Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The DT Situation

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The DT Situation

    So with Opening Night fast approaching, how do you see the mess at DT working out in terms of the 53 man roster? The first two are obvious - Joseph and Bernard. And there will also be a 3rd healthy DT on the active roster - with Hendricks, Kuhn and the recently signed Marcus Thomas fighting for the spot. I don't see Oren Wilson or Carlton Powell being in the discussion, they may even be among those cut before Monday is over.

    But then it gets a little murky. Austin will surely be DT #4 on the roster. It doesn't sound like he'll be ready for Opening Night but they aren't going to cut him nor will they put him on IR and force him to miss a 3rd straight season. And then you have Canty, who also sounds unlikely to play on Opening Night but might be not too far behind that. Plus there's Shaun Rogers who hasn't gone on IR yet and sounds optimistic that he can play with blood thinners.

    I'm guessing Hendricks sticks around with Kuhn being stashed on the practice squad assuming he goes unclaimed. Unfortunately I'd have to say Canty winds up on the PUP list. I doubt it will take him 6 more weeks to heal, but carrying a 5th DT on the roster is a luxury I'm just not sure the Giants can afford, especially since they're probably going to need to carry extra help in the secondary. Meanwhile Rogers is cut with a handshake agreement to bring him back once he feels fully capable of playing.

    How do you think this will play out?

  • #2
    I don't know man we gotta see how thomas and austin play and then we'll have an answer no point in guessing.

    Comment


    • #3
      although i believe that we pay too much for canty we should cut or restructure asap joseph is the way forward with hendricks they are 2 beast and soon it will jpp and ojomo, how about that guys nasty d line.

      Comment


      • #4
        53 players just isnt enough roster spots with how big and fast these guys are today. So many more injuries. They need to expand the rosters

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Redeyejedi View Post
          53 players just isnt enough roster spots with how big and fast these guys are today. So many more injuries. They need to expand the rosters
          Then they have to increase salary cap,,,which in turn would cut into owners profits.....this is never about football.....this is always about business and the bottom line
          "When I was 15, I could not believe how dumb my father was.....when I was 25, I could not believe how much he had learned in 10 years"

          1st to use the phrase "In Reese we trust"

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by fansince69 View Post
            Then they have to increase salary cap,,,which in turn would cut into owners profits.....this is never about football.....this is always about business and the bottom line
            I understand that but if the NFL is serious about long term health of the players more depth on the roster would go a long way. Right Now guys rush back play hurt because just not enough bodies 3 more roster spots could clean that up some.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Redeyejedi View Post
              I understand that but if the NFL is serious about long term health of the players more depth on the roster would go a long way. Right Now guys rush back play hurt because just not enough bodies 3 more roster spots could clean that up some.
              They are not really concerned with the health of the players.....they are concerned with law suits that the players bring by being hurt.........as long as they install new rules for safety...they cover their ***** in court....which in turn keeps them from getting sued

              if you watch ....everything comes down to money for the owners...not the safety of the players or the enjoyment of the fans.........it is just like any other big business......
              "When I was 15, I could not believe how dumb my father was.....when I was 25, I could not believe how much he had learned in 10 years"

              1st to use the phrase "In Reese we trust"

              Comment


              • #8
                I will never understand the reason for the IR rules in football. Why can't they have something similar to the DL in baseball. Why do you have to either keep them on the roster or IR them for the year. It makes no sense. And they can only be on pup if the didn't practice at all in camp? Why?
                #80

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by nhpgiantsfan View Post
                  I will never understand the reason for the IR rules in football. Why can't they have something similar to the DL in baseball. Why do you have to either keep them on the roster or IR them for the year. It makes no sense. And they can only be on pup if the didn't practice at all in camp? Why?
                  baseball is 162 games...football is 16...baseball also has minor league players they can bring up to replace guys when on dl......it does seem like football could adjust.....Im sure there are reasons we as fans do not understand....or are not aware of
                  "When I was 15, I could not believe how dumb my father was.....when I was 25, I could not believe how much he had learned in 10 years"

                  1st to use the phrase "In Reese we trust"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I actually think Kuhn makes the roster he played a lot with the first team against the Bears. How DT position shapes up depends if Canty stays on the PUP list or not to start the season.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by fansince69 View Post
                      baseball is 162 games...football is 16...baseball also has minor league players they can bring up to replace guys when on dl......it does seem like football could adjust.....Im sure there are reasons we as fans do not understand....or are not aware of
                      It comes back to money.They could easily use the practice squad as part of the inactive roster but that would mean paying them more

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Redeyejedi View Post
                        It comes back to money.They could easily use the practice squad as part of the inactive roster but that would mean paying them more
                        there is one huge difference between the practice squad and the minor leagues

                        when a player is sent to minor league he does not have to pass through waivers....so no matter what that player is still owned by the team that sent him down.....every time a player is sent to practice squad there is a chance that he ends up on another team.........it is the NFL's way of helping parity........you dont really want this guy on your team so lets see if anyone else does before you can stash him

                        if you think about it.... the nfl has a 53 man roster with 8 guys that no one else wants

                        baseball has a 24 man roster with 16 more waiting in the wings....plus 3 or more other minor league teams that they pretty much have control of
                        "When I was 15, I could not believe how dumb my father was.....when I was 25, I could not believe how much he had learned in 10 years"

                        1st to use the phrase "In Reese we trust"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by kbusch22 View Post
                          Meanwhile Rogers is cut with a handshake agreement to bring him back once he feels fully capable of playing.
                          What's that worth?

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X