PDA

View Full Version : How about Shockey??



dutchnyg
02-11-2012, 12:45 AM
Just a shot in the dark.. You think they give him a look?

JJC7301
02-11-2012, 12:48 AM
No chance in hell.

Harooni
02-11-2012, 12:49 AM
love the shockster but he demanded to be traded.

dave56dj
02-11-2012, 12:50 AM
Steve Smith maybe - Shockey - no chance.

ShakeNBake
02-11-2012, 01:20 AM
Not gonna happen, but I personally wouldn't mind taking my two Shockey Jerseys out of retirement

GiantWarfare
02-11-2012, 01:27 AM
http://i482.photobucket.com/albums/rr187/kimballas/pw-shockey.gif

Shockey: "Hell yeah! That'd be awesome!"

NYG: "Umm...not a chance buddy"

Shockey: "Whuh???"

TrueBlue10
02-11-2012, 01:32 AM
aaaahhhhahahahahaha!!!

... oh... you were kinda serious?

mm, no. I'd rather have Ballard play in a full leg cast. =P

FresnoGiant
02-11-2012, 01:33 AM
Not gonna happen, but I personally wouldn't mind taking my two Shockey Jerseys out of retirement


Me too. Mine is all sad and dusty in the back of the closet. Too bad he would have a different number now though since Cruz has 80 now.

ajd121
02-11-2012, 01:49 AM
Not gonna happen, but I personally wouldn't mind taking my two Shockey Jerseys out of retirement


Me too. Mine is all sad and dusty in the back of the closet. Too bad he would have a different number now though since Cruz has 80 now.

I saw someone got the name on the back changed for about $30

BillTheGreek
02-11-2012, 02:28 AM
I liked Shockey, but lets face it, Manning is the Captain....... and ..what he says GO's..... Shockey never listen to him , He also wanted to be traded......got his wish......its up to Eli .....

TrueBlue10
02-11-2012, 02:40 AM
Not gonna happen, but I personally wouldn't mind taking my two Shockey Jerseys out of retirement


Me too. Mine is all sad and dusty in the back of the closet. Too bad he would have a different number now though since Cruz has 80 now.

I saw someone got the name on the back changed for about $30


friend of mine got an authentic Shockey jersey for $35 last year, then paid $40 to get the name changed .... gave it to me for my birthday. not too shabby.

redbeardxxv
02-11-2012, 04:33 AM
Just a shot in the dark.. You think they give him a look?

Who???


Ok, seriously, the guy had heart. Manning leads this team, though, and Shockey would interfere with that. Aside fro that, he's injury prone, aging, and will cause more problems than he solves. No, I think Shockey is a bad answer to our TE issues and would cause a regression rather than ...... well, you get the point.

Roswell777
02-11-2012, 04:41 AM
Absolutely not.

giantfanatic
02-11-2012, 05:52 AM
I think Reese has proven he would rather find gold in the draft than re-cycle players. No chance they go after Shockey - not to mention he has an attitude that spells trouble. Same with Plaxico. I would take Boss back, but he is damaged now. Smith has already peaked in my view so I would not take him back either.

Diamondring
02-11-2012, 06:44 AM
Why this post was made and what's it's purpose? No no Shockey and why you think we need him?

dutchnyg
02-11-2012, 08:45 AM
Why this post was made and what's it's purpose? No no Shockey and why you think we need him?

Well 2 TEs on the PUP for one, and him splitting time with Olsen, I dont think it would be out the question

MikeSherrard
02-11-2012, 08:48 AM
Eli has stated MANY TIMES that the only thing missing during his legendary 2 super bowl winning drives was a guy in the huddle yeallg at him "I'm open" on every play.

Shockey can bring that element to the table!

jomo
02-11-2012, 08:56 AM
Signing a chronically injured, under performing, aging player who worked actively to impede Eli's development andrejects the word TEAM,is not my idea of a smart move.

swimeasy
02-11-2012, 08:57 AM
NO to 'All In for Me' players. No Shockey, no Plax, no Tiki.

gmen0820
02-11-2012, 09:22 AM
I was so happy to trade Shockey. Addition by subtraction.

I'll take him back when Owens goes back to Philly.

MikeIsaGiant
02-11-2012, 09:24 AM
What about Tiki bro? I heard he really wants to play with Eli

FBomb
02-11-2012, 09:30 AM
Absolutely not.............loved the guy, but he was bad for Eli and is a shell of his former self......no.</P>

jomo
02-11-2012, 09:35 AM
What about Tiki bro? I heard he really wants to play with Eli<FONT color=#ff0000>Yeah, let's put the gang back together............the gang that has zero Super Bowl rings. </FONT></P>


<FONT color=#000000>They had zero rings for a reason. You don't get to the top of the mountain with self serving guys who can't be trusted by their teammates.</FONT></P>

Gimaniac
02-11-2012, 09:44 AM
How about Cancer ??

