Brady was off without pressure. Not what u need or expect from him. I think all the extra **** got to him. Im still not a believer in Sanchez, his play didn't impress me at all.

But on a change of topic... honestly how bad is Joe Flacco. I think he may be the most overrated QB in the NFL
Matt.. all that stuff is part of the game..Man I don't care about either team ...but saying the Pats handed them the game because they played like **** is bull the Jets had 11 men on the field that played a part in all that happened....

like i didn't see great defensive plays from the Jets I saw alot of bad plays out of the Pats...

The Jets did their part in hitting Brady... that rattled him and thew him off for the rest of the game...

I got Pitt this week... double digits
</p>


Your hate for the Jets is clouding your judgement. The Pats WR's could not get seperation all day. The pass rush was somewhat successful with 4 rushers.</p>


Brady was fine. Maybe not by his standards but I wouldn't say he played poorly.</p>


This was a case of a Jets team imposing its will on their opponents. I don't see the Jets rolling over next week like you seem to suggest.</p>


Again I don't care about either team..I do have a problem with a lot of Pats fans up here tho...I watched thegamewith a good friend and Pats fan and I was pulling for the Pats....But I agree with MH's points here they beat them plain and simple with good Def football...MH-I am very concerned that the Jet's have the tools to go all the way.
</p>


Could it be Jets/Packers?</p>


No matter which of the 4 teams remaining make it to the SB, the game should be very interesting.</p>If Chicago somehow beats the pack, I don't think Chicago can beat the jet's if they were to make it past pitty.

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 01:22 PM
For the 6,000th page I would like to say

**** THE EAGLES

lttaylor56
01-17-2011, 01:26 PM
For the 6,000th page I would like to say

**** THE EAGLES+1 That is the silver lining in this current NYG cloud-the eagles are OUT.

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 01:31 PM
For the 6,000th page I would like to say **** THE EAGLES+1 That is the silver lining in this current NYG cloud-the eagles are OUT.
</P>


They saw the extent of how far Mike Vick can take them.</P>

bandwgn86
01-17-2011, 01:38 PM
Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin? </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 01:39 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 01:40 PM
For the 6,000th page I would like to say **** THE EAGLES+1 That is the silver lining in this current NYG cloud-the eagles are OUT.
</P>


They saw the extent of how far Mike Vick can take them.</P>
lol. Everything I read has him projected as the #1 fantasy player for next year. Your feelings? Vick over AP, CJ, MJD or Foster? I don't see how anyone can do it...

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 01:41 PM
alrite ****ers, im out. Time to get rid of the evil one....

ta-ta
Take it easy on Lando, all he wanted to do was give you his heart....... LOL

Between you and him I can't give it away

bandwgn86
01-17-2011, 01:44 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]

ny06
01-17-2011, 01:47 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose the Yankees over playing for his home country [:)]</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 01:52 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>

bandwgn86
01-17-2011, 01:52 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose the Yankees over playing for his home country [:)]</P>say what now? he's a Canucklehead?

ny06
01-17-2011, 01:54 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose the Yankees over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


say what now? he's a Canucklehead?</P>


Born in Ontario</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 02:00 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose the Yankees over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


say what now? he's a Canucklehead?</P>


Born in Ontario</P>


</P>


Bandy knew there was something he liked about him but couldn't put his finger on it.</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 02:00 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 02:02 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>

bandwgn86
01-17-2011, 02:05 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose the Yankees over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


say what now? he's a Canucklehead?</P>


Born in Ontario</P>


</P>


Bandy knew there was something he liked about him but couldn't put his finger on it.</P>


no quite[:$] </P>


there wasn't that many Back Catchers worth picking up.. and the Jays needed a Back Catcher</P>


</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 02:08 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 02:12 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 02:16 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 02:18 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>


</P>


A man of your sophistication should know that the century started on Jan 1. 2001.</P>


</P>


Speaking of bleeding eyes....</P>


http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_-eQJjcw9x0w/SkiPpPCcaBI/AAAAAAAAAF8/0D7G-SKRGCc/s400/death+gogo+yubari.jpg</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 02:20 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>


</P>


A man of your sophistication should know that the century started on Jan 1. 2001.</P>


</P>


Excuse me, then I guess the 2000 championship does not count. </P>


Oh well I'll give it to you, what is a lousy 10 years compared to 1923-2004</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 02:24 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>


</P>


A man of your sophistication should know that the century started on Jan 1. 2001.</P>


</P>


Excuse me, then I guess the 2000 championship does not count. </P>


Oh well I'll give it to you, what is a lousy 10 years compared to 1923-2004</P>


</P>


I'm not talking about 10 years. This CENTURY belongs to us.</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 02:24 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>


</P>


A man of your sophistication should know that the century started on Jan 1. 2001.</P>


</P>


Excuse me, then I guess the 2000 championship does not count. </P>


Oh well I'll give it to you, what is a lousy 10 years compared to 1923-2004</P>


</P>


I'm not talking about 10 years. This CENTURY belongs to us.</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 02:28 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>


</P>


A man of your sophistication should know that the century started on Jan 1. 2001.</P>


</P>


Excuse me, then I guess the 2000 championship does not count. </P>


Oh well I'll give it to you, what is a lousy 10 years compared to 1923-2004</P>


</P>


I'm not talking about 10 years. This CENTURY belongs to us.</P>


</P>


Hate to break it to you but the Yankees will be in the race this season. </P>


And like I have posted before, the BIG free agent is next year. </P>


http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2011/1/17/1940326/albert-pujols-contract-extension-cardinals-salary</P>


*anything is possible*</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 02:33 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>


</P>


A man of your sophistication should know that the century started on Jan 1. 2001.</P>


</P>


Excuse me, then I guess the 2000 championship does not count. </P>


Oh well I'll give it to you, what is a lousy 10 years compared to 1923-2004</P>


</P>


I'm not talking about 10 years. This CENTURY belongs to us.</P>


</P>


Hate to break it to you but the Yankees will be in the race this season. </P>


And like I have posted before, the BIG free agent is next year. </P>


http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2011/1/17/1940326/albert-pujols-contract-extension-cardinals-salary</P>


*anything is possible*</P>


</P>


You WILL be in a race for the cellar of the AL East with the Orioles and Jays. </P>


And what are you going to do, trade Tex and his $160MM contract to make room for Pujols?</P>


</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 02:45 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>


</P>


A man of your sophistication should know that the century started on Jan 1. 2001.</P>


</P>


Excuse me, then I guess the 2000 championship does not count. </P>


Oh well I'll give it to you, what is a lousy 10 years compared to 1923-2004</P>


</P>


I'm not talking about 10 years. This CENTURY belongs to us.</P>


</P>


Hate to break it to you but the Yankees will be in the race this season. </P>


And like I have posted before, the BIG free agent is next year. </P>


http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2011/1/17/1940326/albert-pujols-contract-extension-cardinals-salary</P>


*anything is possible*</P>


</P>


You WILL be in a race for the cellar of the AL East with the Orioles and Jays. </P>


And what are you going to do, trade Tex and his $160MM contract to make room for Pujols?</P>


</P>


</P>


The Yankees will be in the cellar of the AL East?</P>


We were in the post-season last year and swept the Twins, but now we are going to be the bottom feeders of the AL East???</P>


We don't have to trade Tex to make room for Pujols, you and everyone knows the Yankees can sign Pujols if they want. </P>


You and other posters thought it was unrealistic to think it could happen, well it seems Pujols will want A-Rod type money. And it's safe to say the Cards do not have that kind of money. </P>


Will he be a Yankee? I have no idea, but if he is a free agent next season the Yankees will be front runners on picking him up. </P>

JPizzack
01-17-2011, 02:45 PM
And what are you going to do, trade Tex and his $160MM contract to make room for Pujols?</p>


</p>

even I told ny06 I have no idea what he was talking about with this one.....

ny06
01-17-2011, 02:48 PM
Be afraid...</P>


It could happen</P>


http://i55.tinypic.com/5nrsew.jpg</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 02:49 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>


</P>


A man of your sophistication should know that the century started on Jan 1. 2001.</P>


</P>


Excuse me, then I guess the 2000 championship does not count. </P>


Oh well I'll give it to you, what is a lousy 10 years compared to 1923-2004</P>


</P>


I'm not talking about 10 years. This CENTURY belongs to us.</P>


</P>


Hate to break it to you but the Yankees will be in the race this season. </P>


And like I have posted before, the BIG free agent is next year. </P>


http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2011/1/17/1940326/albert-pujols-contract-extension-cardinals-salary</P>


*anything is possible*</P>


</P>


You WILL be in a race for the cellar of the AL East with the Orioles and Jays. </P>


And what are you going to do, trade Tex and his $160MM contract to make room for Pujols?</P>


</P>


</P>


The Yankees will be in the cellar of the AL East?</P>


We were in the post-season last year and swept the Twins, but now we are going to be the bottom feeders of the AL East???</P>


