Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



    [quote user="Kase-1"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="Kase-1"][quote user="dezzzR"]Breaking Bad Sunday at 10! Cant Wait!
    [/quote]Cant wait to see what THIS guy does


    [/quote] Isn't that one of the bad guys in Beverly Hills Cop?[/quote]OMG I think it is!!!!

    I think thats the main enforcer who kills Eddie Murphy's buddy in the beginning of the movie
    [/quote] yeah</P>


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Banks</P>

    Comment


    • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

      [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="dezzzR"][quote user="patsrule666"]Wow MH, those part timers are really getting un der your skin? I didnt think the <u>mighty oak</u> had thin bark when it came to somebody questioning his fandom....[/quote]I was thinking a soft pine
      [/quote]
      When a guy with the handle "Rebelfan" tries to suggest that there are Giants fan who root against Eli in the games, Morehead will challenge. I will speak truth to stupidity. I will always..."Fight The Power"!!!![/quote]

      Come check the G-Fambulance and The Scarf Soldiers every home game in Lot L6, and like us on facebook and instagam 'NYG Scarf Soldiers'

      Comment


      • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

        [quote user="MattMeyerBud"]alrite guys sorry i've been slacking wtih the fantasy stuff, just been really busy.

        So we need to vote on some new stuff flex, qb points, and what else?

        I dont think we can vote on QB points until flex is resolved and then what kind of flex wil it be, with 2 or 3 WRs. So first vote has to be FLEX or STANDARD.

        We have 11 members returning so first to 6 gets the vote.

        Members are Me, blondie, pappy, lando, byron, LT, sharick, lawl, daven, pats, and who am i forgetting?

        Somebody keep this going:

        VOTE ON FLEX

        YES FLEX:

        NO FLEX: matt, amanda[/quote]You forgot about me again, Im gonna go in the corner and cry..... Then serve you all poison food at THEE game, LOL jk

        I vote for Funkmaster Flex
        Come check the G-Fambulance and The Scarf Soldiers every home game in Lot L6, and like us on facebook and instagam 'NYG Scarf Soldiers'

        Comment


        • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



          Whattup....how was the weekend?</P>
          Oderint Dum Metuant

          It's too bad, I'm too good....

          Comment


          • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

            Yes to Flex

            Comment


            • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

              [quote user="DavenIII"]Yes to Flex
              [/quote]
              What the hell?
              The reason I'm anti flex is because I bought YOUR argument that having no flex was better for good players.
              Admit nothing. Deny everything. Make counter accusations.

              Comment


              • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



                [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"]Yes to Flex
                [/quote] What the hell? The reason I'm anti flex is because I bought YOUR argument that having no flex was better for good players.[/quote]
                </P>


                lol just daven being daven</P>


                </P>


                NO FLEX: Me, Amanda, Byron, Pappy</P>


                </P>


                YES FLEX: Lawl, Daven, Kase</P>


                </P>


                still waiting on Lando, pats, sharick, LT</P>
                https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

                Comment


                • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



                  na actually take that back pappy, Daven was always a flex</P>


                  </P>


                  his argument is its more stratagy and doesn't beluieve that it makes teams try and draft more RB heavy</P>
                  https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

                  Comment


                  • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                    [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"]Yes to Flex
                    [/quote]
                    What the hell?
                    The reason I'm anti flex is because I bought YOUR argument that having no flex was better for good players.[/quote]

                    I don't know if I ever made that argument lol Matt was always against flex I was always for it.

                    I like being able to choose 3RB's or 3WR's each week, Matt has this idea that Fantasy is still about the RB (it used to be) so when you allow flex everyone will choose 3 good RB's....this won't happen but that's what he "thinks" will happen.

                    Comment


                    • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                      [quote user="MattMeyerBud"]

                      na actually take that back pappy, Daven was always a flex</P>


                      </P>


                      his argument is its more stratagy and doesn't beluieve that it makes teams try and draft more RB heavy</P>[/quote]
                      No way. Several years ago he said something like....."You know your playing hard core fantasy football when you are starting...(name of some remote WR).
                      Now maybe he's changed his view since then, but that was his position a while ago.
                      Admit nothing. Deny everything. Make counter accusations.

