PDA

View Full Version : THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 [465] 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701

ny06
09-09-2011, 01:45 PM
but no seriously guys

GMEN SEASON OPENER IN 2 DAYS!!!!
</P>


I can't wait...</P>


On a side note, <FONT color=#ff0000>your favorite player</FONT> couldn't finish practice today. </P>


ebenezersamuel Ebenezer Samuel
Beckum also,didnt finish practice. Questionable.
40 seconds ago </P>




honestly

someboyd give me an argument how hes NOT the new GWilk, just on the offensive side of the ball
because he cant catch</P>


That's the only thing he can do. </P>


Everything else is suspect. </P>

dezzzR
09-09-2011, 01:49 PM
but no seriously guys

GMEN SEASON OPENER IN 2 DAYS!!!!
</p>


I can't wait...</p>


On a side note, <font color="#ff0000">your favorite player</font> couldn't finish practice today. </p>


ebenezersamuel Ebenezer Samuel
Beckum also,didnt finish practice. Questionable.
40 seconds ago </p>




honestly

someboyd give me an argument how hes NOT the new GWilk, just on the offensive side of the ball
because he cant catch</p>


That's the only thing he can do. </p>


Everything else is suspect. </p>and hopefully we can utilize that like greenbay does. everyones worried about tightends that can block, but our running game looked fine in preseason as did the rest of the o line. im not worried.

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 02:15 PM
You should have this conversation in a PM. Everyone is going to know what you are doing LT.
</p>


these are things everyone was talking about yesterday...no secret really.

LT, if' you've made a waiver claim, on your team page, there should be a date next to where that waiver gets put thru. Like if it says Sep. 10...it will probably process over the night, and you can plug in that player/defense after that.</p>Here's what it says:

<div id="teamnotes">
<div id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486450" class="bd">

<h4 id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486468">Team Notes</h4>
<ul id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486449"><li id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486448" class="first last "><span id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486466">Waiver 1 - <strong id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486467">Sep 11[/b]: St. Louis dropping Brent Celek (http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/236459/8/viewwaiver?claim_id=8_100014)</span>[/list]So I'll have acess on 9/11 to plug em in if I choose?

</div>

</div>

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 02:17 PM
You should have this conversation in a PM. Everyone is going to know what you are doing LT.
</p>


these are things everyone was talking about yesterday...no secret really.

LT, if' you've made a waiver claim, on your team page, there should be a date next to where that waiver gets put thru. Like if it says Sep. 10...it will probably process over the night, and you can plug in that player/defense after that.</p> yeah LT also your waiver position changes from week to week it rotates based on pickups and such....if three managers are after one playerand you have the higher waver position you get the player i they do you loose....go over all the rules LT.there a more to this game than meets the eye.....[B]

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 02:19 PM
http://www.americancurvesmag.com/galleries/gia-marie-macool/
http://www.americancurvesmag.com/nooner/images/2011/09-09-2011-GiaMarieMacool.jpg

JPizzack
09-09-2011, 02:19 PM
You should have this conversation in a PM. Everyone is going to know what you are doing LT.
</P>


these are things everyone was talking about yesterday...no secret really.

LT, if' you've made a waiver claim, on your team page, there should be a date next to where that waiver gets put thru. Like if it says Sep. 10...it will probably process over the night, and you can plug in that player/defense after that.</P>Here's what it says:


<DIV id=teamnotes>
<DIV class=bd id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486450>
<H4 id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486468>Team Notes</H4>
<UL id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486449>
<LI class="first last " id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486448><SPAN id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486466>Waiver 1 - <STRONG id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486467>Sep 11[/b]: St. Louis dropping Brent Celek (http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/236459/8/viewwaiver?claim_id=8_100014)</SPAN></LI>[/list]So I'll have acess on 9/11 to plug em in if I choose?
</DIV></DIV>



</P>


correct. Assuming nobody else higher than you in waiver priority put a claim on StL</P>

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 02:20 PM
http://www.giants.com/interstitial/mobileapp.html
http://www.giants.com/assets/images/Email-Blasts/Giants-Mobile/top-mobile.jpg (http://link.giants.com/r/26P7PR/V97R/UUTRNA9/D4IPA/4IHV/E4/h)

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 02:23 PM
You should have this conversation in a PM. Everyone is going to know what you are doing LT.
</p>


these are things everyone was talking about yesterday...no secret really.

LT, if' you've made a waiver claim, on your team page, there should be a date next to where that waiver gets put thru. Like if it says Sep. 10...it will probably process over the night, and you can plug in that player/defense after that.</p>Here's what it says:


<div id="teamnotes">
<div class="bd" id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486450">
<h4 id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486468">Team Notes</h4>
<ul id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486449">
<li class="first last " id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486448"><span id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486466">Waiver 1 - <strong id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486467">Sep 11[/b]: St. Louis dropping Brent Celek (http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/236459/8/viewwaiver?claim_id=8_100014)</span>[/list]So I'll have acess on 9/11 to plug em in if I choose?
</div></div>



</p>


correct. Assuming nobody else higher than you in waiver priority put a claim on StL</p>OH **** ME! I knew I moved Driver into my actives last night.....I forgot about the save changes tab.
There must a a waiver priority list somewhere?

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 02:26 PM
<font><font>Wife's Diary:*
&gt;&gt; Tonight, I thought my husband was acting
weird. We had made
&gt;&gt; plans to meet at a nice restaurant for
dinner. I was shopping
&gt;&gt; with my friends all day long, so I
thought he was upset at the
&gt;&gt; fact that I was a bit late, but
he made no comment on it.
&gt;&gt; Conversation wasn't flowing, so I
suggested that we go
&gt;&gt; somewhere quiet so we could talk. He
agreed, but he didn't say
&gt;&gt; much.
&gt;&gt; I asked
him what was wrong; He said, 'Nothing.' I asked him
&gt;&gt; if it was
my fault that he was upset He said he wasn't upset,
&gt;&gt; that it
had nothing to do with me, and not to worry about it.
&gt;&gt; On the
way home, I told him that I loved him. He smiled
&gt;&gt; slightly,
and kept driving.
&gt;&gt; I can't explain his behavior I don't know
why he didn't say,
&gt;&gt; 'I love you, too.' When we got home, I
felt as if I had lost
&gt;&gt; him completely, as if he wanted
nothing to do with me
&gt;&gt; anymore. He just sat there quietly, and
watched TV.. He
&gt;&gt; continued to seem distant and absent.
Finally, with silence
&gt;&gt; all around us, I decided to go to bed.
About 15 minutes later,
&gt;&gt; he came to bed. But I still felt that
he was distracted, and
&gt;&gt; his thoughts were somewhere else. He
fell asleep; I cried. I
&gt;&gt; don't know what to do. I'm almost
sure that his thoughts are
&gt;&gt; with someone else. My life is a
disaster.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; *
&gt;&gt; *
&gt;&gt;
*
&gt;&gt; *
&gt;&gt; *
&gt;&gt; *
&gt;&gt;
*
&gt;&gt; *
&gt;&gt; *
&gt;&gt;
*
&gt;&gt; *
&gt;&gt; *
&gt;&gt; *
&gt;&gt;
*
&gt;&gt; *Husband's Diary:*
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; A
five putt; who the hell five putts ?
</font></font>

JPizzack
09-09-2011, 02:31 PM
OH **** ME! I knew I moved Driver into my actives last night.....I forgot about the save changes tab.
There must a a waiver priority list somewhere?
</P>


On the main league page, there's a column next to teams that should say waiver....teams with numbers 1 thru 12.</P>


If I'm waiver 3, and youre waiver 7, and we both put claims on the same guy, I will "win" the claim so to speak.
The original waiver order is determined by your draft position I believe. And every time you have a claim go thru successfully, youre bumped back to 12th.</P>

JPizzack
09-09-2011, 02:33 PM
<FONT size=+0><FONT size=+0>Husband's Diary:*
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; A five putt; who the hell five putts ?
</FONT></FONT></P>


i lol'd</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 02:37 PM
but no seriously guys

GMEN SEASON OPENER IN 2 DAYS!!!!
</p>


I can't wait...</p>


On a side note, <font color="#ff0000">your favorite player</font> couldn't finish practice today. </p>


ebenezersamuel Ebenezer Samuel
Beckum also,didnt finish practice. Questionable.
40 seconds ago </p>

honestly

someboyd give me an argument how hes NOT the new GWilk, just on the offensive side of the ball
because he cant catch, gwilk couldnt do anything. honestly i would be surprised to see him in the slot more this year.


hes an overrated catcher. His hands really aren't that solid.... just another fan favorite hype who has the physical tools and won't amount to anything

GWilk v2.0

dezzzR
09-09-2011, 02:39 PM
You should have this conversation in a PM. Everyone is going to know what you are doing LT.
</p>


these are things everyone was talking about yesterday...no secret really.

LT, if' you've made a waiver claim, on your team page, there should be a date next to where that waiver gets put thru. Like if it says Sep. 10...it will probably process over the night, and you can plug in that player/defense after that.</p>Here's what it says:


<div id="teamnotes">
<div class="bd" id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486450">
<h4 id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486468">Team Notes</h4>
<ul id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486449">
<li class="first last " id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486448"><span id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486466">Waiver 1 - <strong id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486467">Sep 11[/b]: St. Louis dropping Brent Celek (http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/236459/8/viewwaiver?claim_id=8_100014)</span>[/list]So I'll have acess on 9/11 to plug em in if I choose?
</div></div>



</p>


correct. Assuming nobody else higher than you in waiver priority put a claim on StL</p>OH **** ME! I knew I moved Driver into my actives last night.....<u>I forgot about the save changes tab.</u>
There must a a waiver priority list somewhere?
ant that a *****???? lol

JPizzack
09-09-2011, 02:41 PM
hes an overrated catcher. His hands really aren't that solid.... just another fan favorite hype who has the physical tools and won't amount to anything

GWilk v2.0
</P>


maybe i wasnt in TAGF enough. I didn't know he was a fan favorite lol</P>


I dont get too excited about draft picks usually. I like KP AFTER we got him, didnt know much about him. Nicks obviously was a awesome pick for us I felt...
THIS year though, Austin and Prince I was kind of excited about I guess....
That worked out soooooo well for me &gt;.&lt;</P>

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 02:44 PM
I just got my personalized Beckum jersey to. ****

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 02:45 PM
OH **** ME! I knew I moved Driver into my actives last night.....I forgot about the save changes tab.
There must a a waiver priority list somewhere?
</p>


On the main league page, there's a column next to teams that should say waiver....teams with numbers 1 thru 12.</p>


If I'm waiver 3, and youre waiver 7, and we both put claims on the same guy, I will "win" the claim so to speak.
The original waiver order is determined by your draft position I believe. And every time you have a claim go thru successfully, youre bumped back to 12th.</p>K, thanks JP-I see the waiver order. Are all of the available players considered on waiver?

ibleedblue85
09-09-2011, 02:47 PM
I just got my personalized Beckum jersey to. ****
</P>


did i miss something??????</P>

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 02:50 PM
You should have this conversation in a PM. Everyone is going to know what you are doing LT.
</p>


these are things everyone was talking about yesterday...no secret really.

LT, if' you've made a waiver claim, on your team page, there should be a date next to where that waiver gets put thru. Like if it says Sep. 10...it will probably process over the night, and you can plug in that player/defense after that.</p>Here's what it says:


<div id="teamnotes">
<div class="bd" id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486450">
<h4 id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486468">Team Notes</h4>
<ul id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486449">
<li class="first last " id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486448"><span id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486466">Waiver 1 - <strong id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486467">Sep 11[/b]: St. Louis dropping Brent Celek (http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/236459/8/viewwaiver?claim_id=8_100014)</span>[/list]So I'll have acess on 9/11 to plug em in if I choose?
</div></div>



</p>


correct. Assuming nobody else higher than you in waiver priority put a claim on StL</p>OH **** ME! I knew I moved Driver into my actives last night.....<u>I forgot about the save changes tab.</u>
There must a a waiver priority list somewhere?
ant that a *****???? lol
Your not kidding. Good thing-there was only one game last night and this was not a Sunday/

ibleedblue85
09-09-2011, 02:52 PM
You should have this conversation in a PM. Everyone is going to know what you are doing LT.
</P>


these are things everyone was talking about yesterday...no secret really.

LT, if' you've made a waiver claim, on your team page, there should be a date next to where that waiver gets put thru. Like if it says Sep. 10...it will probably process over the night, and you can plug in that player/defense after that.</P>Here's what it says:


<DIV id=teamnotes>
<DIV id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486450 class=bd>
<H4 id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486468>Team Notes</H4>
<UL id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486449>
<LI id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486448 class="first last "><SPAN id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486466>Waiver 1 - <STRONG id=yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486467>Sep 11[/b]: St. Louis dropping Brent Celek (http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/236459/8/viewwaiver?claim_id=8_100014)</SPAN></LI>[/list]So I'll have acess on 9/11 to plug em in if I choose?
</DIV></DIV>



</P>


correct. Assuming nobody else higher than you in waiver priority put a claim on StL</P>


OH **** ME! I knew I moved Driver into my actives last night.....<U>I forgot about the save changes tab.</U>
There must a a waiver priority list somewhere?
ant that a *****???? lol
</P>


i was just gonna say toyou before about the lines ups... DONT FORGET THE SAVE BUTTON! i cant tell you how many times people (including myself) have forgot to hit save! also with trades... if someone purposes and you dont want it double check the box you are clicking.... hit the wrong one of those by accident once too LOL</P>

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 02:53 PM
I just got my personalized Beckum jersey to. ****
</p>


did i miss something??????</p>How's it personalized? Show us a pic.

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 02:54 PM
he was making a joke

he may not have the common sense to not have 6 wives, but he knows better than to get a Beckum jersey

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 02:54 PM
hes an overrated catcher.
So are you but I'll keep pitchin it to ya

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 02:54 PM
You should have this conversation in a PM. Everyone is going to know what you are doing LT.
</p>


these are things everyone was talking about yesterday...no secret really.

LT, if' you've made a waiver claim, on your team page, there should be a date next to where that waiver gets put thru. Like if it says Sep. 10...it will probably process over the night, and you can plug in that player/defense after that.</p>Here's what it says:


<div id="teamnotes">
<div id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486450" class="bd">
<h4 id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486468">Team Notes</h4>
<ul id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486449">
<li id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486448" class="first last "><span id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486466">Waiver 1 - <strong id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486467">Sep 11[/b]: St. Louis dropping Brent Celek (http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/236459/8/viewwaiver?claim_id=8_100014)</span>[/list]So I'll have acess on 9/11 to plug em in if I choose?
</div></div>



</p>


correct. Assuming nobody else higher than you in waiver priority put a claim on StL</p>


OH **** ME! I knew I moved Driver into my actives last night.....<u>I forgot about the save changes tab.</u>
There must a a waiver priority list somewhere?
ant that a *****???? lol
</p>


i was just gonna say toyou before about the lines ups... DONT FORGET THE SAVE BUTTON! i cant tell you how many times people (including myself) have forgot to hit save! also with trades... if someone purposes and you dont want it double check the box you are clicking.... hit the wrong one of those by accident once too LOL</p>A brutal mistake lol....when I realized last night, I was so bummed.

lawl
09-09-2011, 02:55 PM
but no seriously guys

GMEN SEASON OPENER IN 2 DAYS!!!!
</p>


I can't wait...</p>


On a side note, <font color="#ff0000">your favorite player</font> couldn't finish practice today. </p>


ebenezersamuel Ebenezer Samuel
Beckum also,didnt finish practice. Questionable.
40 seconds ago </p>

honestly

someboyd give me an argument how hes NOT the new GWilk, just on the offensive side of the ball
because he cant catch, gwilk couldnt do anything. honestly i would be surprised to see him in the slot more this year.


hes an overrated catcher.<font size="5"> His hands really aren't that solid</font>.... just another fan favorite hype who has the physical tools and won't amount to anything

GWilk v2.0


He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 02:55 PM
I just got my personalized Beckum jersey to. ****
</p>


did i miss something??????</p>
Uhhhhh the joke...LMAO

Also my damn $, pretty sure you're missing that. lol One day it will find it's way to the end of the rainbow.

JPizzack
09-09-2011, 02:58 PM
OH **** ME! I knew I moved Driver into my actives last night.....I forgot about the save changes tab.
There must a a waiver priority list somewhere?
</P>


On the main league page, there's a column next to teams that should say waiver....teams with numbers 1 thru 12.</P>


If I'm waiver 3, and youre waiver 7, and we both put claims on the same guy, I will "win" the claim so to speak.
The original waiver order is determined by your draft position I believe. And every time you have a claim go thru successfully, youre bumped back to 12th.</P>


K, thanks JP-I see the waiver order. Are all of the available players considered on waiver?
</P>


I think how it works is from kickoff of the first game of the week, until weds. everyone who would be a free agent, is considered on waivers. that way nobody can "ninja add" a 3rd string RB after the first 2 break their legs on back to back plays. lol</P>


</P>

dezzzR
09-09-2011, 03:01 PM
You should have this conversation in a PM. Everyone is going to know what you are doing LT.
</p>


these are things everyone was talking about yesterday...no secret really.

