Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

THEE NYG SWAG THREAD

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • No PPR for me (said so earlier)

    I'm all for a recount on the 3WR and flex ...it's fine with me, as long as we understand that it's still EITHER 3WR and Flex or 2 WR and Flex...Flex has been voted in already...2WR vs 3WR is a separate vote.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by lttaylor56 View Post
      New boards are a little quirky for me at times also. When I am signed in the boards tell me I am not signed in and cannot post. When I have a message I want to respond to, I have to go to the main board sign in and then I have a difficult time getting back to the message. The board doesn't load the Swag Last page like it used to. It can be frustrating 50% of the time.
      seems to be a running theme. today was the first day that my work browser kept me logged in from the previous log in. the boards do seem to act up at times, definitely.
      Oderint Dum Metuant

      It's too bad, I'm too good....

      Comment


      • Originally posted by DavenIII View Post
        No PPR for me (said so earlier) I'm all for a recount on the 3WR and flex ...it's fine with me, as long as we understand that it's still EITHER 3WR and Flex or 2 WR and Flex...Flex has been voted in already...2WR vs 3WR is a separate vote.
        Right, but after I voted for flex, the idea of a3 wr + flex came about. It is a completely different idea in itself. If I knew a 3 wr+flex was a possibility then I would not have voted for flex.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Imgrate View Post
          Right, but after I voted for flex, the idea of a3 wr + flex came about. It is a completely different idea in itself. If I knew a 3 wr+flex was a possibility then I would not have voted for flex.

          Yes, but the two votes had nothing to do with each other.

          we voted on flex or no flex...the flex was agreed upon (that's done)

          then Matt wanted 3WR's still...that was voted on and agreed with.

          if everyone is angry about the 3WR thing I'm fine with doing a recount on that, but if we recount flex I'll be angry...that was decided on already before the 3 WR thing and it has nothing to do with it.

          Comment


          • I know my vote doesnt count...but the phrase "compromise vote" is totally not true. the bottom line is that if some people knew 3WR + flex was an option, they wouldnt have voted for flex. Lawl is correct.
            Oderint Dum Metuant

            It's too bad, I'm too good....

            Comment


            • Originally posted by JPizzack View Post
              I know my vote doesnt count...but the phrase "compromise vote" is totally not true. the bottom line is that if some people knew 3WR + flex was an option, they wouldnt have voted for flex. Lawl is correct.
              what I don't like about this comment is you are suggesting that the 3wr vote has something to do with the flex vote...they are completely separate votes and have nothing to do with one another.

              we decided as a league that having a flex position is good, period end of story over.

              then Matt...being butt hurt over it decided to make up for that he was going to try an add another WR spot to the roster.

              that's an entirely different vote that the league also decided was a good idea.

              now everyone seems to be angry about 3WR+Flex....fine, whatever...but the point is we agreed on flex we just don't seem to agree on Flex AND 3wr's...since Flex was passed first the only thing up for discussion should be 3 WR's

              Comment


              • Originally posted by DavenIII View Post
                what I don't like about this comment is you are suggesting that the 3wr vote has something to do with the flex vote...they are completely separate votes and have nothing to do with one another.

                we decided as a league that having a flex position is good, period end of story over.

                then Matt...being butt hurt over it decided to make up for that he was going to try an add another WR spot to the roster.

                that's an entirely different vote that the league also decided was a good idea.

                now everyone seems to be angry about 3WR+Flex....fine, whatever...but the point is we agreed on flex we just don't seem to agree on Flex AND 3wr's...since Flex was passed first the only thing up for discussion should be 3 WR's
                I dont think anyone is arguing the orignal flex vote. I think that it was a matter of people voting either (3WR + 2RB) vs (2WR + 2RB +flex)......nobody knew 3WR + flex was going to be an additional option after the fact.
                Oderint Dum Metuant

                It's too bad, I'm too good....

                Comment


                • Ok, well that's fine but only cause I don't care if it's 2+2+Flex or 3+2+Flex...makes no difference to me.

                  but I will say that Matt went on and on and on about it 2 or 3 times a page for 6-10 pages in a row....if anyone didn't know about it, it was because they were purposefully ignoring Matt's posts....which I mean I don't blame anyone if that was the case :P

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by JPizzack View Post
                    I know my vote doesnt count...but the phrase "compromise vote" is totally not true. the bottom line is that if some people knew 3WR + flex was an option, they wouldnt have voted for flex. Lawl is correct.
                    I totally agree

                    Comment


                    • Lets take a new vote on taking a new vote. Flex has been voted in. Now it should be 3 WR plus flex or 2 WR plus flex.
                      Admit nothing. Deny everything. Make counter accusations.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Morehead State View Post
                        Lets take a new vote on taking a new vote. Flex has been voted in. Now it should be 3 WR plus flex or 2 WR plus flex.
                        3 wr + flex was not introduced at the beginning. It should not be voted on at all. If 3 wr plus flex was introduced at the beginning (before I made my vote) then I would have voted for 3 wr instead of flex and therefore flex would not have won.

                        Comment


                        • jeez....new forums are even more boring than the old ones....
                          Oderint Dum Metuant

                          It's too bad, I'm too good....

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by MattMeyerBud View Post
                            Well it was actually that some agred that the compromise was better so everybody is happy and then the people that don't want flex period would rather have 3 wr
                            I think everyone wants 2WR with a Flex OR 3WR..... Thats what it seems like to me
                            Come check the G-Fambulance and The Scarf Soldiers every home game in Lot L6, and like us on facebook and instagam 'NYG Scarf Soldiers'

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Kase-1 View Post
                              I think everyone wants 2WR with a Flex OR 3WR..... Thats what it seems like to me
                              I originally voted 3 wr on flex same setup as last year...that was the first vote we took and it passed Matt called it...then somebody changed their vote and all hell broke loose.....lol


                              page:13570

                              FLEX VOTE UPDATE:

                              NO FLEX: Me, Amanda, Pappy, Byron, Lando

                              YES FLEX: Daven, Lawl, Sharick, Kase

                              waiting on LT and Pats

                              5-4
                              LT voted standard....pats voted flex....making the vote 6 to 5 standard......

                              here is matt calling it....page 13571

                              The vote is in, it's standard. I say we just try to vote it out to attempt peace


                              [/quote]
                              I'm changing my vote to flex......... guess who?


                              Matt was calling for a compromise vote nearly from the beginning....I guess I didn't realize it would actually go to vote it still wouldn't have changed my original vote had I known....

                              the vote started on page 13546..........

                              page 13547 Matt and I talking

                              [/quote] Matt... WR is deep this year, even for a mandatory 3 receiver starts... i would be okay with a flex if we HAVE to start 3 wrs and 2 rbs and 1 flex.... but people wat 2rbs 2 WRs and 1 flex... it just is weak sauce[/quote] Byron ....make the flex spot rb/te, 3wrs, 2rbs......jk... I'm good with no flex.......


                              and the rest is history....its a good read if you got the time starts at 13546
                              Last edited by byron; 08-06-2012, 01:02 PM.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by byron View Post
                                I originally voted 3 wr on flex same setup as last year...that was the first vote we took and it passed Matt called it...then somebody changed their vote and all hell broke loose.....lol
                                Way to go MH lol

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X