<FONT size=4>We don't have to trade Tex to make room for Pujols</FONT>, you and everyone knows the Yankees can sign Pujols if they want. </P>


You and other posters thought it was unrealistic to think it could happen, well it seems Pujols will want A-Rod type money. And it's safe to say the Cards do not have that kind of money. </P>


Will he be a Yankee? I have no idea, but if he is a free agent next season the Yankees will be front runners on picking him up. </P>


</P>


Are they going to platoon?</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 02:49 PM
And what are you going to do, trade Tex and his $160MM contract to make room for Pujols?</P>


</P>




even I told ny06 I have no idea what he was talking about with this one.....
</P>


So your saying the Yankees don't have the money or spot for Pujols?</P>


Let me guess, you said the same thing about the Yankees not getting A-Rod?</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 02:50 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>


</P>


A man of your sophistication should know that the century started on Jan 1. 2001.</P>


</P>


Excuse me, then I guess the 2000 championship does not count. </P>


Oh well I'll give it to you, what is a lousy 10 years compared to 1923-2004</P>


</P>


I'm not talking about 10 years. This CENTURY belongs to us.</P>


</P>


Hate to break it to you but the Yankees will be in the race this season. </P>


And like I have posted before, the BIG free agent is next year. </P>


http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2011/1/17/1940326/albert-pujols-contract-extension-cardinals-salary</P>


*anything is possible*</P>


</P>


You WILL be in a race for the cellar of the AL East with the Orioles and Jays. </P>


And what are you going to do, trade Tex and his $160MM contract to make room for Pujols?</P>


</P>


</P>


The Yankees will be in the cellar of the AL East?</P>


We were in the post-season last year and swept the Twins, but now we are going to be the bottom feeders of the AL East???</P>


<FONT size=4>We don't have to trade Tex to make room for Pujols</FONT>, you and everyone knows the Yankees can sign Pujols if they want. </P>


You and other posters thought it was unrealistic to think it could happen, well it seems Pujols will want A-Rod type money. And it's safe to say the Cards do not have that kind of money. </P>


Will he be a Yankee? I have no idea, but if he is a free agent next season the Yankees will be front runners on picking him up. </P>


</P>


Are they going to platoon?</P>


</P>


One of them will have to DH. </P>


</P>

JPizzack
01-17-2011, 02:51 PM
And what are you going to do, trade Tex and his $160MM contract to make room for Pujols?</p>


</p>




even I told ny06 I have no idea what he was talking about with this one.....
</p>


So your saying the Yankees don't have the money or spot for Pujols?</p>


Let me guess, you said the same thing about the Yankees not getting A-Rod?</p>

well, you dont pay a DH 160 million...nor do you pay a guy that young just to hit and not play the field.
It wont happen....there's no reason for it. at all.
We're going to improve pitching, and fill holes for the next few seasons.

ny06
01-17-2011, 02:54 PM
And what are you going to do, trade Tex and his $160MM contract to make room for Pujols?</P>


</P>




even I told ny06 I have no idea what he was talking about with this one.....
</P>


So your saying the Yankees don't have the money or spot for Pujols?</P>


Let me guess, you said the same thing about the Yankees not getting A-Rod?</P>




well, you dont pay a DH 160 million...nor do you pay a guy that young just to hit and not play the field.
It wont happen....there's no reason for it. at all.
We're going to improve pitching, and fill holes for the next few seasons.
</P>


That would be a logical answer. </P>


But you must not know how the steninbrenners do business. </P>


<U>If </U>Pujols is available the Yankees will not care if he plays DH, First or whatever. </P>


We will be adding to a dangerous lineup the best hitter in the bigs. </P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 02:55 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>


</P>


A man of your sophistication should know that the century started on Jan 1. 2001.</P>


</P>


Excuse me, then I guess the 2000 championship does not count. </P>


Oh well I'll give it to you, what is a lousy 10 years compared to 1923-2004</P>


</P>


I'm not talking about 10 years. This CENTURY belongs to us.</P>


</P>


Hate to break it to you but the Yankees will be in the race this season. </P>


And like I have posted before, the BIG free agent is next year. </P>


http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2011/1/17/1940326/albert-pujols-contract-extension-cardinals-salary</P>


*anything is possible*</P>


</P>


You WILL be in a race for the cellar of the AL East with the Orioles and Jays. </P>


And what are you going to do, trade Tex and his $160MM contract to make room for Pujols?</P>


</P>


</P>


The Yankees will be in the cellar of the AL East?</P>


We were in the post-season last year and swept the Twins, but now we are going to be the bottom feeders of the AL East???</P>


<FONT size=4>We don't have to trade Tex to make room for Pujols</FONT>, you and everyone knows the Yankees can sign Pujols if they want. </P>


You and other posters thought it was unrealistic to think it could happen, well it seems Pujols will want A-Rod type money. And it's safe to say the Cards do not have that kind of money. </P>


Will he be a Yankee? I have no idea, but if he is a free agent next season the Yankees will be front runners on picking him up. </P>


</P>


Are they going to platoon?</P>


</P>


One of them will have to DH. </P>


</P>


</P>


No wayone of, if not the best player in baseball, in his prime is gunna sign for any amount of money to be a DH. </P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 02:56 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff>Freakin Yankees.. when the hell did you sign Rusell Martin?</FONT> </P>


afternoon folks.</P>


Kase love the new look Rangers.. "if you can't win, atleast beat the hell out of em"</P>


</P>


</P>


old news..</P>


i was hoping he woulda signed with the Jays [:(]</P>


I guess he choose thecash to play for a bunch of mercs over playing for his home country [:)]</P>


</P>


</P>


Life is funny sometimes.</P>


</P>


Speaking of cash, 7 year 142 million for Crawford. (Talk about OVER-SPENDING)</P>


Adrian Gonzalez will be asking for a Mark Texeria money. </P>


You sure you want to talk about the Yankees spending money?</P>


The only deal your team made that was a smart investment was Dan Wheeler. </P>


And you will see why soo many White Sox fans wanted Bobby Jenks out of town asap. </P>


</P>


Gunna be a great year of Red Sox/Yankees trash talking.</P>


Welcome to our dynasty.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>And trust me, Gonzalez and the Sox have already agreed on a contract</FONT>. They just won't announce until after the season starts for luxury tax reasons.</P>


</P>


Did Theo Epstein tell you that?</P>


Dynasty? I did not know if your franchise knew what that meant. </P>


We on the other hand have had numerous dynasties. </P>


</P>


If you follow the Boston media you would know that its essentially common knowledge around these parts.</P>


Our dynasty startedin 2004 and we will add a third WS championship in 8 years this season.</P>


Its The Red Sox Century and you're just living in it.</P>


</P>


I don't follow the Boston media, my eyes would bleed..If I am not mistaken aren't the Yankees and Sox tied with 2 world series this Century?</P>


So if it's the Red Sox century, then the Yankees are the owners and your paying rent..</P>


</P>


A man of your sophistication should know that the century started on Jan 1. 2001.</P>


</P>


Excuse me, then I guess the 2000 championship does not count. </P>


Oh well I'll give it to you, what is a lousy 10 years compared to 1923-2004</P>


</P>


I'm not talking about 10 years. This CENTURY belongs to us.</P>


</P>


Hate to break it to you but the Yankees will be in the race this season. </P>


And like I have posted before, the BIG free agent is next year. </P>


http://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2011/1/17/1940326/albert-pujols-contract-extension-cardinals-salary</P>


*anything is possible*</P>


</P>


You WILL be in a race for the cellar of the AL East with the Orioles and Jays. </P>


And what are you going to do, trade Tex and his $160MM contract to make room for Pujols?</P>


</P>


</P>


The Yankees will be in the cellar of the AL East?</P>


We were in the post-season last year and swept the Twins, but now we are going to be the bottom feeders of the AL East???</P>


<FONT size=4>We don't have to trade Tex to make room for Pujols</FONT>, you and everyone knows the Yankees can sign Pujols if they want. </P>


You and other posters thought it was unrealistic to think it could happen, well it seems Pujols will want A-Rod type money. And it's safe to say the Cards do not have that kind of money. </P>


Will he be a Yankee? I have no idea, but if he is a free agent next season the Yankees will be front runners on picking him up. </P>


</P>


Are they going to platoon?</P>


</P>


One of them will have to DH. </P>


</P>


</P>


No wayone of, if not the best player in baseball, in his prime is gunna sign for any amount of money to be a DH. </P>


</P>


Anything is possible. </P>


I bet many did not think A-Rod would switch positions. </P>


</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 03:02 PM
Playing 3rd base and DH'ing are very different. You are on the thinnest of ice with this argument.

ny06
01-17-2011, 03:07 PM
Playing 3rd base and DH'ing are very different. You are on the thinnest of ice with this argument.</P>


No, I am speaking of opinion of what may happen. </P>


I have yet to say the Yankees are signing Pujols. </P>


All I have stated is if Pujols is a free agent the Yankees will make a legitimate offer. </P>