LT, if' you've made a waiver claim, on your team page, there should be a date next to where that waiver gets put thru. Like if it says Sep. 10...it will probably process over the night, and you can plug in that player/defense after that.</p>Here's what it says:


<div id="teamnotes">
<div id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486450" class="bd">
<h4 id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486468">Team Notes</h4>
<ul id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486449">
<li id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486448" class="first last "><span id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486466">Waiver 1 - <strong id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486467">Sep 11[/b]: St. Louis dropping Brent Celek (http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/236459/8/viewwaiver?claim_id=8_100014)</span>[/list]So I'll have acess on 9/11 to plug em in if I choose?
</div></div>



</p>


correct. Assuming nobody else higher than you in waiver priority put a claim on StL</p>


OH **** ME! I knew I moved Driver into my actives last night.....<u>I forgot about the save changes tab.</u>
There must a a waiver priority list somewhere?
ant that a *****???? lol
</p>


i was just gonna say toyou before about the lines ups... DONT FORGET THE SAVE BUTTON! i cant tell you how many times people (including myself) have forgot to hit save! also with trades... if someone purposes and you dont want it double check the box you are clicking.... hit the wrong one of those by accident once too LOL</p>A brutal mistake lol....when I realized last night, I was so bummed.
happened to me a few times as well....i thought i started farve that one year he was with the jets and had like 6 tds in one game. im talking **** to the other guy and hes like "yeaaa, now only if you started him..." raaghhhhh!!!!!!!

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 03:05 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 03:07 PM
he was making a joke

he may not have the common sense to not have 6 wives, but he knows better than to get a Beckum jersey

<font size="6">LMAO!!!</font>

ibleedblue85
09-09-2011, 03:08 PM
he was making a joke

he may not have the common sense to not have 6 wives, but he knows better than to get a Beckum jersey
</P>


i know that but why would you say personilzed then</P>

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 03:08 PM
but no seriously guys

GMEN SEASON OPENER IN 2 DAYS!!!!

Score prediction Professor Bud?

I will go with 24-13 Giants

lawl
09-09-2011, 03:10 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

ibleedblue85
09-09-2011, 03:10 PM
but no seriously guys

GMEN SEASON OPENER IN 2 DAYS!!!!

Score prediction Professor Bud?

I will go with 24-13 Giants
</P>


im so ****ing excited. i think i need to break out taco dip and giants cake for the occasion!</P>

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 03:17 PM
he was making a joke

he may not have the common sense to not have 6 wives, but he knows better than to get a Beckum jersey
</p>


i know that but why would you say personilzed then</p>
Ok, now you got me. If they really have one you could buy without having to personalize it that would be embarrassing to our fan base.

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 03:21 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 03:22 PM
No practice again for Texans HB Arian Foster because of the hamstring. If he can't go, Derrick Ward starts. Ben Tate who? The old G Man gonna bring it!

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 03:23 PM
<div class="report">


Saints coach Sean Payton confirmed Friday
afternoon that Marques Colston suffered a shoulder injury in Thursday
night's NFL opener.</p>
</div>
<div class="impact">
Payton provided no details, so it sounds like the
team is awaiting MRI results before updating Colston's condition.<font color="#0000FF"> Some
rumors have circulated that the Saints are fearing a significant injury.</font>
We should know more by the weekend.

Rut Row
</div>

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 03:24 PM
I think i need to break out taco dip

I love it when you talk dirty

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 03:27 PM
OH **** ME! I knew I moved Driver into my actives last night.....I forgot about the save changes tab.
There must a a waiver priority list somewhere?
</p>


On the main league page, there's a column next to teams that should say waiver....teams with numbers 1 thru 12.</p>


If I'm waiver 3, and youre waiver 7, and we both put claims on the same guy, I will "win" the claim so to speak.
The original waiver order is determined by your draft position I believe. And every time you have a claim go thru successfully, youre bumped back to 12th.</p>


K, thanks JP-I see the waiver order. Are all of the available players considered on waiver?
</p>


I think how it works is from kickoff of the first game of the week, until weds. everyone who would be a free agent, is considered on waivers. that way nobody can "ninja add" a 3rd string RB after the first 2 break their legs on back to back plays. lol</p>


</p>Thanks JP

lttaylor56
09-09-2011, 03:29 PM
You should have this conversation in a PM. Everyone is going to know what you are doing LT.
</p>


these are things everyone was talking about yesterday...no secret really.

LT, if' you've made a waiver claim, on your team page, there should be a date next to where that waiver gets put thru. Like if it says Sep. 10...it will probably process over the night, and you can plug in that player/defense after that.</p>Here's what it says:


<div id="teamnotes">
<div id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486450" class="bd">
<h4 id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486468">Team Notes</h4>
<ul id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486449">
<li id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486448" class="first last "><span id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486466">Waiver 1 - <strong id="yui_3_3_0_21_131559210486467">Sep 11[/b]: St. Louis dropping Brent Celek (http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com/f1/236459/8/viewwaiver?claim_id=8_100014)</span>[/list]So I'll have acess on 9/11 to plug em in if I choose?
</div></div>



</p>


correct. Assuming nobody else higher than you in waiver priority put a claim on StL</p>


OH **** ME! I knew I moved Driver into my actives last night.....<u>I forgot about the save changes tab.</u>
There must a a waiver priority list somewhere?
ant that a *****???? lol
</p>


i was just gonna say toyou before about the lines ups... DONT FORGET THE SAVE BUTTON! i cant tell you how many times people (including myself) have forgot to hit save! also with trades... if someone purposes and you dont want it double check the box you are clicking.... hit the wrong one of those by accident once too LOL</p>A brutal mistake lol....when I realized last night, I was so bummed.
happened to me a few times as well....i thought i started farve that one year he was with the jets and had like 6 tds in one game. im talking **** to the other guy and hes like "yeaaa, now only if you started him..." raaghhhhh!!!!!!!
oUCHH!! lmao, it's great when it happens to others.

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 03:31 PM
Some of you may have seen this photo or maybe not. It's a 20 ft crock they caught in the Phillipines. I guess the lil bugger isn't eating. I was looking at the photo again and noticed something incredible about the people in this remote village. Check the Lakers jersey in the top left. We takin over the world!!!

http://l.yimg.com/bt/api/res/1.2/YtrxwBWF414j2SKQ1rZU.Q--/YXBwaWQ9eW5ld3M7cT04NTt3PTYzMA--/http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ap_webfeeds/556aaeb10a23f414f70e6a70670001bb.jpg

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 03:45 PM
<h4>NFC Up For Grabs?</h4>


<table><thead>
<tr>
<th>Year</th>
<th>NFC champion since 2001</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="last">
<td>2010</td>
<td>Packers*</td>
</tr>
<tr class="last">
<td>2009</td>
<td>Saints*</td>
</tr>
<tr class="last">
<td>2008</td>
<td>Cardinals</td>
</tr>
<tr class="last">
<td>2007</td>
<td>Giants*</td>
</tr>
<tr class="last">
<td>2006</td>
<td>Bears</td>
</tr>
<tr class="last">
<td>2005</td>
<td>Seahawks</td>
</tr>
<tr class="last">
<td>2004</td>
<td>Eagles</td>
</tr>
<tr class="last">
<td>2003</td>
<td>Panthers</td>
</tr>
<tr class="last">
<td>2002</td>
<td>Buccaneers*</td>
</tr>
<tr class="last">
<td>2001</td>
<td>Rams</td>
</tr>

<tr class="last">
<td colspan="2">*Won Super Bowl.

</td></tr></tbody></table>

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 03:50 PM
okay so we have an issue:

me and blondie missed the playoff settings, its set to 4 teams. Since the first game was yesterday its going to be a pain in the ***

But either way we never voted on playoffs this year

do u guys want 4 or 6 teams in the playoffs?

4 team means tha tthe playoffs will start week 15 and there will be no byes

6 team means that the playoffs will start week 14. The top 2 seeds will get a buy week 14 while 3 thru 6 play and then 15 is the semis and 16 is the finals...


------

Waiting on: Pappy, Byron, Pats, Lando, daven, shock&amp;awe, kase

4 team playoff:

mmb

6 team playoff


blondie

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 03:52 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets

lawl
09-09-2011, 03:55 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 03:57 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 04:01 PM
okay so we have an issue:

me and blondie missed the playoff settings, its set to 4 teams. Since the first game was yesterday its going to be a pain in the ***

But either way we never voted on playoffs this year

do u guys want 4 or 6 teams in the playoffs?

4 team means tha tthe playoffs will start week 15 and there will be no byes

6 team means that the playoffs will start week 14. The top 2 seeds will get a buy week 14 while 3 thru 6 play and then 15 is the semis and 16 is the finals...


------

Waiting on: Pappy, Byron, Pats, Lando, daven, shock&amp;awe, kase

4 team playoff:

mmb

6 team playoff


blondie

You didn't miss **** *** boy. That is how you wanted it last year so you took it upon yourself to neglect it.
<font size="6">
<font color="#0000FF">6 Teams</font></font><font color="#0000FF" size="6">!!!!</font>

More teams in the dance make it more fun. 4 out of 12 is not very good odds at all. Anyone can make a run like Pizz did last year.

It really should not even be up for a vote. It should just be 6 since that is the way our league has always been. How could you not want more teams to be in the playoffs.....

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:04 PM
okay so we have an issue:

me and blondie missed the playoff settings, its set to 4 teams. Since the first game was yesterday its going to be a pain in the ***

But either way we never voted on playoffs this year

do u guys want 4 or 6 teams in the playoffs?

4 team means tha tthe playoffs will start week 15 and there will be no byes

6 team means that the playoffs will start week 14. The top 2 seeds will get a buy week 14 while 3 thru 6 play and then 15 is the semis and 16 is the finals...


------

Waiting on: Pappy, Byron, Pats, Lando, daven, shock&amp;awe, kase

4 team playoff:

mmb

6 team playoff


blondie

You didn't miss **** *** boy. That is how you wanted it last year so you took it upon yourself to neglect it.
<font size="6">
6 Teams. </font>

More teams in the dance make it more fun. 4 out of 12 is not very good odds at all. Anyone can make a run like Pizz did last year.

It really should not even be up for a vote. It should just be 6 since that is the way our league has always been. How could you not want more teams to be in the playoffs.....

blondie set it up *******

i just helped but we both missed it. I forgot u guys are gay and want half the league in the playoffs

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:06 PM
Waiting on: Byron, Pats, shock&amp;awe, kase

4 team playoff:

mmb

6 team playoff


blondie, Lando, pappy, daven

dezzzR
09-09-2011, 04:06 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands
if he was thrown at 13 times and caught 13 balls, yes so far he does have sticky fingers. why cant we have a blocking end and a recieving tightend? like i said if we can utilize beckum like greenbay does with finley hes worth keep. and despite what you say he has shown flashes. a few of those 13 caught balls were big first downs.

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 04:08 PM
<font size="6">It has always been 6 and should be 6 forever</font>.

I'll be in the dance no matter what but you guys should give yourselves a chance. lol

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:11 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands
if he was thrown at 13 times and caught 13 balls, yes so far he does have sticky fingers. why cant we have a blocking end and a recieving tightend? like i said if we can utilize beckum like greenbay does with finley hes worth keep. and despite what you say he has shown flashes. a few of those 13 caught balls were big first downs.


lol just be prepared to get ur balls broke all year. He'll have another 15 catches this year and he'll be an awful blocker and banged up like he always is

Gwilk v2.0

ibleedblue85
09-09-2011, 04:11 PM
**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</P>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</P>


</P>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:12 PM
<font size="6">It has always been 6 and should be 6 forever</font>.

I'll be in the dance no matter what but you guys should give yourselves a chance. lol


just like it should alway sbe flex?

How'd that work out for ya

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:14 PM
**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>

well one more vote and its 6, but ur going to have to write them an email about it and ask the mto change it for you.

I went to go do it but it didn't work for me

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 04:15 PM
<font color="#0000FF">**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</font></p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>
Exaaaaaaactly. Classy move there Professor Bud.

Pappy Byron and Kase will vote 6. Then it's game over. It should not even be a vote.

Matt of all people should want 6 teams. He has never smelled the top 4.

ibleedblue85
09-09-2011, 04:16 PM
**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</P>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</P>


</P>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</P>




well one more vote and its 6, but ur going to have to write them an email about it and ask the mto change it for you.

I went to go do it but it didn't work for me
</P>


your not the commish so you cnat change settings unless your logged on under me dumbass LOL im leaving work.. i changed it to 6 teams with playoffs 14, 15 and 16 (i hate championships in week 17, its really not fair) so its just like it was last year. if there are enough votes to change it to 4 teams then i will do it tomorrow so get your votes in now.</P>


</P>


leaving work, have a fabulous weekend and i will talk to most of you on sunday. GOOOOOO GIANTS... and good luck in fantasy! except you pappy..... you can kick rocks :) i promise come monday i will love you again.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:16 PM
<font color="#0000ff">**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</font></p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>
Exaaaaaaactly. Classy move there Professor Bud.

Pappy Byron and Kase will vote 6. Then it's game over. It should not even be a vote.

Matt of all people should want 6 teams. He has never smelled the top 4.


paleasssssse son

u should of cut me in on ur year 1 winnings since i basically drafted and mad trades for u all year tha tyear

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:17 PM
**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>




well one more vote and its 6, but ur going to have to write them an email about it and ask the mto change it for you.

I went to go do it but it didn't work for me
</p>


your not the commish so you cnat change settings unless your logged on under me dumbass LOL im leaving work.. i changed it to 6 teams with playoffs 14, 15 and 16 (i hate championships in week 17, its really not fair) so its just like it was last year. if there are enough votes to change it to 4 teams then i will do it tomorrow so get your votes in now.</p>


</p>


leaving work, have a fabulous weekend and i will talk to most of you on sunday. GOOOOOO GIANTS... and good luck in fantasy! except you pappy..... you can kick rocks :) i promise come monday i will love you again.</p>

ohhh i thought u gave me co-commish stuff

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 04:18 PM
<font size="6">It has always been 6 and should be 6 forever</font>.

I'll be in the dance no matter what but you guys should give yourselves a chance. lol


just like it should alway sbe flex?

How'd that work out for ya

Not so good. But in hindsight it's fine....Just separates the men from the boys like you said.

ibleedblue85
09-09-2011, 04:18 PM
**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</P>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</P>


</P>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</P>




well one more vote and its 6, but ur going to have to write them an email about it and ask the mto change it for you.

I went to go do it but it didn't work for me
</P>


your not the commish so you cnat change settings unless your logged on under me dumbass LOL im leaving work.. i changed it to 6 teams with playoffs 14, 15 and 16 (i hate championships in week 17, its really not fair) so its just like it was last year. if there are enough votes to change it to 4 teams then i will do it tomorrow so get your votes in now.</P>


</P>


leaving work, have a fabulous weekend and i will talk to most of you on sunday. GOOOOOO GIANTS... and good luck in fantasy! except you pappy..... you can kick rocks :) i promise come monday i will love you again.</P>




ohhh i thought u gave me co-commish stuff
</P>


nahh you cant change to co-commish stuff i dont think, i made you co owner of the big money league we are doing together so you can make changes on our line up but thats not this league dummy</P>

ibleedblue85
09-09-2011, 04:19 PM
<FONT size=6>It has always been 6 and should be 6 forever</FONT>.

I'll be in the dance no matter what but you guys should give yourselves a chance. lol


just like it should alway sbe flex?

How'd that work out for ya

Not so good. But in hindsight it's fine....Just separates the <FONT color=#ff1493>men from the boys</FONT> like you said.
</P>


<FONT color=#ff1493>so well finally see that having 6 wives doesnt make you a man????</FONT></P>

dezzzR
09-09-2011, 04:20 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands
if he was thrown at 13 times and caught 13 balls, yes so far he does have sticky fingers. why cant we have a blocking end and a recieving tightend? like i said if we can utilize beckum like greenbay does with finley hes worth keep. and despite what you say he has shown flashes. a few of those 13 caught balls were big first downs.


lol just be prepared to get ur balls broke all year. He'll have another 15 catches this year and he'll be an awful blocker and banged up like he always is

Gwilk v2.0
so youre saying ballard will have more catches? i smell a bet brewing.

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 04:21 PM
<font color="#0000ff">**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</font></p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>
Exaaaaaaactly. Classy move there Professor Bud.

Pappy Byron and Kase will vote 6. Then it's game over. It should not even be a vote.

Matt of all people should want 6 teams. He has never smelled the top 4.


paleasssssse son

u should of cut me in on ur year 1 winnings since i basically drafted and mad trades for u all year tha tyear

I love how you give me 0 credit. That is what will make this year so sweet.

Alllllll byyyyyyyyy myyyyysseeeeeeeeeellllffff

ibleedblue85
09-09-2011, 04:21 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets
That's preseason. Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands
if he was thrown at 13 times and caught 13 balls, yes so far he does have sticky fingers. why cant we have a blocking end and a recieving tightend? like i said if we can utilize beckum like greenbay does with finley hes worth keep. and despite what you say he has shown flashes. a few of those 13 caught balls were big first downs.


lol just be prepared to get ur balls broke all year. He'll have another 15 catches this year and he'll be an awful blocker and banged up like he always is

Gwilk v2.0
so youre saying ballard will have more catches? i smell a bet brewing.
</P>


what will your end of the bargian be paid in... frosted flakes?</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:22 PM
<font size="6">It has always been 6 and should be 6 forever</font>.

I'll be in the dance no matter what but you guys should give yourselves a chance. lol


just like it should alway sbe flex?

How'd that work out for ya

Not so good. But in hindsight it's fine....Just separates the men from the boys like you said.


hence why ur squad is so weak

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:23 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands
if he was thrown at 13 times and caught 13 balls, yes so far he does have sticky fingers. why cant we have a blocking end and a recieving tightend? like i said if we can utilize beckum like greenbay does with finley hes worth keep. and despite what you say he has shown flashes. a few of those 13 caught balls were big first downs.


lol just be prepared to get ur balls broke all year. He'll have another 15 catches this year and he'll be an awful blocker and banged up like he always is

Gwilk v2.0
so youre saying ballard will have more catches? i smell a bet brewing.


who said anything about Ballard?

i'll take the under 19.5 grabs for ur boy beckum this year

put up or shut up

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:24 PM
<font color="#0000ff">**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</font></p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>
Exaaaaaaactly. Classy move there Professor Bud.

