Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DE or WR in the 1st

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DE or WR in the 1st

    I think it's the only two positions that make sense for us to pick. If Stephen Hill is available I think he is our pick, someone who can stretch the field for Nicks & Cruz.

    If he is gone I think we go best available DE.

    Yes we need OL / RB / TE help, but those positions aren't as highly valued by our front office. Skill positions (WR / DE / CB ) always seem to come first.

  • #2
    Re: DE or WR in the 1st

    DE very possible if it's the right one. No on WR ,
    Jernigan is our # 3. I think we get insurance for Nicks not a compliment to him. We already have Cruz and Jernigan for that. Plus is Hixon done? We don't spend a one here especially on a guy like Hill. Comes from the wrong system at Ga Tech to come right in and play for us. Also, he has questionable production in college, though the system did not feature him. Showed some spunk at the combine and could be a good option at 2 but I 'd rather address it in round 4,5,or 6. There is good depth at WR in this draft. I think I would like DT rather than DE in round one -
    Worthy?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: DE or WR in the 1st

      DE or DT in round 1, not WR

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: DE or WR in the 1st

        We picked up a DT. I think we pickup DE insurance for OSI's slot.maybe NOT in the first picks but somewhere in the draft. our WR core is excellent.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: DE or WR in the 1st

          Kendall Wright or Ruben Randle at WR would be great if they are there, but I'd love to get another good young DE if we could. Osi and Kiwi are on the last years of their deals, so grabbing a guy that can be a talented contributor at that spot in his second year is a great idea.

          Reese will probably go BPA, but I think he'll look real hard at pulling the trigger on a DE if a good one is there like Nick Perry.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: DE or WR in the 1st



            [quote user="Warchild"]I think it's the only two positions that make sense for us to pick. If Stephen Hill is available I think he is our pick, someone who can stretch the field for Nicks & Cruz. If he is gone I think we go best available DE. Yes we need OL / RB / TE help, but those positions aren't as highly valued by our front office. Skill positions (WR / DE / CB ) always seem to come first.[/quote]




            We have probably the bestgroup of DE's in the league and one of, if not thee most prolific WR tandem in the NFL.




            How on earth are these our two biggest needs in the draft?




            O line, RB, LB, safety are all more important needs.

            Admit nothing. Deny everything. Make counter accusations.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: DE or WR in the 1st

              [quote user="Morehead State"]

              [quote user="Warchild"]I think it's the only two positions that make sense for us to pick. If Stephen Hill is available I think he is our pick, someone who can stretch the field for Nicks & Cruz. If he is gone I think we go best available DE. Yes we need OL / RB / TE help, but those positions aren't as highly valued by our front office. Skill positions (WR / DE / CB ) always seem to come first.[/quote]




              We have probably the bestgroup of DE's in the league and one of, if not thee most prolific WR tandem in the NFL.




              How on earth are these our two biggest needs in the draft?




              O line, RB, LB, safety are all more important needs.

              [/quote]
              Osi and Kiwi are in the last years of their deal, we just lost Tollefson, and Tuck gets nicked up.

              A guy like Nick Perry is a good pick if he is there at 32.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: DE or WR in the 1st

                But we have Kiwi, Osi, Tuck, & JPP, and we have Nicks, Cruz, Jerrigan, and a bunch of other wr's :O

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: DE or WR in the 1st

                  Please give me a break away scat back in the mold of Meggett or Sproles. A guy who returns punts, not fair catches them and also is a third down nightmare for D coordinators.

                  Please.

                  I am asking nicely.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: DE or WR in the 1st

                    [quote user="IamGiantsfan"]But we have Kiwi, Osi, Tuck, & JPP, and we have Nicks, Cruz, Jerrigan, and a bunch of other wr's :O[/quote]

                    Osi is easily negated by the run and gets taken out of the game easily. need a guy who can get around the end and stretch the line out and help allow a DE blitz or LB blitz.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: DE or WR in the 1st

                      Not a chance we take a DE in the first round. There are no good DE's in this draft that warrant a 1st round pick.


                      DT on the other hand is a very real possibility.
                      "Once a Giant, ALWAYS, a Giant."

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: DE or WR in the 1st

                        [quote user="Roswell777"]Please give me a break away scat back in the mold of Meggett or Sproles.

                        Please.

                        I am asking nicely.[/quote]

                        LaMichael James would be a GREAT pick in Round 2 for us.

                        Get Eli a weapon to throw short passes too like Drew Brees has, and see Eli p[lay even better this year.

                        I am with you on that!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: DE or WR in the 1st

                          [quote user="NYG4lifeNYK"]Not a chance we take a DE in the first round. There are no good DE's in this draft that warrant a 1st round pick.


                          DT on the other hand is a very real possibility.
                          [/quote]
                          I agree!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: DE or WR in the 1st

                            [quote user="Tommy_Ribs"][quote user="Morehead State"]


                            [quote user="Warchild"]I think it's the only two positions that make sense for us to pick. If Stephen Hill is available I think he is our pick, someone who can stretch the field for Nicks & Cruz. If he is gone I think we go best available DE. Yes we need OL / RB / TE help, but those positions aren't as highly valued by our front office. Skill positions (WR / DE / CB ) always seem to come first.[/quote]




                            We have probably the bestgroup of DE's in the league and one of, if not thee most prolific WR tandem in the NFL.




                            How on earth are these our two biggest needs in the draft?




                            O line, RB, LB, safety are all more important needs.




                            [/quote]
                            Osi and Kiwi are in the last years of their deal, we just lost Tollefson, and Tuck gets nicked up.

                            A guy like Nick Perry is a good pick if he is there at 32.
                            [/quote]




                            I can't predict what JR will do of course, but to say that these 2 positions are the only real options makes no sense to me. I suppose you could make a case for almost any position on the field, but to say that these are the only 2 logical options.................?




                            How about our RB position? Our starter has chronic foot problems and our back up wouldn't make the roster on many other teams. Brown didn't see the field last year and will start the season on suspension, and Scott is completely unproven.




                            DT is thin, O line is very uncertain and we are also thin at safety and our backup CB's are a huge question mark.




                            BUT




                            Our two starting WR's had 2700 yards together and our DE's are great. And these are the positions he claims are our most glairing needs. Enough so for him to say that no other position is an option.




                            The OP makes no sense to me.

                            Admit nothing. Deny everything. Make counter accusations.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: DE or WR in the 1st

                              [quote user="Brandon jacobs"]Osi is easily negated by the run and gets taken out of the game easily. need a guy who can get around the end and stretch the line out and help allow a DE blitz or LB blitz.[/quote]

                              Oh yea? We are back on that fallacy again are we?


                              Go ahead and watch this Osi video for me and for yourself.

                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nlKDo_m694
                              "Once a Giant, ALWAYS, a Giant."

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X