Who cares about positions, you don't let a player of Pujols magnitude slip away cause you have a 1st baseman. </P>


The Cards will do everything in there power to keep Pujols in St. Louis.</P>


But be realistic, he wants to be paid A-Rod money. (deservingly so)</P>


Would he stay in St. Louis for a pay cut? Or go elsewhere for more money?</P>


No loyalty in sports... </P>

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 03:14 PM
Older the bear, sweeter the chew

bigblue4417
01-17-2011, 03:22 PM
Be afraid...</P>


It could happen</P>


http://i55.tinypic.com/5nrsew.jpg</P>
That would be the worst thing ever. Baseball would be a joke. Yankees would be Microsoft. The only baseball game I would watch is the All Star Game....and Pizz says the NBA is whack!?

ny06
01-17-2011, 03:24 PM
Be afraid...</P>


It could happen</P>


http://i55.tinypic.com/5nrsew.jpg</P>


That would be the worst thing ever. Baseball would be a joke. Yankees would be Microsoft. The only baseball game I would watch is the All Star Game....and Pizz says the NBA is whack!?</P>


Baseball wants Pujols to stay in St. Louis. </P>


I just think it is going to be hard for the Cards to afford him. </P>


If I was the Cards general manager, I would do anything possible to keep the modern day Stan Musial</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 03:34 PM
Playing 3rd base and DH'ing are very different. You are on the thinnest of ice with this argument.</P>


No, I am speaking of opinion of what may happen. </P>


I have yet to say the Yankees are signing Pujols. </P>


All I have stated is if Pujols is a free agent the Yankees will make a legitimate offer. </P>


Who cares about positions, you don't let a player of Pujols magnitude slip away cause you have a 1st baseman. </P>


The Cards will do everything in there power to keep Pujols in St. Louis.</P>


But be realistic, he wants to be paid A-Rod money. (deservingly so)</P>


Would he stay in St. Louis for a pay cut? Or go elsewhere for more money?</P>


No loyalty in sports... </P>


</P>


http://www.online-sign.com/signs/warning/thumbs/257.jpg</P>


<FONT size=4>BEWARE OF THIN ICE</FONT></P>

Kase-1
01-17-2011, 03:38 PM
Older the bear, sweeter the chew

"-Blacker the berry, sweeter the juice
...Nigga, its darker the berry sweeter the juice
- Oh yea, well she darker than a mothaluva too"

10pts to the 1st person to name that movie....

ny06
01-17-2011, 03:39 PM
Playing 3rd base and DH'ing are very different. You are on the thinnest of ice with this argument.</P>


No, I am speaking of opinion of what may happen. </P>


I have yet to say the Yankees are signing Pujols. </P>


All I have stated is if Pujols is a free agent the Yankees will make a legitimate offer. </P>


Who cares about positions, you don't let a player of Pujols magnitude slip away cause you have a 1st baseman. </P>


The Cards will do everything in there power to keep Pujols in St. Louis.</P>


But be realistic, he wants to be paid A-Rod money. (deservingly so)</P>


Would he stay in St. Louis for a pay cut? Or go elsewhere for more money?</P>


No loyalty in sports... </P>


</P>


http://www.online-sign.com/signs/warning/thumbs/257.jpg</P>


<FONT size=4>BEWARE OF THIN ICE</FONT></P>


</P>


I guess giving an opinion ona players future is not warranted in this convo?</P>


Can you explain how the Cards are going to afford Pujols?</P>


</P>

JPizzack
01-17-2011, 03:41 PM
Let the record show I think everything ny06 is saying is...uhh...a total stretch.
I can tell you exactly what will happen. Pujols will talk to the yanks(his own choice), who will make a lowball offer, the get leverage from other teams. Thats assuming anyone on the yankees actually even cares.

JPizzack
01-17-2011, 03:43 PM
I guess giving an opinion ona players future is not warranted in this convo?</p>


Can you explain how the Cards are going to afford Pujols?</p>


</p>

actually, I would dare you to answer how can they NOT

ny06
01-17-2011, 03:46 PM
Let the record show I think everything ny06 is saying is...uhh...a total stretch.
I can tell you exactly what will happen. Pujols will talk to the yanks(his own choice), who will make a lowball offer, the get leverage from other teams. Thats assuming anyone on the yankees actually even cares.
</P>


It may be a stretch but it's not unrealistic.</P>


First if the Cards don't get a deal done before spring training then Pujols and the cards will no longer be talking contract extensions during the season. </P>


Could that change? Of course..</P>


The only way Pujols talks to the Yankees if the Cards don't get a deal on the table before spring training is over. </P>


I am assuming he will want to stay in St. Louis, but they will have to dish out there biggest contract in franchise history.</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 03:46 PM
I guess giving an opinion ona players future is not warranted in this convo?</P>


Can you explain how the Cards are going to afford Pujols?</P>


</P>




actually, I would dare you to answer how can they NOT
</P>


$275 million reasons</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 03:48 PM
Playing 3rd base and DH'ing are very different. You are on the thinnest of ice with this argument.</P>


No, I am speaking of opinion of what may happen. </P>


I have yet to say the Yankees are signing Pujols. </P>


All I have stated is if Pujols is a free agent the Yankees will make a legitimate offer. </P>


Who cares about positions, you don't let a player of Pujols magnitude slip away cause you have a 1st baseman. </P>


The Cards will do everything in there power to keep Pujols in St. Louis.</P>


But be realistic, he wants to be paid A-Rod money. (deservingly so)</P>


Would he stay in St. Louis for a pay cut? Or go elsewhere for more money?</P>


No loyalty in sports... </P>


</P>


http://www.online-sign.com/signs/warning/thumbs/257.jpg</P>


<FONT size=4>BEWARE OF THIN ICE</FONT></P>


</P>


I guess giving an opinion ona players future is not warranted in this convo?</P>


Can you explain how the Cards are going to afford Pujols?</P>


</P>


</P>


Don't get touchy!</P>


Let me explain why your "Pujols to the Yankees" scenario makes NO SENSE.</P>


The question is not whether or not he will resign with St. Louis.( Although I would be shocked if he doesn't. If they were willing to pay Holiday that much, why on earth would they now not want to sign Pujols)</P>


The real question is why the Yankees would be a likely suitor. They have a top 1st baseman. They will not DH a guy who has the kind of defensive skills Tex has. So you are suggesting that Pujols will be willing to spend the rest of his career sitting on the bench (as one of the gresatest players of the past 20 years) and be a DH. That defies logic. He would never tarnish his career, and quite frankly the Yankees aren't dumb enough to pay him that much money to do it.</P>

JPizzack
01-17-2011, 03:52 PM
Pujols and Wainwright should be the biggest concerns of STL. they have alot of expendable pieces after that, including Holiday....bad deal to begin with. They will spend the money, itll happen

ny06
01-17-2011, 03:56 PM
Playing 3rd base and DH'ing are very different. You are on the thinnest of ice with this argument.</P>


No, I am speaking of opinion of what may happen. </P>


I have yet to say the Yankees are signing Pujols. </P>


All I have stated is if Pujols is a free agent the Yankees will make a legitimate offer. </P>


Who cares about positions, you don't let a player of Pujols magnitude slip away cause you have a 1st baseman. </P>


The Cards will do everything in there power to keep Pujols in St. Louis.</P>


But be realistic, he wants to be paid A-Rod money. (deservingly so)</P>


Would he stay in St. Louis for a pay cut? Or go elsewhere for more money?</P>


No loyalty in sports... </P>


</P>


http://www.online-sign.com/signs/warning/thumbs/257.jpg</P>


<FONT size=4>BEWARE OF THIN ICE</FONT></P>


</P>


I guess giving an opinion ona players future is not warranted in this convo?</P>


Can you explain how the Cards are going to afford Pujols?</P>


</P>


</P>


Don't get touchy!</P>


Let me explain why your "Pujols to the Yankees" scenario makes NO SENSE.</P>


The question is not whether or not he will resign with St. Louis.( Although I would be shocked if he doesn't. If they were willing to pay Holiday that much, why on earth would they now not want to sign Pujols)</P>


The real question is why the Yankees would be a likely suitor. They have a top 1st baseman. They will not DH a guy who has the kind of defensive skills Tex has. So you are suggesting that Pujols will be willing to spend the rest of his career sitting on the bench (as one of the gresatest players of the past 20 years) and be a DH. That defies logic. He would never tarnish his career, and quite frankly the Yankees aren't dumb enough to pay him that much money to do it.</P>


</P>


The question isn't will the Cards pay Pujols, the question is can they afford him? </P>


Why would being a DH tarnish a career?</P>


This deal may never happen, but to say it won't happen is not thinking of the big picture. </P>


Do I want the Yankees to pick Pujols up if he is a free agent? Of course, would it be hard to find a spot to put him cause of Tex? Yeah. </P>


My arguement is you don't let hitters like Pujols go if he is available</P>

Morehead State
01-17-2011, 04:05 PM
Playing 3rd base and DH'ing are very different. You are on the thinnest of ice with this argument.</P>