Pappy Byron and Kase will vote 6. Then it's game over. It should not even be a vote.

Matt of all people should want 6 teams. He has never smelled the top 4.


paleasssssse son

u should of cut me in on ur year 1 winnings since i basically drafted and mad trades for u all year tha tyear

I love how you give me 0 credit. That is what will make this year so sweet.

Alllllll byyyyyyyyy myyyyysseeeeeeeeeellllffff


yea i mean technically u havenb't made the playoffs yet either

ur boy who drafted for u did

dezzzR
09-09-2011, 04:27 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets
That's preseason. Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands
if he was thrown at 13 times and caught 13 balls, yes so far he does have sticky fingers. why cant we have a blocking end and a recieving tightend? like i said if we can utilize beckum like greenbay does with finley hes worth keep. and despite what you say he has shown flashes. a few of those 13 caught balls were big first downs.


lol just be prepared to get ur balls broke all year. He'll have another 15 catches this year and he'll be an awful blocker and banged up like he always is

Gwilk v2.0
so youre saying ballard will have more catches? i smell a bet brewing.
</p>


what will your end of the bargian be paid in... frosted flakes?</p>ayy mind ya buisness and get back to work.

dezzzR
09-09-2011, 04:28 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands
if he was thrown at 13 times and caught 13 balls, yes so far he does have sticky fingers. why cant we have a blocking end and a recieving tightend? like i said if we can utilize beckum like greenbay does with finley hes worth keep. and despite what you say he has shown flashes. a few of those 13 caught balls were big first downs.


lol just be prepared to get ur balls broke all year. He'll have another 15 catches this year and he'll be an awful blocker and banged up like he always is

Gwilk v2.0
so youre saying ballard will have more catches? i smell a bet brewing.


who said anything about Ballard?

i'll take the under 19.5 grabs for ur boy beckum this year

put up or shut up
how much?

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:29 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands
if he was thrown at 13 times and caught 13 balls, yes so far he does have sticky fingers. why cant we have a blocking end and a recieving tightend? like i said if we can utilize beckum like greenbay does with finley hes worth keep. and despite what you say he has shown flashes. a few of those 13 caught balls were big first downs.


lol just be prepared to get ur balls broke all year. He'll have another 15 catches this year and he'll be an awful blocker and banged up like he always is

Gwilk v2.0
so youre saying ballard will have more catches? i smell a bet brewing.


who said anything about Ballard?

i'll take the under 19.5 grabs for ur boy beckum this year

put up or shut up
how much?


hundo

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 04:30 PM
**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>




well one more vote and its 6, but ur going to have to write them an email about it and ask the mto change it for you.

I went to go do it but it didn't work for me
</p>


your not the commish so you cnat change settings unless your logged on under me dumbass LOL im leaving work.. i changed it to 6 teams with playoffs 14, 15 and 16 (i hate championships in week 17, its really not fair) so its just like it was last year. if there are enough votes to change it to 4 teams then i will do it tomorrow so get your votes in now.</p>


</p>


leaving work, have a fabulous weekend and i will talk to most of you on sunday. GOOOOOO GIANTS... and good luck in fantasy! except you pappy..... you can kick rocks :) i promise come monday i will love you again.</p>
And Snap, She cracks the whip. Power of the P-U-S-S-Y

We all know who wears the pants...

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 04:31 PM
<font size="6">It has always been 6 and should be 6 forever</font>.

I'll be in the dance no matter what but you guys should give yourselves a chance. lol


just like it should alway sbe flex?

How'd that work out for ya

Not so good. But in hindsight it's fine....Just separates the <font color="#ff1493">men from the boys</font> like you said.
</p>


<font color="#ff1493">so well finally see that having 6 wives doesnt make you a man????</font></p>
As long as your still one of them it does.

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:31 PM
**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>




well one more vote and its 6, but ur going to have to write them an email about it and ask the mto change it for you.

I went to go do it but it didn't work for me
</p>


your not the commish so you cnat change settings unless your logged on under me dumbass LOL im leaving work.. i changed it to 6 teams with playoffs 14, 15 and 16 (i hate championships in week 17, its really not fair) so its just like it was last year. if there are enough votes to change it to 4 teams then i will do it tomorrow so get your votes in now.</p>


</p>


leaving work, have a fabulous weekend and i will talk to most of you on sunday. GOOOOOO GIANTS... and good luck in fantasy! except you pappy..... you can kick rocks :) i promise come monday i will love you again.</p>
And Snap, She cracks the whip. Power of the P-U-S-S-Y

We all know who wears the pants...


and we all know who drafts your teams

especially after this past draft

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:31 PM
**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>




well one more vote and its 6, but ur going to have to write them an email about it and ask the mto change it for you.

I went to go do it but it didn't work for me
</p>


your not the commish so you cnat change settings unless your logged on under me dumbass LOL im leaving work.. i changed it to 6 teams with playoffs 14, 15 and 16 (i hate championships in week 17, its really not fair) so its just like it was last year. if there are enough votes to change it to 4 teams then i will do it tomorrow so get your votes in now.</p>


</p>


leaving work, have a fabulous weekend and i will talk to most of you on sunday. GOOOOOO GIANTS... and good luck in fantasy! except you pappy..... you can kick rocks :) i promise come monday i will love you again.</p>
And Snap, She cracks the whip. Power of the P-U-S-S-Y

We all know who wears the pants...


and we all know who drafts your teams

especially after this past draft

MattMeyerBud
09-09-2011, 04:31 PM
**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>




well one more vote and its 6, but ur going to have to write them an email about it and ask the mto change it for you.

I went to go do it but it didn't work for me
</p>


your not the commish so you cnat change settings unless your logged on under me dumbass LOL im leaving work.. i changed it to 6 teams with playoffs 14, 15 and 16 (i hate championships in week 17, its really not fair) so its just like it was last year. if there are enough votes to change it to 4 teams then i will do it tomorrow so get your votes in now.</p>


</p>


leaving work, have a fabulous weekend and i will talk to most of you on sunday. GOOOOOO GIANTS... and good luck in fantasy! except you pappy..... you can kick rocks :) i promise come monday i will love you again.</p>
And Snap, She cracks the whip. Power of the P-U-S-S-Y

We all know who wears the pants...


and we all know who drafts your teams

especially after this past draft

dezzzR
09-09-2011, 04:32 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands
if he was thrown at 13 times and caught 13 balls, yes so far he does have sticky fingers. why cant we have a blocking end and a recieving tightend? like i said if we can utilize beckum like greenbay does with finley hes worth keep. and despite what you say he has shown flashes. a few of those 13 caught balls were big first downs.


lol just be prepared to get ur balls broke all year. He'll have another 15 catches this year and he'll be an awful blocker and banged up like he always is

Gwilk v2.0
so youre saying ballard will have more catches? i smell a bet brewing.


who said anything about Ballard?

i'll take the under 19.5 grabs for ur boy beckum this year

put up or shut up
how much?


hundo

deal. and just to be clear and not have a repeat of izbo situation(was that who it was?) if travis has 20 catches i win, if he has 19 you win. correct?

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 04:33 PM
<font color="#0000ff">**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</font></p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>
Exaaaaaaactly. Classy move there Professor Bud.

Pappy Byron and Kase will vote 6. Then it's game over. It should not even be a vote.

Matt of all people should want 6 teams. He has never smelled the top 4.


paleasssssse son

u should of cut me in on ur year 1 winnings since i basically drafted and mad trades for u all year tha tyear

I love how you give me 0 credit. That is what will make this year so sweet.

Alllllll byyyyyyyyy myyyyysseeeeeeeeeellllffff


yea i mean technically u havenb't made the playoffs yet either

ur boy who drafted for u did

My team is sick playa. You just have to wait for it.

and I told you this would not get to me anymore. I picked my entire team except Maclin. He was not even at my house. I know you know this but I'm just telling you.

Like I said, when I finish better than you this year, you better give me my props.

DavenIII
09-09-2011, 04:36 PM
DAMN I got some new found respect for Dez...

Btw Dez..take if from me (since I have like 20 bets every year lol) send Matt a PM of the trade...not that he's every renegged and I don't think he would...but the specifics of bets get lost over the course of a season...it's good to be able to check your PM's for the exact wording of a bet when it comes down to the wire.

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 04:38 PM
**** YOU- dont put that blame on me!!!! lol</p>


i didnt set **** up, like you said i copied your entire leage for the other league we are doing and said we would go bakc and change the setting which you did and missed obviously! lol</p>


</p>


it should be 6 but if we have a majority vote for 4 then we will change it to 4 but no it shouldnt be.</p>




well one more vote and its 6, but ur going to have to write them an email about it and ask the mto change it for you.

I went to go do it but it didn't work for me
</p>


your not the commish so you cnat change settings unless your logged on under me dumbass LOL im leaving work.. i changed it to 6 teams with playoffs 14, 15 and 16 (i hate championships in week 17, its really not fair) so its just like it was last year. if there are enough votes to change it to 4 teams then i will do it tomorrow so get your votes in now.</p>


</p>


leaving work, have a fabulous weekend and i will talk to most of you on sunday. GOOOOOO GIANTS... and good luck in fantasy! except you pappy..... you can kick rocks :) i promise come monday i will love you again.</p>
And Snap, She cracks the whip. Power of the P-U-S-S-Y

We all know who wears the pants...


and we all know who drafts your teams

especially after this past draft

Same guy who drafted this one and made a sick trade. If it makes you feel better to give him so much credit than by all means continue. I drafted 95% of that team and the year before. I picked my line up every week, placed my trades, picked up my waivers, remembered to play a kicker and everything. It's not just the draft as you know my friend. I love how much it bothers you. You want me to take a picture of my champ certificate and send it to you?

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 04:40 PM
Did you vote Daven?

dezzzR
09-09-2011, 04:45 PM
DAMN I got some new found respect for Dez...

Btw Dez..take if from me (since I have like 20 bets every year lol) send Matt a PM of the trade...not that he's every renegged and I don't think he would...but the specifics of bets get lost over the course of a season...it's good to be able to check your PM's for the exact wording of a bet when it comes down to the wire.

yea thats a good idea. word it up matt.

byron
09-09-2011, 04:46 PM
<FONT color=#0000ff size=6>6</FONT></P>


<FONT color=#0000ff size=6></FONT></P>

DavenIII
09-09-2011, 04:50 PM
Did you vote Daven?


Yeah Matt Texted me, I think in this league 6 teams to the playoffs is good, it's not super competitive and most of us know each other, having more people "in it" at the end can be good for this league.

If it was a super cut-throat big money league I'd be voting 4 but this is not that.

dezzzR
09-09-2011, 04:55 PM
michael kay " hey plax!, THE GIANTS DONT WANT TO BE YOUR FRIEND, GET OVER IT!"

hahaha

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 05:12 PM
Kase votes 6

byron
09-09-2011, 05:37 PM
so I hear apuppy screaming andhe ain't stopping...so I run down there to see what thehell is going on one puppy's got the other puppy by the ear and won't let go I thought he was dieing</P>


</P>


</P>


</P>

bigblue4417
09-09-2011, 06:51 PM
<div class="report">


FOX Sports' Jay Glazer reports that Marques Colston broke his collarbone in Thursday night's NFL opener.</p>
</div>

Glazer puts Colston's timetable for return at four weeks, but that's probably optimistic.

bandwgn86
09-10-2011, 10:04 AM
<div class="report">


FOX Sports' Jay Glazer reports that Marques Colston broke his collarbone in Thursday night's NFL opener.</p>
</div>

Glazer puts Colston's timetable for return at four weeks, but that's probably optimistic.Yah 4 weeks sounds a tad short... How long was Romo out? Not that I'm comparing the 2, we all know Romo's a puss e so I imagine he needed extra time.

MattMeyerBud
09-10-2011, 11:02 AM
<div class="report">


FOX Sports' Jay Glazer reports that Marques Colston broke his collarbone in Thursday night's NFL opener.</p>
</div>

Glazer puts Colston's timetable for return at four weeks, but that's probably optimistic.Yah 4 weeks sounds a tad short... How long was Romo out? Not that I'm comparing the 2, we all know Romo's a puss e so I imagine he needed extra time.

i heard 4-6 weeks too, i thought that was a bit low myself

dezzzR
09-10-2011, 11:20 AM
<div class="report">


FOX Sports' Jay Glazer reports that Marques Colston broke his collarbone in Thursday night's NFL opener.</p>
</div>

Glazer puts Colston's timetable for return at four weeks, but that's probably optimistic.Yah 4 weeks sounds a tad short... How long was Romo out? Not that I'm comparing the 2, we all know Romo's a puss e so I imagine he needed extra time.

i heard 4-6 weeks too, i thought that was a bit low myself
whats good with that bet?

ny06
09-10-2011, 11:29 AM
<DIV class=report>


FOX Sports' Jay Glazer reports that Marques Colston broke his collarbone in Thursday night's NFL opener.</P></DIV>


Glazer puts Colston's timetable for return at four weeks, but that's probably optimistic.</P>


Tough break (no pun intended)</P>


Colston is a good Receiver. </P>

MattMeyerBud
09-10-2011, 11:37 AM
<div class="report">


FOX Sports' Jay Glazer reports that Marques Colston broke his collarbone in Thursday night's NFL opener.</p>
</div>

Glazer puts Colston's timetable for return at four weeks, but that's probably optimistic.Yah 4 weeks sounds a tad short... How long was Romo out? Not that I'm comparing the 2, we all know Romo's a puss e so I imagine he needed extra time.

i heard 4-6 weeks too, i thought that was a bit low myself
whats good with that bet?


100 bucks under 19.5?

send me a pm so we have it - im game

lawl
09-10-2011, 11:58 AM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands


I never said he has great hands or bad hands or mediocre hands. All I said was that you have absolutely no basis when you say his hands are overrated.

Stop backtracking, you're acting like morehead.

MattMeyerBud
09-10-2011, 12:01 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands


I never said he has great hands or bad hands or mediocre hands. All I said was that you have absolutely no basis when you say his hands are overrated.

Stop backtracking, you're acting like morehead.

His hands are overrated. People think hes legit but when has he ever made a tough catch in the pros? Never.

My point is if we're keeping a TE who is one dimensional, he better shine in that one dimension and he hasn't and my guess is he wont ever and will be by next year.

You have to step up when your get your shots and ur fighting for ur position. So far the only thing of note i've seen out of Beckum is not knowing what route hes suppose to run and not catching a catchable but tough ball. If the dude was that legit he would of came up wiht it

I know it was on play, but people get cut on one play. He hasn't done enough to lock his spot up on this team is my opinion.

I think Gilbride agrees as well with all the trouble hes had with him at practice and then basically blowing Ballard in that article

lawl
09-10-2011, 12:08 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands


I never said he has great hands or bad hands or mediocre hands. All I said was that you have absolutely no basis when you say his hands are overrated.

Stop backtracking, you're acting like morehead.

His hands are overrated.* People think hes legit but when has he ever made a tough catch in the pros? Never.

My point is if we're keeping a TE who is one dimensional, he better shine in that one dimension and he hasn't and my guess is he wont ever and will be by next year.

You have to step up when your get your shots and ur fighting for ur position. So far the only thing of note i've seen out of Beckum is not knowing what route hes suppose to run and not catching a catchable but tough ball. If the dude was that legit he would of came up wiht it

I know it was on play, but people get cut on one play.* He hasn't done enough to lock his spot up on this team is my opinion.

I think Gilbride agrees as well with all the trouble hes had with him at practice and then basically blowing Ballard in that article


About 90% of what you just said has absolutely nothing to do with his hands.

In games that have mattered he has never dropped a pass, yet somehow based on this he has overrated hands?

Just say he sucks and admit you were wrong that you could possibly say/know that his hands are overrated.

MattMeyerBud
09-10-2011, 03:51 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands
if he was thrown at 13 times and caught 13 balls, yes so far he does have sticky fingers. why cant we have a blocking end and a recieving tightend? like i said if we can utilize beckum like greenbay does with finley hes worth keep. and despite what you say he has shown flashes. a few of those 13 caught balls were big first downs.


lol just be prepared to get ur balls broke all year. He'll have another 15 catches this year and he'll be an awful blocker and banged up like he always is

Gwilk v2.0
so youre saying ballard will have more catches? i smell a bet brewing.


who said anything about Ballard?

i'll take the under 19.5 grabs for ur boy beckum this year

put up or shut up
how much?


hundo

deal. and just to be clear and not have a repeat of izbo situation(was that who it was?) if travis has 20 catches i win, if he has 19 you win. correct?


yes

MattMeyerBud
09-10-2011, 04:02 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets


That's preseason.

Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands


I never said he has great hands or bad hands or mediocre hands. All I said was that you have absolutely no basis when you say his hands are overrated.

Stop backtracking, you're acting like morehead.

His hands are overrated. People think hes legit but when has he ever made a tough catch in the pros? Never.

My point is if we're keeping a TE who is one dimensional, he better shine in that one dimension and he hasn't and my guess is he wont ever and will be by next year.

You have to step up when your get your shots and ur fighting for ur position. So far the only thing of note i've seen out of Beckum is not knowing what route hes suppose to run and not catching a catchable but tough ball. If the dude was that legit he would of came up wiht it

I know it was on play, but people get cut on one play. He hasn't done enough to lock his spot up on this team is my opinion.

I think Gilbride agrees as well with all the trouble hes had with him at practice and then basically blowing Ballard in that article


About 90% of what you just said has absolutely nothing to do with his hands.

In games that have mattered he has never dropped a pass, yet somehow based on this he has overrated hands?

Just say he sucks and admit you were wrong that you could possibly say/know that his hands are overrated.

i will apologize i did word it wrong. Too specific by saying hands, as a receiver hes overrated.

