Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DAVID WILSON THE PICK

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

    [quote user="Zaggs"][quote user="Tommy_Ribs"][quote user="Zaggs"][quote user="Tommy_Ribs"][quote user="Zaggs"][quote user="Tommy_Ribs"]33rd ranked Player on Mayock's board: http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000...P11_hot_topics

    It's not a reach, it was a solid pick.

    I would have loved Upshaw or Cordy Glenn or Jonathan Martin, but Wilson is a good RB, he'll help Eli and Bradshaw.
    [/quote]

    To show the fallacy of this point. Cordy Glenn was ranked 25th by Mayock, he's still on the board. Stephen Hill was ranked 32nd. He's still on the board. Vinny Curry was ranked 30th (not that we need another D-lineman) and is still available.
    [/quote]

    LOL, Fallacy?

    We had the 32nd pick, and we used it on a guy ranked 33rd by an extremely respected draft expert.

    So I think that this shows, using Mayock's ratings, the GIANTS did not reach on Wilson. He was picked where he was rated. he was not rated as a 3rd rounder. He was the 33rd ranked guy.
    [/quote]

    But he was also not a value nor solid pick.
    [/quote]

    According to who?

    You?

    Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not believe that you are a paid analyst on a major sports network, or an active GM of a Pro Football team.

    If you are, please correct me. Even if you are, I still will take MAyock's ratings and Reese's track record on this pick right now.
    [/quote]

    Thats my whole point. Mayock had other players who were available rated higher. So you're trying to disagree with me, while actually agreeing with me.
    [/quote]
    But, how do you know a series of coin flips didn't separate those players? You act like the difference between Wilson and the guys available were huge. Honestly, not a lot usually separates the 25th ranked guy and the 33rd on someone's board.

    Also, BPA as a JR draft strategy is a myth.

    Comment


    • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

      [quote user="Zaggs"][quote user="Morehead State"]

      [quote user="Zaggs"][quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="Zaggs"]
      Don't see Glenn being any worse than Beatty.
      [/quote] So you want to use a first round pick on a guy who "wont be worse"? I really think this whole hate thing stems from a couple people who think Glenn was a great prospect. Glenn scares the heck out of me as a prospect. He cant bend at his knees at all, so he plays high or bends at the waist (which means either no leverage, or eventual back problems), hes big and strong but hes not really a mauler. He is more a catcher with how he uses his hands. Frankly, I think Glenn will have an exceptionally hard time playing RT. Thing he would be easy prey for any NFL pass rusher. And his lack of bend and inherent lack of leverage scares me inside at guard. High high bust potential for Glenn, IMO[/quote]

      As opposed to using a first round pick on a guy who's probably going to be tackled for losses a few times? You can pull the "I'm better than you" act in college. But thats not going to work against NFL linebackers.
      I actually would have prefered Stephen Hill be picked to start off as the outside/3rd option and then let him learn the position.
      [/quote]




      Every player drafted in the first round is a heck of a lot better than the guys they play against in college.




      Isn't that a good thing?

      [/quote]

      Which means they way the play works well against inferior competition. But like everyone says, the NFL game is faster. Wilson is going to be seeing linebackers than run as fast as him. Something he did not see much of in college.
      [/quote]

      Please name me all the 4.4 Linebackers.

      Comment


      • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

        [quote user="ShakeNBake"][quote user="Zaggs"][quote user="jjj45"][quote user="bELIeve_in_Giants"]

        I remember when everyone hated the JPP pick.*

        [/quote]Exactly, people think they are experts cuz they follow the draft a lot.

        This is a great pick. With BJ gone we need a RB. This dude fits the bill.





        [/quote]

        And neither DJ Ware nor Da'rel Scott are running backs?
        [/quote]

        Ware is mediocre at best and Scott is still unproven. Good thing we have TC, hopefully he can fix Scott's and Wilsons fumbling issues.
        [/quote]

        Gerald Ingram the running back coach is the one who has been fixing the fumbles, not TC.
        Originally posted by PennState1
        In and around the end zone and on crucial plays, the ball should go to one of our 3 receivers and no one else if at all possible.