No, I am speaking of opinion of what may happen. </P>


I have yet to say the Yankees are signing Pujols. </P>


All I have stated is if Pujols is a free agent the Yankees will make a legitimate offer. </P>


Who cares about positions, you don't let a player of Pujols magnitude slip away cause you have a 1st baseman. </P>


The Cards will do everything in there power to keep Pujols in St. Louis.</P>


But be realistic, he wants to be paid A-Rod money. (deservingly so)</P>


Would he stay in St. Louis for a pay cut? Or go elsewhere for more money?</P>


No loyalty in sports... </P>


</P>


http://www.online-sign.com/signs/warning/thumbs/257.jpg</P>


<FONT size=4>BEWARE OF THIN ICE</FONT></P>


</P>


I guess giving an opinion ona players future is not warranted in this convo?</P>


Can you explain how the Cards are going to afford Pujols?</P>


</P>


</P>


Don't get touchy!</P>


Let me explain why your "Pujols to the Yankees" scenario makes NO SENSE.</P>


The question is not whether or not he will resign with St. Louis.( Although I would be shocked if he doesn't. If they were willing to pay Holiday that much, why on earth would they now not want to sign Pujols)</P>


The real question is why the Yankees would be a likely suitor. They have a top 1st baseman. They will not DH a guy who has the kind of defensive skills Tex has. So you are suggesting that Pujols will be willing to spend the rest of his career sitting on the bench (as one of the gresatest players of the past 20 years) and be a DH. That defies logic. He would never tarnish his career, and quite frankly the Yankees aren't dumb enough to pay him that much money to do it.</P>


</P>


The question isn't will the Cards pay Pujols, the question is can they afford him? </P>


Why would being a DH tarnish a career?</P>


This deal may never happen, but to say it won't happen is not thinking of the big picture. </P>


Do I want the Yankees to pick Pujols up if he is a free agent? Of course, would it be hard to find a spot to put him cause of Tex? Yeah. </P>


My arguement is you don't let hitters like Pujols go if he is available</P>


</P>


You are going all "Daven" on this. You just won't give it up. </P>


The Yankees do not have a need for a 1st baseman, and no way Pujols would want to be a DH.</P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 04:10 PM
Playing 3rd base and DH'ing are very different. You are on the thinnest of ice with this argument.</P>


No, I am speaking of opinion of what may happen. </P>


I have yet to say the Yankees are signing Pujols. </P>


All I have stated is if Pujols is a free agent the Yankees will make a legitimate offer. </P>


Who cares about positions, you don't let a player of Pujols magnitude slip away cause you have a 1st baseman. </P>


The Cards will do everything in there power to keep Pujols in St. Louis.</P>


But be realistic, he wants to be paid A-Rod money. (deservingly so)</P>


Would he stay in St. Louis for a pay cut? Or go elsewhere for more money?</P>


No loyalty in sports... </P>


</P>


http://www.online-sign.com/signs/warning/thumbs/257.jpg</P>


<FONT size=4>BEWARE OF THIN ICE</FONT></P>


</P>


I guess giving an opinion ona players future is not warranted in this convo?</P>


Can you explain how the Cards are going to afford Pujols?</P>


</P>


</P>


Don't get touchy!</P>


Let me explain why your "Pujols to the Yankees" scenario makes NO SENSE.</P>


The question is not whether or not he will resign with St. Louis.( Although I would be shocked if he doesn't. If they were willing to pay Holiday that much, why on earth would they now not want to sign Pujols)</P>


The real question is why the Yankees would be a likely suitor. They have a top 1st baseman. They will not DH a guy who has the kind of defensive skills Tex has. So you are suggesting that Pujols will be willing to spend the rest of his career sitting on the bench (as one of the gresatest players of the past 20 years) and be a DH. That defies logic. He would never tarnish his career, and quite frankly the Yankees aren't dumb enough to pay him that much money to do it.</P>


</P>


The question isn't will the Cards pay Pujols, the question is can they afford him? </P>


Why would being a DH tarnish a career?</P>


This deal may never happen, but to say it won't happen is not thinking of the big picture. </P>


Do I want the Yankees to pick Pujols up if he is a free agent? Of course, would it be hard to find a spot to put him cause of Tex? Yeah. </P>


My arguement is you don't let hitters like Pujols go if he is available</P>


</P>


You are going all "Daven" on this. You just won't give it up. </P>


The Yankees do not have a need for a 1st baseman, and no way Pujols would want to be a DH.</P>


</P>


The Yankees don't need a first baseman. </P>


And the reason I am not giving up is it has yet to happen. </P>


Pujols could sign his extension tommorow and this convo would have been moot. </P>


But he <U>could </U>test the free agent market, and who's to say the Yankees won't try to bring him in? </P>


I have said it before, anything is possible. </P>

ny06
01-17-2011, 04:14 PM
I have never stated the Yankees are signing Pujols. </P>


All I have stated is that it will be very difficult for the Cards to afford the contract demand of Pujols. </P>


The only team that could afford Pujols is the Yankees. </P>


But the yankees have invested alot of money into there first baseman teixeira.</P>


Do I think Pujols would want to play DH? Prob not, but we as fans have no idea what can happen. </P>

bandwgn86
01-17-2011, 05:04 PM
I have never stated the Yankees are signing Pujols. </P>


All I have stated is that it will be very difficult for the Cards to afford the contract demand of Pujols. </P>


The only team that could afford Pujols is the Yankees. </P>


But the yankees have invested alot of money into there first baseman teixeira.</P>


Do I think Pujols would want to play DH? Prob not, but we as fans have no idea what can happen. </P>Yankees suck [:)]

bandwgn86
01-17-2011, 05:09 PM
and so do the Lakers

ny06
01-17-2011, 09:35 PM
[;)]




I have never stated the Yankees are signing Pujols. </P>


All I have stated is that it will be very difficult for the Cards to afford the contract demand of Pujols. </P>


The only team that could afford Pujols is the Yankees. </P>


But the yankees have invested alot of money into there first baseman teixeira.</P>


Do I think Pujols would want to play DH? Prob not, but we as fans have no idea what can happen. </P>


Yankees suck [:)]</P>


You hate the Yankees soo much you like them [;)]</P>

bandwgn86
01-17-2011, 11:10 PM
[;)]




I have never stated the Yankees are signing Pujols. </P>


All I have stated is that it will be very difficult for the Cards to afford the contract demand of Pujols. </P>


The only team that could afford Pujols is the Yankees. </P>


But the yankees have invested alot of money into there first baseman teixeira.</P>


Do I think Pujols would want to play DH? Prob not, but we as fans have no idea what can happen. </P>


Yankees suck [:)]</P>


You hate the Yankees soo much you like them [;)]</P>NEVER!
LOL.. but i do admit baseball needs the Yanks..they are a necessary evil if you will.

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 08:53 AM
anyone gettin this same uhh...idk what to call it. ice storm?
they cant keep it off the roads fast enough, its crazy here.</P>


I've been in the branch for 45 mins, and i've seen the big town plows go by twice, and the road has like 4 inches of slush on it (if not worse than slush)</P>

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 09:05 AM
Love this....
Bill Simmons, who is basically my favorite sports writer of all time (Morehead You'll like him, Boston franchises fan, lived there till recent years) had an article last week about where Carmelo will end up.
Sorry for such a large quote, but I think this is awesome...lol





There is one better place for Anthony: for basketball, his title chances, his wife, everything. He is choosing not to see it. He could even get his $65 million extension right away.</P>


</P>





The place? Los Angeles.</P>


</P>





The team? The Clippers.</P>


</P>





Thirty-four years of misery and bad luck, the most despicable owner in sports … I know. And I know you're laughing and saying, "Stop it, Simmons, you're just saying this because you've had season tickets since 2004 and they beat the Heat on Wednesday night, you're embarrassing yourself." Just hear me out. This Blake Griffin situation has gone places for which, frankly, I wasn't prepared. You see this stuff on television, you see these guys when they pass through town, but to have someone this special playing down the street … to have season tickets for someone like this … I can barely put it into words.</P>


</P>





You know when you're in the theater watching a gripping movie, and you can't get up for the bathroom or popcorn because you don't want to miss a scene? That's Griffin. He's the movie. You can't get up, glance at your iPhone, glance at a text, fumble for your soda … there's just no way to know when that next highlight is coming. The fact that he's a guaranteed 24-13 guy every night -- it's almost an afterthought to the show itself. Griffin plays with an ongoing recklessness that's both breathtaking and petrifying.</P>


</P>





Remember, Clippers fans are conditioned to think the worst. They've been burned too many times: Danny Manning, Shaun Livingston, Derek Smith, Bill Walton, Ron Harper, you name it. Giving them the league's most fearless player is almost like a psychology experiment; the energy in the stands resembles nothing you have ever felt at a sporting event. There's Blake flying up for an offensive rebound, soaring higher, and higher, and then a little bit higher … and we're sitting there in awe, and we're gasping for air … and right at the moment of truth, we realize one of the following four things:</P>