Do i think this sure hand thing that is going around about him is ridic? Yes but hes overrated as a receiver.

lttaylor56
09-10-2011, 06:45 PM
He's never dropped a pass in the NFL, just sayin.

Has he ever had one thrown to him?

Yup, he was the only player targeted last year that didnt have a dropped pass.

I have no idea how anyone could possibly say his hands are overrated if the ball hardly ever comes his way and when it has, he has always caught it.

Just Matt being Matt I suppose.(talking out of ***)

Talking out of it or tossing it. Those are his specialties...


or the fact that he dropped one vs the jets
That's preseason. Beckum was the on player on the team that was targeted last year and didn't drop the ball. Obviously he had much less chances to drop the ball, but the point remains that if he hasn't dropped the ball how could anyone conclude that his hands are overrated?

wow really - he caught all 13 balls...

ur right what was i thinking - sign him up. He obviously has stickum hands
I never said he has great hands or bad hands or mediocre hands. All I said was that you have absolutely no basis when you say his hands are overrated. Stop backtracking, you're acting like morehead.

His hands are overrated. People think hes legit but when has he ever made a tough catch in the pros? Never.

My point is if we're keeping a TE who is one dimensional, he better shine in that one dimension and he hasn't and my guess is he wont ever and will be by next year.

You have to step up when your get your shots and ur fighting for ur position. So far the only thing of note i've seen out of Beckum is not knowing what route hes suppose to run and not catching a catchable but tough ball. If the dude was that legit he would of came up wiht it

I know it was on play, but people get cut on one play. He hasn't done enough to lock his spot up on this team is my opinion.

I think Gilbride agrees as well with all the trouble hes had with him at practice and then basically blowing Ballard in that article
About 90% of what you just said has absolutely nothing to do with his hands. In games that have mattered he has never dropped a pass, yet somehow based on this he has overrated hands? Just say he sucks and admit you were wrong that you could possibly say/know that his hands are overrated.

i will apologize i did word it wrong. Too specific by saying hands, as a receiver hes overrated.

Do i think this sure hand thing that is going around about him is ridic? Yes but hes overrated as a receiver.
Tomorrow must be the start of regular season--thee is hopping on Saturday [Y] Enjoy the games tomorrow Guy's!

bandwgn86
09-11-2011, 10:01 AM
What beauty day lining up for me..
At 1pm my Hamilton Tigercats go for series sweep over Montreal.
4pm GO GIANTS
7pm my Jays are on, which isn't a huge deal but one of my favourite pitchers is on the mound for the first time since Tommy J surgery in 2008....... Dustin MCGowan..

Don't care?
Don't care!
:) go giants

dezzzR
09-11-2011, 10:21 AM
GAME DAY!! I HATE WAITING FOR4 PM GAMES!!!!!

ny06
09-11-2011, 10:25 AM
GAME DAY!! I HATE WAITING FOR4 PM GAMES!!!!!
</P>


I know right. </P>


I want my Giants now!!!!</P>

Kase-1
09-11-2011, 10:47 AM
GAME DAY!! I HATE WAITING FOR4 PM GAMES!!!!!
The only saving grace is that we get to see the Steelers vs Ravens game...... I LOOOOOOOVE seeing those 2 teams rip each other apart piece by piece, straight up old school football

bandwgn86
09-11-2011, 05:15 PM
What beauty day lining up for me..
At 1pm my Hamilton Tigercats go for series sweep over Montreal.
4pm GO GIANTS
7pm my Jays are on, which isn't a huge deal but one of my favourite pitchers is on the mound for the first time since Tommy J surgery in 2008....... Dustin MCGowan..

Don't care?
Don't care!
:) go giants1 out of 2 so far...come on GMen. 2 outta 3 would be swell

dezzzR
09-11-2011, 06:00 PM
now do you people see how bad zone coverage is? webster looks lost.

byron
09-11-2011, 07:05 PM
now do you people see how bad zone coverage is? webster looks lost.
I'm with ya dezz I hate zone you have to have pressure for it to work..fewell should have been blitzing every ****ing down.....these coaches are lost you have to use your strengths...undisciplined play...**** it...it is what it is. I'm so tired of all the ****ing around at the line!!call a play and run it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</P>


</P>


edit... I'm carm now ....sorry guys</P>


edit ..check that I wasn't done.......its become a need now before I have stroke! on to next week......</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 08:54 AM
now do you people see how bad zone coverage is? webster looks lost.


Na I agree that I don't like that kind of coverage, but typically we mix it all in. Yesterday we didn't put pressure on ANY WRs

and goddamn did our oline look like ****...

could take that with a grain of salt. Kerrigan and Orakpo may be the best 3-4 OLD combo in the league

Mario looked lost yesterday as wel

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 09:06 AM
now do you people see how bad zone coverage is? webster looks lost.


Na I agree that I don't like that kind of coverage, but typically we mix it all in. Yesterday we didn't put pressure on ANY WRs

and goddamn did our oline look like ****...

could take that with a grain of salt. Kerrigan and Orakpo may be the best 3-4 OLD combo in the league

Mario looked lost yesterday as wel
</P>


We have guys that we drafted because of their press coverage talents and we are asking them play zone. This is why I could not understand the Fewell hire in the first place (which i said at the time).</P>


The only guys who played well were Nicks and JPP. The rest of the team stunk up the joint. (although I will give BJ a pass because he only got 6 carries)</P>


I wonder what will happen when we play a good team.</P>

ny06
09-12-2011, 09:13 AM
now do you people see how bad zone coverage is? webster looks lost.
</P>


I can understand the zone coverage in the first half. </P>


Trying to hide the fact we were out of two starters on the defensive line (Tuck, Osi)</P>


But after halftime and there were no adjustments, the Redskins just sat back and played catch with there receivers. </P>

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 09:21 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</P>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</P>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</P>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</P>

ny06
09-12-2011, 09:24 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</P>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</P>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</P>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</P>


</P>


That play was doomed from the moment McKenzie coulden't get Kerrigen on the ground. </P>


</P>

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 09:42 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</p>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</p>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</p>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</p>yea it was a poor decision. so was that throw to bradshaw in the flat with a linebacker 5 ft away and closing. we abandoned the run. ughhh i dont know you guuyyss

DavenIII
09-12-2011, 09:49 AM
So yea...pretty much everything was bad.

Eli got his rhythm after a bad start...Him and the Running game is about the only thing I'm not worried about at the moment...and maybe Kenny Phillips and JPP...

everyone else should be on notice imho.

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 09:52 AM
Eli wasn't good at all by any means, but our O-line totally collapsed in the 2nd half, worse than anything I've ever seen. And why did we abandon the run BEFORE we were even losing??
Our LBs were giving up plays alllll over the middle of the field, but I guess I almost expected that.
Very disappointing. But the first loss is out of the way, so hopefully something clicks going into next week.

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 10:01 AM
if fewell doesnt adjust for next week, my head is going to explode.

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 10:03 AM
i was thinking, maybe eli does need a veteran wr.....

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 10:05 AM
So yea...pretty much everything was bad.

Eli got his rhythm after a bad start...Him and the Running game is about the only thing I'm not worried about at the moment...and maybe Kenny Phillips and JPP...

everyone else should be on notice imho.
</P>


You and I were watching a different game. The only thing we agree on is JPP.</P>


Eli made a few nice plays early and then stunk up the place. KP is lost in this defense. He is always late to pick up WR's released by corners into his area. He was much better suited for Spags defense.</P>


And what running game? We had 19 total carries. BJ was the better RB on the field yesterday. Bradshaw was lousy.</P>


We better win next week or this season will spiral out of control.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:09 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</p>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</p>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</p>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</p>

ur a fool if u think that aws on eli. Thats a bang-bang play. McKenzie HAD to cut block the DE to make it work. You can't wait for that to happen, you have to just do it. The fact that it was picked was just bad luck. Typically thats just a batted ball

Let the grown ups talk before u start trolling pappy

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 10:09 AM
i was thinking, maybe eli does need a veteran wr.....
</P>


I'm actually a little more concerned with potential trust issues amoung Eli and his o-line....if they let him get beat up like he did yesterday, I don't expect any amazing games from him.</P>


</P>


btw, TO, and Bad Randy are available =P</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:11 AM
now do you people see how bad zone coverage is? webster looks lost.


Na I agree that I don't like that kind of coverage, but typically we mix it all in. Yesterday we didn't put pressure on ANY WRs

and goddamn did our oline look like ****...

could take that with a grain of salt. Kerrigan and Orakpo may be the best 3-4 OLD combo in the league

Mario looked lost yesterday as wel
</p>


We have guys that we drafted because of their press coverage talents and we are asking them play zone. This is why I could not understand the Fewell hire in the first place (which i said at the time).</p>


The only guys who played well were Nicks and JPP. The rest of the team stunk up the joint. (although I will give BJ a pass because he only got 6 carries)</p>


I wonder what will happen when we play a good team.</p>

i disliked the signing too - but warmed up to it after I read a lil more about Fewell

I think Bradshaw and Ballard looks very good as well. Our LBs and DLine players really good. We look pretty legit against the run.

Jesus god our o-line though. Baas either looks dominant or like the worst players inthe league

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:12 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</p>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</p>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</p>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</p>yea it was a poor decision. so was that throw to bradshaw in the flat with a linebacker 5 ft away and closing. we abandoned the run. ughhh i dont know you guuyyss


you guys have no concept of how that play is suppose to be ran

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:13 AM
So yea...pretty much everything was bad.

Eli got his rhythm after a bad start...Him and the Running game is about the only thing I'm not worried about at the moment...and maybe Kenny Phillips and JPP...

everyone else should be on notice imho.


KP has his moments and was lucky to pop that ball out of armstrongs hands - but he has to do better in coverage

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 10:13 AM
oh, and did anyone notice that JPP and Tollefson played the entire game? Without depth, that defense cannot stay on the field as long as they did yesterday. Turrrble.</P>


We need our ends back, and having Prince back would help (at least I assume he would) too. </P>


and whoever said Bradshaw was bad yesterday.....yes. it was not pretty.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:15 AM
Eli wasn't good at all by any means, but our O-line totally collapsed in the 2nd half, worse than anything I've ever seen. And why did we abandon the run BEFORE we were even losing??
Our LBs were giving up plays alllll over the middle of the field, but I guess I almost expected that.
Very disappointing. But the first loss is out of the way, so hopefully something clicks going into next week.

im really not understanding the knocks on eli too much.

He made some nice plays and threw the ball away alot. Isn't that what everybody was crying about?

I couldn't stomach how they kept popping up his completion %. He was like 3 for 12 or whatever to start the game and there were drops and he threw the ball away.

I am going to break it down tom night.

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:16 AM
So yea...pretty much everything was bad.

Eli got his rhythm after a bad start...Him and the Running game is about the only thing I'm not worried about at the moment...and maybe Kenny Phillips and JPP...

everyone else should be on notice imho.
</p>


You and I were watching a different game. The only thing we agree on is JPP.</p>


Eli made a few nice plays early and then stunk up the place. KP is lost in this defense. He is always late to pick up WR's released by corners into his area. He was much better suited for Spags defense.</p>


And what running game? We had 19 total carries. BJ was the better RB on the field yesterday. Bradshaw was lousy.</p>


We better win next week or this season will spiral out of control.</p>

stuck up the place, he couldn't even set his feet. He was on the run ALL day long

the good news about this is that we have a new center and so maybe they are still learning. Hopfully.

But keep in mind our OLine looked awful first two games of teh season last year as well

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 10:17 AM
i was thinking, maybe eli does need a veteran wr.....
</p>


I'm actually a little more concerned with potential trust issues amoung Eli and his o-line....if they let him get beat up like he did yesterday, I don't expect any amazing games from him.</p>


</p>


btw, TO, and Bad Randy are available =P</p>when eli was sacked around our own 2 in the 2nd half he looked reeeal pissed, but i didnt see him yelling.

i DID see tc yelling at eli though, for all those who say tom doesnt.

ehhh i dont like either of them.

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:17 AM
i was thinking, maybe eli does need a veteran wr.....
</p>


I'm actually a little more concerned with potential trust issues amoung Eli and his o-line....if they let him get beat up like he did yesterday, I don't expect any amazing games from him.</p>


</p>


btw, TO, and Bad Randy are available =P</p>

yea but TO won't be ready for like a month n a half.

Bad Randy is interesting, but I dont think we need that headache/

I think it was just growing pains and playing a very underrated defense in Washington.


Kerrigan and Orakpo are ****ing SICK

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 10:18 AM
Eli wasn't good at all by any means, but our O-line totally collapsed in the 2nd half, worse than anything I've ever seen. And why did we abandon the run BEFORE we were even losing??
Our LBs were giving up plays alllll over the middle of the field, but I guess I almost expected that.
Very disappointing. But the first loss is out of the way, so hopefully something clicks going into next week.

im really not understanding the knocks on eli too much.

He made some nice plays and threw the ball away alot. Isn't that what everybody was crying about?

I couldn't stomach how they kept popping up his completion %. He was like 3 for 12 or whatever to start the game and there were drops and he threw the ball away.

I am going to break it down tom night.
</P>


that's why i said he wasnt *good* but commented on the total failure of our o-line to do their job at all in the 2nd half. Although they had some big lapses in the 1st half also, just not as regularly. We made some rookie jobbers on the skins d-line looks like ****ing all-pros</P>

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 10:20 AM
yea but TO won't be ready for like a month n a half.

Bad Randy is interesting, but I dont think we need that headache/

</P>


gotta be honest dude....although I don't LIKE either of them...I'm pretty damn sure both of them could still produce.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:22 AM
oh, and did anyone notice that JPP and Tollefson played the entire game? Without depth, that defense cannot stay on the field as long as they did yesterday. Turrrble.</p>


We need our ends back, and having Prince back would help (at least I assume he would) too. </p>


and whoever said Bradshaw was bad yesterday.....yes. it was not pretty.</p>

well thats what happens when your starting DEs are out for the game.

Not that we missed them too much. Tolly and JPP did a good job getting pressure all day and we were solid vs the run.

I didn't think BRadshaw looked that bad yesterday at all. I think most of the issues came from lack of blocking.

Except one run, he had like 7 yards on. If he would of busted it to the sidelines instead of back up the middle he might of broke it

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:22 AM
yea but TO won't be ready for like a month n a half.

Bad Randy is interesting, but I dont think we need that headache/

</p>


gotta be honest dude....although I don't LIKE either of them...I'm pretty damn sure both of them could still produce.</p>

i like em both

Randy Moss can't handle NY though


my real question is why the **** are we not trying to work Devin Thomas in?

Have to be honest, im sick of the stubborness of this staff. Victor Cruz? can we stop with that already.

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:25 AM
Eli wasn't good at all by any means, but our O-line totally collapsed in the 2nd half, worse than anything I've ever seen. And why did we abandon the run BEFORE we were even losing??
Our LBs were giving up plays alllll over the middle of the field, but I guess I almost expected that.
Very disappointing. But the first loss is out of the way, so hopefully something clicks going into next week.

im really not understanding the knocks on eli too much.

He made some nice plays and threw the ball away alot. Isn't that what everybody was crying about?

I couldn't stomach how they kept popping up his completion %. He was like 3 for 12 or whatever to start the game and there were drops and he threw the ball away.

I am going to break it down tom night.
</p>


that's why i said he wasnt *good* but commented on the total failure of our o-line to do their job at all in the 2nd half. Although they had some big lapses in the 1st half also, just not as regularly. We made some rookie jobbers on the skins d-line looks like ****ing all-pros</p>

that kid Kerrigan is the truth i think

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 10:27 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</P>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</P>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</P>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</P>




ur a fool if u think that aws on eli. Thats a bang-bang play. McKenzie HAD to cut block the DE to make it work. You can't wait for that to happen, you have to just do it. The fact that it was picked was just bad luck. Typically thats just a batted ball

Let the grown ups talk before u start trolling pappy
</P>


I'm not saying that the break down of the play was on Eli. I do expect our veteran QB to see that the play had broken down and adjust accordingly. I don't expect him to force it with the DE standing in the passing lane and KMac laying on the ground.</P>


If you watch the play you can see that all this was clear when Eli threw the ball. There was not a lot of time to adjust, but after 8 years the game should have slowed down enough to make the right decision. This is just like the Cruz adjustment in pre season. It was Cruz's fault that he didn't make the sight adjustment, just as it was KMac's fault that he missed the block, but the DECISION to throw the ball in both plays was all on Eli.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:27 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 10:28 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</p>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</p>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</p>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</p>yea it was a poor decision. so was that throw to bradshaw in the flat with a linebacker 5 ft away and closing. we abandoned the run. ughhh i dont know you guuyyss


you guys have no concept of how that play is suppose to be ran
yea but when your left tackle goes for a dends legs and fails dont throw it in his direction, throw it away.


im thought eli played well at times, he didnt "stink up" the place. nothing was flowing, absolutely no consistency on either side of the ball. it was a **** show. with our schedule and with rex friggin grossman throwing all over us for over 300 yards, im very worried.

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:29 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</p>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</p>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</p>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</p>




ur a fool if u think that aws on eli. Thats a bang-bang play. McKenzie HAD to cut block the DE to make it work. You can't wait for that to happen, you have to just do it. The fact that it was picked was just bad luck. Typically thats just a batted ball

Let the grown ups talk before u start trolling pappy
</p>


I'm not saying that the break down of the play was on Eli. I do expect our veteran QB to see that the play had broken down and adjust accordingly. I don't expect him to force it with the DE standing in the passing lane and KMac laying on the ground.</p>


If you watch the play you can see that all this was clear when Eli threw the ball. There was not a lot of time to adjust, but after 8 years the game should have slowed down enough to make the right decision. This is just like the Cruz adjustment in pre season. It was Cruz's fault that he didn't make the sight adjustment, just as it was KMac's fault that he missed the block, but the DECISION to throw the ball in both plays was all on Eli.</p>

there is no adjustment on a hot route screen. You step back and throw and you have to believe your lineman is making the block

bottom line, not even debatable.

