PDA

View Full Version : Vernon Davis will be a decoy this Sunday



theyregood
01-20-2012, 07:28 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

calzonesays
01-20-2012, 07:31 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

how do you know the Giants game plan and how many guys they put on VD?

Blue daddy
01-20-2012, 07:33 PM
Why should this game be any differnt for him then rest of the season.

theyregood
01-20-2012, 07:36 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

how do you know the Giants game plan and how many guys they put on VD?


They will do a Zone Bracket coverage on VD,

an LB will play bump/man to man on him while a safety will play zone on top of him.

because of what he did last week, this is how coaches do double teams

FIFTY6G-MAN
01-20-2012, 07:47 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

how do you know the Giants game plan and how many guys they put on VD?


They will do a Zone Bracket coverage on VD,

an LB will play bump/man to man on him while a safety will play zone on top of him.

because of what he did last week, this is how coaches do double teamsI dont think so. We will cover V.D. just like he has VD and it will play out like our last game against them but with a healthy NYG team getting the win!

FIFTY6G-MAN
01-20-2012, 07:50 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

how do you know the Giants game plan and how many guys they put on VD?


They will do a Zone Bracket coverage on VD,

an LB will play bump/man to man on him while a safety will play zone on top of him.

because of what he did last week, this is how coaches do double teamsBTW do you REALLY think NYG will try to TRIPLE cover one guy???? are you insane? No Recvr in the NFL gets a triple. If you believe that the Giants do that then yes Crabtree will be open, hell my 16 year old would be open for a TD everytime..

theyregood
01-20-2012, 07:51 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

how do you know the Giants game plan and how many guys they put on VD?


They will do a Zone Bracket coverage on VD,

an LB will play bump/man to man on him while a safety will play zone on top of him.

because of what he did last week, this is how coaches do double teamsI dont think so. We will cover V.D. just like he has VD and it will play out like our last game against them but with a healthy NYG team getting the win!

youll be in trouble if you dont double cover him, really.

FIFTY6G-MAN
01-20-2012, 08:10 PM
R you a SF fan? You state I'll be in trouble.

fansince69
01-20-2012, 08:12 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

how do you know the Giants game plan and how many guys they put on VD?


They will do a Zone Bracket coverage on VD,

an LB will play bump/man to man on him while a safety will play zone on top of him.

because of what he did last week, this is how coaches do double teamsI dont think so. We will cover V.D. just like he has VD and it will play out like our last game against them but with a healthy NYG team getting the win!

youll be in trouble if you dont double cover him, really.

He was covered just fine last game till Boley went down....We Arent really worried...Witten and Gronk did very little against Boley Im sure he can handle VD(is that short for venereal disease)

slipknottin
01-20-2012, 08:15 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

there is no such thing as triple coverage.

theyregood
01-20-2012, 08:17 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

there is no such thing as triple coverage.

Yes you can, put 2 guys on him man to man with a safety playing Zone spying on him on top, that would be triple coverage

everyone else play Zone to prevent the long TD.

slipknottin
01-20-2012, 08:19 PM
Yes you can, put 2 guys on him man to man with a safety playing Zone spying on him on top, that would be triple coverage

That does not happen in real life.

ShakeNBake
01-20-2012, 08:20 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

there is no such thing as triple coverage.

Yes you can, put 2 guys on him man to man with a safety playing Zone spying on him on top, that would be triple coverage

everyone else play Zone to prevent the long TD.

That is unheard of, try again

bLuereverie
01-20-2012, 08:20 PM
Right, take your greatest and arguably only receiving weapon to run guys away from the other hacks on the field.

miken609
01-20-2012, 08:22 PM
Yes you can, put 2 guys on him man to man with a safety playing Zone spying on him on top, that would be triple coverage

That does not happen in real life.lol

VD&Crabs85
01-20-2012, 08:22 PM
Can't happen! Won't happen! Maybe a double now & then becauese if you triple, then Frank the Tank will get loose!

ShakeNBake
01-20-2012, 08:25 PM
Can't happen! Won't happen! Maybe a double now & then becauese if you triple, then Frank the Tank will get loose!

VD and crabs LMAO nice username, are you a walking STD?

theyregood
01-20-2012, 08:25 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

there is no such thing as triple coverage.

