Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Second try at a Big Blue Mock

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Second try at a Big Blue Mock

    Here is an attempt after our recent signings:

    1) DJ Fluker - RT Alabama - I feel like this one is close to etched in stone to be honest. Fluker is a day 1 starter and a Phil Loadholt clone. Will beast in the run game and is better than most think in the passing game. I feel he is a RT and not a guard, but if he fails as a tackle, we can push him inside.

    2) Sio Moore - OLB Uconn - I love more as a potential strong side LB for the Giants. He can rush the passer and cover fairly well. He is another I feel can be an instant starter.

    3) Sam Montgomery - DE LSU - I see a decent slide for Montgomery come draft day, but he was a first round talent at the beginning of the year. BPA here for us.

    4) Terry Hawthorne - CB - Illinois - Good size and speed combo here. Hawthorne is an underrated CB in a very good CB class but should be available here. He can play specials for a year and be ready to be plugged in in 2014.

    5) Josh Boyd - DT - Mississippi St. - Another DT for our rotation with the potential to start down the line. Boyd is a stout run stuffer with some pass rush moves. Offers good value here.

    6) Johnathan Stewart - ILB Texas A&M - Very good size and a good athlete to boot. Would be a nice special teams player with the ability to play MLB down the road.

    7). Lamar Mady - G - Youngstown State - This is a guy I hear the Giants love. Sent our O-line coach to his pro day where he looked very good. 35 BP reps and good numbers in the drills as well. Needs some time to develop though.

    Priority FA's

    Ryan Griffin - TE UConn
    Jeff Tuel - QB - Washington State
    T.J. Moe - WR Missouri
    George Winn - RB Cincinnati
    Cody Davis - S Texas Tech
    Marcus Cromartie - CB Wisconsin
    Mike Catapano - DE Princeton
    Nathan Williams - LB Ohio State

  • #2
    Do you think if we draft Fluker he will start over Diehl and Brewer?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Cloud57 View Post
      Do you think if we draft Fluker he will start over Diehl and Brewer?
      Planet Fluker >>> Diehl & Brewer

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Cloud57 View Post
        Do you think if we draft Fluker he will start over Diehl and Brewer?
        Yes, without a doubt. Diehl has been brought back as insurance. I cannot see him starting without a few injuries. I see Fluker and Brewer battling for the LG spot.

        Comment


        • #5
          Poor Sam ... that's a helluva slide he took!

          That and since he's more of a 3-4 OLB, you have us drafting (in essence) three LBers. And an OT who is being moved to OG before he's even drafted.

          Not the kind of moves I see the Giants making (although the personnel are all good choices).
          I don't always root for the Cowboys but when I do I wear my pink Jessica Simpson edition Romo jersey. (yes I lost a bet)

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Kruunch View Post
            Poor Sam ... that's a helluva slide he took!

            That and since he's more of a 3-4 OLB, you have us drafting (in essence) three LBers. And an OT who is being moved to OG before he's even drafted.

            Not the kind of moves I see the Giants making (although the personnel are all good choices).
            not a fan of this.. reminds me of Sintim

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Kruunch View Post
              Poor Sam ... that's a helluva slide he took!

              That and since he's more of a 3-4 OLB, you have us drafting (in essence) three LBers. And an OT who is being moved to OG before he's even drafted.

              Not the kind of moves I see the Giants making (although the personnel are all good choices).
              Disagree on him being a 3-4 OLB. He is absolutely and end in a 4-3 scheme. And like I said Fluker is a tackle in my book, and a darn good one at that.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Carter.525 View Post
                not a fan of this.. reminds me of Sintim
                Not Sintim at all. Sintim was a 3-4 OLB a lot of the time in college. Montgomery has not played 3-4 OLB at all at LSU. Was strictly a 4-3 end and a three down player at that.

