Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

    [quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="lttaylor56"]Tailgating essentials


    [/quote]

    lmao
    [/quote]i dont get it?[/quote]You never will, sorry Bandy.

    Comment


    • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

      lol did anyone see charlie sheens roast? im watching jeff ross on youtube. this guy is too good.

      "has any body seen bree olson, your ex goddess's latest movie?? the last time i saw that many guys coming out of the same hole i was watching the rescue of the chilain miners" LMAO hahahahaa

      Comment


      • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

        This is the legal definition of First Degree Murder MMB.

        <font color="#0000FF"><span class="hw">first degree murder</span> n</font>. although it varies from
        state to state, it is generally a killing which is deliberate and
        premeditated (planned, after lying in wait, by poison or as part of a
        scheme), in conjunction with felonies such as rape, burglary, arson,
        involving multiple deaths, the killing of certain types of people (such
        as a child, a police officer, a prison guard, a fellow prisoner), or
        with certain weapons, particularly a gun. The specific criteria for
        first degree murder are established by statute in each state and by the
        United States Code in federal prosecutions. <font color="#0000FF"> It is distinguished from
        second degree murder in which premeditation is usually absent, and from
        manslaughter which lacks premeditation and suggests that at most there
        was intent to harm rather than to kill.
        </font>

        I highlighted the important part for you.

        Dr.K.'s Murders (assisted suicides as you call them but the law doesn't recognize that as anything) fits with the definition of FIRST DEGREE Murder because of the premeditation.

        this is not my opinion...but a fact.

        CA's and Dr.K (supposed) Crimes are equal in the eyes of the law...you do not determine whether something is first or second degree murder depending on how YOU in particular feel about the person...it has to fit a strict guideline.

        Now you are going to go on and talk about how Dr.K was charged and convicted with 2nd Degree Murder, I DO understand that is the case....but that is not relevant to the discussion....because that out come of one particular case is irrelevant in a discussion about the entire system and how it works.

        Comment


        • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

          [quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="lttaylor56"]Tailgating essentials


          [/quote]

          lmao
          [/quote]i dont get it?[/quote]You never will, sorry Bandy.
          [/quote]you could change that by telling me?

          Comment


          • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

            [quote user="DavenIII"]This is the legal definition of First Degree Murder MMB.

            <font color="#0000ff"><span class="hw">first degree murder</span> n</font>. although it varies from
            state to state, it is generally a killing which is deliberate and
            premeditated (planned, after lying in wait, by poison or as part of a
            scheme), in conjunction with felonies such as rape, burglary, arson,
            involving multiple deaths, the killing of certain types of people (such
            as a child, a police officer, a prison guard, a fellow prisoner), or
            with certain weapons, particularly a gun. The specific criteria for
            first degree murder are established by statute in each state and by the
            United States Code in federal prosecutions. <font color="#0000ff"> It is distinguished from
            second degree murder in which premeditation is usually absent, and from
            manslaughter which lacks premeditation and suggests that at most there
            was intent to harm rather than to kill.
            </font>

            I highlighted the important part for you.

            Dr.K.'s Murders (assisted suicides as you call them but the law doesn't recognize that as anything) fits with the definition of FIRST DEGREE Murder because of the premeditation.

            this is not my opinion...but a fact.

            CA's and Dr.K (supposed) Crimes are equal in the eyes of the law...you do not determine whether something is first or second degree murder depending on how YOU in particular feel about the person...it has to fit a strict guideline.

            Now you are going to go on and talk about how Dr.K was charged and convicted with 2nd Degree Murder, I DO understand that is the case....but that is not relevant to the discussion....because that out come of one particular case is irrelevant in a discussion about the entire system and how it works.

            [/quote]

            and again it was viewed as assisted suicide

            they weren't equal and the verdict proved it.

            You can keep trying to wish there was a different ending but it went through the courts and was seen as NOT the same thing as Murder 1.

            And ALL The time in court are other court cases and verdicts used as examples for the case at hand. SO essentially they do all play into each others hands.

            The fact is that Dr. K was guilty of Murder 2. Thats the fact. HE didn't kill them, he helped the people kill themselves. Game over. YOu've already lost

            Just like I can't change the fact that Casey Anthony was found innocent. You can't change the fact that Dr. K wasn't guilty of murder 1.