The DE is suppose to be cut Moorhead. During that play 90% of the time the defender is in the passing lane, but just hunched over or on the ground. Awful job by McKenzie.

The fact that it was INT'd rather than a batted ball is just bad luck.

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 10:30 AM
Eli wasn't good at all by any means, but our O-line totally collapsed in the 2nd half, worse than anything I've ever seen. And why did we abandon the run BEFORE we were even losing??
Our LBs were giving up plays alllll over the middle of the field, but I guess I almost expected that.
Very disappointing. But the first loss is out of the way, so hopefully something clicks going into next week.

im really not understanding the knocks on eli too much.

He made some nice plays and threw the ball away alot. Isn't that what everybody was crying about?

I couldn't stomach how they kept popping up his completion %. He was like 3 for 12 or whatever to start the game and there were drops and he threw the ball away.

I am going to break it down tom night.
</P>


Take off your rose colored glasses when you do. Although I'm sure you won't.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:30 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</p>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</p>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</p>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</p>yea it was a poor decision. so was that throw to bradshaw in the flat with a linebacker 5 ft away and closing. we abandoned the run. ughhh i dont know you guuyyss


you guys have no concept of how that play is suppose to be ran
yea but when your left tackle goes for a dends legs and fails dont throw it in his direction, throw it away.


im thought eli played well at times, he didnt "stink up" the place. nothing was flowing, absolutely no consistency on either side of the ball. it was a **** show. with our schedule and with rex friggin grossman throwing all over us for over 300 yards, im very worried.


by the time the olineman fails the ball is already leaving the hand. Its a bang-bang play

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:31 AM
Eli wasn't good at all by any means, but our O-line totally collapsed in the 2nd half, worse than anything I've ever seen. And why did we abandon the run BEFORE we were even losing??
Our LBs were giving up plays alllll over the middle of the field, but I guess I almost expected that.
Very disappointing. But the first loss is out of the way, so hopefully something clicks going into next week.

im really not understanding the knocks on eli too much.

He made some nice plays and threw the ball away alot. Isn't that what everybody was crying about?

I couldn't stomach how they kept popping up his completion %. He was like 3 for 12 or whatever to start the game and there were drops and he threw the ball away.

I am going to break it down tom night.
</p>


Take off your rose colored glasses when you do. Although I'm sure you won't.</p>

honestly you have really become a troll..

besides the pick, which wasn't his fault, what else was your knocks on him?

I mean besides the fact he couldn't settle AT ALL and was running all night.

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 10:33 AM
Eli wasn't good at all by any means, but our O-line totally collapsed in the 2nd half, worse than anything I've ever seen. And why did we abandon the run BEFORE we were even losing??
Our LBs were giving up plays alllll over the middle of the field, but I guess I almost expected that.
Very disappointing. But the first loss is out of the way, so hopefully something clicks going into next week.

im really not understanding the knocks on eli too much.

He made some nice plays and threw the ball away alot. Isn't that what everybody was crying about?

I couldn't stomach how they kept popping up his completion %. He was like 3 for 12 or whatever to start the game and there were drops and he threw the ball away.

I am going to break it down tom night.
</P>


Take off your rose colored glasses when you do. Although I'm sure you won't.</P>




honestly you have really become a troll..

besides the pick, which wasn't his fault, what else was your knocks on him?

I mean besides the fact he couldn't settle AT ALL and was running all night.
</P>


He didn't stink any worse than the rest of the team Matt, I'll give you that.</P>


At what point to we ask our QB to make a play?</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:36 AM
Eli wasn't good at all by any means, but our O-line totally collapsed in the 2nd half, worse than anything I've ever seen. And why did we abandon the run BEFORE we were even losing??
Our LBs were giving up plays alllll over the middle of the field, but I guess I almost expected that.
Very disappointing. But the first loss is out of the way, so hopefully something clicks going into next week.

im really not understanding the knocks on eli too much.

He made some nice plays and threw the ball away alot. Isn't that what everybody was crying about?

I couldn't stomach how they kept popping up his completion %. He was like 3 for 12 or whatever to start the game and there were drops and he threw the ball away.

I am going to break it down tom night.
</p>


Take off your rose colored glasses when you do. Although I'm sure you won't.</p>




honestly you have really become a troll..

besides the pick, which wasn't his fault, what else was your knocks on him?

I mean besides the fact he couldn't settle AT ALL and was running all night.
</p>


He didn't stink any worse than the rest of the team Matt, I'll give you that.</p>


At what point to we ask our QB to make a play?</p>

He could barely get the ball off yesterday and when he did it was typically effective

How many balls did he throw away, i hear nothing about u praising him for that while u were killing him ALL off season and last year for it.

NOW your asking him to make plays? If its not there throw it away, how many times have u said that

hence why ur a troll

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 10:41 AM
Eli wasn't good at all by any means, but our O-line totally collapsed in the 2nd half, worse than anything I've ever seen. And why did we abandon the run BEFORE we were even losing??
Our LBs were giving up plays alllll over the middle of the field, but I guess I almost expected that.
Very disappointing. But the first loss is out of the way, so hopefully something clicks going into next week.

im really not understanding the knocks on eli too much.

He made some nice plays and threw the ball away alot. Isn't that what everybody was crying about?

I couldn't stomach how they kept popping up his completion %. He was like 3 for 12 or whatever to start the game and there were drops and he threw the ball away.

I am going to break it down tom night.
</P>


Take off your rose colored glasses when you do. Although I'm sure you won't.</P>




honestly you have really become a troll..

besides the pick, which wasn't his fault, what else was your knocks on him?

I mean besides the fact he couldn't settle AT ALL and was running all night.
</P>


And you are becoming an Eli apologist.</P>


You require nothing of your "future Hall of Famer" QB. Except to "not be horrible" If he has one bad game he gets a pass from me. But this is a huge pattern with him. He played lousy in pre season and now its continued into the regular season. Good thing he had Nicks to make some plays. Otherwise it would have been uglier.</P>


The kid didn't stand out in his poor play. the whole team played lousy. And this loss is not on him except that he was one of the many contributors to the poor performance.</P>


We lost to a bad team and did it in an embarrassing way. But in Matt's world, the QB was a "shining beacon of great play" in a sea of traitors and misfits.</P>


And I'm a troll. get real Matt.</P>


</P>

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 10:42 AM
Why are we running a sweep on 3rd and 1 and why is Bradshaw in the game on short yardage instead of Jacobs. I just don't understand...

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 10:43 AM
Why are we running a sweep on 3rd and 1 and why is Bradshaw in the game on short yardage instead of Jacobs. I just don't understand...
</P>


Because our coaching staff is stubborn to a fault.</P>

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 10:43 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol

lawl
09-12-2011, 10:48 AM
My team is straight trash.

Said it when i drafted em.

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 10:48 AM
Why are we running a sweep on 3rd and 1 and why is Bradshaw in the game on short yardage instead of Jacobs. I just don't understand...
</P>


to ensure that we properly Kill our Drive</P>

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 10:49 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol
</P>


Wonder why LT hasn't showed up this morning. The Ryan Torrain thing was not his best moment.</P>


I still think you are winning (probably by a lot) this week but it will be fun to sweat it out with you tonight. Lets hope the Pats D/ST doesn't do what it did last year at Miami.</P>

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 10:50 AM
My team is straight trash.

Said it when i drafted em.
</P>


Well QB's are huge with our scoring. You waited a long time to get one. I'll trade Flacco to you if you want.</P>

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 10:52 AM
Rut Row Red Sawx

lawl
09-12-2011, 10:53 AM
cant believe people drafted both fitzpatrick and cam newton, what the ****

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:53 AM
Why are we running a sweep on 3rd and 1 and why is Bradshaw in the game on short yardage instead of Jacobs. I just don't understand...


Bradshaw is typicaly a better short yardage back becuase hes small strong and shifty. On short yardage you know they are going to play the LOS hard and sometimes its hard for a big back like JAcobs to fit in those tiny spots.

Bradshaw has actually been a really good short yardage back for us, but Moses couldn't part that line of scrimmage on that play yesterday

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:54 AM
Why are we running a sweep on 3rd and 1 and why is Bradshaw in the game on short yardage instead of Jacobs. I just don't understand...
</p>


Because our coaching staff is stubborn to a fault.</p>

the sweep i dont get either

and finally we agree about something, the coache sbeing stubborn

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 10:54 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol
</p>


Wonder why LT hasn't showed up this morning. The Ryan Torrain thing was not his best moment.</p>


I still think you are winning (probably by a lot) this week but<font color="#0000FF"> it will be fun to sweat it out</font> with you tonight.
</p>

Lets hope the Pats D/ST doesn't do what it did last year at Miami.</p>
Not my idea of fun. lol

I know, I already thought about that. Miami better pull it together and I need TD's from the Law Firm

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:55 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:57 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol
</p>


Wonder why LT hasn't showed up this morning. The Ryan Torrain thing was not his best moment.</p>


I still think you are winning (probably by a lot) this week but it will be fun to sweat it out with you tonight. Lets hope the Pats D/ST doesn't do what it did last year at Miami.</p>

yea, i have to tink he made a mistake and just put the wrong guy in.

HE hit me up all excited early in the day but I was finishing the kitchen and bathroom in my place

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 10:57 AM
Week 1 fantasy busts:
Legarette Blount
Chris Johnson
Frank Gore

Guysnobody started,but should have...

the Steve Smith &amp; Cam Newton connection....ouch. </P>

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 10:59 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</P>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</P>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</P>


</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 10:59 AM
My team is straight trash.

Said it when i drafted em.
</p>


Well QB's are huge with our scoring. You waited a long time to get one. I'll trade Flacco to you if you want.</p>

QBs are overrated IMO. IT just depends how the draft goes. I only had 17 points out of my QB and i had the most points in the league.

I think you'll be fine lawl

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:01 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>

did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 11:02 AM
How terrible of a pass was this....


http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2011/0911/dal_u_bryant01jr_200.jpg

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:02 AM
My team is straight trash.

Said it when i drafted em.
</P>


Well QB's are huge with our scoring. You waited a long time to get one. I'll trade Flacco to you if you want.</P>




QBs are overrated IMO. IT just depends how the draft goes. I only had 17 points out of my QB and i had the most points in the league.

I think you'll be fine lawl
</P>


I disagree. QB is huge in this league.</P>


I know you are high on Hightower but i think he's over rated. He is a straight line runner and will not produce in the long run in Wash.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:03 AM
and did YOU notice Houston had the 2nd best defensive performance in fantasy?

lawl
09-12-2011, 11:04 AM
My team is straight trash.

Said it when i drafted em.
</p>


Well QB's are huge with our scoring. You waited a long time to get one. I'll trade Flacco to you if you want.</p>

QBs are overrated IMO. IT just depends how the draft goes. I only had 17 points out of my QB and i had the most points in the league.

I think you'll be fine lawl
\

If Orton plays well I'll have confidence, but we'll see....

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:04 AM
My team is straight trash.

Said it when i drafted em.
</p>


Well QB's are huge with our scoring. You waited a long time to get one. I'll trade Flacco to you if you want.</p>




QBs are overrated IMO. IT just depends how the draft goes. I only had 17 points out of my QB and i had the most points in the league.

I think you'll be fine lawl
</p>


I disagree. QB is huge in this league.</p>


I know you are high on Hightower but i think he's over rated. He is a straight line runner and will not produce in the long run in Wash.</p>

it is, but it costs u value in later rounds... so it evens out

ESPECIALLY this year. There is a TON of late round talent at QB

I love Hightower. We have a top rushing defense I still feel like. He still had a legit day. Shanahan is going to FEEEEED him. He will beast this year. The value i got on him is sickness

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:05 AM
My team is straight trash.

Said it when i drafted em.
</p>


Well QB's are huge with our scoring. You waited a long time to get one. I'll trade Flacco to you if you want.</p>

QBs are overrated IMO. IT just depends how the draft goes. I only had 17 points out of my QB and i had the most points in the league.

I think you'll be fine lawl
\

If Orton plays well I'll have confidence, but we'll see....


I think u ride wtih Eli. You know where his numbers will be about and he had a slow start yest.

Should have a big week this week

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:05 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</P>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</P>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</P>


</P>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</P>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</P>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:06 AM
How terrible of a pass was this....


http://a.espncdn.com/photo/2011/0911/dal_u_bryant01jr_200.jpg


yea it was

he still looked good though

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:07 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>

you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 11:09 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>
And Houston outproduced both of them. How can you give him a hard time when he scored the most points this week? lol

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:09 AM
My team is straight trash.

Said it when i drafted em.
</P>


Well QB's are huge with our scoring. You waited a long time to get one. I'll trade Flacco to you if you want.</P>




QBs are overrated IMO. IT just depends how the draft goes. I only had 17 points out of my QB and i had the most points in the league.

I think you'll be fine lawl
\

If Orton plays well I'll have confidence, but we'll see....
</P>


Not sure about that. Orton is now playing for a much more conservative HC. He won't throw for much more than 3000 yards this season. Look for the running game to be featured in Denver.</P>


I actually like Denver as a sleeper this year. QB makes few mistakes. they got Dumerville back and the D should be better in general. I like them for 9-7.</P>


You need Flacco. How nice it would be to have had him yesterday Lawl. All I want isEli and a back up RB.</P>

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 11:09 AM
and did YOU notice Houston had the 2nd best defensive performance in fantasy?
</P>


anyone who plays the Colts will be the best ranked. lol</P>

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 11:13 AM
he still looked good though

He should have a really good year unfortunately. I am glad they hooked up Witten. I have always liked that guy and he is really good.

How about Stafford? You need him to hook up with CJ for double points...

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:15 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</P>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</P>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</P>


</P>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</P>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</P>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</P>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</P>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</P>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</P>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</P>

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 11:16 AM
on espn, rex is the next tom brady, the eagles defense is "frightening", tony romos first game back and hes already "not a good qb" dear lord how to people watch this ****?

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:17 AM
and did YOU notice Houston had the 2nd best defensive performance in fantasy?
</p>


anyone who plays the Colts will be the best ranked. lol</p>

houston ;)

but they were actually the second. Baltimorewas the first cuz PItt looked PUTRID...

Big Ben was brutal

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:18 AM
My team is straight trash.

Said it when i drafted em.
</p>


Well QB's are huge with our scoring. You waited a long time to get one. I'll trade Flacco to you if you want.</p>




QBs are overrated IMO. IT just depends how the draft goes. I only had 17 points out of my QB and i had the most points in the league.

I think you'll be fine lawl
\

If Orton plays well I'll have confidence, but we'll see....
</p>


Not sure about that. Orton is now playing for a much more conservative HC. He won't throw for much more than 3000 yards this season. Look for the running game to be featured in Denver.</p>


I actually like Denver as a sleeper this year. QB makes few mistakes. they got Dumerville back and the D should be better in general. I like them for 9-7.</p>


You need Flacco. How nice it would be to have had him yesterday Lawl. <font size="6">All I want isEli </font>and a back up RB.</p>

the irony

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:18 AM
on espn, rex is the next tom brady, the eagles defense is "frightening", tony romos first game back and hes already "not a good qb" dear lord how to people watch this ****?
</P>


Evidentally you found a way.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:19 AM
on espn, rex is the next tom brady, the eagles defense is "frightening", tony romos first game back and hes already "not a good qb" dear lord how to people watch this ****?


lol philly frightening?

They got the ball jammed down their throats

only thing frightening is that we have no secondary

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:20 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</p>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</p>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</p>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</p>

made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:20 AM
My team is straight trash.

Said it when i drafted em.
</P>


Well QB's are huge with our scoring. You waited a long time to get one. I'll trade Flacco to you if you want.</P>




QBs are overrated IMO. IT just depends how the draft goes. I only had 17 points out of my QB and i had the most points in the league.

I think you'll be fine lawl
\

If Orton plays well I'll have confidence, but we'll see....
</P>


Not sure about that. Orton is now playing for a much more conservative HC. He won't throw for much more than 3000 yards this season. Look for the running game to be featured in Denver.</P>


I actually like Denver as a sleeper this year. QB makes few mistakes. they got Dumerville back and the D should be better in general. I like them for 9-7.</P>


You need Flacco. How nice it would be to have had him yesterday Lawl. <FONT size=6>All I want isEli </FONT>and a back up RB.</P>




the irony
</P>


Only need him vs. Buffalo at home. I need depth at RB. I already have a great FF QB. Proposed a trade with shocks but I'll trade with anyone who has an abundance of RB's.</P>

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 11:20 AM
Was Atlanta that bad or Chicago that good?


How about Jay Cutler to MH? lol

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:21 AM
he still looked good though

He should have a really good year unfortunately. I am glad they hooked up Witten. I have always liked that guy and he is really good.

How about Stafford? You need him to hook up with CJ for double points...


already got that in another league

If u got an offer, i'm all ears

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:22 AM
Was Atlanta that bad or Chicago that good?


How about Jay Cutler to MH? lol
</P>


No one saw that coming. I'm glad he silenced some critics after the playoff debacle. But he is still essentially a FF backup.</P>


Don't you agree?</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:24 AM
Was Atlanta that bad or Chicago that good?


How about Jay Cutler to MH? lol


lol i love Cutler this year. I have him as a backup in like 3 leagues

I do think Atlanta is overrated. Julio Jones is legit, but they could of signed randy moss and not ****ed up their draft and got some defensive players and some oline like they actually needed.

But they will def be better than what they played.

Chicago's defense looked awesome. Idoubt they maintain that kind of dominanace though

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:25 AM
Was Atlanta that bad or Chicago that good?