</P>





A. Blake is about to make the single greatest highlight in the history of professional basketball.



B. Blake is about to give us the highlight of the night.



C. Blake can't pull this off because the degree of difficulty is too high, but he's trying anyway.



D. Blake is going to break his neck or land in a such a way that his leg flies off his body and lands in the fifth row.</P>


</P>





Those are the four options EVERY time he goes in the air. Watching it unfold reminds me of watching my 3-year-old son, who's equally fearless (and dangerous); occasionally, we'll notice him missing, look around, then catch him sliding down a flight of stairs at warp speed on top of a mangled UPS box with no time to stop him. All we can do is stand there and yelp, then hold our breath and hope he makes it. That's Griffin. There is nothing like seeing him live. Nothing. Even if he gives you one electric moment in 150 minutes, that moment beats anyone else's electric moment right now. Clippers fans have learned to anticipate those moments just before they happen, paving the way for the best side effect for any basketball or hockey crowd: when fans start reacting to something great before it happens … and then it happens.</P>


</P>





Example: Against Denver last week, Blake stole the ball and dribbled down the right wing, with Baron Davis trailing to his left and one defender back. As Blake crossed the foul line extended, headed for a seemingly easy layup, he threw the ball back for Baron. To the uninitiated, the pass seemed idiotic. You're giving up a possible layup? Really? But Clippers fans had been properly trained by this point. They knew. They got it. Blake wanted the Return Oop. Even as Blake was throwing the pass, the buzz started, like a low rumble of a "Whoooaaaaa." Baron deftly took the pass and lobbed it back ("WHOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAA!"), but Blake was already jumping ("WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAA!") and climbing and climbing and climbing (here's where the "Oh God, don't let him get hurt" sound comes in, which I can't even spell properly), then the slam ("HARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!") We lost our minds, basically. At halftime, I was still so wired that J.A. Adande teased me, "Look at you, you can't stop hopping up and down, you're like a little kid." </P>


</P>





I can't help it. Griffin is the most meaningful in-the-air player since Shawn Kemp. Throw in his competitive streak and he did the impossible -- he made Baron Davis care about basketball again. As my friend Tollin said last week, "It's amazing; it's like Baron has a purpose again." He's Blake's dunk muse. Now the Clips have the foundation of something special: Griffin, Davis, Eric Gordon (a future All-Star) and enough left to make a legitimate offer for Denver: lottery pick Al-Farouq Aminu, Chris Kaman, expiring contracts and the rights to Minnesota's unprotected 2012 pick (nearly as valuable a trade chip as Favors) for Carmelo and Al Harrington's horrendous contract that's the Carmelo Trade Tax. Mrs. Anthony could live in Hollywood and make her next unwatchable reality show. And her husband could play with Griffin, Gordon, Davis, Eric Bledsoe and DeAndre Jordan … a situation that's between five and 20 times more appealing than New Jersey. Even when you include Donald Sterling.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 09:10 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 09:15 AM
was just about to update u mutts about my day about everybody in my department called out and all I have is me, myself, and i to deal with today. But that just changed and my boss of all people just walked in...

reminds me of yesterday, I was excited my ex was gonna move all her **** out and although she got most of it. But the dumb ***** didn't get a storage unit big enough and she still has half my storage space filled... I can't stomach her...

two days, two teabags

****

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 09:22 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


yuppp. pretty much.
Edgar Martinezwas the ****tttttt! ppl teased me cuz I was a Yankee fan when I was little who also LOVED The Mariners.
But what wasn't to love?!?!?!
Junior, Edgar, Tino, A-Rod, Jay Buhner, Randy Johnson? ****, even Goose Gossage played on the 94 team! lol</P>

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 09:25 AM
was just about to update u mutts about my day about everybody in my department called out and all I have is me, myself, and i to deal with today. But that just changed and my boss of all people just walked in...

reminds me of yesterday, I was excited my ex was gonna move all her **** out and although she got most of it. But the dumb ***** didn't get a storage unit big enough and she still has half my storage space filled... I can't stomach her...

two days, two teabags

****
</P>


that sucks!!</P>


aaaaaand...</P>


that sucks!!</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 09:35 AM
damn man... i had my boy over the crib on sunday. I've gone to school with him since 5th grade. He just moved back up to Jersey after living in florida for 8 years for this chick we use to go to school with and was his prom date. He was over telling me and blondie he thinks hes gonna get her a ring before the years out. Just looked at his fb: "last 5 months were a lie" and then his chick set her **** to single.

i hate *****es

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 09:38 AM
damn man... i had my boy over the crib on sunday. I've gone to school with him since 5th grade. He just moved back up to Jersey after living in florida for 8 years for this chick we use to go to school with and was his prom date. He was over telling me and blondie he thinks hes gonna get her a ring before the years out. Just looked at his fb: "last 5 months were a lie" and then his chick set her **** to single.

i hate *****es
</P>


wow...wtf...
</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 09:40 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 09:47 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
</P>


lol he played right into the interviewer's questioning...</P>


but yea, he's not saying anything that is news really...its not like nobody knows Coughlin is uptight lol.</P>


what I don't get is...remember in strahan's book, how he confronted TC, and Coughlin was like...listen I know youre right...I will back off, but you have to respect my style or else nobody else will follow?
What happened to all that? Was it just cuz it was Strahan? does TC think our team is full of no respect jobbers or something? i guess i dont get the coaching style really...</P>

bigblue4417
01-18-2011, 10:00 AM
I am so sick of hearing about Plax

P.S. Matt - Blow me!

dezzzR
01-18-2011, 10:01 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 10:09 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.
</P>


i dont really care about coughlin's record.
if we arent winning, it's not working.

Rolle just isnt a good interviewee, unlike Eli who just knows what to say and what to avoid...
Rolle just plays into it...so bad...</P>

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 10:11 AM
I am so sick of hearing about Plax

P.S. Matt - Blow me!



</P>


BEEEEELOOOOW MEEEEEEE</P>

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:15 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 10:18 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>


</P>


he has also started games at 2B and SS, whats your point? lol</P>

dezzzR
01-18-2011, 10:19 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.
</p>


i dont really care about coughlin's record.
if we arent winning, it's not working.

Rolle just isnt a good interviewee, unlike Eli who just knows what to say and what to avoid...
Rolle just plays into it...so bad...</p>he knew what type of guy tc was before he signed the contract. he needs to shut his mouth.

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:21 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


yuppp. pretty much.
Edgar Martinezwas the ****tttttt! <FONT color=#0000ff>ppl teased me cuz I was a Yankee fan when I was little who also LOVED The Mariners.
</FONT>But what wasn't to love?!?!?!
Junior, Edgar, Tino, A-Rod, Jay Buhner, Randy Johnson? ****, even Goose Gossage played on the 94 team! lol</P>


</P>


I would have teased you too. </P>


You like a team that knocked out Don Mattingly and the yankees in 95. </P>


<FONT color=#ff0000>How many Championships did they win again?</FONT></P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:23 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
</p>


lol he played right into the interviewer's questioning...</p>


but yea, he's not saying anything that is news really...its not like nobody knows Coughlin is uptight lol.</p>


what I don't get is...remember in strahan's book, how he confronted TC, and Coughlin was like...listen I know youre right...I will back off, but you have to respect my style or else nobody else will follow?
What happened to all that? Was it just cuz it was Strahan? does TC think our team is full of no respect jobbers or something? i guess i dont get the coaching style really...</p>

thta could be it but I have to put that on Tuck and Osi....

I mean Rolle def doesn't have TC's respect to be the real leader of defense simply by the fact that he hasn't been there. Tuck has to be that bridge and hes not

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:24 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>


</P>


he has also started games at 2B and SS, whats your point? lol</P>


</P>


My point is when he came into the bigs he played left-field. </P>


And to say he played 2nd base and short stop is silly, what he play that afew games?</P>


He played left field and 3rd base on and off for a few seasons. </P>


</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:24 AM
I am so sick of hearing about Plax

P.S. Matt - Blow me!





i watched a lil of that game... Kobe was on Westbrook all night

he got owned

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:25 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.


all of a sudden ur a TC guy?

10-6 is bull**** if u can't beat anybody .500 or better

lucky schedule

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:26 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</p>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</p>

okay so then TWO possible high doubtful scenerios. I wont even give him playing DH the label of being doubtful, thats just impossible.

And im not sure Pujos has the respect for Tex to move over like Arod did for Jeter.

He would have to REALLY want to just be a Yankee

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:27 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</p>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</p>

okay so then TWO possible high doubtful scenerios. I wont even give him playing DH the label of being doubtful, thats just impossible.

And im not sure Pujos has the respect for Tex to move over like Arod did for Jeter.

He would have to REALLY want to just be a Yankee

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:27 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.
</p>


i dont really care about coughlin's record.
if we arent winning, it's not working.

Rolle just isnt a good interviewee, unlike Eli who just knows what to say and what to avoid...
Rolle just plays into it...so bad...</p>he knew what type of guy tc was before he signed the contract. he needs to shut his mouth.