        Comment


        • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

          [quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="lawl"]
          Stick to you pre draft thoughts. You were opposed to a rb in the first round.

          Do not let the giants decisions sway your thought process. The last time you did so was with sintim. You didn't like him pre draft, but once we took him you couldn't make up enough reasons for us to like him.[/quote]

          I honestly thought a better player would drop to them, everyone I really liked was gone by the time they picked. And while I wasent in love with drafting a HB in the first, it wasent because I disliked Wilson. I really thought some better players would drop to 32, by the time the giants were picking there really was not much to chose from.

          And I never liked Sintim, pre or post draft.[/quote]

          its not a matter of disliking Wilson. You clearly stated that the drop off in talent of the 2nd back and the 15th back isn't that big.

          As for sintim. Don't remember talking about how physical he was in training camp and that he is much better in coverage than people think? I sure do.

          Comment


          • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

            [quote user="lawl"]

            Branch worthy Reyes randle massie[/quote]

            Not a bad list apart from Massie, who I think is clearly not a first round talent.

            If you put Wilson, Branch, Worthy, Reyes and Randle together as a group, say they all got the same grade, I would think you could make the argument for Wilson as more of a need.

            Have to always assume need fits in there too. Giants may be far happier with what they have at WR and DT than we think.

            Comment


            • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

              [quote user="lawl"]

              its not a matter of disliking Wilson. You clearly stated that the drop off in talent of the 2nd back and the 15th back isn't that big.[/quote]
              Well, admittadly, I didnt watch much of Wilson, his film annoys me, and I did not expect a HB in the first. I watched far more video of mid-late round HBs, and then some of Martin because everyone was talking him up.

              As for sintim. Don't remember talking about how physical he was in training camp and that he is much better in coverage than people think? I sure do.
              I made a post about how he chased down a HB (dont remember who it was) in the open field and knocked away a pass, thought that was really impressive. Biggest knock on him coming out was his coverage ability, thought he might be much better in that aspect than given credit for. Physical play you cant see in camp, I didnt say anything to that effect, other than perhaps talking about how big he looked compared to the other LBs.

              Comment


              • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

                [quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="lawl"]

                Branch worthy Reyes randle massie[/quote]

                Not a bad list apart from Massie, who I think is clearly not a first round talent.

                If you put Wilson, Branch, Worthy, Reyes and Randle together as a group, say they all got the same grade, I would think you could make the argument for Wilson as more of a need.

                Have to always assume need fits in there too. Giants may be far happier with what they have at WR and DT than we think.[/quote]

                Vast amounts of young talent at valuable positions is every NFL team's number 1 need. I will always think that should be the case

                Comment


                • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

                  [quote user="lawl"]

                  Vast amounts of young talent at valuable positions is every NFL team's number 1 need. I will always think that should be the case[/quote]

                  Eh, gotta think of the 32nd pick as a 2nd rounder, might feel better about a HB if you consider him a 2nd round pick.

                  Comment


                  • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

                    [quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="lawl"]

                    its not a matter of disliking Wilson. You clearly stated that the drop off in talent of the 2nd back and the 15th back isn't that big.[/quote]
                    Well, admittadly, I didnt watch much of Wilson, his film annoys me, and I did not expect a HB in the first. I watched far more video of mid-late round HBs, and then some of Martin because everyone was talking him up.

                    As for sintim. Don't remember talking about how physical he was in training camp and that he is much better in coverage than people think? I sure do.
                    I made a post about how he chased down a HB (dont remember who it was) in the open field and knocked away a pass, thought that was really impressive. Biggest knock on him coming out was his coverage ability, thought he might be much better in that aspect than given credit for. Physical play you cant see in camp, I didnt say anything to that effect, other than perhaps talking about how big he looked compared to the other LBs.[/quote]
                    You distinctly mentioned sintim jamming guys and saying how physical he was.