            But either way, this whole argument has turned from ur ridiculous points of view on the death penalty. You don't believe in it, thats fine. But you were attacking my point by saying then ALL murderers should get the death penalty and that there was no way to decipher the two.

            AGain you are wrong there by the simple fact that the differences of murder 1 and murder 2 are a good starting point for deciding who would get the death penalty. Murder 1 would be my first requirement of being eligible

            Its completely relevent to the argument... because the case was tried and convicted. Again - HE didn't kill these people. He helped THEM kill themselves. Thats how it avoids murder 1 and thats why it was
            https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

            Comment


            • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

              [quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="lttaylor56"]Tailgating essentials


              [/quote]

              lmao
              [/quote]i dont get it?[/quote]You never will, sorry Bandy.
              [/quote]you could change that by telling me?[/quote]

              lol long story
              https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

              Comment


              • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

                Daven - one question. And if u avoid it and start saying a million different things im going to abuse my mod power and delete what u say until I got an answer

                In your most honest, non-trolling, opinion: Had the jury came back and found Casey Anthony guilty, what do you think they would of found her guilty of:

                A) Murder 1

                of

                B) Murder 2

                simple A or B
                https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

                Comment


                • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

                  [quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="lttaylor56"]Tailgating essentials


                  [/quote]

                  lmao
                  [/quote]i dont get it?[/quote]You never will, sorry Bandy.
                  [/quote]you could change that by telling me?[/quote]

                  lol long story
                  [/quote]i get it! no Canadians allowed..

                  such racists

                  Comment


                  • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

                    [quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"]This is the legal definition of First Degree Murder MMB.

                    <font color="#0000ff"><span class="hw">first degree murder</span> n</font>. although it varies from
                    state to state, it is generally a killing which is deliberate and
                    premeditated (planned, after lying in wait, by poison or as part of a
                    scheme), in conjunction with felonies such as rape, burglary, arson,
                    involving multiple deaths, the killing of certain types of people (such
                    as a child, a police officer, a prison guard, a fellow prisoner), or
                    with certain weapons, particularly a gun. The specific criteria for
                    first degree murder are established by statute in each state and by the
                    United States Code in federal prosecutions. <font color="#0000ff"> It is distinguished from
                    second degree murder in which premeditation is usually absent, and from
                    manslaughter which lacks premeditation and suggests that at most there
                    was intent to harm rather than to kill.
                    </font>

                    I highlighted the important part for you.

                    Dr.K.'s Murders (assisted suicides as you call them but the law doesn't recognize that as anything) fits with the definition of FIRST DEGREE Murder because of the premeditation.

                    this is not my opinion...but a fact.

                    CA's and Dr.K (supposed) Crimes are equal in the eyes of the law...you do not determine whether something is first or second degree murder depending on how YOU in particular feel about the person...it has to fit a strict guideline.

                    Now you are going to go on and talk about how Dr.K was charged and convicted with 2nd Degree Murder, I DO understand that is the case....but that is not relevant to the discussion....because that out come of one particular case is irrelevant in a discussion about the entire system and how it works.

                    [/quote]

                    and again it was viewed as assisted suicide

                    they weren't equal and the verdict proved it.

                    You can keep trying to wish there was a different ending but it went through the courts and was seen as NOT the same thing as Murder 1.

                    And ALL The time in court are other court cases and verdicts used as examples for the case at hand. SO essentially they do all play into each others hands.

                    The fact is that Dr. K was guilty of Murder 2. Thats the fact. HE didn't kill them, he helped the people kill themselves. Game over. YOu've already lost

                    Just like I can't change the fact that Casey Anthony was found innocent. You can't change the fact that Dr. K wasn't guilty of murder 1.

                    But either way, this whole argument has turned from ur ridiculous points of view on the death penalty. You don't believe in it, thats fine. But you were attacking my point by saying then ALL murderers should get the death penalty and that there was no way to decipher the two.

                    AGain you are wrong there by the simple fact that the differences of murder 1 and murder 2 are a good starting point for deciding who would get the death penalty. Murder 1 would be my first requirement of being eligible

                    Its completely relevent to the argument... because the case was tried and convicted. Again - HE didn't kill these people. He helped THEM kill themselves. Thats how it avoids murder 1 and thats why it was
                    [/quote]yea he never killed ANYONE, he just gave very ill people the necessities to end it, all they had to do was push a button.