Yes you can, put 2 guys on him man to man with a safety playing Zone spying on him on top, that would be triple coverage

everyone else play Zone to prevent the long TD.

That is unheard of, try again


thats because you dont know football D.

egyptian420
01-20-2012, 08:26 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

how do you know the Giants game plan and how many guys they put on VD?


They will do a Zone Bracket coverage on VD,

an LB will play bump/man to man on him while a safety will play zone on top of him.

because of what he did last week, this is how coaches do double teams
<font color="#FF0000">Thanks Coughlin</font>

slipknottin
01-20-2012, 08:26 PM
thats because you dont know football D.

again, we are talking in real life. Not what you do in madden or what you draw on your napkins during school lunch.

VD&Crabs85
01-20-2012, 08:27 PM
Can't happen! Won't happen! Maybe a double now & then becauese if you triple, then Frank the Tank will get loose!

VD and crabs LMAO nice username, are you a walking STD?


LOL - Maybe...i should have covered up...it was either that or Crabby Patty!

ShakeNBake
01-20-2012, 08:28 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

there is no such thing as triple coverage.

Yes you can, put 2 guys on him man to man with a safety playing Zone spying on him on top, that would be triple coverage

everyone else play Zone to prevent the long TD.

That is unheard of, try again


thats because you dont know football D.

Name one player that gets triple teamed in the NFL, thats right you can't because your talking out of your rear end

theyregood
01-20-2012, 08:30 PM
thats because you dont know football D.

again, we are talking in real life. Not what you do in madden or what you draw on your napkins during school lunch.

if you dont think triple teams dont exist, then fine with me.

slipknottin
01-20-2012, 08:32 PM
if you dont think triple teams dont exist, then fine with me.

You can think all sorts of things exist in your alternate reality. Have fun with that.

theyregood
01-20-2012, 08:33 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

there is no such thing as triple coverage.

Yes you can, put 2 guys on him man to man with a safety playing Zone spying on him on top, that would be triple coverage

everyone else play Zone to prevent the long TD.

That is unheard of, try again


thats because you dont know football D.

Name one player that gets triple teamed in the NFL, thats right you can't because your talking out of your rear end


Vernon Davis on sunday.

theyregood
01-20-2012, 08:34 PM
if you dont think triple teams dont exist, then fine with me.

You can think all sorts of things exist in your alternate reality. Have fun with that.

You wouldnt be a good football defensive coach. lol

bflo23
01-20-2012, 08:34 PM
Don't feed 49er trolls that think Vernon Davis will just be a "decoy" that would get triple team coverage. Same 49er troll believed a Flacco vs Smith Super Bowl is imminent and is a lot more exciting than Eli vs Brady.

bLuereverie
01-20-2012, 08:35 PM
if you dont think triple teams dont exist, then fine with me.

You can think all sorts of things exist in your alternate reality. Have fun with that.

You wouldnt be a good football defensive coach. lol

And you would?

GameTime
01-20-2012, 08:35 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.</P>


the guy is on fire. He will get his plays no doubt.</P>


His coverage will def drawmultiple DBsso otherrecievers can make plays but he will get his too...</P>


</P>


</P>

slipknottin
01-20-2012, 08:37 PM
You wouldnt be a good football defensive coach. lol

Fortunately none of us live in your alternate universe where those types of things exist.

ShakeNBake
01-20-2012, 08:38 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

there is no such thing as triple coverage.

Yes you can, put 2 guys on him man to man with a safety playing Zone spying on him on top, that would be triple coverage

everyone else play Zone to prevent the long TD.

That is unheard of, try again


thats because you dont know football D.

Name one player that gets triple teamed in the NFL, thats right you can't because your talking out of your rear end


Vernon Davis on sunday.

You're so damn stupid you can't even troll correctly. How does a decoy get triple teamed genius?

theyregood
01-20-2012, 08:41 PM
if you dont think triple teams dont exist, then fine with me.

You can think all sorts of things exist in your alternate reality. Have fun with that.

You wouldnt be a good football defensive coach. lol

And you would?

Good football defensive coaches create different looking defensive formations and coverages to confuse the QB.

