Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NEW YORK KNICKS 2012-2013 THREAD

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • knicks comeback and win 102-97

    Comment


    • stat is still a big dog in the game. he needs to be featured more.

      great comeback win. anyone that watched knows it couldn't get much worse in the first quarter and a half. they couldn't miss and were blowing us out by over 20, shooting over 80 percent lol. it seemed like the team rallied when melo went down.

      the beauty is maybe this will open woodson's eyes. he was forced to play stat more and feature him and he delivered. no doubt in my mind he could be averaging over 20 on a good percentage if given more shots.

      kidd also shot the ball well again, made a bunch of clutch shots. novak made some shots too. we avoided a terrible loss.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by kNicksGiants View Post
        just because you're open doesn't mean it's a good shot. especially if you're missing repeatedly.

        i read a stat that said JR shoots the 3 ball this year at 40% when it's a catch and shoot, but he shoots the 3 at 6% off the dribble. someone tell him not to ever shoot a 3 off the dribble lol.

        i don't agree that melo needs to be surrounded with shooters either. it's helps the spacing when he isos but when the ball is kicked out to an open guy he doesn't have to take the shot. why not dribble in and attack the rim off the close out? get the defense to collapse and drop it off to a big. shump isn't even a threat offensively, yet he's set up tyson several times by simply attacking the rim and then passing it to him when the d collapses.

        we don't need a great jumpshooter... we need a smart 2 way player that knows how to play the game. this knicks team is full of low iq players. felton has tunnel vision on the pick n roll. JR is JR. kidd shows his smarts all the time but physically he's not capable of what his mind wants him to do most of the time.

        what the knicks really need is a great or even just good solid pg that is more pass first but can shoot. knicks backcourt is atrocious, same problem we've had the last several years.
        LOL 6% off the dribble I have to look into that its almost to horrible to be believable. If that is he should be benched every time he takes 1 off the dribble

        Comment


        • Originally posted by kNicksGiants View Post
          just because you're open doesn't mean it's a good shot. especially if you're missing repeatedly.

          i read a stat that said JR shoots the 3 ball this year at 40% when it's a catch and shoot, but he shoots the 3 at 6% off the dribble. someone tell him not to ever shoot a 3 off the dribble lol.

          i don't agree that melo needs to be surrounded with shooters either. it's helps the spacing when he isos but when the ball is kicked out to an open guy he doesn't have to take the shot. why not dribble in and attack the rim off the close out? get the defense to collapse and drop it off to a big. shump isn't even a threat offensively, yet he's set up tyson several times by simply attacking the rim and then passing it to him when the d collapses.

          we don't need a great jumpshooter... we need a smart 2 way player that knows how to play the game. this knicks team is full of low iq players. felton has tunnel vision on the pick n roll. JR is JR. kidd shows his smarts all the time but physically he's not capable of what his mind wants him to do most of the time.

          what the knicks really need is a great or even just good solid pg that is more pass first but can shoot. knicks backcourt is atrocious, same problem we've had the last several years.
          A jump shooter that can take it to the basket and has a high basketball IQ is going to be a 10 million dollar a year player its just not feasible. If he isnt 10 million he will be 6'2 combo guard that will be a huge liability on defense at the 2. Knicks will just have to pray they hit the lottery in the draft and steal a max type player with a pick in the 20's. I'ts so depressing watching a team that I know this is the best it can do , a 4-6 seed in the East. All that cap room they had ,the years of being terrible to not even be close to being good enough. The team is maxed out with 2 draft picks in the next 4 years and no young players. Do u guys realize how dark the coming days are.
          Last edited by Redeyejedi; 03-04-2013, 11:13 PM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by L.T.56 View Post
            knicks comeback and win 102-97
            what a game

            Comment


            • 4-6 seed? we're currently the 3rd seed. i see us finishing between 2 and 4.

              and i said it doesn't have to be a jump shooter. i said a smart 2 way player that can take it to the basket.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by kNicksGiants View Post
                4-6 seed? we're currently the 3rd seed. i see us finishing between 2 and 4.

                and i said it doesn't have to be a jump shooter. i said a smart 2 way player that can take it to the basket.
                I think they will get passed by the Bulls and maybe the Nets by the end of the year. I think they could beat the Nets in a playoff series probably would go 7. Dont think they are beating Heat,Pacers,Bulls for sure.