                    Comment


                    • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

                      [quote user="dezzzR"]lol did anyone see charlie sheens roast? im watching jeff ross on youtube. this guy is too good.

                      "has any body seen bree olson, your ex goddess's latest movie?? the last time i saw that many guys coming out of the same hole i was watching the rescue of the chilain miners" LMAO hahahahaa
                      [/quote]Now that's funny. I'd still tap it.

                      Comment


                      • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

                        [quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="bandwgn86"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="lttaylor56"]Tailgating essentials


                        [/quote]

                        lmao
                        [/quote]i dont get it?[/quote]You never will, sorry Bandy.
                        [/quote]you could change that by telling me?[/quote]

                        lol long story
                        [/quote]i get it! no Canadians allowed..

                        such racists[/quote]Sorry Bandy-it's not a racist thing.

                        Comment


                        • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

                          [quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"]This is the legal definition of First Degree Murder MMB.

                          <font color="#0000ff"><span class="hw">first degree murder</span> n</font>. although it varies from
                          state to state, it is generally a killing which is deliberate and
                          premeditated (planned, after lying in wait, by poison or as part of a
                          scheme), in conjunction with felonies such as rape, burglary, arson,
                          involving multiple deaths, the killing of certain types of people (such
                          as a child, a police officer, a prison guard, a fellow prisoner), or
                          with certain weapons, particularly a gun. The specific criteria for
                          first degree murder are established by statute in each state and by the
                          United States Code in federal prosecutions. <font color="#0000ff"> It is distinguished from
                          second degree murder in which premeditation is usually absent, and from
                          manslaughter which lacks premeditation and suggests that at most there
                          was intent to harm rather than to kill.
                          </font>

                          I highlighted the important part for you.

                          Dr.K.'s Murders (assisted suicides as you call them but the law doesn't recognize that as anything) fits with the definition of FIRST DEGREE Murder because of the premeditation.

                          this is not my opinion...but a fact.

                          CA's and Dr.K (supposed) Crimes are equal in the eyes of the law...you do not determine whether something is first or second degree murder depending on how YOU in particular feel about the person...it has to fit a strict guideline.

                          Now you are going to go on and talk about how Dr.K was charged and convicted with 2nd Degree Murder, I DO understand that is the case....but that is not relevant to the discussion....because that out come of one particular case is irrelevant in a discussion about the entire system and how it works.

                          [/quote]

                          and again it was viewed as assisted suicide

                          they weren't equal and the verdict proved it.

                          You can keep trying to wish there was a different ending but it went through the courts and was seen as NOT the same thing as Murder 1.

                          And ALL The time in court are other court cases and verdicts used as examples for the case at hand. SO essentially they do all play into each others hands.

                          The fact is that Dr. K was guilty of Murder 2. Thats the fact. HE didn't kill them, he helped the people kill themselves. Game over. YOu've already lost

                          Just like I can't change the fact that Casey Anthony was found innocent. You can't change the fact that Dr. K wasn't guilty of murder 1.

                          But either way, this whole argument has turned from ur ridiculous points of view on the death penalty. You don't believe in it, thats fine. But you were attacking my point by saying then ALL murderers should get the death penalty and that there was no way to decipher the two.

                          AGain you are wrong there by the simple fact that the differences of murder 1 and murder 2 are a good starting point for deciding who would get the death penalty. Murder 1 would be my first requirement of being eligible

                          Its completely relevent to the argument... because the case was tried and convicted. Again - HE didn't kill these people. He helped THEM kill themselves. Thats how it avoids murder 1 and thats why it was
                          [/quote]yea he never killed ANYONE, he just gave very ill people the necessities to end it, all they had to do was push a button.
                          [/quote]Pacino did a great job in the Movie about Kavorkian.

                          Comment


                          • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

                            [quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="dezzzR"]lol did anyone see charlie sheens roast? im watching jeff ross on youtube. this guy is too good.