You can try triple teaming a player, one play, and then make it look like youre goin to do the same, then make them drop back into a zone.

its all chess play,

if you dont take advantage of that, then a really good QB can burn your D.

thats why you show different looks against an O to keep the QB guessing what to do,

thats why defenses like 3-4 are always ends up as the best D in then NFL because it is very versatile and you can do a lot of different looks with it which confuses the O.

bflo23
01-20-2012, 08:41 PM
Vernon Davis is the 9th ranked TE (yards) and is averaging 49 yards per game.

For his career, he is a 1st round #6 pick TE that has averaged 43 receiving yards per game for his career.

giantsfan420
01-20-2012, 09:28 PM
if you dont think triple teams dont exist, then fine with me.

You can think all sorts of things exist in your alternate reality. Have fun with that.

You wouldnt be a good football defensive coach. lol

And you would?

Good football defensive coaches create different looking defensive formations and coverages to confuse the QB.

You can try triple teaming a player, one play, and then make it look like youre goin to do the same, then make them drop back into a zone.

its all chess play,

if you dont take advantage of that, then a really good QB can burn your D.

thats why you show different looks against an O to keep the QB guessing what to do,

thats why defenses like 3-4 are always ends up as the best D in then NFL because it is very versatile and you can do a lot of different looks with it which confuses the O.

well then we'll be fine bc we're going against alex smith and he isn't a good qb imo. certainly not worried about him burning our defense AT ALL.

but the OP isnt that far off. triple teams can happen. example, osi, jpp and tuck ALL OVER alex "more ints than td's" smith

theyregood
01-20-2012, 09:33 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.

there is no such thing as triple coverage.

Yes you can, put 2 guys on him man to man with a safety playing Zone spying on him on top, that would be triple coverage

everyone else play Zone to prevent the long TD.

That is unheard of, try again


thats because you dont know football D.

Name one player that gets triple teamed in the NFL, thats right you can't because your talking out of your rear end


Vernon Davis on sunday.

You're so damn stupid you can't even troll correctly. How does a decoy get triple teamed genius?


He will be there to open up the other offensive recievers genius.

theyregood
01-20-2012, 09:37 PM
if you dont think triple teams dont exist, then fine with me.

You can think all sorts of things exist in your alternate reality. Have fun with that.

You wouldnt be a good football defensive coach. lol

And you would?

Good football defensive coaches create different looking defensive formations and coverages to confuse the QB.

You can try triple teaming a player, one play, and then make it look like youre goin to do the same, then make them drop back into a zone.

its all chess play,

if you dont take advantage of that, then a really good QB can burn your D.

thats why you show different looks against an O to keep the QB guessing what to do,

thats why defenses like 3-4 are always ends up as the best D in then NFL because it is very versatile and you can do a lot of different looks with it which confuses the O.

well then we'll be fine bc we're going against alex smith and he isn't a good qb imo. certainly not worried about him burning our defense AT ALL.

but the OP isnt that far off. triple teams can happen. example, osi, jpp and tuck ALL OVER alex "more ints than td's" smith

he only had 5 ints this season

pheonix73
01-20-2012, 09:37 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.
welll O.K. 9er FAN... but sorry it will just not happen because alex will be running for his life... with justin osi j.p.p and kiwi after it....

bLuereverie
01-20-2012, 09:41 PM
he only had 5 ints this season

And 44 sacks

JJC7301
01-20-2012, 09:42 PM
I would just put Boley on Davis 1-to-1, unless he proves that we actually NEED to double him. We've been handling the elite TEs in the league in the past 4 games. Not underestimating Davis, but let him prove that he's going to require the extra attention first.

bflo23
01-20-2012, 09:55 PM
This OP is really overrating the 9th ranked TE in the NFL. He probably thinks Vernon Davis is better than Gronk and Jimmy Graham. And then he thinks that Crabtree is making the Giants secondary shaking in their boots.

