Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Would you rather draft??

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Would you rather draft??

    Non- need positions such as Fleener or Stephen Hill, or a need position like Kuechly?

  • #2
    Re: Would you rather draft??

    [quote user="AceOspadZ4"]Non- need positions such as Fleener or Stephen Hill, or a need position like Kuechly?[/quote]If Kuechly is there you take him no ifs, ands, or buts about it.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Would you rather draft??

      [quote user="XxBigWhitxX"][quote user="AceOspadZ4"]Non- need positions such as Fleener or Stephen Hill, or a need position like Kuechly?[/quote]If Kuechly is there you take him no ifs, ands, or buts about it.[/quote]

      Yeah definitely...Luke would certainly qualify as the BPA.
      "You killed my family, and I don't like that kind of thing."

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Would you rather draft??

        Kuechly would fill a need & be BPA......but there's no way that happens......one thing I know is,whoever we pick,it'll be someone none of us expect.....

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Would you rather draft??

          I wouldn't say no way profootball talks mock has him dropping to us and selecting him.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Would you rather draft??

            [quote user="BluGiantPies"]I wouldn't say no way profootball talks mock has him dropping to us and selecting him.[/quote]

            Saw that mock and stopped reading after the Colts took RG3 first.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Would you rather draft??

              I think TE and WR are bigger needs than MLB.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Would you rather draft??

                [quote user="slipknottin"]I think TE and WR are bigger needs than MLB.[/quote]

                For the first round pick? I mean I think the Giants bigger needs are LB and O-Line but this 32 pick can go anyway depending on the how the top 5 picks go.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Would you rather draft??

                  I do think the Giants have their starters set at this moment in time at WR and TE but still theres a lot of questions unanswered about the depth behind in those positions. With out a question the Giants struggled when MLB position lost depth and a no one seemed to grab the starting role by the horns. That been said I don't see major holes in the actual roster that Reese can't fill with quality and talent in this years draft. BPA at DT, TE, RB, ILB or WR are all possibilities but I do see Reese taking a even keel value-need pick this year at 32.
                  " Success is never final, but failure can be " B.P.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Would you rather draft??

                    [quote user="NYG_88"]For the first round pick? I mean I think the Giants bigger needs are LB and O-Line but this 32 pick can go anyway depending on the how the top 5 picks go.[/quote]

                    For any pick, doesnt matter.

                    Bigger argument is player rankings, is Kuechly a better player than Fleener. Which I do believe he is.

                    Giants always draft mix of value and position of need.

                    Both Fleener & Kuechly would fit both if avaliable at 32. So its likely a matter of which they think is the better player.

                    But I think that decision is made for the giants, very improbable that both are avaliable at 32. And I dont think Hightower is as good a player as Fleener, not by a long shot

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Would you rather draft??

                      [quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="NYG_88"]For the first round pick? I mean I think the Giants bigger needs are LB and O-Line but this 32 pick can go anyway depending on the how the top 5 picks go.[/quote]

                      For any pick, doesnt matter.

                      Bigger argument is player rankings, is Kuechly a better player than Fleener. Which I do believe he is.

                      Giants always draft mix of value and position of need.

                      Both Fleener & Kuechly would fit both if avaliable at 32. So its likely a matter of which they think is the better player.

                      But I think that decision is made for the giants, very improbable that both are avaliable at 32. And I dont think Hightower is as good a player as Fleener, not by a long shot[/quote]

                      If it presents itself between Kuechly and Fleener for the 32nd pick, it would be interesting which they would go. Think most Giants fan would choose Kuechly and I would too.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Would you rather draft??

                        Kuechly

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Would you rather draft??

                          [quote user="slipknottin"]I think TE and WR are bigger needs than MLB.[/quote]

                          Slip thank you so much for this i couldn't of said it better myself.

                          we spent like 3 picks on LB's last year. do we really need to spend a 1st on one this year?

                          don't get me wrong if Keuchley is there then its BPA and i agree but other than him i think, TE/OL/WR/RB are bigger needs at 32 in that order

                          imho

                          Retweeted by Rueben Randle
                          @Katdaddyjay 17h
                          @RuebenRandle @OBJ_3 @Giants
                          http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...ps625a51fb.jpg

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Would you rather draft??

                            Though I like Fleener, if Kuechly somehow drops to 32, I would be happy if Reese took him.



                            But it all depends who Reese and the Giants have on their boards as BPA. If Kuechly is gone, and they feel Fleener is BPA---once again, I'm ok with that.


                            But since we signed Bennett, albeit to a 1 yr deal, I don't think we have to sweat the TE position in rd 1. Maybe a guy like Green or Egnew in the 3rd or 4th could be an option.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Would you rather draft??

                              Luke has the most value of any of these guys mentioned.

                              But his position is not 1 of more need than the others , thats just your opinion and I dont agree.
                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X