Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mock Drafts

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mock Drafts

    Need help here. Ive seen players mentioned from TEs to OLs to DLs to LBs and even more secondary help. Who do you think our first and second round picks may be. I guess someone may see a real focus but would like a real consensus. I know Reese and his " war room " crew will make the calls but some guys out there can read their minds better than I can.Oponions anyone

  • #2
    Re: Mock Drafts

    really hoping for fleener in the 1st. i dont see san fran taking fleener like some people do. they have davis and walker at TE and moss, manningham, and crabtree at WR, there wouldnt be room for him. denver is also another team who could have interest, but i think they go defense. if fleener is there at 32, tkae him.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Mock Drafts

      [quote user="nygfan0816"]really hoping for fleener in the 1st. i dont see san fran taking fleener like some people do. they have davis and walker at TE and moss, manningham, and crabtree at WR, there wouldnt be room for him. denver is also another team who could have interest, but i think they go defense. if fleener is there at 32, tkae him.[/quote]

      I just don't see the point of a receiver/te in the first. If you have Nicks and Cruz on the outside anyone will look like a beast in the middle. Just draft guys that are athletes and Eli will make them superstars. Look what he did with freaking Jake Ballard!!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Mock Drafts

        [quote user="Spizi"][quote user="nygfan0816"]really hoping for fleener in the 1st. i dont see san fran taking fleener like some people do. they have davis and walker at TE and moss, manningham, and crabtree at WR, there wouldnt be room for him. denver is also another team who could have interest, but i think they go defense. if fleener is there at 32, tkae him.[/quote]

        I just don't see the point of a receiver/te in the first. If you have Nicks and Cruz on the outside anyone will look like a beast in the middle. Just draft guys that are athletes and Eli will make them superstars. Look what he did with freaking Jake Ballard!![/quote]

        why give a sports car ****ty oil when you can afford the premium.
        it is completely asinine to say give eli whatever we can he will make them good, we know he will but why not give him better so he can make them great.
        the fact that we only have nicks and cruz is the reason why we need another threat. go back to the super bowl if manningham didn't make that catch we lose the game and your all calling for his head or saying we definitely need to draft another WR early. you cannot...cannot just say we have two receivers were fine, they will get double coverage and if no one can get open eli gets sacked looking for options.

        here's the point of a TE/WR early in the draft even if its at 32. we have an elite QB who can make plays with not so great talent ( beckum / ballard ) give him the tools to out score teams instead of coming back in the 4th gain a size-able lead in the first and let our defense as it stands now Tee off on opposing offenses cause they're now playing catch up.

        defense wins championships... only cause the offense puts the team ahead for them to pin their ears back. we need balance and the offense is slightly unbalanced as it stands now.

        FFS

        Retweeted by Rueben Randle
        @Katdaddyjay 17h
        @RuebenRandle @OBJ_3 @Giants
        http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...ps625a51fb.jpg

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Mock Drafts

          [quote user="rainierjef"][quote user="Spizi"][quote user="nygfan0816"]really hoping for fleener in the 1st. i dont see san fran taking fleener like some people do. they have davis and walker at TE and moss, manningham, and crabtree at WR, there wouldnt be room for him. denver is also another team who could have interest, but i think they go defense. if fleener is there at 32, tkae him.[/quote]

          I just don't see the point of a receiver/te in the first. If you have Nicks and Cruz on the outside anyone will look like a beast in the middle. Just draft guys that are athletes and Eli will make them superstars. Look what he did with freaking Jake Ballard!![/quote]

          why give a sports car ****ty oil when you can afford the premium.
          it is completely asinine to say give eli whatever we can he will make them good, we know he will but why not give him better so he can make them great.
          the fact that we only have nicks and cruz is the reason why we need another threat. go back to the super bowl if manningham didn't make that catch we lose the game and your all calling for his head or saying we definitely need to draft another WR early. you cannot...cannot just say we have two receivers were fine, they will get double coverage and if no one can get open eli gets sacked looking for options.

          here's the point of a TE/WR early in the draft even if its at 32. we have an elite QB who can make plays with not so great talent ( beckum / ballard ) give him the tools to out score teams instead of coming back in the 4th gain a size-able lead in the first and let our defense as it stands now Tee off on opposing offenses cause they're now playing catch up.

          defense wins championships... only cause the offense puts the team ahead for them to pin their ears back. we need balance and the offense is slightly unbalanced as it stands now.