Tony Gonzalez had nearly 100 more receiving yards and 13 more catches than Vernon Davis. Did the Giants triple team him? And the Falcons have Roddy White with nearly 1300 receiving yards and Matt Ryan as their QB. How did the Falcons do vs the Giants?

giantsfan420
01-20-2012, 10:01 PM
i think the OP should be more worried about which of NY's pass catching options is going to be double or triple teamed.

nicks? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
Cruz? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
MM? fine. better get used to 2 wr's having 80 yd td receptions.


the only way SF will be able to stop nicks, or cruz will be to triple team them.

nicks and cruz warrant twice the attention VD gets. and im sure sfians know all about having to pay attention to their vd

theyregood
01-20-2012, 10:11 PM
he will be double or triple covered opening up Crabtree and other WR as well as Gore.
welll O.K. 9er FAN... but sorry it will just not happen because alex will be running for his life... with justin osi j.p.p and kiwi after it....

sorry but theyll be working on 3 step drop plays not giving enough time for your rushers to get a sack.

theyregood
01-20-2012, 10:11 PM
I would just put Boley on Davis 1-to-1, unless he proves that we actually NEED to double him. We've been handling the elite TEs in the league in the past 4 games. Not underestimating Davis, but let him prove that he's going to require the extra attention first.

yes that would be a good defensive plan, lol

theyregood
01-20-2012, 10:13 PM
i think the OP should be more worried about which of NY's pass catching options is going to be double or triple teamed.

nicks? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
Cruz? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
MM? fine. better get used to 2 wr's having 80 yd td receptions.


the only way SF will be able to stop nicks, or cruz will be to triple team them.

nicks and cruz warrant twice the attention VD gets. and im sure sfians know all about having to pay attention to their vd

we have a ballhawking d, you should be more worried.

leads the league in takeaways, we always gets ints.

the more passing plays the more you give the D a chance of intercepting it.

giantsfan420
01-20-2012, 10:57 PM
i think the OP should be more worried about which of NY's pass catching options is going to be double or triple teamed.

nicks? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
Cruz? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
MM? fine. better get used to 2 wr's having 80 yd td receptions.


the only way SF will be able to stop nicks, or cruz will be to triple team them.

nicks and cruz warrant twice the attention VD gets. and im sure sfians know all about having to pay attention to their vd

we have a ballhawking d, you should be more worried.

leads the league in takeaways, we always gets ints.

the more passing plays the more you give the D a chance of intercepting it.

no u were tied for most takeaways. who were u tied with...oh yeah green bay. how'd that work out for them???they led in int's too, which is 10x more of an issue for us than fumbles.

we have a baller qb. u can say we should be more worried...but truth is, alex smith has had a cinderella season. only, the clock strikes midnight early in san frannie sunday.

smith CANT lead the 9ers by being a game manager, and when u barely throw for 3000 yards and like 15 tds, thats what u are. he will HAVE TO make a bunch of plays JUST TO KEEP UP with out offense. that will equate into him being sacked (44 times already this season, and he barely throws. LMFAO) or throwing ints.

u bandwagoners will all be calling for a new qb this offseason. u might as well just accept it now and brace urself.

JJC7301
01-20-2012, 11:09 PM
This OP is really overrating the 9th ranked TE in the NFL. He probably thinks Vernon Davis is better than Gronk and Jimmy Graham. And then he thinks that Crabtree is making the Giants secondary shaking in their boots.

Tony Gonzalez had nearly 100 more receiving yards and 13 more catches than Vernon Davis. Did the Giants triple team him? And the Falcons have Roddy White with nearly 1300 receiving yards and Matt Ryan as their QB. How did the Falcons do vs the Giants?

We did a good job on Witten and Keller the weeks before that as well. They were the leading receivers for their respective teams -- something like 70 yards each. Each week, the play against the TEs has gotten better and better.

I would not start out doubling Davis unless he proves that he needs to be doubled. Focus on stopping the run and getting to Smith.

theyregood
01-20-2012, 11:13 PM
i think the OP should be more worried about which of NY's pass catching options is going to be double or triple teamed.

nicks? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
Cruz? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
MM? fine. better get used to 2 wr's having 80 yd td receptions.


the only way SF will be able to stop nicks, or cruz will be to triple team them.

nicks and cruz warrant twice the attention VD gets. and im sure sfians know all about having to pay attention to their vd

we have a ballhawking d, you should be more worried.

leads the league in takeaways, we always gets ints.

the more passing plays the more you give the D a chance of intercepting it.

no u were tied for most takeaways. who were u tied with...oh yeah green bay. how'd that work out for them???they led in int's too, which is 10x more of an issue for us than fumbles.

we have a baller qb. u can say we should be more worried...but truth is, alex smith has had a cinderella season. only, the clock strikes midnight early in san frannie sunday.

smith CANT lead the 9ers by being a game manager, and when u barely throw for 3000 yards and like 15 tds, thats what u are. he will HAVE TO make a bunch of plays JUST TO KEEP UP with out offense. that will equate into him being sacked (44 times already this season, and he barely throws. LMFAO) or throwing ints.

u bandwagoners will all be calling for a new qb this offseason. u might as well just accept it now and brace urself.