MikeIsaGiant
02-11-2012, 09:45 AM
What about Tiki bro? I heard he really wants to play with Eli<FONT color=#ff0000>Yeah, let's put the gang back together............the gang that has zero Super Bowl rings. </FONT></P>


<FONT color=#000000>They had zero rings for a reason. You don't get to the top of the mountain with self serving guys who can't be trusted by their teammates.</FONT></P>

I know, it was a joke LOL

jomo
02-11-2012, 09:49 AM
What about Tiki bro? I heard he really wants to play with Eli<FONT color=#ff0000>Yeah, let's put the gang back together............the gang that has zero Super Bowl rings. </FONT></P>


<FONT color=#000000>They had zero rings for a reason. You don't get to the top of the mountain with self serving guys who can't be trusted by their teammates.</FONT></P> I know, it was a joke LOLI got it and it gave a chuckle. [:D]

Dabluguy
02-11-2012, 09:51 AM
Hell no!!!!

JesseJames
02-11-2012, 10:31 AM
I think one of the main reasons for Shockey not coming back here is that he was a huge distraction in the huddle to Eli always wanting the ball. Actually with the way Shockey left here I think he has put himself in the same category as Plax..

stomping
02-11-2012, 10:38 AM
Not gonna happen, but I personally wouldn't mind taking my two Shockey Jerseys out of retirement


Me too. Mine is all sad and dusty in the back of the closet. Too bad he would have a different number now though since Cruz has 80 now.

I saw someone got the name on the back changed for about $30


Or you could change it like some people changed Carmelo Anthony's #7 jersey to a Lin #17 jersey. They taped over his name and wrote Lin. They added the one with more tape. lol.

Down-lifer
02-11-2012, 10:44 AM
I have no respect for Shockey.... hes a punk and he is fragile.

TheEnigma
02-11-2012, 10:54 AM
Oh my god.

I have the PERFECT picture response but it has a curse word. So tempted to post...

Morehead State
02-11-2012, 11:15 AM
Just a shot in the dark.. You think they give him a look?</P>


http://cdn.obsidianportal.com/assets/45951/burning-bridges.jpg</P>

BParcells777
02-11-2012, 11:16 AM
I would take Jeramey back

Its all changed now.....he would be a much humbler role player this time around, and he is an amazing talent when he decides to put out

PS- I'm talking about Jeramey Schockey not Jeramey Lin

rebelfan1966
02-11-2012, 11:22 AM
I don't Eli would stand for it.... Shockey was a disruption during Eli's developmental years.

BParcells777
02-11-2012, 11:24 AM
I don't Eli would stand for it.... Shockey was a disruption during Eli's developmental years.

that was then........this is NOW

BParcells777
02-11-2012, 11:24 AM
I don't Eli would stand for it.... Shockey was a disruption during Eli's developmental years.

that was then........this is NOW

rebelfan1966
02-11-2012, 11:31 AM
I don't Eli would stand for it.... Shockey was a disruption during Eli's developmental years.

that was then........this is NOW


I don't think for one second that Eli has forgotten all the hand gestures made by Shockey on the field, him calling Eli out in the huddle, doing everything to stand in the way of Eli emerging into the leader on Offense, plus refusing to attend minis.... I will say this, Shockey has about the same chance as Tiki has of ever making the Giants roster in the future.

Bing Crosby
02-11-2012, 11:34 AM
The hell with Shockey. We don't need the crying old man around here.

RoanokeFan
02-11-2012, 11:44 AM
Just a shot in the dark.. You think they give him a look?

There's a better chance of seeing little green monkeys crawl out of Reese's ***.

Brandon jacobs
02-11-2012, 11:46 AM
Nope. he was one of the locker room problems. I still haven't forgotten his ***** fit about SB 42 not being on the field(sidelines during). that was a team decision.

He can go sit with the OTHER girly men.

jomo
02-11-2012, 11:48 AM
Nope. he was one of the locker room problems. I still haven't forgotten his ***** fit about SB 42 not being on the field(sidelines during). that was a team decision. He can go sit with the OTHER girly men.I can just see him in street clothes on the sidelines at SB 42 as Eli comes off the field....."HEY, I'M OPEN, I'M OPEN, GET ME THE BALL!!"</P>


What a moron.</P>

NYGRealityCheck
02-11-2012, 12:16 PM
Just a shot in the dark.. You think they give him a look?

There's a better chance of seeing little green monkeys crawl out of Reese's ***.



There's a better chance of making those monkeys kidnap Dorothy and Toto.

1. Shockey was a lockerroom/team problem when he got traded by the Gaints, who got fed up with him. Coughlin certaintly won't deal with those "out-coached" comments, after winning 2 Superbowls now.

2. Shockey is NFL-old now. He difinitely in the twilight of his career.

3. He will demand a lot of $$$ while the Giants are managing to stay under the cap.

888888
02-11-2012, 12:19 PM
Is Shock still playing?

swimeasy
02-11-2012, 12:20 PM
Is Shock still playing?

Was with the Panthers and will be a FA.

Firenugget
02-11-2012, 12:25 PM
I don't Eli would stand for it.... Shockey was a disruption during Eli's developmental years.

that was then........this is NOW


aaaand it makes much less sense NOW.[:|]

GMENAGAIN
02-11-2012, 12:47 PM
Yes! Let's go sign one of the most overrated players ever who is a horse's ***, is always injured, impeded the develoment of our franchise QB and is now at the end of his career!!!

Sarcasman
02-11-2012, 12:49 PM
Just a shot in the dark.. You think they give him a look?

Who?

spair
02-11-2012, 12:50 PM
Just a shot in the dark.. You think they give him a look?

How about no!