Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

    He played great in the super bowl. Have the coaches mentioned using him more? Could be a hidden weapon in the passing game.

  • #2
    Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

    Considering we play 21 personnel so often, or at least try to, I think we offer him a bigger role than anyone else in the league. He'll have plenty of oppurtunities.
    My body was sculpted to the proportions of Michelangelo's David.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

      I have no opinions of a strategic nature to offer - but I just like the guy - like the presence he has on the field - and hope he performs well in a significant role for the team this season. I've always appreciated guys who seem dedicated and unselfish when they're playing the less glamorous positions. Guys who work for a living.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

        If none of the RB's step up I would like to see get the ball in short yard situations.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

          [quote user="gmen0820"]Considering we play 21 personnel so often, or at least try to, I think we offer him a bigger role than anyone else in the league. He'll have plenty of oppurtunities.[/quote]

          Not really. We run 11 personnel most often and I only expect that trend to continue.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

            [quote user="giantsfan39"][quote user="gmen0820"]Considering we play 21 personnel so often, or at least try to, I think we offer him a bigger role than anyone else in the league. He'll have plenty of oppurtunities.[/quote]

            Not really. We run 11 personnel most often and I only expect that trend to continue.
            [/quote]We did run 11 personnel very often, the majority of the time in fact, because we often got behind.

            We started games with 21 personnel, and I'm sure would love to stick with it throughout whole games with it as the majority personnel package, especially since Manningham is gone too.

            I will admit though, most of the games I watched from last year that confirm what I'm saying were before Cruz REALLY established himself. We don't really have a Cruz/Manningham-like 3rd option, at least not yet (although I do think Randle will be good).

            Still, I think we restore balance to the 21 personnel-11 personnel package.
            My body was sculpted to the proportions of Michelangelo's David.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

              And I just want to be clear on this, as I feel I'm being a little vague. I realize we play 11 personnel very often, and the way the league is going, see that to continue.

              11 personnel dominates NFL offenses around the league, from what I've observed. I think the critical factor, and difference is that the Giants would be much more likely to balance the 11 personnel with a 21 alignment...rather than most teams would with 5 wide sets, or 2 TE hybrid sets.

              Many teams don't even carry FBs as it is. I think 4 years ago, Hynoski is a 4th-5th round pick.
              My body was sculpted to the proportions of Michelangelo's David.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

                I remember Garafolo saying that he was one of the reasons why our running game had trouble last year, he had difficulty with some of the larger LBs. That said he has bulked up a bit this year and we will see how he does. Bottom line between he and Bear we should do fine; it's the OL that worries me...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?



                  No change in his role this year. He'll be a surprise option, particularly out of the back field on a short pass route. That's it.

                  No one remembers who came in second.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

                    I really don't think we will run 21 personnel more. That takes Cruz out of the slot and I also believe Randle/Hixon/Jernigan is sufficient enough for us to find a 3rd WR. I honestly expect more 4 wide. And think we could see more 2 TE sets as well. David Wilson is best out of the shotgun imo.

                    I do think Hynoski will get a few carries on 3rd and 1 or 3rd and inches.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

                      [quote user="giantsfan39"]I really don't think we will run 21 personnel more. That takes Cruz out of the slot and I also believe Randle/Hixon/Jernigan is sufficient enough for us to find a 3rd WR. I honestly expect more 4 wide. And think we could see more 2 TE sets as well. David Wilson is best out of the shotgun imo.

                      I do think Hynoski will get a few carries on 3rd and 1 or 3rd and inches.
                      [/quote]Hmmm..............Hynoski or Wilson out of the backfield. No brainer.
                      No one remembers who came in second.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

                        [quote user="giantsfan39"]I really don't* think we will run 21 personnel more. That takes Cruz out of the slot and I also believe Randle/Hixon/Jernigan is sufficient enough for us to find a 3rd WR. I honestly expect more 4 wide. And* think we could see more 2 TE* sets as well. David Wilson is best out of the shotgun imo.

                        I do think Hynoski will get a few carries on 3rd and 1 or 3rd and inches.
                        [/quote]21 personnel has Cruz and Nicks on the outside with a huge threat of run.

                        Cruz and Nicks can get open vs single man coverage, 21 personnel is advantageous because with two wide receivers who can get open, and a threat in the back field, and sufficient blocking, defenses are off balance.

                        Again, we ran 11 personnel the majority of the time, but we are still a base 21 team. We ran Nickel the majority of the time last yeas, but we are still a base 43.
                        My body was sculpted to the proportions of Michelangelo's David.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

                          I never understand why so many people want to get the fullback the ball.

                          He's there to block. And rarely make a catch. That's it.

                          Eli manning is an eligible receiver every play too. Let's send him out on pass routes and have him run the ball, right??

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?

                            While were on the subject. I live in the same town as Henry. Seen him yesterday at sheetz. A mini mart. He looks huge. Still a humble small town guy. Nice as hell. Go jints.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Bigger role for Hynoski this season?



                              [quote user="slipknottin"]I never understand why so many people want to get the fullback the ball. He's there to block. And rarely make a catch. That's it. Eli manning is an eligible receiver every play too. Let's send him out on pass routes and have him run the ball, right??[/quote]







                              i think a lot of the hype comes from his play late in the season last year. it wasnt much just the way he done it! hurdling a player on a run and catching a coupla passes outta the backfield for big plays!




                              to be honest im looking forward to his play this coming season as well!




                              personally i think he haspotential and could be a weapon at times.

                              sigpic

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X