We dont need to keep up with your offense, your offense first has to try and score against our defense.

giantsfan420
01-20-2012, 11:20 PM
i think the OP should be more worried about which of NY's pass catching options is going to be double or triple teamed.

nicks? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
Cruz? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
MM? fine. better get used to 2 wr's having 80 yd td receptions.


the only way SF will be able to stop nicks, or cruz will be to triple team them.

nicks and cruz warrant twice the attention VD gets. and im sure sfians know all about having to pay attention to their vd

we have a ballhawking d, you should be more worried.

leads the league in takeaways, we always gets ints.

the more passing plays the more you give the D a chance of intercepting it.

no u were tied for most takeaways. who were u tied with...oh yeah green bay. how'd that work out for them???they led in int's too, which is 10x more of an issue for us than fumbles.

we have a baller qb. u can say we should be more worried...but truth is, alex smith has had a cinderella season. only, the clock strikes midnight early in san frannie sunday.

smith CANT lead the 9ers by being a game manager, and when u barely throw for 3000 yards and like 15 tds, thats what u are. he will HAVE TO make a bunch of plays JUST TO KEEP UP with out offense. that will equate into him being sacked (44 times already this season, and he barely throws. LMFAO) or throwing ints.

u bandwagoners will all be calling for a new qb this offseason. u might as well just accept it now and brace urself.

We dont need to keep up with your offense, your offense first has to try and score against our defense.

lol u keep telling urselves that.

17 points will prob be more than enough to beat u guys sunday. we'll at min. drop 21 on u guys...can alex smith carry ur team when gores held in check?

still tho, how does alex smith handle the triple team all over him? jpp, osi, and tuck...he's in trouble

theyregood
01-20-2012, 11:29 PM
i think the OP should be more worried about which of NY's pass catching options is going to be double or triple teamed.

nicks? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
Cruz? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
MM? fine. better get used to 2 wr's having 80 yd td receptions.


the only way SF will be able to stop nicks, or cruz will be to triple team them.

nicks and cruz warrant twice the attention VD gets. and im sure sfians know all about having to pay attention to their vd

we have a ballhawking d, you should be more worried.

leads the league in takeaways, we always gets ints.

the more passing plays the more you give the D a chance of intercepting it.

no u were tied for most takeaways. who were u tied with...oh yeah green bay. how'd that work out for them???they led in int's too, which is 10x more of an issue for us than fumbles.

we have a baller qb. u can say we should be more worried...but truth is, alex smith has had a cinderella season. only, the clock strikes midnight early in san frannie sunday.

smith CANT lead the 9ers by being a game manager, and when u barely throw for 3000 yards and like 15 tds, thats what u are. he will HAVE TO make a bunch of plays JUST TO KEEP UP with out offense. that will equate into him being sacked (44 times already this season, and he barely throws. LMFAO) or throwing ints.

u bandwagoners will all be calling for a new qb this offseason. u might as well just accept it now and brace urself.

We dont need to keep up with your offense, your offense first has to try and score against our defense.

lol u keep telling urselves that.

17 points will prob be more than enough to beat u guys sunday. we'll at min. drop 21 on u guys...can alex smith carry ur team when gores held in check?

still tho, how does alex smith handle the triple team all over him? jpp, osi, and tuck...he's in trouble

i dont think you can hold Gore in check? your rushing D is bad.

we have more chance of beating you because we are more balanced all around.

Voldamort
01-20-2012, 11:48 PM
Perry has a plan.

theyregood
01-20-2012, 11:55 PM
You guys are forgeting, 49ers has the best stat of any team.

they commit less turnovers than anybody.

You win games by commiting less turnovers.

Doesnt matter if you have a high powered offense, or you have Eli or a good pass rush.