          FFS
          [/quote]

          You're not understanding my point... There is no need to waste a high pick on a WR or TE because we can get an athlete at those positions in the later rounds. Just imagine that Jake Ballard ran a 4.6 instead of a 5.0. Ballard, a guy with no real natural talent, would have went from an average TE to dominant playmaker in our offense last year. That is why I'm saying we should take a guy like Egnew in the third or Streeter in the 4th instead of say Fleener or Hill in the first.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Mock Drafts

            [quote user="Spizi"][quote user="rainierjef"][quote user="Spizi"][quote user="nygfan0816"]really hoping for fleener in the 1st. i dont see san fran taking fleener like some people do. they have davis and walker at TE and moss, manningham, and crabtree at WR, there wouldnt be room for him. denver is also another team who could have interest, but i think they go defense. if fleener is there at 32, tkae him.[/quote]

            I just don't see the point of a receiver/te in the first. If you have Nicks and Cruz on the outside anyone will look like a beast in the
            middle. Just draft guys that are athletes and Eli will make them
            superstars. Look what he did with freaking Jake Ballard!![/quote]


            why give a sports car ****ty oil when you can afford the
            premium.
            it is completely asinine to say give eli whatever we
            can he will make them good, we know he will but why not give
            him better so he can make them great.
            the fact that we only
            have nicks and cruz is the reason why we need another threat.
            go back to the super bowl if manningham didn't make that catch
            we lose the game and your all calling for his head or saying we
            definitely need to draft another WR early. you cannot...cannot
            just say we have two receivers were fine, they will get double
            coverage and if no one can get open eli gets sacked looking for
            options.

            here's the point of a TE/WR early in the draft
            even if its at 32. we have an elite QB who can make plays with
            not so great talent ( beckum / ballard ) give him the tools to out
            score teams instead of coming back in the 4th gain a size-able
            lead in the first and let our defense as it stands now Tee off on
            opposing offenses cause they're now playing catch up.


            defense wins championships... only cause the offense puts
            the team ahead for them to pin their ears back. we need balance
            and the offense is slightly unbalanced as it stands now.


            FFS
            [/quote]


            I get your point and agree with it. We don't need to spend a #1 on a WR .Jernigan is the planned number 3. We need depth not an immediate starter. Our biggest FA acquisition is a TE, we don't go #1 there either. There are TE's that fit our needs with later picks. We need a RB, Some OL and DL help and a safety. A stud LB in one would be ok.

            You're not understanding my point... There is no need to waste a high pick on a WR or TE because we can get an athlete at those positions in the later rounds. Just imagine that Jake Ballard ran a 4.6 instead of a 5.0. Ballard, a guy with no real natural talent, would have went from an average TE to dominant playmaker in our offense last year. That is why I'm saying we should take a guy like Egnew in the third or Streeter in the 4th instead of say Fleener or Hill in the first.[/quote]

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Mock Drafts

              Man I posted that in the wrong spot again! Geez! Anyway I get your point Spizi

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Mock Drafts

                [quote user="Spizi"]

                You're not understanding my point... There is no need to waste a high pick on a WR or TE because we can get an athlete at those positions in the later rounds. [/quote]

                Athletes dont contribute their rookie year...

