Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lavonte David

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lavonte David

    Why don't more people talk about this kid!? I've been watching tape and the guy is a phenomenal Athlete at Linebacker. The only problem is that he's a little light but the guy is rocked up.

  • #2
    Re: Lavonte David

    [quote user="XxBigWhitxX"]Why don't more people talk about this kid!? I've been watching tape and the guy is a phenomenal Athlete at Linebacker. The only problem is that he's a little light but the guy is rocked up.[/quote]Not sure where you've been but Lavonte David has gotten plenty of talk in these draft threads. I like this guy a lot and think he could/should be drawing interest from the Giants. I don't see hardly any holes in his game. I think the main knock on him is his size and where does he play on the field. I know he's a projected weakside LB, but I think he could convert over and play safety at the next level.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Lavonte David

      [quote user="heavyhitter"][quote user="XxBigWhitxX"]Why don't more people talk about this kid!? I've been watching tape and the guy is a phenomenal Athlete at Linebacker. The only problem is that he's a little light but the guy is rocked up.[/quote]Not sure where you've been but Lavonte David has gotten plenty of talk in these draft threads. I like this guy a lot and think he could/should be drawing interest from the Giants. I don't see hardly any holes in his game. I think the main knock on him is his size and where does he play on the field. I know he's a projected weakside LB, but I think he could convert over and play safety at the next level.
      [/quote]he has the size/ speed to play the linebacker pseudo-safety-role that Fewell loves

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Lavonte David

        [quote user="XxBigWhitxX"][quote user="heavyhitter"][quote user="XxBigWhitxX"]Why don't more people talk about this kid!? I've been watching tape and the guy is a phenomenal Athlete at Linebacker. The only problem is that he's a little light but the guy is rocked up.[/quote]Not sure where you've been but Lavonte David has gotten plenty of talk in these draft threads. I like this guy a lot and think he could/should be drawing interest from the Giants. I don't see hardly any holes in his game. I think the main knock on him is his size and where does he play on the field. I know he's a projected weakside LB, but I think he could convert over and play safety at the next level.
        [/quote]he has the size/ speed to play the linebacker pseudo-safety-role that Fewell loves[/quote]He's projected to go somewhere in the 2nd round though. You think he'll still be on the board at 64?

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Lavonte David

          NFL Combine 2012 Risers: Lavonte David

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Lavonte David

            No way in hell. we might honestly HAVE TO take him at 32

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Lavonte David

              [quote user="XxBigWhitxX"]No way in hell. we might honestly HAVE TO take him at 32[/quote]You're probably right, he'll be off the board at 64.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Lavonte David

                [quote user="heavyhitter"][quote user="XxBigWhitxX"]No way in hell. we might honestly HAVE TO take him at 32[/quote]You're probably right, he'll be off the board at 64.
                [/quote]

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Lavonte David

                  [quote user="heavyhitter"][quote user="XxBigWhitxX"]No way in hell. we might honestly HAVE TO take him at 32[/quote]You're probably right, he'll be off the board at 64.
                  [/quote]In McShay's latest mock he has us taking him at 32.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Lavonte David

                    [quote user="XxBigWhitxX"][quote user="heavyhitter"][quote user="XxBigWhitxX"]No way in hell. we might honestly HAVE TO take him at 32[/quote]You're probably right, he'll be off the board at 64.
                    [/quote]In McShay's latest mock he has us taking him at 32.[/quote]May be a slight reach, but not by much. Can't say I'm surprised though

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Lavonte David

                      Being that he's like 6'1 I dnt think 235 is too light

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Lavonte David

                        It is the biggest knock against him. he is as good a tackler and as instinctual as Kuechly, As fast as Kendricks, and has the coverage ability of Harrison smith.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Lavonte David



                          [quote user="myles2424"]Being that he's like 6'1 I dnt think 235 is too light[/quote]







                          Agree, I think he will get lost amongst the big men, besides we already have two "light" by LB standards guys now. If you are going to pick someone take a look at the kid from West Virginia, looks like he might be a little closer to what we want.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Lavonte David

                            [quote user="Captain Chaos"]

                            [quote user="myles2424"]Being that he's like 6'1 I dnt think 235 is too light[/quote]




                            *




                            Agree, I think he will get lost amongst the big men, besides we already have two "light" by LB standards guys now.* If you are going to pick someone take a look at the kid from West Virginia, looks like he might be a little closer to what we want.

                            [/quote]If your talking about Bruce Irving the guy is a DE/34OLB. he has no value as a LB in a 4-3.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Lavonte David

                              [quote user="XxBigWhitxX"][quote user="Captain Chaos"]

                              [quote user="myles2424"]Being that he's like 6'1 I dnt think 235 is too light[/quote]







                              Agree, I think he will get lost amongst the big men, besides we already have two "light" by LB standards guys now. If you are going to pick someone take a look at the kid from West Virginia, looks like he might be a little closer to what we want.

                              [/quote]If your talking about Bruce Irving the guy is a DE/34OLB. he has no value as a LB in a 4-3.[/quote]

                              He is probably gonna be a 3-4 OLB maybe a 4-3 OLB I think he is too small to be a DE for anyone but the eagles

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X