Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

    [quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Morehead State"]


    Uh Oh!!</P>


    Eli disagrees with Matt regarding bounties.</P>


    I wonder if that carries any weight with Good Ol' Meyerbud.</P>


    [/quote]

    I don't care who the QB is, i think we all know what their response is...

    I'll stick with Bavaro
    [/quote]</P>


    You've been hating on Eli all year!</P>
    Admit nothing. Deny everything. Make counter accusations.

    Comment


    • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

      [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="Morehead State"]


      Uh Oh!!</p>


      Eli disagrees with Matt regarding bounties.</p>


      I wonder if that carries any weight with Good Ol' Meyerbud.</p>


      [/quote]

      I don't care who the QB is, i think we all know what their response is...

      I'll stick with Bavaro
      [/quote]</p>


      You've been hating on Eli all year!</p>[/quote]

      old man, don't forget who had their eyes open (me) before they juts bought into what the mainstream media told you was true (you)
      https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

      Comment


      • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



        [quote user="MattMeyerBud"]
        old man, don't forget who had their eyes open (me) before they juts bought into what the mainstream media told you was true (you)
        [/quote]</P>


        glad im not the only one who picked up on that lol</P>
        Oderint Dum Metuant

        It's too bad, I'm too good....

        Comment


        • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

          by the way Matt, if I always loss the side bets to you how come you aren't taking the hixon bet...oh that's right...because you don't want to admit it but you found out I was right...we are going to sign a 3rd receiver...the Giants never intended to use Hixon as a WR this year....he's being signed as a ST guy...and that's it.


          Comment


          • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



            [quote user="DavenIII"]by the way Matt, if I always loss the side bets to you how come you aren't taking the hixon bet...oh that's right...because you don't want to admit it but you found out I was right...we are going to sign a 3rd receiver...the Giants never intended to use Hixon as a WR this year....he's being signed as a ST guy...and that's it.


            [/quote]</P>


            =O
            yea, strange that Matt said "bet is off, we're signing a 3rd receiver..."
            wouldnt he take the bet? lol</P>
            Oderint Dum Metuant

            It's too bad, I'm too good....

            Comment


            • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

              [quote user="DavenIII"]by the way Matt, if I always loss the side bets to you how come you aren't taking the hixon bet...oh that's right...because you don't want to admit it but you found out I was right...we are going to sign a 3rd receiver...the Giants never intended to use Hixon as a WR this year....he's being signed as a ST guy...and that's it.


              [/quote]

              found you were right?

              U said Barden and Jernigan are going to get more PT than him. The bet was as the WR core is right now.

              I'll stil ltake the bet that Hixon has better year receiving than Barden and Jernigan barring injury on hixon
              https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

              Comment


              • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                [quote user="JPizzack"]

                [quote user="DavenIII"]by the way Matt, if I always loss the side bets to you how come you aren't taking the hixon bet...oh that's right...because you don't want to admit it but you found out I was right...we are going to sign a 3rd receiver...the Giants never intended to use Hixon as a WR this year....he's being signed as a ST guy...and that's it.


                [/quote]</p>


                =O
                yea, strange that Matt said "bet is off, we're signing a 3rd receiver..."
                wouldnt he take the bet? lol</p>[/quote]

                and again - the whole HIXON IS A ST guy is kind of over blown.

                He usually only handles half of the returning duties. As it stands Hixon will be our 3rd WR. And like I said, I still think theres a shot he could be because the signing is a question mark, but I just wouldn't put money on it...

                any way u want to dice it Hixon will be more involved than Barden and Jernigan...

                and yes i always win these side bets wtih you. I paid u 100 bucks 2 years ago because we had 200 on the fantasy heads up season. Hence i won 100 dollars worth of side bets. And well, we know about this past year

                EDIT: and on another note about why i won't do the bet, I want to go by what most would consider a third receiver, not daven standards
                https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

                Comment


                • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                  [quote user="MattMeyerBud"]and on another note about why i won't do the bet, I want to go by what most would consider a third receiver, not daven standards[/quote]

                  most people consider whoever is playing in the slot the 3rd receiver.

                  3rd receiver has NOTHING to do with production, it has to do with who the 3rd option at the receiver position is....and it won't be Hixon this year...that's for sure, he probably won't even be a 4th or 5th option as I do believe either Barden or Jernigan will still contribute more to the offense then him this year.

                  I'll bet 20$ on either Barden "or" Jernigan producing more then Hixon this year...

                  Comment


                  • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                    [quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]and on another note about why i won't do the bet, I want to go by what most would consider a third receiver, not daven standards[/quote]

                    most people consider whoever is playing in the slot the 3rd receiver.

                    3rd receiver has NOTHING to do with production, it has to do with who the 3rd option at the receiver position is....and it won't be Hixon this year...that's for sure, he probably won't even be a 4th or 5th option as I do believe either Barden or Jernigan will still contribute more to the offense then him this year.

                    I'll bet 20$ on either Barden "or" Jernigan producing more then Hixon this year...
                    [/quote]

                    no they wouldn't, because that would mean Steve Smith was the # 3 WR in 09.

                    Your the only person that thinks production isn't what the 3rd receiver is about.

                    Regardless, besides your SNAPS theory you came back with JUST RECEPTIONS.