If the other team doesnt commit turnovers, then they will be hard to beat.

giantsfan420
01-20-2012, 11:56 PM
i think the OP should be more worried about which of NY's pass catching options is going to be double or triple teamed.

nicks? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
Cruz? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
MM? fine. better get used to 2 wr's having 80 yd td receptions.


the only way SF will be able to stop nicks, or cruz will be to triple team them.

nicks and cruz warrant twice the attention VD gets. and im sure sfians know all about having to pay attention to their vd

we have a ballhawking d, you should be more worried.

leads the league in takeaways, we always gets ints.

the more passing plays the more you give the D a chance of intercepting it.

no u were tied for most takeaways. who were u tied with...oh yeah green bay. how'd that work out for them???they led in int's too, which is 10x more of an issue for us than fumbles.

we have a baller qb. u can say we should be more worried...but truth is, alex smith has had a cinderella season. only, the clock strikes midnight early in san frannie sunday.

smith CANT lead the 9ers by being a game manager, and when u barely throw for 3000 yards and like 15 tds, thats what u are. he will HAVE TO make a bunch of plays JUST TO KEEP UP with out offense. that will equate into him being sacked (44 times already this season, and he barely throws. LMFAO) or throwing ints.

u bandwagoners will all be calling for a new qb this offseason. u might as well just accept it now and brace urself.

We dont need to keep up with your offense, your offense first has to try and score against our defense.

lol u keep telling urselves that.

17 points will prob be more than enough to beat u guys sunday. we'll at min. drop 21 on u guys...can alex smith carry ur team when gores held in check?

still tho, how does alex smith handle the triple team all over him? jpp, osi, and tuck...he's in trouble

i dont think you can hold Gore in check? your rushing D is bad.

we have more chance of beating you because we are more balanced all around.
lol keep telling urself that.

we've dominated opponents run games for what 5 or 6 weeks straight now?

turner had more yards than gore i believe, and turner couldnt do **** **** vs us. they couldnt even get 2 yards on 3rd down.

if gore is ur "weapon", its the equivalent of a water gun compared to our water cannon of dlineman.

ur more balanced all around?LMFAO. u guys are a good defense with a run game.

we have a good d playing great. the past 4 weeks the giants d has actually been statistically better than u guys. our run game has been averaging 134 yards a game or near that, which i'd assume is as good as u guys.

and to top it off, WE ACTUALLY HAVE A QB WHO WINS GAMES. a qb who can throw for 300 yards. smith sucks so bad even in games he plays out of his mind he cant crack 300 yards.

dallas beat u guys in SF and we DEMOLISHED them two times. when we last met, we had a plethora of players out and injured.

like i said, i can understand u telling urself all these things, but what scares u is deep down inside, u hear this voice whispering "we cant beat ny. we dont have the qb to do it. a run game will not be enough"...and it keeps u up at night doesnt it.

u lie there on ur bed, staring up into darkness, wishing that some how alex smith becomes eli manning. wishing ur run game would carry ur pass game. and u know it wont happen. but hey, keep telling urself whatever u need to.

nygfan7387
01-21-2012, 12:09 AM
Don't these Niner fans know that we see Jason Witten and Chris Cooley TWICE a year? They think he's the only Pro Bowl tight end in the universe...Well then again, that is kind of easy thinking that because the NFC West (along with the AFC West) is the toilet bowl of the NFL...

theyregood
01-21-2012, 12:14 AM
i think the OP should be more worried about which of NY's pass catching options is going to be double or triple teamed.

nicks? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
Cruz? fine. better get used to 80 yd td receptions.
MM? fine. better get used to 2 wr's having 80 yd td receptions.


the only way SF will be able to stop nicks, or cruz will be to triple team them.

nicks and cruz warrant twice the attention VD gets. and im sure sfians know all about having to pay attention to their vd

we have a ballhawking d, you should be more worried.

leads the league in takeaways, we always gets ints.

the more passing plays the more you give the D a chance of intercepting it.

no u were tied for most takeaways. who were u tied with...oh yeah green bay. how'd that work out for them???they led in int's too, which is 10x more of an issue for us than fumbles.

we have a baller qb. u can say we should be more worried...but truth is, alex smith has had a cinderella season. only, the clock strikes midnight early in san frannie sunday.

smith CANT lead the 9ers by being a game manager, and when u barely throw for 3000 yards and like 15 tds, thats what u are. he will HAVE TO make a bunch of plays JUST TO KEEP UP with out offense. that will equate into him being sacked (44 times already this season, and he barely throws. LMFAO) or throwing ints.

u bandwagoners will all be calling for a new qb this offseason. u might as well just accept it now and brace urself.