                      Comment


                      • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                        [quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"]Yes to Flex
                        [/quote]
                        What the hell?
                        The reason I'm anti flex is because I bought YOUR argument that having no flex was better for good players.[/quote]

                        I don't know if I ever made that argument lol Matt was always against flex I was always for it.

                        I like being able to choose 3RB's or 3WR's each week, Matt has this idea that Fantasy is still about the RB (it used to be) so when you allow flex everyone will choose 3 good RB's....this won't happen but that's what he "thinks" will happen.
                        [/quote]
                        I'm confused.....No flex would make the RB LESS important.
                        Admit nothing. Deny everything. Make counter accusations.

                        Comment


                        • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD



                          [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"]Yes to Flex
                          [/quote] What the hell? The reason I'm anti flex is because I bought YOUR argument that having no flex was better for good players.[/quote]

                          I don't know if I ever made that argument lol Matt was always against flex I was always for it.

                          I like being able to choose 3RB's or 3WR's each week, Matt has this idea that Fantasy is still about the RB (it used to be) so when you allow flex everyone will choose 3 good RB's....this won't happen but that's what he "thinks" will happen.
                          [/quote] I'm confused.....No flex would make the RB LESS important.[/quote]</P>


                          correct. and considering so many more teams are going 2+ RBs nowadays, that's a bigger decision than ever in fantasy.</P>
                          Oderint Dum Metuant

                          It's too bad, I'm too good....

                          Comment


                          • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                            [quote user="JPizzack"]

                            [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"]Yes to Flex
                            [/quote] What the hell? The reason I'm anti flex is because I bought YOUR argument that having no flex was better for good players.[/quote]

                            I don't know if I ever made that argument lol Matt was always against flex I was always for it.

                            I like being able to choose 3RB's or 3WR's each week, Matt has this idea that Fantasy is still about the RB (it used to be) so when you allow flex everyone will choose 3 good RB's....this won't happen but that's what he "thinks" will happen.
                            [/quote] I'm confused.....No flex would make the RB LESS important.[/quote]</P>


                            correct. and considering so many more teams are going 2+ RBs nowadays, that's a bigger decision than ever in fantasy.</P>[/quote]
                            Here's my assessment..........Good players don't like the flex. Marginal players like that crutch.
                            Admit nothing. Deny everything. Make counter accusations.

                            Comment


                            • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                              [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"]Yes to Flex
                              [/quote]
                              What the hell?
                              The reason I'm anti flex is because I bought YOUR argument that having no flex was better for good players.[/quote]

                              I don't know if I ever made that argument lol Matt was always against flex I was always for it.

                              I like being able to choose 3RB's or 3WR's each week, Matt has this idea that Fantasy is still about the RB (it used to be) so when you allow flex everyone will choose 3 good RB's....this won't happen but that's what he "thinks" will happen.
                              [/quote]
                              I'm confused.....No flex would make the RB LESS important.[/quote]

                              Matt's point - Flex = 3 RB's for everyone all the time.
                              My Point - Flex = more options for everyone every week.

                              and while I may have said something to the effect of "you know you are playing in a deep league when you play X Receiver" that is completely separate from whether flex is involved or not...they really have nothing to do with each other, you can play a deep league with flex or without.



                              Comment


                              • Re: THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

                                [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="JPizzack"]

                                [quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"][quote user="Morehead State"][quote user="DavenIII"]Yes to Flex
                                [/quote] What the hell? The reason I'm anti flex is because I bought YOUR argument that having no flex was better for good players.[/quote]

                                I don't know if I ever made that argument lol Matt was always against flex I was always for it.

                                I like being able to choose 3RB's or 3WR's each week, Matt has this idea that Fantasy is still about the RB (it used to be) so when you allow flex everyone will choose 3 good RB's....this won't happen but that's what he "thinks" will happen.
                                [/quote] I'm confused.....No flex would make the RB LESS important.[/quote]</p>


                                correct. and considering so many more teams are going 2+ RBs nowadays, that's a bigger decision than ever in fantasy.</p>[/quote]
                                Here's my assessment..........<u>Good players don't like the flex. Marginal players like that crutch.</u>[/quote]baloney

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X