                            "has any body seen bree olson, your ex goddess's latest movie?? the last time i saw that many guys coming out of the same hole i was watching the rescue of the chilain miners" LMAO hahahahaa
                            [/quote]Now that's funny. I'd still kiss her on the lips with tongue
                            [/quote]

                            Now thats grosssssss

                            it would of been alot less disgusting if u would of said that you would just hit it
                            https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

                            Comment


                            • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

                              [quote user="lttaylor56"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"]This is the legal definition of First Degree Murder MMB.

                              <font color="#0000ff"><span class="hw">first degree murder</span> n</font>. although it varies from
                              state to state, it is generally a killing which is deliberate and
                              premeditated (planned, after lying in wait, by poison or as part of a
                              scheme), in conjunction with felonies such as rape, burglary, arson,
                              involving multiple deaths, the killing of certain types of people (such
                              as a child, a police officer, a prison guard, a fellow prisoner), or
                              with certain weapons, particularly a gun. The specific criteria for
                              first degree murder are established by statute in each state and by the
                              United States Code in federal prosecutions. <font color="#0000ff"> It is distinguished from
                              second degree murder in which premeditation is usually absent, and from
                              manslaughter which lacks premeditation and suggests that at most there
                              was intent to harm rather than to kill.
                              </font>

                              I highlighted the important part for you.

                              Dr.K.'s Murders (assisted suicides as you call them but the law doesn't recognize that as anything) fits with the definition of FIRST DEGREE Murder because of the premeditation.

                              this is not my opinion...but a fact.

                              CA's and Dr.K (supposed) Crimes are equal in the eyes of the law...you do not determine whether something is first or second degree murder depending on how YOU in particular feel about the person...it has to fit a strict guideline.

                              Now you are going to go on and talk about how Dr.K was charged and convicted with 2nd Degree Murder, I DO understand that is the case....but that is not relevant to the discussion....because that out come of one particular case is irrelevant in a discussion about the entire system and how it works.

                              [/quote]

                              and again it was viewed as assisted suicide

                              they weren't equal and the verdict proved it.

                              You can keep trying to wish there was a different ending but it went through the courts and was seen as NOT the same thing as Murder 1.

                              And ALL The time in court are other court cases and verdicts used as examples for the case at hand. SO essentially they do all play into each others hands.

                              The fact is that Dr. K was guilty of Murder 2. Thats the fact. HE didn't kill them, he helped the people kill themselves. Game over. YOu've already lost

                              Just like I can't change the fact that Casey Anthony was found innocent. You can't change the fact that Dr. K wasn't guilty of murder 1.

                              But either way, this whole argument has turned from ur ridiculous points of view on the death penalty. You don't believe in it, thats fine. But you were attacking my point by saying then ALL murderers should get the death penalty and that there was no way to decipher the two.

                              AGain you are wrong there by the simple fact that the differences of murder 1 and murder 2 are a good starting point for deciding who would get the death penalty. Murder 1 would be my first requirement of being eligible

                              Its completely relevent to the argument... because the case was tried and convicted. Again - HE didn't kill these people. He helped THEM kill themselves. Thats how it avoids murder 1 and thats why it was
                              [/quote]yea he never killed ANYONE, he just gave very ill people the necessities to end it, all they had to do was push a button.
                              [/quote]Pacino did a great job in the Movie about Kavorkian.
                              [/quote]yea i saw that, it was really sad.

                              Comment


                              • Re: THEE GAME IS vs THE BUFFALO BILLS ON OCT 16th!

                                [quote user="dezzzR"]yea he never killed ANYONE, he just gave very ill people the necessities to end it, all they had to do was push a button. [/quote]

                                doesn't matter, it's still considered for example a Class B Felony in New Hampsire...and the minimum sentence would have been 60 Years.

                                It's different from state to state...it's actually legal in Oregon....but only if the Doctor prescribes the drugs and they are self-administered and the patient had less then 6 months to live.

                                My point to this whole thing is MMB says "if CA got convicted she would should get the Death Sentence" but the reason he says that is because he thinks what she did was terrible.

                                My point is in many states Dr.K. may have gotten the death sentence for his crime...but Matt would have said he didn't deserve it.

                                the point is the law has a very distinct set of rules for each crime and the sentencing follows those rules...it's not as simple as he wants it to be..it's not.

                                "I think what she did is terrible...DEATH SENTENCE NOW!" and that's what Matt makes it out to be.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X