We dont need to keep up with your offense, your offense first has to try and score against our defense.

lol u keep telling urselves that.

17 points will prob be more than enough to beat u guys sunday. we'll at min. drop 21 on u guys...can alex smith carry ur team when gores held in check?

still tho, how does alex smith handle the triple team all over him? jpp, osi, and tuck...he's in trouble

i dont think you can hold Gore in check? your rushing D is bad.

we have more chance of beating you because we are more balanced all around.
lol keep telling urself that.

we've dominated opponents run games for what 5 or 6 weeks straight now?

turner had more yards than gore i believe, and turner couldnt do **** **** vs us. they couldnt even get 2 yards on 3rd down.

if gore is ur "weapon", its the equivalent of a water gun compared to our water cannon of dlineman.

ur more balanced all around?LMFAO. u guys are a good defense with a run game.

we have a good d playing great. the past 4 weeks the giants d has actually been statistically better than u guys. our run game has been averaging 134 yards a game or near that, which i'd assume is as good as u guys.

and to top it off, WE ACTUALLY HAVE A QB WHO WINS GAMES. a qb who can throw for 300 yards. smith sucks so bad even in games he plays out of his mind he cant crack 300 yards.

dallas beat u guys in SF and we DEMOLISHED them two times. when we last met, we had a plethora of players out and injured.

like i said, i can understand u telling urself all these things, but what scares u is deep down inside, u hear this voice whispering "we cant beat ny. we dont have the qb to do it. a run game will not be enough"...and it keeps u up at night doesnt it.

u lie there on ur bed, staring up into darkness, wishing that some how alex smith becomes eli manning. wishing ur run game would carry ur pass game. and u know it wont happen. but hey, keep telling urself whatever u need to.

you forgot Special Teams, we have better special teams than you.

and we commit less turnovers than you.

Put that all together and it will be a tough day for the Giants.

GameTime
01-21-2012, 12:28 AM
You guys are forgeting, 49ers has the best stat of any team. they commit less turnovers than anybody. You win games by commiting less turnovers. Doesnt matter if you have a high powered offense, or you have Eli or a good pass rush. If the other team doesnt commit turnovers, then they will be hard to beat.</P>


while that is true....the Niners do protect the ball.....</P>


stats dont win ball games.....it going to be tough game. I dont agree with theGiants members here who seem to think its going to be a cake walk or that Smith is going to fold. Everything Smith has done this season has been just the contrary. </P>


Thisis a close match up.....wont be an easy win for either team...</P>

bearbryant
01-21-2012, 12:31 AM
Yeh, so, 9ers will make their best receiver a decoy. LOL That might work for ONE play but not a game plan, sparky! </P>


Anyway, thought I'd retort a few of the misleading statements made in this post. 1- Even though we were not running the ball very well back at that part of the season, both AB and BJ9 especially) ran very nicely in our last game and we'll do better Sunday. Did you guys even know who Ware was? 2- We sent gore to the pine in the last game; he was no help in the game and same thing will be done to him Sunday. 3- The only reason why the Giants lost the last game inSF was because of T.O.'s that will not happen again, we will not beat ourselves Sunday.Eli has been our rock and he will be rocking Sunday. I hope that you all have been watching the NEW Giant Defense: their all healthy, all knowing and just want to rattle the hell out of the QB across the LOS from them..., And they're very good at it, too. Not to mention our secondary which has tightened up the field on everyone in the Playoffs. Whether its dry or wet, sunny or cloudy, this Sunday the NY Giants will be looking to TCB. </P>

byron
01-21-2012, 01:09 AM
I'm not one who care much for **** talking ortrying to figure outwhats going to happen...So I won't be throwing any stats at ya ....I plain and simple like our chancesour boys are playing some damn good football these days.. they keep it up comeSunday they win...nothing against you and your teammy friend but that's just the way I see it could be wrong....whileI would prefer better weather for the game.. it goes both ways.. but thanks for the update.....Go Giants </P>

theyregood
01-21-2012, 03:02 PM
one more day left i cant wait for the game!

bflo23
01-21-2012, 03:04 PM
one more day left i cant wait for the game!