                    Why do I remember random things like this? I don't know

                    Comment


                    • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

                      [quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="lawl"]

                      Vast amounts of young talent at valuable positions is every NFL team's number 1 need. I will always think that should be the case[/quote]

                      Eh, gotta think of the 32nd pick as a 2nd rounder, might feel better about a HB if you consider him a 2nd round pick.[/quote]

                      a first round pick is a first round pick. Do you think of the 33rd pick as basically a 1st rounder? Of course not. it is what it is. I don't like this thought process

                      Comment


                      • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

                        [quote user="lawl"]
                        You distinctly mentioned sintim jamming guys and saying how physical he was.

                        Why do I remember random things like this? I don't know[/quote]

                        in training camp? They barely touch each other, lol. He could have been in some drills and doing something I suppose. Dont recall. Certainly wasent physical when he got on the field though.

                        Comment


                        • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

                          [quote user="lawl"]
                          a first round pick is a first round pick. Do you think of the 33rd pick as basically a 1st rounder? Of course not. it is what it is. I don't like this thought process[/quote]

                          I dont think very many (if any) teams look at the draft by round. We know the giants dont.

                          They go by grouping of players.

                          Reese did say he expected by the 32nd pick the guys they were looking at he thought were 2nd round talent. Combined with him saying he thought the players bewteen 15-32 (or something like that) were all very similar.

                          You get the idea that he had a bunch of 2nd round talent players to chose from at 32, and he tried to trade out, couldnt find anyone willing, so took the player at the biggest need position.

                          Comment


                          • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

                            [quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="lawl"]

                            Branch worthy Reyes randle massie[/quote]

                            Not a bad list apart from Massie, who I think is clearly not a first round talent.

                            If you put Wilson, Branch, Worthy, Reyes and Randle together as a group, say they all got the same grade, I would think you could make the argument for Wilson as more of a need.

                            Have to always assume need fits in there too. Giants may be far happier with what they have at WR and DT than we think.[/quote]
                            Very well said, need reached value with Wilson at 32. Aside of all the problems and injuries on the line during the season it was clear that the running game needed a shot and Wilson fits in nicely. I do still believe that the talent level at WR, DT, TE it's even during the next 2 or 3 rounds. Of course time will tell if Reese got it right with this kid .
                            " Success is never final, but failure can be " B.P.

                            Comment


                            • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

                              [quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="lawl"]
                              a first round pick is a first round pick. Do you think of the 33rd pick as basically a 1st rounder? Of course not. it is what it is. I don't like this thought process[/quote]

                              I dont think very many (if any) teams look at the draft by round. We know the giants dont.

                              They go by grouping of players.

                              Reese did say he expected by the 32nd pick the guys they were looking at he thought were 2nd round talent. Combined with him saying he thought the players bewteen 15-32 (or something like that) were all very similar.

                              You get the idea that he had a bunch of 2nd round talent players to chose from at 32, and he tried to trade out, couldnt find anyone willing, so took the player at the biggest need position.[/quote]

                              They don't look at players by round but Reese said at 32 we'd be looking at players with 2nd round grades? Lol

                              I don't think rb is a need. Any random scrub will provide us with enough production.

                              Our dl qb cover guys and wrs win games for us. Keep these positions loaded and we have a higher chance of continued success. Using a high pick on a rb takes away a valuable asset that could've been invested into one of these positions.

                              Comment


                              • Re: DAVID WILSON THE PICK

                                [quote user="lawl"]

                                They don't look at players by round but Reese said at 32 we'd be looking at players with 2nd round grades? Lol[/quote]
                                You get what he means.

                                I don't think rb is a need. Any random scrub will provide us with enough production.
                                DJ Ware begs to differ.

                                Our dl qb cover guys and wrs win games for us. Keep these positions loaded and we have a higher chance of continued success. Using a high pick on a rb takes away a valuable asset that could've been invested into one of these positions.
                                Regardless of how they went about it, I thought improving the run game was a huge need this offseason.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X