                And Ballard has plenty of natural talent. Good hands, understands how to get open, finds holes in zone defenses. All things an "athlete" does not do.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Mock Drafts

                  [quote user="Spizi"][quote user="rainierjef"][quote user="Spizi"][quote user="nygfan0816"]really hoping for fleener in the 1st. i dont see san fran taking fleener like some people do. they have davis and walker at TE and moss, manningham, and crabtree at WR, there wouldnt be room for him. denver is also another team who could have interest, but i think they go defense. if fleener is there at 32, tkae him.[/quote]

                  I just don't see the point of a receiver/te in the first. If you have Nicks and Cruz on the outside anyone will look like a beast in the middle. Just draft guys that are athletes and Eli will make them superstars. Look what he did with freaking Jake Ballard!![/quote]

                  why give a sports car ****ty oil when you can afford the premium.
                  it is completely asinine to say give eli whatever we can he will make them good, we know he will but why not give him better so he can make them great.
                  the fact that we only have nicks and cruz is the reason why we need another threat. go back to the super bowl if manningham didn't make that catch we lose the game and your all calling for his head or saying we definitely need to draft another WR early. you cannot...cannot just say we have two receivers were fine, they will get double coverage and if no one can get open eli gets sacked looking for options.

                  here's the point of a TE/WR early in the draft even if its at 32. we have an elite QB who can make plays with not so great talent ( beckum / ballard ) give him the tools to out score teams instead of coming back in the 4th gain a size-able lead in the first and let our defense as it stands now Tee off on opposing offenses cause they're now playing catch up.

                  defense wins championships... only cause the offense puts the team ahead for them to pin their ears back. we need balance and the offense is slightly unbalanced as it stands now.

                  FFS
                  [/quote]

                  You're not understanding my point... There is no need to waste a high pick on a WR or TE because we can get an athlete at those positions in the later rounds. Just imagine that Jake Ballard ran a 4.6 instead of a 5.0. Ballard, a guy with no real natural talent, would have went from an average TE to dominant playmaker in our offense last year. That is why I'm saying we should take a guy like Egnew in the third or Streeter in the 4th instead of say Fleener or Hill in the first.[/quote]

                  You mean like Travis beckum?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Mock Drafts

                    [quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="Spizi"]

                    You're not understanding my point... There is no need to waste a high pick on a WR or TE because we can get an athlete at those positions in the later rounds. [/quote]

                    Athletes dont contribute their rookie year...

                    And Ballard has plenty of natural talent. Good hands, understands how to get open, finds holes in zone defenses. All things an "athlete" does not do.[/quote]

                    i wouldnt say ballard has good hands. hes had some drops

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Mock Drafts

                      [quote user="rainierjef"][quote user="Spizi"][quote user="nygfan0816"]really hoping for fleener in the 1st. i dont see san fran taking fleener like some people do. they have davis and walker at TE and moss, manningham, and crabtree at WR, there wouldnt be room for him. denver is also another team who could have interest, but i think they go defense. if fleener is there at 32, tkae him.[/quote]

                      I just don't see the point of a receiver/te in the first. If you have Nicks and Cruz on the outside anyone will look like a beast in the middle. Just draft guys that are athletes and Eli will make them superstars. Look what he did with freaking Jake Ballard!![/quote]

                      why give a sports car ****ty oil when you can afford the premium.
                      it is completely asinine to say give eli whatever we can he will make them good, we know he will but why not give him better so he can make them great.
                      the fact that we only have nicks and cruz is the reason why we need another threat. go back to the super bowl if manningham didn't make that catch we lose the game and your all calling for his head or saying we definitely need to draft another WR early. you cannot...cannot just say we have two receivers were fine, they will get double coverage and if no one can get open eli gets sacked looking for options.

                      here's the point of a TE/WR early in the draft even if its at 32. we have an elite QB who can make plays with not so great talent ( beckum / ballard ) give him the tools to out score teams instead of coming back in the 4th gain a size-able lead in the first and let our defense as it stands now Tee off on opposing offenses cause they're now playing catch up.

                      defense wins championships... only cause the offense puts the team ahead for them to pin their ears back. we need balance and the offense is slightly unbalanced as it stands now.