How about Jay Cutler to MH? lol
</p>


No one saw that coming. I'm glad he silenced some critics after the playoff debacle. But he is still essentially a FF backup.</p>


Don't you agree?</p>

depends. I think he can be in that platoon type group

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 11:26 AM
and did YOU notice Houston had the 2nd best defensive performance in fantasy?
</p>


anyone who plays the Colts will be the best ranked. lol</p>

houston ;)

but they were actually the second. Baltimorewas the first cuz PItt looked PUTRID...

Big Ben was brutal
yea steelers o line was gaaabage too

did anyone see troy poll go nuuuuts in that scuffle? hes gettting stomped on, so troy starts getting up, takes the guys leg and nearly snaps it, and pile drives him. hes a freeeeeak

lol did anyone hear boomer say "hey cam newton (or some scrub) throws better than sims? and the announcer with sims was like, "hes busy polishing his ring boom." and then sims goes " BOTH of them"
lmao ahhhh i hate boomer.

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:26 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</P>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</P>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</P>


</P>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</P>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</P>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</P>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</P>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</P>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</P>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</P>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</P>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</P>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </P>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</P>

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:28 AM
Was Atlanta that bad or Chicago that good?


How about Jay Cutler to MH? lol


lol i love Cutler this year. I have him as a <FONT size=6>backup</FONT> in like 3 leagues

I do think Atlanta is overrated. Julio Jones is legit, but they could of signed randy moss and not ****ed up their draft and got some defensive players and some oline like they actually needed.

But they will def be better than what they played.

Chicago's defense looked awesome. Idoubt they maintain that kind of dominanace though
</P>


Precisely.</P>


And lets be careful with some of these week one performances. We all thought Houston was going to the SB after week one last season.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:28 AM
and did YOU notice Houston had the 2nd best defensive performance in fantasy?
</p>


anyone who plays the Colts will be the best ranked. lol</p>

houston ;)

but they were actually the second. Baltimorewas the first cuz PItt looked PUTRID...

Big Ben was brutal
yea steelers o line was gaaabage too

did anyone see troy poll go nuuuuts in that scuffle? hes gettting stomped on, so troy starts getting up, takes the guys leg and nearly snaps it, and pile drives him. hes a freeeeeak

lol did anyone hear boomer say "hey cam newton (or some scrub) throws better than sims? and the announcer with sims was like, "hes busy polishing his ring boom." and then sims goes " BOTH of them"
lmao ahhhh i hate boomer.


haha yea i heard that Marino said it to Simms

then Simms dropped the "i am too busy polishing my rings, both of em"

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:29 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</p>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</p>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</p>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</p>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</p>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</p>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </p>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</p>

"If it isn't there, don't throw it"

but yet yesterday when it wasn't there, u wanted him to throw it anyway apparently by your statements today

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 11:29 AM
Baltimorewas the first cuz PItt looked PUTRID...

Big Ben was brutal



and I loved every second of it....lol</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:30 AM
Was Atlanta that bad or Chicago that good?


How about Jay Cutler to MH? lol


lol i love Cutler this year. I have him as a <font size="6">backup</font> in like 3 leagues

I do think Atlanta is overrated. Julio Jones is legit, but they could of signed randy moss and not ****ed up their draft and got some defensive players and some oline like they actually needed.

But they will def be better than what they played.

Chicago's defense looked awesome. Idoubt they maintain that kind of dominanace though
</p>


Precisely.</p>


And lets be careful with some of these week one performances. We all thought Houston was going to the SB after week one last season.</p>

after the top 8 QBs, you can justify starting Cutler wtih the rest.

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:31 AM
and did YOU notice Houston had the 2nd best defensive performance in fantasy?
</P>


anyone who plays the Colts will be the best ranked. lol</P>




houston ;)

but they were actually the second. Baltimorewas the first cuz PItt looked PUTRID...

Big Ben was brutal
yea steelers o line was gaaabage too

did anyone see troy poll go nuuuuts in that scuffle? hes gettting stomped on, so troy starts getting up, takes the guys leg and nearly snaps it, and pile drives him. hes a freeeeeak

lol did anyone hear boomer say "hey cam newton (or some scrub) throws better than sims? and the announcer with sims was like, "hes busy polishing his ring boom." and then sims goes " BOTH of them"
lmao ahhhh i hate boomer.


haha yea i heard that Marino said it to Simms

then Simms dropped the "i am too busy polishing my rings, both of em"
</P>


Very few QB's I have ever seen threw a better ball than Phil. The guy had a rocket and threw the best seam pass ever.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:32 AM
Baltimorewas the first cuz PItt looked PUTRID...

Big Ben was brutal



and I loved every second of it....lol</p>

blondie wasn't

lolololol

honestly i can't believe he had positive fantasy points

lttaylor56
09-12-2011, 11:32 AM
yea but TO won't be ready for like a month n a half.

Bad Randy is interesting, but I dont think we need that headache/

</p>


gotta be honest dude....although I don't LIKE either of them...I'm pretty damn sure both of them could still produce.</p>

i like em both

Randy Moss can't handle NY though


my real question is why the **** are we not trying to work Devin Thomas in?

Have to be honest, im sick of the stubborness of this staff. Victor Cruz? can we stop with that already.
Moss would be crying at press conferences in NY. lol

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 11:33 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</p>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</p>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</p>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</p>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</p>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</p>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </p>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</p>why are we STILL *****ing about eli?! defense is the problem!

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 11:34 AM
Was Atlanta that bad or Chicago that good?


How about Jay Cutler to MH? lol
</p>


No one saw that coming. I'm glad he silenced some critics after the playoff debacle. But he is still essentially a FF backup.</p>


Don't you agree?</p>
Not really. Just depends on his match ups. I don't know why you hate the guy so much. He has a ton of weapons, a great defense and an awesome RB. Pretty good recipe. Kind of like Flacco and you love him.

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 11:35 AM
and did YOU notice Houston had the 2nd best defensive performance in fantasy?
</p>


anyone who plays the Colts will be the best ranked. lol</p>

houston ;)

but they were actually the second. Baltimorewas the first cuz PItt looked PUTRID...

Big Ben was brutal
yea steelers o line was gaaabage too

did anyone see troy poll go nuuuuts in that scuffle? hes gettting stomped on, so troy starts getting up, takes the guys leg and nearly snaps it, and pile drives him. hes a freeeeeak

lol did anyone hear boomer say "hey cam newton (or some scrub) throws better than sims? and the announcer with sims was like, "hes busy polishing his ring boom." and then sims goes " BOTH of them"
lmao ahhhh i hate boomer.


haha yea i heard that Marino said it to Simms

then Simms dropped the "i am too busy polishing my rings, both of em"
ahh i thought it was boom. dammit.

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:35 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</P>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</P>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</P>


</P>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</P>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</P>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</P>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</P>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</P>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</P>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</P>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</P>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</P>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </P>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</P>




"If it isn't there, don't throw it"

but yet yesterday when it wasn't there, u wanted him to throw it anyway apparently by your statements today


</P>


No.... I expect him to step up better in the pocket. I expect him to make the subtle moves in the pocket to create more time (ala Marino), I expect him to wait until the last second if needed for a guy to break open and be willing to take the hit. I expect him to hit the hot WR in a blitz and I expect him to throw those balls in places where only his guy to catch it.</P>


When those things can't happen, I expect him to throw it away or take the sack.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:35 AM
i have a HUUUGE knock on Eli i almost forgot to bring up

Mammy - you should love this

WHY THE **** DO WE TAKE FOREVER TOGET THE PLAY OFF?!?!

Granted things were looking grim, but we had the ball with over 5 minutes left down two scores, we are in a "hurry up" offense and we STILL are only getting the ball off with like 5 seconds on the play clock

ITS GROSS

I want to know whose responsible for this because i'm not sure if its Eli, Coughlin, or Gilbride

but i'm DEF putting half the blame on Coughlin for not getting it fixed. I've just had enough of it.

lttaylor56
09-12-2011, 11:37 AM
Why are we running a sweep on 3rd and 1 and why is Bradshaw in the game on short yardage instead of Jacobs. I just don't understand...
Good questions in addition to how can we get a delay of game penalty. Wtf?

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:37 AM
Was Atlanta that bad or Chicago that good?


How about Jay Cutler to MH? lol
</p>


No one saw that coming. I'm glad he silenced some critics after the playoff debacle. But he is still essentially a FF backup.</p>


Don't you agree?</p>
Not really. Just depends on his match ups. I don't know why you hate the guy so much. He has a ton of weapons, a great defense and an awesome RB. Pretty good recipe. Kind of like Flacco and you love him.


yea but even compared to flacco, he is in a mike martz offense so that would be in Cutlers favor

lttaylor56
09-12-2011, 11:38 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</p>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</p>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</p>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</p>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</p>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</p>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </p>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</p>why are we STILL *****ing about eli?! defense is the problem!
I consider Defense this teams strength. W/o Tuck and Osi it was miserable.

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:39 AM
Was Atlanta that bad or Chicago that good?


How about Jay Cutler to MH? lol
</P>


No one saw that coming. I'm glad he silenced some critics after the playoff debacle. But he is still essentially a FF backup.</P>


Don't you agree?</P>



Not really. Just depends on his match ups. I don't know why you hate the guy so much. He has a ton of weapons, a great defense and an awesome RB. Pretty good recipe. Kind of like Flacco and you love him.
</P>


Cutler was hot early last season and faded. the problem with him is his weapons.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:40 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</p>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</p>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</p>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</p>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</p>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</p>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </p>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</p>




"If it isn't there, don't throw it"

but yet yesterday when it wasn't there, u wanted him to throw it anyway apparently by your statements today


</p>


No.... I expect him to step up better in the pocket. I expect him to make the subtle moves in the pocket to create more time (ala Marino), I expect him to wait until the last second if needed for a guy to break open and be willing to take the hit. I expect him to hit the hot WR in a blitz and I expect him to throw those balls in places where only his guy to catch it.</p>


When those things can't happen, I expect him to throw it away or take the sack.</p>

Eli was making good throws in the face of pressure - when he could.

Impossible to create time when theres leaks ALL over the line and pressure is coming from all angles. Its amazing how Giants fans forget this, but then take pride that the concept we've built our defense around.

He was def hitting hot WRs.

Throw the ball only where his guy could catch it? But thjat would go against EVERYTHING you hate. What if that means the receiver would have to reach for the ball, or jump for it?

You have ZERO consistancy in anything you say

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 11:40 AM
i have a HUUUGE knock on Eli i almost forgot to bring up

Mammy - you should love this

WHY THE **** DO WE TAKE FOREVER TOGET THE PLAY OFF?!?!

Granted things were looking grim, but we had the ball with over 5 minutes left down two scores, we are in a "hurry up" offense and we STILL are only getting the ball off with like 5 seconds on the play clock

ITS GROSS

I want to know whose responsible for this because i'm not sure if its Eli, Coughlin, or Gilbride

but i'm DEF putting half the blame on Coughlin for not getting it fixed. I've just had enough of it.
</P>


yea, it's been a running trait for all of Eli's career. But he's also had TC and Gilbride(for most) his whole career. So.....it's obviously still a problem that hasn't been fixed at least 5 years in the making. that is pretty bad...</P>

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 11:40 AM
Was Atlanta that bad or Chicago that good?


How about Jay Cutler to MH? lol


lol i love Cutler this year. I have him as a <font size="6">backup</font> in like 3 leagues

I do think Atlanta is overrated. Julio Jones is legit, but they could of signed randy moss and not ****ed up their draft and got some defensive players and some oline like they actually needed.

But they will def be better than what they played.

Chicago's defense looked awesome. Idoubt they maintain that kind of dominanace though
</p>


Precisely.</p>


And lets be careful with some of these week one performances. We all thought Houston was going to the SB after week one last season.</p>

<font color="#0000ff" size="4">after the top 8 QBs, you can justify starting Cutler wtih the rest. </font>

http://superkanecity.tripod.com/Data/StoneColdSteveAustin.jpg

and that's the bottom line Cause Stone Cold Said So

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:40 AM
Was Atlanta that bad or Chicago that good?


How about Jay Cutler to MH? lol
</p>


No one saw that coming. I'm glad he silenced some critics after the playoff debacle. But he is still essentially a FF backup.</p>


Don't you agree?</p>



Not really. Just depends on his match ups. I don't know why you hate the guy so much. He has a ton of weapons, a great defense and an awesome RB. Pretty good recipe. Kind of like Flacco and you love him.
</p>


Cutler was hot early last season and faded. the problem with him is his weapons.</p>

Roy will be legit there and it looks like they are finally using Hester. I think he'll be fine

lttaylor56
09-12-2011, 11:41 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol
</p>


Wonder why LT hasn't showed up this morning. The Ryan Torrain thing was not his best moment.</p>


I still think you are winning (probably by a lot) this week but it will be fun to sweat it out with you tonight. Lets hope the Pats D/ST doesn't do what it did last year at Miami.</p>Sorry, got here late today. Ryan Torrain --ughh. I think I am officially confused with FF as of last night. I'm watching triple digit scores lighting up our board, scratching my head, trying to figure what I did wrong.

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 11:41 AM
Eli was making good throws in the face of pressure - when he could.

Impossible to create time when theres leaks ALL over the line and pressure is coming from all angles. Its amazing how Giants fans forget this, but then take pride that the concept we've built our defense around.

He was def hitting hot WRs.

Throw the ball only where his guy could catch it? But thjat would go against EVERYTHING you hate. What if that means the receiver would have to reach for the ball, or jump for it?

You have ZERO consistancy in anything you say
</P>


ohhhh burn.....</P>

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:43 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</P>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</P>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</P>


</P>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</P>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</P>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</P>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</P>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</P>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</P>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</P>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</P>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</P>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </P>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</P>




"If it isn't there, don't throw it"

but yet yesterday when it wasn't there, u wanted him to throw it anyway apparently by your statements today


</P>


No.... I expect him to step up better in the pocket. I expect him to make the subtle moves in the pocket to create more time (ala Marino), I expect him to wait until the last second if needed for a guy to break open and be willing to take the hit. I expect him to hit the hot WR in a blitz and I expect him to throw those balls in places where only his guy to catch it.</P>


When those things can't happen, I expect him to throw it away or take the sack.</P>




Eli was making good throws in the face of pressure - when he could.

Impossible to create time when theres leaks ALL over the line and pressure is coming from all angles. Its amazing how Giants fans forget this, but then take pride that the concept we've built our defense around.

He was def hitting hot WRs.

Throw the ball only where his guy could catch it? But thjat would go against EVERYTHING you hate. What if that means the receiver would have to reach for the ball, or jump for it?

You have ZERO consistancy in anything you say
</P>


Wrong again. Throwing it where only your guy can catch it almost always means throwing it low. When you get the ball up on short passes they can be picked. As we saw last year.</P>


And its exactly what Tom Brady does. Thus so few picks for him.</P>

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:44 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol
</P>


Wonder why LT hasn't showed up this morning. The Ryan Torrain thing was not his best moment.</P>


I still think you are winning (probably by a lot) this week but it will be fun to sweat it out with you tonight. Lets hope the Pats D/ST doesn't do what it did last year at Miami.</P>


Sorry, got here late today. Ryan Torrain --ughh. I think I am officially confused with FF as of last night. I'm watching triple digit scores lighting up our board, scratching my head, trying to figure what I did wrong.
</P>


were you cofused on how to set your starting lineup or did you intend to start Torain?</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:45 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</p>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</p>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</p>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</p>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</p>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</p>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </p>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</p>why are we STILL *****ing about eli?! defense is the problem!
I consider Defense this teams strength. W/o Tuck and Osi it was miserable.


I agree to an extent. I mean vs the run i think we are BEYOND solid. Getting pressure on theQB? BEYOND solid. I mean we were missing 2 of our top 3 pass rushers (however u want to slice it) and we were still cracking Grossman.

On the flipside u do have to give him credit. He took a beating and it took it early and he kept getting up. As bad as it was for us, I have respect for Grossman after yesterday

BUT - the inability to cover in our secondary is such a weakness that it overshadows everything else

Offensively, we really don't know much becuase our OLine looked brutal. Eli played a conservative game (the same kind Mammy cried for in all of his knocks) the backs did decent with what they had.

Again - how bout Ballard. I like that kid. I thought he really stepped up in all aspects of the game for us yesterday. Gotta go back to the film and keep an eye on his blocking

lttaylor56
09-12-2011, 11:46 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</p>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</p>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</p>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</p>




ur a fool if u think that aws on eli. Thats a bang-bang play. McKenzie HAD to cut block the DE to make it work. You can't wait for that to happen, you have to just do it. The fact that it was picked was just bad luck. Typically thats just a batted ball

Let the grown ups talk before u start trolling pappy
</p>


I'm not saying that the break down of the play was on Eli. I do expect our veteran QB to see that the play had broken down and adjust accordingly. I don't expect him to force it with the DE standing in the passing lane and KMac laying on the ground.</p>


If you watch the play you can see that all this was clear when Eli threw the ball. There was not a lot of time to adjust, but after 8 years the game should have slowed down enough to make the right decision. This is just like the Cruz adjustment in pre season. It was Cruz's fault that he didn't make the sight adjustment, just as it was KMac's fault that he missed the block, but the DECISION to throw the ball in both plays was all on Eli.</p>The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;The sad part is that LT did not even realize this until after the Giants Game. I went to my team to execute what I planned and Strategized on Friday--to find out that I did not have a clue wtf I was doing. Last night after the skins game, I am trying to drag and drop Knowshon and Derek Hagan into my starting line up and it's not working. I'm like wtf is this **** broken or something...then the unsettling reality came over me.

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:46 AM
i have a HUUUGE knock on Eli i almost forgot to bring up

Mammy - you should love this

WHY THE **** DO WE TAKE FOREVER TOGET THE PLAY OFF?!?!

