Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Running Back in First 3 rounds:

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Running Back in First 3 rounds:

    Is there any reason to think we dont need to draft a RB as high as possible? I understand BPA in round 1 and maybe round 2. By round 3 we need to have picked a good RB.

    I dont it makes sense to pick a TE in first 3/4 rounds.

  • #2
    Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

    I don't want one in the 1st......id love Robert turbin in the 3rd...

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

      The Giants got Bradshaw in the seventh - no need to rush for one.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

        [quote user="Flip Empty"]The Giants got Bradshaw in the seventh - no need to rush for one.[/quote]Maybe we'll get lucky and get a pick up a RB undrafted. Ala Arian Foster. We seem to have some luck with those.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

          We have had tough luck in 1st round with RB. I just think we have memories of Derek Brown and Shockey which is not as good as Rodney Hampton. We draft great D linemen in 1st round. Knowing this, we should just get another DL in round 1 as BPA. We still need a rb in 2 or 3

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:



            [quote user="Aperspective"]Is there any reason to think we dont need to draft a RB as high as possible? I understand BPA in round 1 and maybe round 2. By round 3 we need to have picked a good RB. I dont it makes sense to pick a TE in first 3/4 rounds.[/quote]




            Not a lot of excitement at running back this year make a 1st round pick, wait to 3 or 4 and maybe get lucky, nobody lighting up the boards right now.

            Forget the Past, Live for the Future!

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

              I'd like to see what scott can do before drafting another rb high

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

                BPA at any round

                Retweeted by Rueben Randle
                @Katdaddyjay 17h
                @RuebenRandle @OBJ_3 @Giants
                http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g1...ps625a51fb.jpg

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

                  I want Magget undrafted freeagent.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

                    Yea. his Dads history makes him look like **** but his Dad was good at the game. one of the best scatbacks in the game as far As i see it.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

                      [quote user="Aperspective"]Is there any reason to think we dont need to draft a RB as high as possible? I understand BPA in round 1 and maybe round 2. By round 3 we need to have picked a good RB.

                      I dont it makes sense to pick a TE in first 3/4 rounds.[/quote]

                      its all about the best value...

                      but I don't get why you would think we need to draft a RB high as possible.

                      Bradshaw: 7th round
                      Jacobs: 4th round
                      Andre Brown: 4th round
                      Ware: Undrafted
                      Scott: 7th round

                      RBs are a dime a dozen.

                      And I agree about TE, I don't think from what i've read that the draft class is particularly strong and there are about 5 cost effective FA TEs out there that I would not mind being in a Giants uni.

                      Coughlin and the staff love Brown and they kept Scott on the roster last year with 3 other RBs. If we let go of Jacobs, expect these guys to get a shot
                      https://www.facebook.com/groups/TheeBloodSport/

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

                        If BJ is still here I do not see us spending a pick on a RB. We would still have him, Bradshaw and Scott (hopefully no Ware).

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

                          [quote user="Aperspective"]Is there any reason to think we dont need to draft a RB as high as possible? I understand BPA in round 1 and maybe round 2. By round 3 we need to have picked a good RB.

                          I dont it makes sense to pick a TE in first 3/4 rounds.[/quote]

                          Reese has never drafted a running back in the first 3 rounds, it's not an area of need (not as big as TE is anyways) and this is a poor draft for RBs.
                          I don't always root for the Cowboys but when I do I wear my pink Jessica Simpson edition Romo jersey. (yes I lost a bet)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Running Back in First 3 rounds:

                            I'll take one via FA with Scott and Ware on the roster but that's about it.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X