TC needs to stop being a stubborn *****. 3 years in a row of underperforming, 2 years of missed playoffs, with 2 of the past 3 years with a superbowl caliber team....

TC got saved by Spags and we all know it. Enough of this loyalty to him. Its enough

The CBA saved Coughlin this year

Morehead State
01-18-2011, 10:27 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>


</P>


he has also started games at 2B and SS, whats your point? lol</P>


</P>


My point is when he came into the bigs he played left-field. </P>


And to say he played 2nd base and short stop is silly, what he play that afew games?</P>


He played left field and 3rd base on and off for a few seasons. </P>


</P>


</P>


While I appreciate your Davenlike tenacity........You really need to let this go.</P>

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:28 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>




okay so then TWO possible high doubtful scenerios. I wont even give him playing DH the label of being doubtful, thats just impossible.

And im not sure Pujos has the respect for Tex to move over like Arod did for Jeter.

He would have to REALLY want to just be a Yankee
</P>


Why is it so doubtful?</P>


Unlikely? Yes, but not highly doubtful.</P>


</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:28 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</p>


yuppp. pretty much.
Edgar Martinezwas the ****tttttt! <font color="#0000ff">ppl teased me cuz I was a Yankee fan when I was little who also LOVED The Mariners.
</font>But what wasn't to love?!?!?!
Junior, Edgar, Tino, A-Rod, Jay Buhner, Randy Johnson? ****, even Goose Gossage played on the 94 team! lol</p>


</p>


I would have teased you too. </p>


You like a team that knocked out Don Mattingly and the yankees in 95. </p>


<font color="#ff0000">How many Championships did they win again?</font></p>

He also likes Emo...

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:29 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>


</P>


he has also started games at 2B and SS, whats your point? lol</P>


</P>


My point is when he came into the bigs he played left-field. </P>


And to say he played 2nd base and short stop is silly, what he play that afew games?</P>


He played left field and 3rd base on and off for a few seasons. </P>


</P>


</P>


While I appreciate your Davenlike tenacity........You really need to let this go.</P>


</P>


I did..</P>


I responded to mmb. </P>


</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:31 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</p>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</p>


</p>


he has also started games at 2B and SS, whats your point? lol</p>


</p>


My point is when he came into the bigs he played left-field. </p>


And to say he played 2nd base and short stop is silly, what he play that afew games?</p>


He played left field and 3rd base on and off for a few seasons. </p>


</p>


</p>


While I appreciate your Davenlike tenacity........You really need to let this go.</p>

i reopened it today. Wasn't around to throw my two cents in.

I am the guilty party

Morehead State
01-18-2011, 10:32 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>


</P>


he has also started games at 2B and SS, whats your point? lol</P>


</P>


My point is when he came into the bigs he played left-field. </P>


And to say he played 2nd base and short stop is silly, what he play that afew games?</P>


He played left field and 3rd base on and off for a few seasons. </P>


</P>


</P>


While I appreciate your Davenlike tenacity........You really need to let this go.</P>


</P>


I did..</P>


I responded to mmb. </P>


</P>


</P>


I'm not seeing it. Don't make me call you Scrappy-too!</P>

dezzzR
01-18-2011, 10:32 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.


all of a sudden ur a TC guy?

10-6 is bull**** if u can't beat anybody .500 or better

lucky schedule
you know iv always supported tc. to insinuate that some how his firm discipline is causing us to loose games is laughable and a cop out imo.

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:32 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</p>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</p>




okay so then TWO possible high doubtful scenerios. I wont even give him playing DH the label of being doubtful, thats just impossible.

And im not sure Pujos has the respect for Tex to move over like Arod did for Jeter.

He would have to REALLY want to just be a Yankee
</p>


Why is it so doubtful?</p>


Unlikely? Yes, but not highly doubtful.</p>


</p>

its doubtful cuz not only would they not spend that money on a dh and Pujos won't settle for DH

and the yankees wouldn't move Tex to DH

it takes two to tango and neither would have their dancing shoes on for that.

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:34 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>


</P>


he has also started games at 2B and SS, whats your point? lol</P>


</P>


My point is when he came into the bigs he played left-field. </P>


And to say he played 2nd base and short stop is silly, what he play that afew games?</P>


He played left field and 3rd base on and off for a few seasons. </P>


</P>


</P>


While I appreciate your Davenlike tenacity........You really need to let this go.</P>


</P>


I did..</P>


I responded to mmb. </P>


</P>


</P>


I'm not seeing it. Don't make me call you Scrappy-too!</P>


</P>


scroll back...</P>


</P>

Morehead State
01-18-2011, 10:34 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>


</P>


he has also started games at 2B and SS, whats your point? lol</P>


</P>


My point is when he came into the bigs he played left-field. </P>


And to say he played 2nd base and short stop is silly, what he play that afew games?</P>


He played left field and 3rd base on and off for a few seasons. </P>


</P>


</P>


While I appreciate your Davenlike tenacity........You really need to let this go.</P>




i reopened it today. Wasn't around to throw my two cents in.

I am the guilty party
</P>


No. If he had let it go, he would have said.."I'm wrong, its crazy talk I know. I should have known that if Morehead was on the other side, I must be wrong"</P>


When he says that (and in those exact words) I will know that he has truly dropped it.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:35 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.


all of a sudden ur a TC guy?

10-6 is bull**** if u can't beat anybody .500 or better

lucky schedule
you know iv always supported tc. to insinuate that some how his firm discipline is causing us to loose games is laughable and a cop out imo.


its the overall package of stubborness

it was admittedly the same issues we had pre-2007. So i think to say its a copout is u just trying to downplay the issue at hand.

Spags won us the superbowl, not coughlin

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 10:35 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


yuppp. pretty much.
Edgar Martinezwas the ****tttttt! <FONT color=#0000ff>ppl teased me cuz I was a Yankee fan when I was little who also LOVED The Mariners.
</FONT>But what wasn't to love?!?!?!
Junior, Edgar, Tino, A-Rod, Jay Buhner, Randy Johnson? ****, even Goose Gossage played on the 94 team! lol</P>


</P>


I would have teased you too. </P>


You like a team that knocked out Don Mattingly and the yankees in 95. </P>


<FONT color=#ff0000>How many Championships did they win again?</FONT></P>


</P>


they coulda easily won the AL easily the year there was no WS. lol
and no, i wanted the Yanks to win that year obviously. </P>

Morehead State
01-18-2011, 10:36 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.


all of a sudden ur a TC guy?

10-6 is bull**** if u can't beat anybody .500 or better

lucky schedule
you know iv always supported tc. to insinuate that some how his firm discipline is causing us to loose games is laughable and a cop out imo.
</P>


Real discipline shows itself with disciplined play on the field. I didn't see any of that this year. Did you?</P>

dezzzR
01-18-2011, 10:36 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.


all of a sudden ur a TC guy?

10-6 is bull**** if u can't beat anybody .500 or better

lucky schedule
you know iv always supported tc. to insinuate that some how his firm discipline is causing us to loose games is laughable and a cop out imo.


its the overall package of stubborness

it was admittedly the same issues we had pre-2007. So i think to say its a copout is u just trying to downplay the issue at hand.

Spags won us the superbowl, not coughlin
ohhh shut up

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:37 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>




okay so then TWO possible high doubtful scenerios. I wont even give him playing DH the label of being doubtful, thats just impossible.

And im not sure Pujos has the respect for Tex to move over like Arod did for Jeter.

He would have to REALLY want to just be a Yankee
</P>


Why is it so doubtful?</P>


Unlikely? Yes, but not highly doubtful.</P>


</P>




its doubtful cuz not only would they not spend that money on a dh and Pujos won't settle for DH

and the yankees wouldn't move Tex to DH

it takes two to tango and neither would have their dancing shoes on for that.


</P>


Well I will say this. </P>


Don't be suprised the Cards don't resign Pujols. </P>


He wants a contract in the 200 million. Don't see the Cards affording that. </P>


That was my main arguement, that he was not staying in St. Louis.</P>


Then I was just playing around that he could come to NY, wishful thinking? Yeah, but you never know. </P>


Stranger things have happened..</P>

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:38 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>


</P>


he has also started games at 2B and SS, whats your point? lol</P>


</P>


My point is when he came into the bigs he played left-field. </P>


And to say he played 2nd base and short stop is silly, what he play that afew games?</P>


He played left field and 3rd base on and off for a few seasons. </P>


</P>


</P>


While I appreciate your Davenlike tenacity........You really need to let this go.</P>




i reopened it today. Wasn't around to throw my two cents in.

I am the guilty party
</P>


No. If he had let it go, he would have said.."I'm wrong, its crazy talk I know. I should have known that if Morehead was on the other side, I must be wrong"</P>


When he says that (and in those exact words) I will know that he has truly dropped it.</P>


</P>


Are you high?</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:38 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.


all of a sudden ur a TC guy?