Granted things were looking grim, but we had the ball with over 5 minutes left down two scores, we are in a "hurry up" offense and we STILL are only getting the ball off with like 5 seconds on the play clock

ITS GROSS

I want to know whose responsible for this because i'm not sure if its Eli, Coughlin, or Gilbride

but i'm DEF putting half the blame on Coughlin for not getting it fixed. I've just had enough of it.
</p>


yea, it's been a running trait for all of Eli's career. But he's also had TC and Gilbride(for most) his whole career. So.....it's obviously still a problem that hasn't been fixed at least 5 years in the making. that is pretty bad...</p>

im going to put it on eli for yesterday

I mean hes switching WRs all over the field while the clock is ticking. ****in call routes from the line. Keep everybody where they were

our hurry up offense was disgusting.

lttaylor56
09-12-2011, 11:48 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol
</p>


Wonder why LT hasn't showed up this morning. The Ryan Torrain thing was not his best moment.</p>


I still think you are winning (probably by a lot) this week but it will be fun to sweat it out with you tonight. Lets hope the Pats D/ST doesn't do what it did last year at Miami.</p>


Sorry, got here late today. Ryan Torrain --ughh. I think I am officially confused with FF as of last night. I'm watching triple digit scores lighting up our board, scratching my head, trying to figure what I did wrong.
</p>


were you <u>cofused</u> on how to set your starting lineup or did you intend to start Torain?</p>=understatement, clueless probably more appropriate. I actually thought I would move Torain in place for the skins game, then move my Oakland and New England players to active for Monday's games.

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 11:48 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</p>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</p>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</p>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</p>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</p>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</p>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </p>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</p>why are we STILL *****ing about eli?! defense is the problem!
I consider Defense this teams strength. W/o Tuck and Osi it was miserable.


I agree to an extent. I mean vs the run i think we are BEYOND solid. Getting pressure on theQB? BEYOND solid. I mean we were missing 2 of our top 3 pass rushers (however u want to slice it) and we were still cracking Grossman.

On the flipside u do have to give him credit. He took a beating and it took it early and he kept getting up. As bad as it was for us, I have respect for Grossman after yesterday

BUT - the inability to cover in our secondary is such a weakness that it overshadows everything else

Offensively, we really don't know much becuase our OLine looked brutal. Eli played a conservative game (the same kind Mammy cried for in all of his knocks) the backs did decent with what they had.

Again - how bout Ballard. I like that kid. I thought he really stepped up in all aspects of the game for us yesterday. Gotta go back to the film and keep an eye on his blocking


i like ballard. hes a big boy with decent speed.

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 11:49 AM
Wrong again. Throwing it where only your guy can catch it almost always means throwing it low. When you get the ball up on short passes they can be picked. As we saw last year.


And its exactly what Tom Brady does. Thus so few picks for him.</P>


</P>


I think of it as more of leading shorterpasses over the middle, and throwing over the outside shoulder like we saw so many times with Nicks last season.
throwing low on those short passes works too, but definitely more difficult to come up with, in my opinion.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:49 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol
</p>


Wonder why LT hasn't showed up this morning. The Ryan Torrain thing was not his best moment.</p>


I still think you are winning (probably by a lot) this week but it will be fun to sweat it out with you tonight. Lets hope the Pats D/ST doesn't do what it did last year at Miami.</p>Sorry, got here late today. Ryan Torrain --ughh. I think I am officially confused with FF as of last night. I'm watching triple digit scores lighting up our board, scratching my head, trying to figure what I did wrong.


well first off - EVERYBODY has those weeks every once in a while. INfact in most of my leagues , it seems like half the teams in all of them were low scoring. Very weird fantasy first week

BUT - Torrain in really screwed you

Charles didn't have a that good of a day and that was suppose to be your workhorse

You didn't really have many TDs from ur skill sets - it will happen

but keep in mind u stil lhave two players left

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:51 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</P>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</P>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</P>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</P>




ur a fool if u think that aws on eli. Thats a bang-bang play. McKenzie HAD to cut block the DE to make it work. You can't wait for that to happen, you have to just do it. The fact that it was picked was just bad luck. Typically thats just a batted ball

Let the grown ups talk before u start trolling pappy
</P>


I'm not saying that the break down of the play was on Eli. I do expect our veteran QB to see that the play had broken down and adjust accordingly. I don't expect him to force it with the DE standing in the passing lane and KMac laying on the ground.</P>


If you watch the play you can see that all this was clear when Eli threw the ball. There was not a lot of time to adjust, but after 8 years the game should have slowed down enough to make the right decision. This is just like the Cruz adjustment in pre season. It was Cruz's fault that he didn't make the sight adjustment, just as it was KMac's fault that he missed the block, but the DECISION to throw the ball in both plays was all on Eli.</P>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;The sad part is that LT did not even realize this until after the Giants Game. I went to my team to execute what I planned and Strategized on Friday--to find out that I did not have a clue wtf I was doing. Last night after the skins game, I am trying to drag and drop Knowshon and Derek Hagan into my starting line up and it's not working. I'm like wtf is this **** broken or something...then the unsettling reality came over me.
</P>


OK LT. Make sure to click on the "matchup" button to check your starting lineup. But its not that hard to make adjustments. </P>


The "matchup" screen is the one we all follow during the games. Please ask for help if you aren't absolutely sure. <FONT color=#ff0000>Except for Matt</FONT>, we are all willing to help with everything but who to play because its no fun if you don't just rely on your own opinion.</P>


</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:52 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</p>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</p>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</p>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</p>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</p>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</p>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </p>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</p>




"If it isn't there, don't throw it"

but yet yesterday when it wasn't there, u wanted him to throw it anyway apparently by your statements today


</p>


No.... I expect him to step up better in the pocket. I expect him to make the subtle moves in the pocket to create more time (ala Marino), I expect him to wait until the last second if needed for a guy to break open and be willing to take the hit. I expect him to hit the hot WR in a blitz and I expect him to throw those balls in places where only his guy to catch it.</p>


When those things can't happen, I expect him to throw it away or take the sack.</p>




Eli was making good throws in the face of pressure - when he could.

Impossible to create time when theres leaks ALL over the line and pressure is coming from all angles. Its amazing how Giants fans forget this, but then take pride that the concept we've built our defense around.

He was def hitting hot WRs.

Throw the ball only where his guy could catch it? But thjat would go against EVERYTHING you hate. What if that means the receiver would have to reach for the ball, or jump for it?

You have ZERO consistancy in anything you say
</p>


Wrong again.<font size="6"> Throwing it where only your guy can catch it almost always means throwing it low.</font> When you get the ball up on short passes they can be picked. As we saw last year.</p>


And its exactly what Tom Brady does. Thus so few picks for him.</p>

that may possibly of been the stupides tthing you've ever said. Congrats, you've shut me up. I dont even know how to respond to such a mindless point being made

And yea- tom Brady ALWAYS threw it low to Randy Moss because that was the only place Moss could get the ball

http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/11/16/128713803868208735.jpg

lttaylor56
09-12-2011, 11:53 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</p>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</p>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</p>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</p>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</p>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</p>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </p>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</p>why are we STILL *****ing about eli?! defense is the problem!
I consider Defense this teams strength. W/o Tuck and Osi it was miserable.


I agree to an extent. I mean vs the run i think we are BEYOND solid. Getting pressure on theQB? BEYOND solid. I mean we were missing 2 of our top 3 pass rushers (however u want to slice it) and we were still cracking Grossman.

On the flipside u do have to give him credit. He took a beating and it took it early and he kept getting up. As bad as it was for us, I have respect for Grossman after yesterday

BUT - the inability to cover in our secondary is such a weakness that it overshadows everything else

Offensively, we really don't know much becuase our OLine looked brutal. Eli played a conservative game (the same kind Mammy cried for in all of his knocks) the backs did decent with what they had.

Again - how bout Ballard. I like that kid. I thought he really stepped up in all aspects of the game for us yesterday. Gotta go back to the film and keep an eye on his blocking


i like ballard. hes a big boy with decent speed.
Ballard was awesome for a 280+ lb te

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:53 AM
Wrong again. Throwing it where only your guy can catch it almost always means throwing it low. When you get the ball up on short passes they can be picked. As we saw last year.


And its exactly what Tom Brady does. Thus so few picks for him.</P>


</P>


I think of it as more of leading shorterpasses over the middle, and throwing over the outside shoulder like we saw so many times with Nicks last season.
throwing low on those short passes works too, but definitely more difficult to come up with, in my opinion.</P>


</P>


By "low" I mean at the numbers. Sometimes you have to throw lower in tight coverage. But Eli's tips last year were almost all above the head passes. Those are dangerous. you almost never see Brady throw it there.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:53 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</p>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</p>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</p>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</p>




ur a fool if u think that aws on eli. Thats a bang-bang play. McKenzie HAD to cut block the DE to make it work. You can't wait for that to happen, you have to just do it. The fact that it was picked was just bad luck. Typically thats just a batted ball

Let the grown ups talk before u start trolling pappy
</p>


I'm not saying that the break down of the play was on Eli. I do expect our veteran QB to see that the play had broken down and adjust accordingly. I don't expect him to force it with the DE standing in the passing lane and KMac laying on the ground.</p>


If you watch the play you can see that all this was clear when Eli threw the ball. There was not a lot of time to adjust, but after 8 years the game should have slowed down enough to make the right decision. This is just like the Cruz adjustment in pre season. It was Cruz's fault that he didn't make the sight adjustment, just as it was KMac's fault that he missed the block, but the DECISION to throw the ball in both plays was all on Eli.</p>The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;The sad part is that LT did not even realize this until after the Giants Game. I went to my team to execute what I planned and Strategized on Friday--to find out that I did not have a clue wtf I was doing. Last night after the skins game, I am trying to drag and drop Knowshon and Derek Hagan into my starting line up and it's not working. I'm like wtf is this **** broken or something...then the unsettling reality came over me.


lol

i hate the oh **** moment in fantasy

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 11:55 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</P>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</P>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</P>


</P>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</P>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</P>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</P>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</P>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</P>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</P>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</P>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</P>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</P>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </P>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</P>




"If it isn't there, don't throw it"

but yet yesterday when it wasn't there, u wanted him to throw it anyway apparently by your statements today


</P>


No.... I expect him to step up better in the pocket. I expect him to make the subtle moves in the pocket to create more time (ala Marino), I expect him to wait until the last second if needed for a guy to break open and be willing to take the hit. I expect him to hit the hot WR in a blitz and I expect him to throw those balls in places where only his guy to catch it.</P>


When those things can't happen, I expect him to throw it away or take the sack.</P>




Eli was making good throws in the face of pressure - when he could.

Impossible to create time when theres leaks ALL over the line and pressure is coming from all angles. Its amazing how Giants fans forget this, but then take pride that the concept we've built our defense around.

He was def hitting hot WRs.

Throw the ball only where his guy could catch it? But thjat would go against EVERYTHING you hate. What if that means the receiver would have to reach for the ball, or jump for it?

You have ZERO consistancy in anything you say
</P>


Wrong again.<FONT size=6> Throwing it where only your guy can catch it almost always means throwing it low.</FONT> When you get the ball up on short passes they can be picked. As we saw last year.</P>


And its exactly what Tom Brady does. Thus so few picks for him.</P>




that may possibly of been the stupides tthing you've ever said. Congrats, you've shut me up. I dont even know how to respond to such a mindless point being made

And yea- tom Brady ALWAYS threw it low to Randy Moss because that was the only place Moss could get the ball

http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/11/16/128713803868208735.jpg


</P>


I'm talking about the short passes Matt. And low means not above the head of the receiver.</P>


Not at his knees.</P>


Almost all of Eli's picks are on short passes.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:55 AM
Wrong again. Throwing it where only your guy can catch it almost always means throwing it low. When you get the ball up on short passes they can be picked. As we saw last year.


And its exactly what Tom Brady does. Thus so few picks for him.</p>


</p>


I think of it as more of leading shorterpasses over the middle, and throwing over the outside shoulder like we saw so many times with Nicks last season.
throwing low on those short passes works too, but definitely more difficult to come up with, in my opinion.</p>

every play is different.

It depends who the defender is, where the defender is, who the receiver is, what kind of route, how much spacing

lttaylor56
09-12-2011, 11:56 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol
</p>


Wonder why LT hasn't showed up this morning. The Ryan Torrain thing was not his best moment.</p>


I still think you are winning (probably by a lot) this week but it will be fun to sweat it out with you tonight. Lets hope the Pats D/ST doesn't do what it did last year at Miami.</p>Sorry, got here late today. Ryan Torrain --ughh. I think I am officially confused with FF as of last night. I'm watching triple digit scores lighting up our board, scratching my head, trying to figure what I did wrong.


well first off - EVERYBODY has those weeks every once in a while. INfact in most of my leagues , it seems like half the teams in all of them were low scoring. Very weird fantasy first week

BUT - Torrain in really screwed you

Charles didn't have a that good of a day and that was suppose to be your workhorse

You didn't really have many TDs from ur skill sets - it will happen

but keep in mind u stil lhave two players left
I'm freakin out--you mean Branch and my kicker? What Matchup Button Moorehead? ....and where did all the points that I had last night go? I'm not very good at this. Classic situation of something looking easier than it is. haha

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:57 AM
BTW the Eli apologists were out in force early yesterday. The pick was a poor decision. if you watch the video you will see that Kerrigan was standing in the way and KMac was already on the ground when Eli threw the ball. The play had broken down and he either needed to loft it over the DE or throw it away.</p>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis.</p>


But LT is a rook. Eli is an 8 year vet.</p>


But in review, Eli wasn't any worse than most of the rest of the team.</p>




ur a fool if u think that aws on eli. Thats a bang-bang play. McKenzie HAD to cut block the DE to make it work. You can't wait for that to happen, you have to just do it. The fact that it was picked was just bad luck. Typically thats just a batted ball

Let the grown ups talk before u start trolling pappy
</p>


I'm not saying that the break down of the play was on Eli. I do expect our veteran QB to see that the play had broken down and adjust accordingly. I don't expect him to force it with the DE standing in the passing lane and KMac laying on the ground.</p>


If you watch the play you can see that all this was clear when Eli threw the ball. There was not a lot of time to adjust, but after 8 years the game should have slowed down enough to make the right decision. This is just like the Cruz adjustment in pre season. It was Cruz's fault that he didn't make the sight adjustment, just as it was KMac's fault that he missed the block, but the DECISION to throw the ball in both plays was all on Eli.</p>


The only decision worse than that yesterday was LT's starting Ryan Torian over either Knowshon or Green-Ellis&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;The sad part is that LT did not even realize this until after the Giants Game. I went to my team to execute what I planned and Strategized on Friday--to find out that I did not have a clue wtf I was doing. Last night after the skins game, I am trying to drag and drop Knowshon and Derek Hagan into my starting line up and it's not working. I'm like wtf is this **** broken or something...then the unsettling reality came over me.
</p>


OK LT. Make sure to click on the "matchup" button to check your starting lineup. But its not that hard to make adjustments. </p>


The "matchup" screen is the one we all follow during the games. Please ask for help if you aren't absolutely sure. <font color="#ff0000">Except for Matt</font>, we are all willing to help with everything but who to play because its no fun if you don't just rely on your own opinion.</p>


</p>

please i always help the rooks out.

I only take advantage of the weak - like you and daven

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:58 AM
Wrong again. Throwing it where only your guy can catch it almost always means throwing it low. When you get the ball up on short passes they can be picked. As we saw last year.


And its exactly what Tom Brady does. Thus so few picks for him.</p>


</p>


I think of it as more of leading shorterpasses over the middle, and throwing over the outside shoulder like we saw so many times with Nicks last season.
throwing low on those short passes works too, but definitely more difficult to come up with, in my opinion.</p>


</p>


By "low" I mean at the numbers. Sometimes you have to throw lower in tight coverage. But Eli's tips last year were almost all above the head passes. Those are dangerous. you almost never see Brady throw it there.</p>

yes - i agree

SOMETIMES

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 11:59 AM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</p>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</p>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</p>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</p>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</p>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</p>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </p>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</p>




"If it isn't there, don't throw it"

but yet yesterday when it wasn't there, u wanted him to throw it anyway apparently by your statements today


</p>


No.... I expect him to step up better in the pocket. I expect him to make the subtle moves in the pocket to create more time (ala Marino), I expect him to wait until the last second if needed for a guy to break open and be willing to take the hit. I expect him to hit the hot WR in a blitz and I expect him to throw those balls in places where only his guy to catch it.</p>


When those things can't happen, I expect him to throw it away or take the sack.</p>




Eli was making good throws in the face of pressure - when he could.

Impossible to create time when theres leaks ALL over the line and pressure is coming from all angles. Its amazing how Giants fans forget this, but then take pride that the concept we've built our defense around.

He was def hitting hot WRs.

Throw the ball only where his guy could catch it? But thjat would go against EVERYTHING you hate. What if that means the receiver would have to reach for the ball, or jump for it?

You have ZERO consistancy in anything you say
</p>


Wrong again.<font size="6"> Throwing it where only your guy can catch it almost always means throwing it low.</font> When you get the ball up on short passes they can be picked. As we saw last year.</p>


And its exactly what Tom Brady does. Thus so few picks for him.</p>




that may possibly of been the stupides tthing you've ever said. Congrats, you've shut me up. I dont even know how to respond to such a mindless point being made

And yea- tom Brady ALWAYS threw it low to Randy Moss because that was the only place Moss could get the ball

http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/11/16/128713803868208735.jpg


</p>


I'm talking about the short passes Matt. And low means not above the head of the receiver.</p>


Not at his knees.</p>


Almost all of Eli's picks are on short passes.</p>

again.. i don't care WHERE the depth of the throw is - theres like 10 other variables that make the decision of where the ball should be. NOT how many yards down field it is

lttaylor56
09-12-2011, 12:00 PM
ok found matchup---

What's up with projected and actual. Yesterday I thought my projected was my actual and today it's not? ....and I'm in finance-scary.