                Comment


                • #9
                  no way on sam montgomery after this,,we don't need this on our team.

                  http://network.yardbarker.com/colleg...elves/12531337

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by tdawg1413 View Post
                    Disagree on him being a 3-4 OLB. He is absolutely and end in a 4-3 scheme. And like I said Fluker is a tackle in my book, and a darn good one at that.
                    Sorry you're right ... I was thinking of Damontre Moore (been talking / watching him a lot lately).

                    Montgomery (and most LSU dline) doesn't really give me a lot of excitement. Although I don't think Montgomery falls that far, I'm not sure I'd want him anyways (the poster above making a good point, although I think that may have just been a coaching stunt).

                    I was never that high on him since he wasn't an elite edge rusher but played the RDE spot.

                    I think that's the only real problem I have with your mock ... otherwise the other picks are solid.
                    Last edited by Kruunch; 03-19-2013, 07:09 AM.
                    I don't always root for the Cowboys but when I do I wear my pink Jessica Simpson edition Romo jersey. (yes I lost a bet)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Kruunch View Post
                      Sorry you're right ... I was thinking of Damontre Moore (been talking / watching him a lot lately).

                      Montgomery (and most LSU dline) doesn't really give me a lot of excitement. Although I don't think Montgomery falls that far, I'm not sure I'd want him anyways (the poster above making a good point, although I think that may have just been a coaching stunt).

                      I was never that high on him since he wasn't an elite edge rusher but played the RDE spot.

                      I think that's the only real problem I have with your mock ... otherwise the other picks are solid.
                      Cool, but that's why I have him in the 3rd round. I feel the story will cause his stock to drop. But the guy was a late first early second round talent so grabbing him in the 3rd would be good value. I can see him as a solid DE vs. the run and chipping in with 6-8 sacks per year as a starter, which is fine.

                      Get him some pro coaching and I guarantee that he will not be taking plays off. You don't play Coastal Carolina in the NFL and it was said he only did this vs. teams that were not up to LSU's level. I am not condoning what he did at all but vs. the Alabama's and Florida's, he gave his all.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by tdawg1413 View Post
                        Cool, but that's why I have him in the 3rd round. I feel the story will cause his stock to drop. But the guy was a late first early second round talent so grabbing him in the 3rd would be good value. I can see him as a solid DE vs. the run and chipping in with 6-8 sacks per year as a starter, which is fine.

                        Get him some pro coaching and I guarantee that he will not be taking plays off. You don't play Coastal Carolina in the NFL and it was said he only did this vs. teams that were not up to LSU's level. I am not condoning what he did at all but vs. the Alabama's and Florida's, he gave his all.
                        Yeah that pretty much tells me that I don't want him. We've seen other players of that ilk and rarely does it go well for long (Haynesworth comes to mind there).

                        Just not a fan of Montgomery at any pick.
                        I don't always root for the Cowboys but when I do I wear my pink Jessica Simpson edition Romo jersey. (yes I lost a bet)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Kruunch View Post
                          Yeah that pretty much tells me that I don't want him. We've seen other players of that ilk and rarely does it go well for long (Haynesworth comes to mind there).

                          Just not a fan of Montgomery at any pick.
                          Understood, I think if we could get him in the 3rd, the player value would be too high to pass up.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I hate Fluker but if you replace Fluker and Montgomery I'd say it's a decent draft.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Random question. Where's Jonathan Goff? People were up in arms when he got axed during final cuts.. Looks like another good call on the giants part
                              Football has been very, very good to us.
                              After losing seasons 2013-15, the giants put up 11 wins in 16.. they are on way Back
                              But for now we can console ourselves with this fact-

                              # of Super Bowl victories since 1985:

                              1-Chicago, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Indianapolis, New Orleans, Seattle
                              2-Washington, Green Bay, Pittsburgh, Baltimore
                              3-San Francisco, Dallas, Denver
                              4-New York Giants!!!
                              5-NE
                              Let's make it 5 in 2016 so we can be on a LINE NE again!!!

                              ***Stat provided by "Schloss22"***

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X