Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Props to Hixon

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Props to Hixon

    I remember how many posters said he was no good a while back. He can catch any ball close to him. He caught balls high, low, and off to the side. Any crow eaters out there?

  • #2
    we really do have a good bunch of wide receivers.
    a darn good QB too.
    due to the fact that I am from the Woodstock generation ...
    my opinions may be chemically enhanced and influenced by severe episodes of memory loss

    Comment


    • #3
      I like hix and always have. The only concern I had were his 2 acl tears to the same knee in back to back seasons. Seeing him come down with that high pass from Eli says it all.

      Comment


      • #4
        Him And RR filled in great today taking the pressure off cruZ. You'd think Cruz wouldn't have even been able to sniff the ball with barden and nicks out I expected him to be blanketed all day yet he scored 3 tds
        Football has been very, very good to us.
        After losing seasons 2013-15, the giants put up 11 wins in 16.. they are on way Back
        But for now we can console ourselves with this fact-

        # of Super Bowl victories since 1985:

        1-Chicago, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Indianapolis, New Orleans, Seattle
        2-Washington, Green Bay, Pittsburgh, Baltimore
        3-San Francisco, Dallas, Denver
        4-New York Giants!!!
        5-NE
        Let's make it 5 in 2016 so we can be on a LINE NE again!!!

        ***Stat provided by "Schloss22"***

        Comment


        • #5
          imagine if nicks was healthy? nicks, hixon and cruz would have been insane
          Don't take it personal, we're just debating.

          ~Big Mike~

          Comment


          • #6
            I don't remember saying that he was no good, what I remember them asking is if he could come back from a second knee injury...

            Comment


            • #7
              Hixon is doing exatly what some of us expected.
              No one remembers who came in second.

              Comment


              • #8
                Hixon has performed well especially under pressure of not having everyone available!

                i see he has given up punt return duties so i expect him to be even better at receiving!
                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by jomo View Post
                  Hixon is doing exatly what some of us expected.
                  +1
                  “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by BigBlue1971 View Post
                    Hixon has performed well especially under pressure of not having everyone available!

                    i see he has given up punt return duties so i expect him to be even better at receiving!
                    What the coaches like abot Hixon is he's always where he is supposed to be and he does whatever they ask.
                    “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hixon is a good player. And an excellent team player. Funny thing is he is making more money than Cruz and Nicks this year!! Lol

                      But seriously, hes performed at a high level and he deserves all the praise.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Marvelousmik View Post
                        imagine if nicks was healthy? nicks, hixon and cruz would have been insane
                        I was not high on Hixon. Glad to eat some crow on that one.
                        I do think his big play ability is well behind MH, but thats about it.

                        Assuming nicks is back (not just in the game mind you).
                        Keep bennet and bradshaw in for max protect,
                        put hixon in the slot and cruz/nicks on the outside. I think
                        that could be a bunch of trouble for even the niners D.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by OX1 View Post
                          I was not high on Hixon. Glad to eat some crow on that one.
                          I do think his big play ability is well behind MH, but thats about it.

                          Assuming nicks is back (not just in the game mind you).
                          Keep bennet and bradshaw in for max protect,
                          put hixon in the slot and cruz/nicks on the outside. I think
                          that could be a bunch of trouble for even the niners D.
                          Who is MH?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Hixon has been showing why he was above Cruz on the depth chart going into 2011 season. Yeah that's not the case anymore with the 2nd ACL tear and Cruz evolving into his role in the Nicks tandem, but Hixon is no slouch by any means. Also, Randle stepped up. I bet Cruz was blanketed at the start of the game, but when Eli started hitting other targets, they just couldn't focus on Cruz anymore.

                            On top of that, Bradshaw's career game set up play action; I believe 2 of Cruz's TDs were off play action. When you have Bradshaw activating his inner Incredible Hulk, you pretty much MUST respect the play action, and with the number of people that bit, it made things a lot easier for the passing game.

                            I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite team in the NFL.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by jomo View Post
                              Hixon is doing exatly what some of us expected.
                              exactly jo

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X