Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A little bit shocked Barden did not get any action

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A little bit shocked Barden did not get any action

    Ok here me out on this one.

    Nicks played well but he was not 100%. He made one move and then kinda just sat in zones. He was used in pick plays and as a decoy. Not a big deal we knew he had some pain and he did what he could. But the one thing the giants were missing last night was chemistry, and Barden seemed to have good chemistry with Eli this pre-season.

    I mean Barden had a pretty good pre-season right? Including a break out type game in Chicago. Since nicks was injured I do not understand why we did not get him in the lineup. Was he injured?
    Just remember Kevin Love makes more money then OBJ, and OBJ also dunks better.

  • #2
    Barden is a third team player. He was on the field for special teams.
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1

    Comment


    • #3
      Hixon had a pretty good game. I am not surprised that Barden wasn't on the offense.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Moke View Post
        Hixon had a pretty good game. I am not surprised that Barden wasn't on the offense.
        I was glad to see Hixon not seem to have any mobility issues and get through game one none the less for wear
        “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1

        Comment


        • #5
          i agree. i read nicks played something like 96% of the offensive snaps...i have no idea why esp cuz he came off an injury and like u said, why not use the additional weapons. nicks wasnt his usual self, so i dunno why u couldnt get more reps in there for RR/Barden but eh, first week messups

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by giantsfan420 View Post
            i agree. i read nicks played something like 96% of the offensive snaps...i have no idea why esp cuz he came off an injury and like u said, why not use the additional weapons. nicks wasnt his usual self, so i dunno why u couldnt get more reps in there for RR/Barden but eh, first week messups
            I agree with this. Nicks looked hampered and slow. He probably shouldn't have been on the field last night.

            Think we would have been better off with Barden on the field instead of Nicks, not even counting the fact that Nicks will heal faster if he sits. If that's what we're going to get from him, we should shut him down for a while.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by sg92 View Post
              I agree with this. Nicks looked hampered and slow. He probably shouldn't have been on the field last night.

              Think we would have been better off with Barden on the field instead of Nicks, not even counting the fact that Nicks will heal faster if he sits. If that's what we're going to get from him, we should shut him down for a while.
              If they didn't play Nicks, Hixon would have taken his place and Randle would have taken Hixon's place as the # 3
              “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by RoanokeFan View Post
                If they didn't play Nicks, Hixon would have taken his place and Randle would have taken Hixon's place as the # 3
                Ya never know until it happens.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Are we sure Randle is ahead of Barden?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hixon looked great. I didn't miss Barden at all.
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hixon did look great. Nicks did not.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by sg92 View Post
                        Are we sure Randle is ahead of Barden?
                        Randle has done less than Barden and is very raw. That would be a puzzler if true.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by CDN_G-FAN View Post
                          Hixon looked great. I didn't miss Barden at all.
                          how could miss somethig that has never even been there!! of course you didnt miss Barden....
                          "Measure Twice......Cut Once"
                          You couldn't be more full of **** if you were break dancing in a Port-a-Potty.......Kruunch

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Gimaniac View Post
                            Ya never know until it happens.
                            True, but that's how the depth chart is laid out
                            “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by sg92 View Post
                              Are we sure Randle is ahead of Barden?
                              We posted the depth chart a few days ago and, if I remember it correctly, Randle was on the 2nd team and Barden the 3rd.

                              Here iit is:

                              http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/depth/_/...ew-york-giants
                              “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X