Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Would you rather draft??

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Would you rather draft??

    [quote user="BlueSanta"]Luke has the most value of any of these guys mentioned.

    But his position is not 1 of more need than the others , thats just your opinion and I dont agree.
    [/quote]Well I have said it before. I would not be shocked to see Reese take a DE or DT at 32, if he feels they are the BPA at 32.


    BlueSanta, could you see Reese trading out of the first rd? I wonder if the Rams would trade their 2nd and the Redskins 2nd to move into the 1st rd?

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Would you rather draft??



      Theres zero chance kuechly makes it to us at 32... If he was to make it to 20-23 range, i'd consider trading up and getting him, no ifs or buts about it... The problem is, hes not making it outta the teens, and i'll put anything on that...




      A player i could see the Giants targeting at 32 is Jerel Worthy DT Michigan St.. Hes got big upside, and its a positon the giants think very highly of, and it would not surprise me one bit if Worthy is the pick...

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Would you rather draft??

        If Kuechly is there it would be a shocker- Baltimore would have to pass him up. Some have him going as high as 12 to Seattle but I just can not see that. Philadelphia just got their guy in D. Ryans so they will most likely go with DT pick. Baltimore is looking for their replacement at MLB so unless we move up and pick prior to them I don't see that happening. Hill most likely will also be gone. Fleener I could see being snagged up by San Fran- they got their receivers now and Defense is set and not sure OL is worth the pick there. Harbaugh loves Stanford guys. I think Giants may be taking the V Tech RB at 32 and looking at TE in 3rd or 4th round (Egnew possibly?).

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Would you rather draft??

          [quote user="tonyt830"][quote user="BlueSanta"]Luke has the most value of any of these guys mentioned.

          But his position is not 1 of more need than the others , thats just your opinion and I dont agree.
          [/quote]Well I have said it before. I would not be shocked to see Reese take a DE or DT at 32, if he feels they are the BPA at 32.


          BlueSanta, could you see Reese trading out of the first rd? I wonder if the Rams would trade their 2nd and the Redskins 2nd to move into the 1st rd?[/quote]

          I dont know, its not impossible, but I dont think it likely either, especially withe the Skins. I do think a trade back is more likely than a trade up.

          It all depends on Reese board. If you believe his post Draft comments in the past couple years he has had guys he rated way higher than where we were picking fall right into his lap.

          But, if this years 32nd pick rolls around and there isnt a pick he loves, its not impossible that he might trade down.
          sigpic

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Would you rather draft??



            [quote user="BlueSanta"][quote user="tonyt830"][quote user="BlueSanta"]Luke has the most value of any of these guys mentioned.

            But his position is not 1 of more need than the others , thats just your opinion and I dont agree.
            [/quote]Well I have said it before. I would not be shocked to see Reese take a DE or DT at 32, if he feels they are the BPA at 32. BlueSanta, could you see Reese trading out of the first rd? I wonder if the Rams would trade their 2nd and the Redskins 2nd to move into the 1st rd?[/quote]

            I dont know, its not impossible, but I dont think it likely either, especially withe the Skins. I do think a trade back is more likely than a trade up.

            It all depends on Reese board. If you believe his post Draft comments in the past couple years he has had guys he rated way higher than where we were picking fall right into his lap.

            But, if this years 32nd pick rolls around and there isnt a pick he loves, its not impossible that he might trade down.
            [/quote]Oh if I mistyped or you misunderstood, but when I mentioned trade down, possibly with the Rams, I meant their 2 2nd rd picks---1 of which is the one the Rams acquired from the Skins to get the overall number 2 pick.







            But yeah I agree trade down would be more likely than trade up in the 1st rd.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Would you rather draft??

              [quote user="tonyt830"]

              [quote user="BlueSanta"][quote user="tonyt830"][quote user="BlueSanta"]Luke has the most value of any of these guys mentioned.

              But his position is not 1 of more need than the others , thats just your opinion and I dont agree.
              [/quote]Well I have said it before. I would not be shocked to see Reese take a DE or DT at 32, if he feels they are the BPA at 32. BlueSanta, could you see Reese trading out of the first rd? I wonder if the Rams would trade their 2nd and the Redskins 2nd to move into the 1st rd?[/quote]

              I dont know, its not impossible, but I dont think it likely either, especially withe the Skins. I do think a trade back is more likely than a trade up.

              It all depends on Reese board. If you believe his post Draft comments in the past couple years he has had guys he rated way higher than where we were picking fall right into his lap.

              But, if this years 32nd pick rolls around and there isnt a pick he loves, its not impossible that he might trade down.
              [/quote]Oh if I mistyped or you misunderstood, but when I mentioned trade down, possibly with the Rams, I meant their 2 2nd rd picks---1 of which is the one the Rams acquired from the Skins to get the overall number 2 pick.







              But yeah I agree trade down would be more likely than trade up in the 1st rd.

              [/quote]

              I agree, though I am curious to see how the slotted picks / rookie salary cap affects JR's aggression on draft day.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Would you rather draft??

                [quote user="AceOspadZ4"]Non- need positions such as Fleener or Stephen Hill, or a need position like Kuechly?[/quote]I disagree they arent needs. The Giants need another weapon in the passing game

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Would you rather draft??

                  Other than RT, I'm starting to think that WR is our biggest need

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Would you rather draft??

                    I thinkmthenonly positions we know they won't be drafting in the 1st are QB, P, and K. One than hose I could see any other position being taken in the 1st based on BPA or need.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Would you rather draft??

                      I'd really like Kuechly or Hill in this draft.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Would you rather draft??

                        I don't understand why TE is still such a big need. Didn't we just pick up Bennett? I mean big enough to use our 1st pick on? I just don't see it.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Would you rather draft??

                          [quote user="Gmenfan87"]I don't understand why TE is still such a big need. Didn't we just pick up Bennett? I mean big enough to use our 1st pick on? I just don't see it.[/quote]

                          A guy with 85 career catches in 4 seasons who has a 1 year contract?

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Would you rather draft??

                            Lets say Bennett becomes a great player who fulfills his supposed inner unleashed potential... then he probably leaves the giants and TE becomes a need again

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Would you rather draft??

                              Even if Bennett, a guy who has done nothing since entering the league, becomes a good TE here, don't they need depth? They lost 2 TE's in the Super Bowl and I like Bear and all but they need someone else.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Would you rather draft??

                                [quote user="Gmenfan87"]I don't understand why TE is still such a big need. Didn't we just pick up Bennett? I mean big enough to use our 1st pick on? I just don't see it.[/quote]

                                Are you serious?

                                ballard - injured might be out for a couple of games
                                Beckum - Injured might be out for a couple of games
                                Hopkins - practice squad guy, only mentioned cause we lost the two up above
                                Pascoe - he's still have ways to go to prove he can handle being a starting TE
                                Bennett - i think everyone is putting way too much hope in this guy coming in and hitting the ground running. i'm not saying hes not going to be great but i'm also not saying he the answer right now.

                                we have the 32nd pick in the first which is almost like an early 2nd round pick. if we were in the teens or top ten then i might say well we do need a TE but non are top ten or fifteen material but its the 32 pick.... come on bruh

                                Retweeted by Rueben Randle
                                @Katdaddyjay 17h
                                @RuebenRandle @OBJ_3 @Giants
                                http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...ps625a51fb.jpg

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X