                Comment


                • bahahahHahahHH

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Redeyejedi View Post
                    I think they will get passed by the Bulls and maybe the Nets by the end of the year. I think they could beat the Nets in a playoff series probably would go 7. Dont think they are beating Heat,Pacers,Bulls for sure.
                    strange but out of the three you mentioned I think we matchup best vs Miami. For some reason bulls and pacers just have our number. We're 1-5 vs those two, beating pacers early in season but losing next two to them and all three to Chicago. And some of those games were not competitive. Miami on the other hand we have a 2-1 record against winning the two in blowouts and had a pretty good lead in the third one until the heat came back late and won it.
                    Football has been very, very good to us.
                    After losing seasons 2013-15, the giants put up 11 wins in 16.. they are on way Back
                    But for now we can console ourselves with this fact-

                    # of Super Bowl victories since 1985:

                    1-Chicago, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Indianapolis, New Orleans, Seattle
                    2-Washington, Green Bay, Pittsburgh, Baltimore
                    3-San Francisco, Dallas, Denver
                    4-New York Giants!!!
                    5-NE
                    Let's make it 5 in 2016 so we can be on a LINE NE again!!!

                    ***Stat provided by "Schloss22"***

                    Comment


                    • Bad part is if we can get by Boston ( which won't be easy by any means ), the Nets or Atlanta in the First Round we would then be forced to deal with and eliminate either Chicago or Indiana just to be able to get a shot at Miami.
                      Football has been very, very good to us.
                      After losing seasons 2013-15, the giants put up 11 wins in 16.. they are on way Back
                      But for now we can console ourselves with this fact-

                      # of Super Bowl victories since 1985:

                      1-Chicago, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Indianapolis, New Orleans, Seattle
                      2-Washington, Green Bay, Pittsburgh, Baltimore
                      3-San Francisco, Dallas, Denver
                      4-New York Giants!!!
                      5-NE
                      Let's make it 5 in 2016 so we can be on a LINE NE again!!!

                      ***Stat provided by "Schloss22"***

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by miked1958 View Post
                        strange but out of the three you mentioned I think we matchup best vs Miami. For some reason bulls and pacers just have our number. We're 1-5 vs those two, beating pacers early in season but losing next two to them and all three to Chicago. And some of those games were not competitive. Miami on the other hand we have a 2-1 record against winning the two in blowouts and had a pretty good lead in the third one until the heat came back late and won it.
                        If the Heat come to play Knicks cant win. Knicks would have a game or 2 where they shoot lights out from 3 and win but they cant win 4 out of 7.

                        The thing that sux is this team cant win and they have no assets to make the team better, they cant even decide to blow it up and go through the draft because Denver owns 2014,2016 Knicks picks.
                        Last edited by Redeyejedi; 03-06-2013, 08:33 AM.

                        Comment


                        • What do u guys think of this NBA Draft video I did branching out
                          Nerlens Noel
                          Last edited by Redeyejedi; 03-06-2013, 01:40 PM.

                          Comment


                          • denver has the right to swap their pick with ours in 2016, very different.

                            we didn't have our full team for any of the games against the bulls or pacers and barely lost to the pacers on the road without melo, no they don't have our number.

                            we're finishing as a top 4 seed this year. i'll bet my account on it with any of you debbie downer posters.

                            Comment


                            • the bulls and nets have been playing mediocre ball for awhile now and are like 5 or 6 games back in the loss column yet you guys think they're gonna pass us? lol talk about having faith in your team. i can't stand the doom and gloom that plagues so many knicks fans.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by kNicksGiants View Post
                                denver has the right to swap their pick with ours in 2016, very different.

                                we didn't have our full team for any of the games against the bulls or pacers and barely lost to the pacers on the road without melo, no they don't have our number.

                                we're finishing as a top 4 seed this year. i'll bet my account on it with any of you debbie downer posters.
                                We better hope Denver is horrible which is certainly possible by then.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X