                    So yo would think a guy with 40 receptions, 400 yards, and 4 TDS would be the third receiver over a guy with 39 receptions, 600 yards, and 7 TDs

                    which would make no sense
                    https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

                    Comment


                    • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                      [quote user="DavenIII"]
                      I'll bet 20$ on either Barden "or" Jernigan producing more then Hixon this year...
                      [/quote]

                      define production
                      https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

                      Comment


                      • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                        [quote user="MattMeyerBud"]

                        no they wouldn't, because that would mean Steve Smith was the # 3 WR in 09.

                        Your the only person that thinks production isn't what the 3rd receiver is about.

                        Regardless, besides your SNAPS theory you came back with JUST RECEPTIONS.

                        So yo would think a guy with 40 receptions, 400 yards, and 4 TDS would be the third receiver over a guy with 39 receptions, 600 yards, and 7 TDs

                        which would make no sense
                        [/quote]

                        Snaps is the only thing that makes sense...but you aren't going to sit there and count the snaps (neither am I) so the closest thing to that is pure receptions.

                        and I'm pretty sure you and me are the only people even discussion what makes a 3rd receiver the third receiver in the first place....so bringing up what everyone else thinks is irrelevent since no one else is even thinking about it.

                        your hypothetical are ridiculous by the way, answer me this who would be the third receiver.

                        55 Receptions 650 yards 3 TD's vs 40 Receptions 750 Yards 6 TD's

                        you make hypothetical that support only your opinion and don't understand that it's going to end up more muddled then that...but that's besides the point, the 3rd receiver is the receiver who takes the 3rd most snaps period...that's not debatable it's just a fact...

                        Comment


                        • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                          [quote user="MattMeyerBud"][quote user="DavenIII"]
                          I'll bet 20$ on either Barden "or" Jernigan producing more then Hixon this year...
                          [/quote]

                          define production
                          [/quote]

                          yeah well that's the problem isn't it, lets go with Fantasy Scoring alone...and fantasy scoring in OUR Fantasy league only..(the GMB one)

                          Comment


                          • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                            [quote user="MattMeyerBud"]So yo would think a guy with 40 receptions, 400 yards, and 4 TDS would be the third receiver over a guy with 39 receptions, 600 yards, and 7 TDs

                            which would make no sense
                            [/quote]

                            would it make sense to say a guy who had 10 receptions for 400 yards and 4 TD's was the third receiver over a guy who had 35 receptions for 399 yards and 3 TD's?

                            I would say the 35 reception guy was more likely the 3rd (or 4th) receiver and the 10 reception guy just got a lucky reception here or there but wasn't really a factor at all.

                            Comment


                            • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                              [quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]

                              no they wouldn't, because that would mean Steve Smith was the # 3 WR in 09.

                              Your the only person that thinks production isn't what the 3rd receiver is about.

                              Regardless, besides your SNAPS theory you came back with JUST RECEPTIONS.

                              So yo would think a guy with 40 receptions, 400 yards, and 4 TDS would be the third receiver over a guy with 39 receptions, 600 yards, and 7 TDs

                              which would make no sense
                              [/quote]

                              Snaps is the only thing that makes sense...but you aren't going to sit there and count the snaps (neither am I) so the closest thing to that is pure receptions.

                              and I'm pretty sure you and me are the only people even discussion what makes a 3rd receiver the third receiver in the first place....so bringing up what everyone else thinks is irrelevent since no one else is even thinking about it.

                              your hypothetical are ridiculous by the way, answer me this who would be the third receiver.

                              55 Receptions 650 yards 3 TD's vs 40 Receptions 750 Yards 6 TD's

                              you make hypothetical that support only your opinion and don't understand that it's going to end up more muddled then that...but that's besides the point, the 3rd receiver is the receiver who takes the 3rd most snaps period...that's not debatable it's just a fact...
                              [/quote]

                              hypothetically a receiver could have 1 more reception but 300 less yards and 4 less TDs and u would consider that guy the 3rd receiver. Obviously you'd be wrong on that.

                              I make the hypothetical because it just shows how faulty your way could be.

                              Personally I would consider the 2nd the second receiver you mentioned as the hands down #3 receiver.

                              Just because one guy is more of a deep threat and one guy is more of a possession guy, you don't automaticaly lose because your a deep threat vs a possession guy. I mean YOU have this thought that third receiver is the slot receiver for osme strange reason even though we've had guys like Amani Toomer, Steve Smith, and Victor Cruz completely contradict your statement.
                              https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

                              Comment


                              • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                                [quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="MattMeyerBud"]So yo would think a guy with 40 receptions, 400 yards, and 4 TDS would be the third receiver over a guy with 39 receptions, 600 yards, and 7 TDs

                                which would make no sense
                                [/quote]

                                would it make sense to say a guy who had 10 receptions for 400 yards and 4 TD's was the third receiver over a guy who had 35 receptions for 399 yards and 3 TD's?

                                I would say the 35 reception guy was more likely the 3rd (or 4th) receiver and the 10 reception guy just got a lucky reception here or there but wasn't really a factor at all.
                                [/quote]

                                i think it would make the most sense, but personally I think theres only one way to really address this to make it fair and thats to incorporate a fantasy points scale to it...

                                1 point per reception, 10 per yard, 6 per TD. Its the only fair way to account for everything the player did

                                https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X