10-6 is bull**** if u can't beat anybody .500 or better

lucky schedule
you know iv always supported tc. to insinuate that some how his firm discipline is causing us to loose games is laughable and a cop out imo.
</p>


Real discipline shows itself with disciplined play on the field. I didn't see any of that this year. Did you?</p>

"its the players fault"

there i responded for him

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:39 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.


all of a sudden ur a TC guy?

10-6 is bull**** if u can't beat anybody .500 or better

lucky schedule
you know iv always supported tc. to insinuate that some how his firm discipline is causing us to loose games is laughable and a cop out imo.


its the overall package of stubborness

it was admittedly the same issues we had pre-2007. So i think to say its a copout is u just trying to downplay the issue at hand.

Spags won us the superbowl, not coughlin
ohhh shut up


Spags won us Cowboys and Pats, Plax won us GB

I coulda coached our guys to victory vs TB

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:39 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</p>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</p>


</p>


he has also started games at 2B and SS, whats your point? lol</p>


</p>


My point is when he came into the bigs he played left-field. </p>


And to say he played 2nd base and short stop is silly, what he play that afew games?</p>


He played left field and 3rd base on and off for a few seasons. </p>


</p>


</p>


While I appreciate your Davenlike tenacity........You really need to let this go.</p>




i reopened it today. Wasn't around to throw my two cents in.

I am the guilty party
</p>


No. If he had let it go, he would have said.."I'm wrong, its crazy talk I know. I should have known that if Morehead was on the other side, I must be wrong"</p>


When he says that (and in those exact words) I will know that he has truly dropped it.</p>


</p>


Are you high?</p>

lol sniffing glue caps this morning pappy?

Morehead State
01-18-2011, 10:40 AM
theres only one possible scenerio I can see for the Yanks to get Pujos, but it would be insane and doubtful

Move him to third, arod to short, Jeter to outfield...

like i said, beyond doubtful... they ain't gonna spend that kind of money for a DH

And somebody asked why wouldn't Pujos play DH? Well because if he cares anything about his legacy just look at Edgar Martinez. The guy who was the greatest DH ever. The guy who Mo himself was the hardest hitter hes ever faced. He can't get a nod to get in being a DH.... there is a pride factor in baseball, jaded, though its still there
</P>


You are aware Pujols played left-field right?</P>


</P>


he has also started games at 2B and SS, whats your point? lol</P>


</P>


My point is when he came into the bigs he played left-field. </P>


And to say he played 2nd base and short stop is silly, what he play that afew games?</P>


He played left field and 3rd base on and off for a few seasons. </P>


</P>


</P>


While I appreciate your Davenlike tenacity........You really need to let this go.</P>




i reopened it today. Wasn't around to throw my two cents in.

I am the guilty party
</P>


No. If he had let it go, he would have said.."I'm wrong, its crazy talk I know. I should have known that if Morehead was on the other side, I must be wrong"</P>


When he says that (and in those exact words) I will know that he has truly dropped it.</P>


</P>


Are you high?</P>


</P>


Only on life.</P>

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 10:43 AM
thta could be it but I have to put that on Tuck and Osi....

I mean Rolle def doesn't have TC's respect to be the real leader of defense simply by the fact that he hasn't been there. Tuck has to be that bridge and hes not
</P>


nobody has stepped up on this team really....
I don't even see Tuck as a leader,
last year Osi spoke out and was treated just the way dezz is treating Rolle...but at least someone said something...
Now we just kinda sit around complaining, and when a player says something, some of us complain even more.</P>

Morehead State
01-18-2011, 10:43 AM
<FONT size=4>NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</FONT></P>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</P>

dezzzR
01-18-2011, 10:43 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.


all of a sudden ur a TC guy?

10-6 is bull**** if u can't beat anybody .500 or better

lucky schedule
you know iv always supported tc. to insinuate that some how his firm discipline is causing us to loose games is laughable and a cop out imo.
</p>


Real discipline shows itself with disciplined play on the field. I didn't see any of that this year. Did you?</p>i saw ****ty playcalling, poor execution and players (not including rolle) taking blame for not playing well. you guys can blame tc all you want, but hes not the problem.

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:45 AM
<FONT size=4>NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</FONT></P>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</P>


</P>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </P>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </P>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</P>

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 10:47 AM
Since we are magically back to talking about Giants football....I have to say this...

There is literally NO reason Gilbride should still be a coordinator on our team.
If he's a good coordinator, which i know we all think he isnt not obviously...then he should have been courted by teams by now, like seriously given offers if not a job...
And if he's NOT a good coordinator(duh) he shouldnt even have a job here anymore.
And since both those scenarios are normal, why is he not insulted that Spags and Fewell have been looked at, and quit by now? lol

Career offensive coordinator, and still not a coach anywhere....what a failure.</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:47 AM
<font size="4">NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</font></p>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</p>

lol

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:48 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.


all of a sudden ur a TC guy?

10-6 is bull**** if u can't beat anybody .500 or better

lucky schedule
you know iv always supported tc. to insinuate that some how his firm discipline is causing us to loose games is laughable and a cop out imo.
</p>


Real discipline shows itself with disciplined play on the field. I didn't see any of that this year. Did you?</p>i saw ****ty playcalling, poor execution and players (not including rolle) taking blame for not playing well. you guys can blame tc all you want, but hes not the problem.


lol dude i hate when u take qoutes from players like that and actually believe them. Not for nothing bro Cowboy players were saying the same thing about Wade Phillips. Then when somebody who actually doesn't give the company line like Rolle says something u get pissy...

ur a confused boy

Morehead State
01-18-2011, 10:49 AM
<FONT size=4>NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</FONT></P>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</P>


</P>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </P>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </P>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</P>


</P>


Lashing out now?</P>


I accept you apology.</P>

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:49 AM
Since we are magically back to talking about Giants football....I have to say this...

There is literally NO reason Gilbride should still be a coordinator on our team.
If he's a good coordinator, which i know we all think he isnt not obviously...then he should have been courted by teams by now, like seriously given offers if not a job...
And if he's NOT a good coordinator(duh) he shouldnt even have a job here anymore.
And since both those scenarios are normal, why is he not insulted that Spags and Fewell have been looked at, and quit by now? lol

Career offensive coordinator, and still not a coach anywhere....what a failure.</P>


</P>


You know he was the head coach of the chargers right?</P>


I am not a fan of gilbride, but he does have a good coaching resume. </P>

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 10:50 AM
<FONT size=4>NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</FONT></P>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</P>


</P>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </P>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </P>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</P>


</P>


we all get your point....but if the rest of us Yankee fans know it wont happen, then why are you not concerning with yourself with getting the best pitchers. That's all that really matters right now, along with making sure we keep enough young guys to replace Jeter and Posada.</P>

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:50 AM
<FONT size=4>NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</FONT></P>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</P>


</P>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </P>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </P>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</P>


</P>


Lashing out now?</P>


I accept you apology.</P>


</P>


Lashing out?</P>


I have yet to lash out</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:50 AM
Since we are magically back to talking about Giants football....I have to say this...

There is literally NO reason Gilbride should still be a coordinator on our team.
If he's a good coordinator, which i know we all think he isnt not obviously...then he should have been courted by teams by now, like seriously given offers if not a job...
And if he's NOT a good coordinator(duh) he shouldnt even have a job here anymore.
And since both those scenarios are normal, why is he not insulted that Spags and Fewell have been looked at, and quit by now? lol

Career offensive coordinator, and still not a coach anywhere....what a failure.</p>

lol when Uconn and Oakland raiders will never give u a real look, theres a reason why lol

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:51 AM
<font size="4">NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</font></p>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</p>


</p>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </p>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </p>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</p>


</p>


Lashing out now?</p>


I accept you apology.</p>

lol yesterday NY06 was playing the daven role. Today its Pappy

my question is when is Daven going to play the Daven role?

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:54 AM
<FONT size=4>NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</FONT></P>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</P>


</P>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </P>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </P>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</P>


</P>


we all get your point....but if the rest of us Yankee fans know it wont happen, then why are you not concerning with yourself with getting the best pitchers. That's all that really matters right now, along with making sure we keep enough young guys to replace Jeter and Posada.</P>


</P>


Posada has been replaced already. </P>


Catcher position (Martin)</P>


Pitching is suffice, but the question is what is Pettitte going to do?</P>


Will AJ be consitent?</P>


bull-pen and closer is good, starting pitching needs another arm. </P>

Morehead State
01-18-2011, 10:54 AM
Since we are magically back to talking about Giants football....I have to say this...

There is literally NO reason Gilbride should still be a coordinator on our team.
If he's a good coordinator, which i know we all think he isnt not obviously...then he should have been courted by teams by now, like seriously given offers if not a job...
And if he's NOT a good coordinator(duh) he shouldnt even have a job here anymore.
And since both those scenarios are normal, why is he not insulted that Spags and Fewell have been looked at, and quit by now? lol

Career offensive coordinator, and still not a coach anywhere....what a failure.</P>


</P>


You know he was the head coach of the chargers right?</P>


I am not a fan of gilbride, but he does have a good coaching resume. </P>


</P>


Yes but this is what he will always be remembered for.</P>


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPK3cDl7Ftw</P>

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 10:55 AM
Since we are magically back to talking about Giants football....I have to say this...

