Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!
[quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]this is where debating with Daven is annoying. He just makes things up .[/quote]
I never do that...you just think I do because you have trouble following links? that's not true...you know I'm providing evidence that you can't refute...you know it proves you incorrect...so you just claim it's made up.
[quote user="MattMeyerBud"]WHat does his first paragraph have to do with anything i said?[/quote]
The first paragraph is my attempt to get you out of your emotional state...you are to busy riding Bradshaws pole to look at the actual data I'm presenting proving your theory incorrect...maybe if you stood up off his pole for 20 second you might be able to look at it objectively and come to what is the correct conclusion....that BJ is faster over 100 Yards then AB.
[quote user="MattMeyerBud"]The second paragraph essentially proves everything I said except that the difference is that he thinks Jacobs would be able to maintain that speed. I completely disagree.[/quote]
you just made **** up about him not being able to maintain speed....the second paragraph proves MY point...that Jacobs "caught up" to Bradshaw by 40 yards....showing that Yes it is a FACT that Jacobs is faster on the longer sprint...(because Bradshaws 20 vs Jacobs 20 Bradshaw wins...so 20-40 Jacobs has over taken bradshaw)
your comment about them being able to maintain the speed for 100 yards...well to put it simply....it's just absolutely ******ed....they are running backs they run for a living...neither is losing any speed over a 100 yard sprint...to claim that they won't be able to maintain their speed for a 100 yard dash is patently ridiculous....it's laughable really.
[/quote]
no u do make things up cuz ur first paragraph was about how game speed is diff tha n40 times. Nobody even brought up game speed.
You giving me some guys made up point system of how HE judges speed is hardly good evidence. And that link u had only gave JAcobs speeds for like 20 different things and bradshaw and wares times for like 2 things.
My opinion is no more made up than yours. Except we've seen the stamina of both guys, so to say that Jacobs prob wouldn't hold up as good as Bradshaw in a 100 yards really isn't that much of a stretch. You just pretend it is, because per usual it hurts your personal points.
You make the case that just because he got quicker from the 20 to the 40 that it automatically he'd be able to maintain and carry that speed for another 60 yards. THATS what ridiculous.
[quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]this is where debating with Daven is annoying. He just makes things up .[/quote]
I never do that...you just think I do because you have trouble following links? that's not true...you know I'm providing evidence that you can't refute...you know it proves you incorrect...so you just claim it's made up.
[quote user="MattMeyerBud"]WHat does his first paragraph have to do with anything i said?[/quote]
The first paragraph is my attempt to get you out of your emotional state...you are to busy riding Bradshaws pole to look at the actual data I'm presenting proving your theory incorrect...maybe if you stood up off his pole for 20 second you might be able to look at it objectively and come to what is the correct conclusion....that BJ is faster over 100 Yards then AB.
[quote user="MattMeyerBud"]The second paragraph essentially proves everything I said except that the difference is that he thinks Jacobs would be able to maintain that speed. I completely disagree.[/quote]
you just made **** up about him not being able to maintain speed....the second paragraph proves MY point...that Jacobs "caught up" to Bradshaw by 40 yards....showing that Yes it is a FACT that Jacobs is faster on the longer sprint...(because Bradshaws 20 vs Jacobs 20 Bradshaw wins...so 20-40 Jacobs has over taken bradshaw)
your comment about them being able to maintain the speed for 100 yards...well to put it simply....it's just absolutely ******ed....they are running backs they run for a living...neither is losing any speed over a 100 yard sprint...to claim that they won't be able to maintain their speed for a 100 yard dash is patently ridiculous....it's laughable really.
[/quote]
no u do make things up cuz ur first paragraph was about how game speed is diff tha n40 times. Nobody even brought up game speed.
You giving me some guys made up point system of how HE judges speed is hardly good evidence. And that link u had only gave JAcobs speeds for like 20 different things and bradshaw and wares times for like 2 things.
My opinion is no more made up than yours. Except we've seen the stamina of both guys, so to say that Jacobs prob wouldn't hold up as good as Bradshaw in a 100 yards really isn't that much of a stretch. You just pretend it is, because per usual it hurts your personal points.
You make the case that just because he got quicker from the 20 to the 40 that it automatically he'd be able to maintain and carry that speed for another 60 yards. THATS what ridiculous.
Comment