You must be hungry. There will be plenty of crow for you to eat tomorrow after all your trash talking. But you will disappear right?

theyregood
01-21-2012, 03:06 PM
one more day left i cant wait for the game!

You must be hungry. There will be plenty of crow for you to eat tomorrow after all your trash talking. But you will disappear right?


what happens if they lose, you going to disappear?

bflo23
01-21-2012, 03:10 PM
one more day left i cant wait for the game!

You must be hungry. There will be plenty of crow for you to eat tomorrow after all your trash talking. But you will disappear right?


what happens if they lose, you going to disappear?

I will be here but we all know you will disappear. You said Smith will throw like Montana with pinpoint accuracy?! I don't think real 49er fans are calling Smith... Joe Montana. I can't wait until tomorrow. With all your trash talking, I am not even sure you are even a 49er troll. You may be just a Giant hating Cowboy troll with nothing better to do.

NorCalSports
01-21-2012, 05:42 PM
Vernon is always a focus by the defense. Whether he is doubled covered or not, where he usually makes a big impact is with his blocking which is excpeptional. If Walker is back, Giants will have to ensure he is covered as well as he can impact a game like he did last time against the Gants. Crabtree had a bad game last week with the drops, but still is the best receiver on the team. The Noners will need to have Williams step up at the other WR position and you might see them throwing more to RBs. There are lots of possibilities and only Roman and harbaugh whowill make the decision will know. Niners rushing had greater success in the second half (and Gore will be back ahealthy) so I hink they adjusted to the run blitz, but Giants will probably change thing up as well. it is a chess match.

Going to be interesting to see what both teams do to limit their respective weapons. On passing, the pass rush will be the great equalizer. It will be interesting to see what both teams do as far as adjusting to each others excellent pass rushe. A good rushing attack can equalize that, so how well each team can run the ball will be big. Both teams don'tr blitz much on pass, so it may be a straight up battle.

FIFTY6G-MAN
01-21-2012, 06:37 PM
if you dont think triple teams dont exist, then fine with me. You can think all sorts of things exist in your alternate reality. Have fun with that. You wouldnt be a good football defensive coach. lol And you would? Good football defensive coaches create different looking defensive formations and coverages to confuse the QB. You can try triple teaming a player, one play, and then make it look like youre goin to do the same, then make them drop back into a zone. its all chess play, if you dont take advantage of that, then a really good QB can burn your D. thats why you show different looks against an O to keep the QB guessing what to do, thats why defenses like 3-4 are always ends up as the best D in then NFL because it is very versatile and you can do a lot of different looks with it which confuses the O. well then we'll be fine bc we're going against alex smith and he isn't a good qb imo. certainly not worried about him burning our defense AT ALL. but the OP isnt that far off.<FONT color=#0000ff size=5> triple teams can happen. example, osi, jpp and tuck ALL OVER alex "more ints than td's" smith</FONT>AWESOME!!!!!![B][B][B]

TroyArcher
01-21-2012, 06:40 PM
Good luck with Crabtree or should I call him hands of stone. The Giants have three top notch WR's so good luck focusing on one. By the way he will not be triple covered. You are truly delusional.

rick5292
01-21-2012, 06:43 PM
if you dont think triple teams dont exist, then fine with me.

You can think all sorts of things exist in your alternate reality. Have fun with that.

You wouldnt be a good football defensive coach. lol

And you would?

Good football defensive coaches create different looking defensive formations and coverages to confuse the QB.

You can try triple teaming a player, one play, and then make it look like youre goin to do the same, then make them drop back into a zone.

its all chess play,

if you dont take advantage of that, then a really good QB can burn your D.

thats why you show different looks against an O to keep the QB guessing what to do,

thats why defenses like 3-4 are always ends up as the best D in then NFL because it is very versatile and you can do a lot of different looks with it which confuses the O.

And....you never answered the question so I will answer it for you: NO

SackingMyths
01-21-2012, 07:00 PM
I'm trying to figure out how this guy is getting under so many of your guys' skin...

His arguments are about as well thought out and logical as this:

http://tinyurl.com/Stoooopid9ersfan (http://tinyurl.com/Stoooopid9ersfan)

Cannot imagine that we're dealing with someone over 15 years old. If I'm wrong, then that's even sadder.