PDA

View Full Version : real bad officating



nymetsgio
12-25-2011, 02:01 AM
is it me or did the giant get three bad calls in this game
1. the fumble that was cause by rolles foot and returned for a td. i thought it was called a fumble on the field. there was not real evidence that would have overturned the call of fumble.
2. the holmes fumble, he was in control of the pass made football moves. the ref called down by contact but replay showed it was a fumble it the refs call incomplete pass fine but that wasnt the call
3. the paul sack fumble clearly he hit the ball out of sanchez hand u can see it on replay.

some of these refs suck real bad luckly we still won.
tell me wat u guys think

NWKEffectElement
12-25-2011, 02:04 AM
There was more than that. What about the LJ fumble called the tuck rule? Revis mugging our receivers. A terrible hold on Tuck on their 2nd Td drive. As a matter or fact a few hold calls.

Eddie050
12-25-2011, 02:23 AM
When Sanchez was bringing the ball down as though he was going to tuck it, they ruled it an in-completed pass. Ok so if it wasn't a fumble, shouldn't it have then been intentional grounding because there was no receiver there and he was inside the box? Second, when Sanchez's arm so to speak was going forward but the ball was still in his hand, they ruled again an in-complete pass. The ball went behind the QB on a throw so it should actually been a live ball...Just some thought!!!!

NWKEffectElement
12-25-2011, 02:42 AM
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/giants/post/_/id/9913/giants-watch-as-big-calls-go-the-other-way

Looks like Giants fans aren't the only ones who noticed.

giantsfan420
12-25-2011, 03:04 AM
When Sanchez was bringing the ball down as though he was going to tuck it, they ruled it an in-completed pass. Ok so if it wasn't a fumble, shouldn't it have then been intentional grounding because there was no receiver there and he was inside the box? Second, when Sanchez's arm so to speak was going forward but the ball was still in his hand, they ruled again an in-complete pass. The ball went behind the QB on a throw so it should actually been a live ball...Just some thought!!!!

yeah on the l.joseph caused fumble, part of the rules stipulate that if the qb's hand is bare and open going forward the tuck rule is not valid. the rule was written that way especially for the situation that happened. plus, his arm was never even going forward, it looked that way bc sanchez saw the pressure and was gonna do whatever he could. he rose his arm above his shoulder, but never initiated forward movement. the refs mistook him raising his arm over his shoulder which was not a forward motion AS a forward motion.

it was bush league all day.

the rolle fumble, im so sure they overturned that, lol. the ref didnt even take up the full allotted time allowed for review. its like he never bothered or realized that it was rolles cleat and not the ground. bc f he had any idea it was the cleat and not the ground, there was no indisputable evidence it wasnt a fumble. the ref had to have thought it was the ground and never realized it was rolles cleat.

bush league officiating all year vs the giants, str8 up bush league. even on reviewable plays theres been a double standard its a f'in joke. bad karma for those refs

Eddie050
12-25-2011, 10:57 PM
You got that right thanks!!!! One reason we need to score points so these blown calls don't bite us...

giants2thebowl
12-25-2011, 11:02 PM
I honestly thought the refs were gonna cost us the game, thank god they didn't

swordfish
12-26-2011, 12:50 PM
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/giants/post/_/id/9913/giants-watch-as-big-calls-go-the-other-way

Looks like Giants fans aren't the only ones who noticed.next time you find a link, please link it, I am in no mood to be retyping the whole script. Its called copy and paste.

FBomb
12-26-2011, 12:59 PM
I don't know if it's all over the league or not but there have been some very questionable calls and non calls all season long.</P>


That was such an obvious fumble return for a TD and the tape showed it. How that got overturned is head scratching.</P>

jacobavaro
12-26-2011, 01:15 PM
what the heck happened when after all those bad fumble calls Sanches scramble for like 15 yards and appeared to be a yard short of the marker the Giants were called for holding how did the Jets get the ball on the 1 yards line first and 10?

fourth&forever
12-26-2011, 01:21 PM
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/giants/post/_/id/9913/giants-watch-as-big-calls-go-the-other-way

Looks like Giants fans aren't the only ones who noticed.next time you find a link, please link it, I am in no mood to be retyping the whole script. Its called copy and paste.
bad Christmas? copy & paste worked for me.

repeatchamps
12-26-2011, 01:22 PM
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/giants/post/_/id/9913/giants-watch-as-big-calls-go-the-other-way Looks like Giants fans aren't the only ones who noticed.next time you find a link, please link it, I am in no mood to be retyping the whole script. Its called copy and paste.</P>


Here you go lazy bones [8-)]:</P>


http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/giants/post/_/id/9913/giants-watch-as-big-calls-go-the-other-way </P>

BlueJayC
12-26-2011, 06:10 PM
what the heck happened when after all those bad fumble calls Sanches scramble for like 15 yards and appeared to be a yard short of the marker the Giants were called for holding how did the Jets get the ball on the 1 yards line first and 10?

I agree....this made zero sense....if they didn't take the yardage and accepted the penalty it should have been half the distance to the goal line and an automatic first down.....instead they gave the Jets BOTH the yardage on the scramble and the first down at the 1.....I was livid and still haven't heard an explanation.