PDA

View Full Version : talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11



miked1958
12-05-2011, 10:13 AM
said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.</P>


on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.</P>

ny06
12-05-2011, 10:16 AM
said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.</FONT></P>


</P>


That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm. </P>


That will be called every time...</P>

Moss#83
12-05-2011, 10:17 AM
What are you saying?

BlueSanta
12-05-2011, 10:26 AM
People need to stop blaming the refs. Our Dbs were VERY physical down the field all game. We could have been called for a lot more than we were.

Take Drivers corner endzone TD catch, Cweb gave him a good thump trying to push him out of bounds, the ref could have easily called that as it was textbook illegal contact.

RonJon
12-05-2011, 11:00 AM
Agree, but there were a lot of questionable calls. Another I thought could have been called was the play on Nicks in the endz one where he had the ball until Peprah hit him and knocked it out. Looked like Peprah led with his helmet to Nicks's face mask. Suprised that one wasn'tcalled.

TuckYou
12-05-2011, 02:38 PM
People need to stop blaming the refs. Our Dbs were VERY physical down the field all game. We could have been called for a lot more than we were.

Take Drivers corner endzone TD catch, Cweb gave him a good thump trying to push him out of bounds, the ref could have easily called that as it was textbook illegal contact.
</P>


But, they let those players play, unlike Williams where they threw the flag. Very inconsistant, That call was horrible. Just let them play.</P>

burier
12-05-2011, 02:41 PM
said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.</FONT></P>


</P>


That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm. </P>


That will be called every time...</P>

Nah. He hit him in the chest with his forearm. Poor call.

GameTime
12-05-2011, 02:42 PM
People need to stop blaming the refs. Our Dbs were VERY physical down the field all game. We could have been called for a lot more than we were.

Take Drivers corner endzone TD catch, Cweb gave him a good thump trying to push him out of bounds, the ref could have easily called that as it was textbook illegal contact.
</P>


But, they let those players play, unlike Williams where they threw the flag. Very inconsistant, That call was horrible. Just let them play.</P>


I agree.....let them play...</P>


the call on JW was a bad call but they wound up punting anyway.....</P>

Manning2Niks
12-05-2011, 02:51 PM
said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.</FONT></P>


</P>



That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm. </P>


That will be called every time...</P>


Nah. He hit him in the chest with his forearm. Poor call.


Ummmm....you do realize that most, if not all, NFL players have 2 arms, right? Because one of his arms clearly grazed Elis helmet.

Now don't get me wrong, the rule is garbage and that really shouldn't be called......however the rules what it is and its cost us in the past so ill gladly take the 15.

Again though, his head was clearly hit if you re-watch.

jhamburg
12-05-2011, 03:11 PM
said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.</P>


<FONT color=#0000ff>on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.</FONT></P>


</P>



That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm. </P>


That will be called every time...</P>


Nah. He hit him in the chest with his forearm. Poor call.


Ummmm....you do realize that most, if not all, NFL players have 2 arms, right? Because one of his arms clearly grazed Elis helmet.

Now don't get me wrong, the rule is garbage and that really shouldn't be called......however the rules what it is and its cost us in the past so ill gladly take the 15.

Again though, his head was clearly hit if you re-watch.

Yes, agreed, contact was made. Argue with the rulebook not with the ref.