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 12:01 PM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol
</P>


Wonder why LT hasn't showed up this morning. The Ryan Torrain thing was not his best moment.</P>


I still think you are winning (probably by a lot) this week but it will be fun to sweat it out with you tonight. Lets hope the Pats D/ST doesn't do what it did last year at Miami.</P>


Sorry, got here late today. Ryan Torrain --ughh. I think I am officially confused with FF as of last night. I'm watching triple digit scores lighting up our board, scratching my head, trying to figure what I did wrong.


well first off - EVERYBODY has those weeks every once in a while. INfact in most of my leagues , it seems like half the teams in all of them were low scoring. Very weird fantasy first week

BUT - Torrain in really screwed you

Charles didn't have a that good of a day and that was suppose to be your workhorse

You didn't really have many TDs from ur skill sets - it will happen

but keep in mind u stil lhave two players left
I'm freakin out--you mean Branch and my kicker? What Matchup Button Moorehead? ....and where did all the points that I had last night go? I'm not very good at this. Classic situation of something looking easier than it is. haha
</P>


OK...right now you have Deon Branch starting. Is that what you want?</P>


Go to the main screen and click on "My Team" or just click on your team name at the right where all the matchups and scores are shown. You will see the names shown for all the starters and the bench players are shown as "BN".</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 12:02 PM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol
</p>


Wonder why LT hasn't showed up this morning. The Ryan Torrain thing was not his best moment.</p>


I still think you are winning (probably by a lot) this week but it will be fun to sweat it out with you tonight. Lets hope the Pats D/ST doesn't do what it did last year at Miami.</p>Sorry, got here late today. Ryan Torrain --ughh. I think I am officially confused with FF as of last night. I'm watching triple digit scores lighting up our board, scratching my head, trying to figure what I did wrong.


well first off - EVERYBODY has those weeks every once in a while. INfact in most of my leagues , it seems like half the teams in all of them were low scoring. Very weird fantasy first week

BUT - Torrain in really screwed you

Charles didn't have a that good of a day and that was suppose to be your workhorse

You didn't really have many TDs from ur skill sets - it will happen

but keep in mind u stil lhave two players left
I'm freakin out--you mean Branch and my kicker? What Matchup Button Moorehead? ....and where did all the points that I had last night go? I'm not very good at this. Classic situation of something looking easier than it is. haha


i think yahoo is just having some issues. All the scores are gone right now, they'll be back later

yes u still have Branch and ur kick to go

Matchups are on the leagues main page to the right. It shows who is playing who and what the scores are. Thats considered the matchups. I also think there is a tab to the top of the page that says matchups

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 12:04 PM
ok found matchup---

What's up with projected and actual. Yesterday I thought my projected was my actual and today it's not? ....and I'm in finance-scary.
</P>


Well that shows your statring lineup and the projected points (projected doesn't mean much, its Yahoo's opinion). But you can only adjust your lineup on your "My Team"screen. thats shows all the players (starters and bench) on your team. The only change you can make now is Hagen for Branch since neither player has started yet.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 12:05 PM
i am pumped to see what Ocho does today.

Interesting to see how he actually adapts. Theres alot of junk about him not fitting and all of that. I think its garbage, I think he may beast there.

lttaylor56
09-12-2011, 12:07 PM
ok found matchup---

What's up with projected and actual. Yesterday I thought my projected was my actual and today it's not? ....and I'm in finance-scary.
</p>


Well that shows your statring lineup and the projected points (projected doesn't mean much, its Yahoo's opinion). But you can only adjust your lineup on your "My Team"screen. thats shows all the players (starters and bench) on your team. The only change you can make now is Hagen for Branch since neither player has started yet.</p>OK-Hagan &amp; Branch--Because my limit for the week is 3 TOTAL wr's correct? So--I used up my 2 TOTAL rb's with Charles and Torain(cause I'm an idiot) and I cannot add anymore rb's for week#1, Correct?

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 12:07 PM
i am pumped to see what Ocho does today.

Interesting to see how he actually adapts. Theres alot of junk about him not fitting and all of that. I think its garbage, I think he may beast there.
</P>


Yea i dont get all the talk either....I think he's going to be good.</P>

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 12:08 PM
i am pumped to see what Ocho does today.

Interesting to see how he actually adapts. Theres alot of junk about him not fitting and all of that. I think its garbage, I think he may beast there.
</P>


He's just another cog in the passing game. He should be a decent 3rd FF WR. Probably something like 850 yards and maybe 6 TD's.</P>


I wouldn't look for him to be a game changer.</P>


</P>

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 12:08 PM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol


lol. I feel alot better about Romo seeing how he did vs the Jets defense now too
</p>


You made the wrong decision starting Freeman. Romo outproduced him in FF points. Decisions like that will cost you this season. You are stubborn like TC.</p>


And did you notice that the Arizona D outproduced the GB D?</p>


</p>




did you notice that pretty much EVERY defense outproduced GB D this week.

I feel fine going wtih Freeman vs Det with Romo vs the Jets. Jets D looked shaky, wasn't expecting that. I'd do it 10 out of 10 times to start the season.

Dez Bryant is going to be a problem
</p>


Didn't you say that I made a mistake by starting Arizona? yes you did. You backtrack better than Michael Jackson.</p>


And true to my word, I will drop them like a bad habit tomorrow.</p>




you got lucky on a kick return lol, dont pat urself on the back too much. Cam Newton threw for 400 yards in his rookie debute against them lol... you got lucky
</p>


You have the wrong MJ as your avi in FF. My choices were GB vs. NO or Zona vs. Cam. No one saw Newton doing what he did. And may i remind you that GB had a 108 yard return.</p>


But my choice was still a plus. Unlike your choice of QB.</p>


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01432/moonwalk_1432135i.jpg</p>




made up the difference by taking Houston - the REAL choice of defenses of week 1...

no bigger moon walk than u killing Eli for not being more conservative with the ball and then cry when he is and then say u want him to make plays

your like a woman. Infact Im going to call u Mammy instead of PAppy from now on
</p>


Thats right Matt. For our "Hall of Fame Gunslinger" (gunslinger still cracks me up) I expect him to make plays AND not give it to the other team.</p>


Its called being a "top ten" QB. </p>


Thats why Romo isn't one. he makes plays but he gives it to the other team, like last night. And right now, I'm not sure our boy is one either.</p>




"If it isn't there, don't throw it"

but yet yesterday when it wasn't there, u wanted him to throw it anyway apparently by your statements today


</p>


No.... I expect him to step up better in the pocket. I expect him to make the subtle moves in the pocket to create more time (ala Marino), I expect him to wait until the last second if needed for a guy to break open and be willing to take the hit. I expect him to hit the hot WR in a blitz and I expect him to throw those balls in places where only his guy to catch it.</p>


When those things can't happen, I expect him to throw it away or take the sack.</p>




Eli was making good throws in the face of pressure - when he could.

Impossible to create time when theres leaks ALL over the line and pressure is coming from all angles. Its amazing how Giants fans forget this, but then take pride that the concept we've built our defense around.

He was def hitting hot WRs.

Throw the ball only where his guy could catch it? But thjat would go against EVERYTHING you hate. What if that means the receiver would have to reach for the ball, or jump for it?

You have ZERO consistancy in anything you say
</p>


Wrong again.<font size="6"> Throwing it where only your guy can catch it almost always means throwing it low.</font> When you get the ball up on short passes they can be picked. As we saw last year.</p>


And its exactly what Tom Brady does. Thus so few picks for him.</p>




that may possibly of been the stupides tthing you've ever said. Congrats, you've shut me up. I dont even know how to respond to such a mindless point being made

And yea- tom Brady ALWAYS threw it low to Randy Moss because that was the only place Moss could get the ball

http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/11/16/128713803868208735.jpg


</p>


I'm talking about the short passes Matt. And low means not above the head of the receiver.</p>


Not at his knees.</p>


Almost all of Eli's picks are on short passes.</p>you can never defeat seagal, give up.

JPizzack
09-12-2011, 12:09 PM
ok found matchup---

What's up with projected and actual. Yesterday I thought my projected was my actual and today it's not? ....and I'm in finance-scary.
</P>


Well that shows your statring lineup and the projected points (projected doesn't mean much, its Yahoo's opinion). But you can only adjust your lineup on your "My Team"screen. thats shows all the players (starters and bench) on your team. The only change you can make now is Hagen for Branch since neither player has started yet.</P>


OK-Hagan &amp; Branch--Because my limit for the week is 3 TOTAL wr's correct? So--I used up my 2 TOTAL rb's with Charles and Torain(cause I'm an idiot) and I cannot add anymore rb's for week#1, Correct?
</P>


that's right. once that person's game happens, that slot is locked till next week.
LT, I thought we went over this last week!! Always play your best matchup, and hope for the best! There's no player swapping.</P>

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 12:11 PM
i am pumped to see what Ocho does today.

Interesting to see how he actually adapts. Theres alot of junk about him not fitting and all of that. I think its garbage, I think he may beast there.
</p>


He's just another cog in the passing game. He should be a decent 3rd FF WR. Probably something like 850 yards and maybe 6 TD's.</p>


I wouldn't look for him to be a game changer.</p>


</p>

1100 and 8 - more if welker contines to get injured

dezzzR
09-12-2011, 12:11 PM
and first place after week 1

get use to seeing it GMB fantasy footballers

You see something new every day. It might take some time getting used to. lol

Ray Rice 1 CJ2K 0 lol
</p>


Wonder why LT hasn't showed up this morning. The Ryan Torrain thing was not his best moment.</p>


I still think you are winning (probably by a lot) this week but it will be fun to sweat it out with you tonight. Lets hope the Pats D/ST doesn't do what it did last year at Miami.</p>Sorry, got here late today. Ryan Torrain --ughh. I think I am officially confused with FF as of last night. I'm watching triple digit scores lighting up our board, scratching my head, trying to figure what I did wrong.


well first off - EVERYBODY has those weeks every once in a while. INfact in most of my leagues , it seems like half the teams in all of them were low scoring. Very weird fantasy first week

BUT - Torrain in really screwed you

Charles didn't have a that good of a day and that was suppose to be your workhorse

You didn't really have many TDs from ur skill sets - it will happen

but keep in mind u stil lhave two players left
I'm freakin out--you mean Branch and my kicker? What Matchup Button Moorehead? ....and where did all the points that I had last night go? I'm not very good at this. Classic situation of something looking easier than it is. haha


<u>i think yahoo is just having some issues. All the scores are gone right now, they'll be back later</u>

yes u still have Branch and ur kick to go

Matchups are on the leagues main page to the right. It shows who is playing who and what the scores are. Thats considered the matchups. I also think there is a tab to the top of the page that says matchups
yea its gone in my league too.

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 12:12 PM
ok found matchup---

What's up with projected and actual. Yesterday I thought my projected was my actual and today it's not? ....and I'm in finance-scary.
</P>


Well that shows your statring lineup and the projected points (projected doesn't mean much, its Yahoo's opinion). But you can only adjust your lineup on your "My Team"screen. thats shows all the players (starters and bench) on your team. The only change you can make now is Hagen for Branch since neither player has started yet.</P>


OK-Hagan &amp; Branch--Because my limit for the week is 3 TOTAL wr's correct? So--I used up my 2 TOTAL rb's with Charles and Torain(cause I'm an idiot) and I cannot add anymore rb's for week#1, Correct?
</P>


Its not the "limit". You must use exactly 2 RB's and 3 WR's. </P>


Both the RB's you had in your starting lineup have already played. You can only add or take out playeres from your starting lineup who haven't played (or their teams played) yet. So your only choice for week 1 in Branch or Hagan. </P>

lttaylor56
09-12-2011, 12:13 PM
ok found matchup---

What's up with projected and actual. Yesterday I thought my projected was my actual and today it's not? ....and I'm in finance-scary.
</p>


Well that shows your statring lineup and the projected points (projected doesn't mean much, its Yahoo's opinion). But you can only adjust your lineup on your "My Team"screen. thats shows all the players (starters and bench) on your team. The only change you can make now is Hagen for Branch since neither player has started yet.</p>


OK-Hagan &amp; Branch--Because my limit for the week is 3 TOTAL wr's correct? So--I used up my 2 TOTAL rb's with Charles and Torain(cause I'm an idiot) and I cannot add anymore rb's for week#1, Correct?
</p>


that's right. once that person's game happens, that slot is locked till next week.
LT, I thought we went over this last week!! Always play your best matchup, and hope for the best! There's no player swapping.</p>We did--You tried to tell me...I was thinking something else.

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 12:14 PM
i am pumped to see what Ocho does today.

Interesting to see how he actually adapts. Theres alot of junk about him not fitting and all of that. I think its garbage, I think he may beast there.
</P>


He's just another cog in the passing game. He should be a decent 3rd FF WR. Probably something like 850 yards and maybe 6 TD's.</P>


I wouldn't look for him to be a game changer.</P>


</P>




1100 and 8 - more if welker contines to get injured
</P>


I don't see that at all. The TE's will be even bigger inthe offense this season. But I do think that Ocho will be a nice contributor.</P>

Morehead State
09-12-2011, 12:15 PM
ok found matchup---

What's up with projected and actual. Yesterday I thought my projected was my actual and today it's not? ....and I'm in finance-scary.
</P>


Well that shows your statring lineup and the projected points (projected doesn't mean much, its Yahoo's opinion). But you can only adjust your lineup on your "My Team"screen. thats shows all the players (starters and bench) on your team. The only change you can make now is Hagen for Branch since neither player has started yet.</P>


OK-Hagan &amp; Branch--Because my limit for the week is 3 TOTAL wr's correct? So--I used up my 2 TOTAL rb's with Charles and Torain(cause I'm an idiot) and I cannot add anymore rb's for week#1, Correct?
</P>


that's right. once that person's game happens, that slot is locked till next week.
LT, I thought we went over this last week!! Always play your best matchup, and hope for the best! There's no player swapping.</P>


We did--You tried to tell me...I was thinking something else.
</P>


Don't fret it LT. We will check with you over the week to make sure you have the starters you want for week 2.</P>

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 12:18 PM
i am pumped to see what Ocho does today.

Interesting to see how he actually adapts. Theres alot of junk about him not fitting and all of that. I think its garbage, I think he may beast there.
</p>


He's just another cog in the passing game. He should be a decent 3rd FF WR. Probably something like 850 yards and maybe 6 TD's.</p>


I wouldn't look for him to be a game changer.</p>


</p>




1100 and 8 - more if welker contines to get injured
</p>


I don't see that at all. The TE's will be even bigger inthe offense this season. But I do think that Ocho will be a nice contributor.</p>
Brady just needs to be human tonight. That is all that matters...

bigblue4417
09-12-2011, 12:22 PM
ok found matchup---

What's up with projected and actual. Yesterday I thought my projected was my actual and today it's not? ....and I'm in finance-scary.
</p>


Well that shows your statring lineup and the projected points (projected doesn't mean much, its Yahoo's opinion). But you can only adjust your lineup on your "My Team"screen. thats shows all the players (starters and bench) on your team. The only change you can make now is Hagen for Branch since neither player has started yet.</p>


OK-Hagan &amp; Branch--Because my limit for the week is 3 TOTAL wr's correct? So--I used up my 2 TOTAL rb's with Charles and Torain(cause I'm an idiot) and I cannot add anymore rb's for week#1, Correct?
</p>


that's right. once that person's game happens, that slot is locked till next week.
LT, I thought we went over this last week!! Always play your best matchup, and hope for the best! There's no player swapping.</p>


We did--You tried to tell me...I was thinking something else.
</p>


Don't fret it LT. We will check with you over the week to make sure you have the starters you want for week 2.</p>
Some games start at 11, some games start at 2. One Sunday and one Monday. If you have a player that goes at 2 and another that starts at 11 you have to get your lineup set by the first start of games. If you have 2 guys going in the late games then you can wait and change it just before the game. If you have a guy that plays at 11 that you wanted to change out for a guy that starts at 2 and don't do it 5 minutes before the first set of games you are screwed. You can always change before the 2nd set of games but once a guy is in and the game has started you can't change anything.

MattMeyerBud
09-12-2011, 12:28 PM
ok found matchup---

What's up with projected and actual. Yesterday I thought my projected was my actual and today it's not? ....and I'm in finance-scary.
</p>


Well that shows your statring lineup and the projected points (projected doesn't mean much, its Yahoo's opinion). But you can only adjust your lineup on your "My Team"screen. thats shows all the players (starters and bench) on your team. The only change you can make now is Hagen for Branch since neither player has started yet.</p>


OK-Hagan &amp; Branch--Because my limit for the week is 3 TOTAL wr's correct? So--I used up my 2 TOTAL rb's with Charles and Torain(cause I'm an idiot) and I cannot add anymore rb's for week#1, Correct?
</p>


that's right. once that person's game happens, that slot is locked till next week.
LT, I thought we went over this last week!! Always play your best matchup, and hope for the best! There's no player swapping.</p>


We did--You tried to tell me...I was thinking something else.
</p>


Don't fret it LT. We will check with you over the week to make sure you have the starters you want for week 2.</p>
Some games start at 11, some games start at 2. One Sunday and one Monday. If you have a player that goes at 2 and another that starts at 11 you have to get your lineup set by the first start of games. If you have 2 guys going in the late games then you can wait and change it just before the game. If you have a guy that plays at 11 that you wanted to change out for a guy that starts at 2 and don't do it 5 minutes before the first set of games you are screwed. You can always change before the 2nd set of games but once a guy is in and the game has started you can't change anything.


1 oclock and 4 oclock

nobody is on mormon time but u