                      FFS
                      [/quote]The Packers had Jordy Nelson,Greg jennings,Donald Driver,James Jones ,Jerimichael Finley and they still took Randall Cobb in the second round. Are division is loaded with offensive talent with the Cowboys and Eagles. If the Giants want to win they have to keep the pedal to the floor on offense

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Mock Drafts

                        [quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="Spizi"]

                        You're not understanding my point... There is no need to waste a high pick on a WR or TE because we can get an athlete at those positions in the later rounds. [/quote]

                        Athletes dont contribute their rookie year...

                        And Ballard has plenty of natural talent. Good hands, understands how to get open, finds holes in zone defenses. All things an "athlete" does not do.[/quote]He just doesnt threaten the seam like Coby Fleener does

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Mock Drafts

                          [quote user="nevada11"]
                          i wouldnt say ballard has good hands. hes had some drops[/quote]

                          I dont neccessarily attribute drops to bad hands. Ballard has made some really tough grabs which I think is more meaningful. Drops I believe a lot of the time have more to do with concentration and looking to get upfield or not get hit before making the catch

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Mock Drafts

                            [quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="Spizi"]

                            You're not understanding my point... There is no need to waste a high pick on a WR or TE because we can get an athlete at those positions in the later rounds. [/quote]

                            Athletes dont contribute their rookie year...

                            And Ballard has plenty of natural talent. Good hands, understands how to get open, finds holes in zone defenses. All things an "athlete" does not do.[/quote]

                            I'm not saying like a dumbass track star who doesn't know how to play football. I'm talking about a decent football player who is an elite athlete. A guy like that could definitely contribute as a rookie.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Mock Drafts

                              [quote user="lawl"][quote user="Spizi"][quote user="rainierjef"][quote user="Spizi"][quote user="nygfan0816"]really hoping for fleener in the 1st. i dont see san fran taking fleener like some people do. they have davis and walker at TE and moss, manningham, and crabtree at WR, there wouldnt be room for him. denver is also another team who could have interest, but i think they go defense. if fleener is there at 32, tkae him.[/quote]

                              I just don't see the point of a receiver/te in the first. If you have Nicks and Cruz on the outside anyone will look like a beast in the middle. Just draft guys that are athletes and Eli will make them superstars. Look what he did with freaking Jake Ballard!![/quote]

                              why give a sports car ****ty oil when you can afford the premium.
                              it is completely asinine to say give eli whatever we can he will make them good, we know he will but why not give him better so he can make them great.
                              the fact that we only have nicks and cruz is the reason why we need another threat. go back to the super bowl if manningham didn't make that catch we lose the game and your all calling for his head or saying we definitely need to draft another WR early. you cannot...cannot just say we have two receivers were fine, they will get double coverage and if no one can get open eli gets sacked looking for options.

                              here's the point of a TE/WR early in the draft even if its at 32. we have an elite QB who can make plays with not so great talent ( beckum / ballard ) give him the tools to out score teams instead of coming back in the 4th gain a size-able lead in the first and let our defense as it stands now Tee off on opposing offenses cause they're now playing catch up.

                              defense wins championships... only cause the offense puts the team ahead for them to pin their ears back. we need balance and the offense is slightly unbalanced as it stands now.

                              FFS
                              [/quote]

                              You're not understanding my point... There is no need to waste a high pick on a WR or TE because we can get an athlete at those positions in the later rounds. Just imagine that Jake Ballard ran a 4.6 instead of a 5.0. Ballard, a guy with no real natural talent, would have went from an average TE to dominant playmaker in our offense last year. That is why I'm saying we should take a guy like Egnew in the third or Streeter in the 4th instead of say Fleener or Hill in the first.[/quote]

                              You mean like Travis beckum?[/quote]

                              No Travis Beckum is not a TE. Honestly I don't know why the Giants drafted him.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X