There is literally NO reason Gilbride should still be a coordinator on our team.
If he's a good coordinator, which i know we all think he isnt not obviously...then he should have been courted by teams by now, like seriously given offers if not a job...
And if he's NOT a good coordinator(duh) he shouldnt even have a job here anymore.
And since both those scenarios are normal, why is he not insulted that Spags and Fewell have been looked at, and quit by now? lol

Career offensive coordinator, and still not a coach anywhere....what a failure.</P>


</P>


You know he was the head coach of the chargers right?</P>


I am not a fan of gilbride, but he does have a good coaching resume. </P>


</P>


yea lol....
such a good resume that even the Bills thought he sucked, and his next job was our QB coach.
we need fresh blood at OC to go along with our young guys.</P>

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:56 AM
<FONT size=4>NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</FONT></P>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</P>


</P>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </P>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </P>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</P>


</P>


Lashing out now?</P>


I accept you apology.</P>




lol yesterday NY06 was playing the daven role. Today its Pappy

my question is when is Daven going to play the Daven role?
</P>


What is the Daven role?</P>


You mean making a observation and pointing out the possibilities?</P>


</P>

ny06
01-18-2011, 10:57 AM
Since we are magically back to talking about Giants football....I have to say this...

There is literally NO reason Gilbride should still be a coordinator on our team.
If he's a good coordinator, which i know we all think he isnt not obviously...then he should have been courted by teams by now, like seriously given offers if not a job...
And if he's NOT a good coordinator(duh) he shouldnt even have a job here anymore.
And since both those scenarios are normal, why is he not insulted that Spags and Fewell have been looked at, and quit by now? lol

Career offensive coordinator, and still not a coach anywhere....what a failure.</P>


</P>


You know he was the head coach of the chargers right?</P>


I am not a fan of gilbride, but he does have a good coaching resume. </P>


</P>


yea lol....
such a good resume that even the Bills thought he sucked, and his next job was our QB coach.
we need fresh blood at OC to go along with our young guys.</P>


</P>


20+ years coaching in the nfl.</P>


Not to bad..</P>

MattMeyerBud
01-18-2011, 10:59 AM
<font size="4">NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</font></p>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</p>


</p>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </p>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </p>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</p>


</p>


Lashing out now?</p>


I accept you apology.</p>




lol yesterday NY06 was playing the daven role. Today its Pappy

my question is when is Daven going to play the Daven role?
</p>


What is the Daven role?</p>


You mean making a observation and pointing out the possibilities?</p>


</p>

stretching, being ridiculuos, and being serious about it lol

JPizzack
01-18-2011, 10:59 AM
Posada has been replaced already.


Catcher position (Martin)</P>


Pitching is suffice, but the question is what is Pettitte going to do?</P>


Will AJ be consitent?</P>


bull-pen and closer is good, starting pitching needs another arm. </P>


</P>


signing Russell Martin to a 1 year deal to see if he doesnt suck as he has the past 2 seasons isnt really "replacing" someone...we're just plugging an obvious leak in the ship ;P
Jesus Montero is the future!! I just want him to be a good catcher, which right now, he isnt really =\</P>

dezzzR
01-18-2011, 11:00 AM
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/01/18/rolle-giants-better-than-jets-coughlin-too-uptight/

can't say hes wrong.. in my heart i agree with everything he says
coughlins record and style speaks for itself. rolles really getting annoying. always has an opinion. just stfu and play.


all of a sudden ur a TC guy?

10-6 is bull**** if u can't beat anybody .500 or better

lucky schedule
you know iv always supported tc. to insinuate that some how his firm discipline is causing us to loose games is laughable and a cop out imo.
</p>


Real discipline shows itself with disciplined play on the field. I didn't see any of that this year. Did you?</p>i saw ****ty playcalling, poor execution and players (not including rolle) taking blame for not playing well. you guys can blame tc all you want, but hes not the problem.


lol dude i hate when u take qoutes from players like that and actually believe them. Not for nothing bro Cowboy players were saying the same thing about Wade Phillips. Then when somebody who actually doesn't give the company line like Rolle says something u get pissy...

ur a confused boy
thats your opinion. i dont like rolle cause he runs his mouth and hasnt even been here a year. i havnt liked him since he was crying about fans booing them at half time for a ****ty half. "were like soldiers coming home from war" giiiive me a ****ing break you goon. hes millionaire that plays football. steeler fans were booing their team before the half saturday too. are they bad fans?

TC aint going noooowhereee so deal with it

dezzzR
01-18-2011, 11:01 AM
<font size="4">NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</font></p>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</p>


</p>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </p>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </p>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</p>


</p>


we all get your point....but if the rest of us Yankee fans know it wont happen, then why are you not concerning with yourself with getting the best pitchers. That's all that really matters right now, along with making sure we keep enough young guys to replace Jeter and Posada.</p>


</p>


Posada has been replaced already. </p>


Catcher position (Martin)</p>


Pitching is suffice, but the question is what is Pettitte going to do?</p>


Will AJ be consitent?</p>


bull-pen and closer is good, starting pitching needs another arm. </p>even with andy i think we need another arm. i think hell be back, anyone else?

ny06
01-18-2011, 11:01 AM
Posada has been replaced already.


Catcher position (Martin)</P>


Pitching is suffice, but the question is what is Pettitte going to do?</P>


Will AJ be consitent?</P>


bull-pen and closer is good, starting pitching needs another arm. </P>


</P>


signing Russell Martin to a 1 year deal to see if he doesnt suck as he has the past 2 seasons isnt really "replacing" someone...we're just plugging an obvious leak in the ship ;P
Jesus Montero is the future!! I just want him to be a good catcher, which right now, he isnt really =\</P>


</P>


Martin will be good this year I feel. </P>


New scenery may help. </P>


Montero will notbe a catcher in the bigs.</P>


They want him to be a DH, or firstbaseman</P>

Morehead State
01-18-2011, 11:01 AM
<FONT size=4>NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</FONT></P>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</P>


</P>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </P>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </P>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</P>


</P>


Lashing out now?</P>


I accept you apology.</P>




lol yesterday NY06 was playing the daven role. Today its Pappy

my question is when is Daven going to play the Daven role?
</P>


What is the Daven role?</P>


You mean making <FONT color=#ff0000>pie in the sky</FONT> observations and pointing out the <FONT color=#ff0000>completely implausable</FONT> possibilities?</P>


</P>


</P>


I see you know him.</P>

Morehead State
01-18-2011, 11:03 AM
Posada has been replaced already.


Catcher position (Martin)</P>


Pitching is suffice, but the question is what is Pettitte going to do?</P>


Will AJ be consitent?</P>


bull-pen and closer is good, starting pitching needs another arm. </P>


</P>


signing Russell Martin to a 1 year deal to see if he doesnt suck as he has the past 2 seasons isnt really "replacing" someone...we're just plugging an obvious leak in the ship ;P
Jesus Montero is the future!! I just want him to be a good catcher, which right now, he isnt really =\</P>


</P>


Martin will be good this year I feel. </P>


New scenery may help. </P>


Montero will notbe a catcher in the bigs.</P>


They want him to be a<FONT size=4> <U>DH</U></FONT>, or firstbaseman</P>


</P>


I disagree. That role is reserved for Albert Pujols.</P>

ny06
01-18-2011, 11:03 AM
<FONT size=4>NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</FONT></P>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</P>


</P>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </P>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </P>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</P>


</P>


Lashing out now?</P>


I accept you apology.</P>




lol yesterday NY06 was playing the daven role. Today its Pappy

my question is when is Daven going to play the Daven role?
</P>


What is the Daven role?</P>


You mean making a observation and pointing out the possibilities?</P>


</P>




stretching, being ridiculuos, and being serious about it lol
</P>


So by making an opinion on a free agent and sticking by your opinion is being called ridiculous?</P>


I got it now..</P>

Morehead State
01-18-2011, 11:04 AM
<FONT size=4>NY06 is to Pujols as Bandy is to Ocho.</FONT></P>


Both have some issues but in a charming way.</P>


</P>


Bandy would give his left arm to meet ocho. </P>


Me on the other hand just want to get the best player in the bigs in pinstripes. </P>


Wishful thinking, like your Red Sox prediction last year..</P>


</P>


Lashing out now?</P>


I accept you apology.</P>




lol yesterday NY06 was playing the daven role. Today its Pappy

my question is when is Daven going to play the Daven role?
</P>


What is the Daven role?</P>


You mean making a observation and pointing out the possibilities?</P>


</P>




stretching, being ridiculuos, and being serious about it lol
</P>


So by making an opinion on a free agent and sticking by your opinion is being called ridiculous?</P>


I got it now..</P>


</P>


Finally!</P>