Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Niners are screwing us! ..Instead of simply releasing Jacobs they put him on suspend

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Niners are screwing us! ..Instead of simply releasing Jacobs they put him on suspend

    Niners are screwing us! ..Instead of simply releasing Jacobs they suspend him knowing full well we could've used him down the stretch ..I mean why not? isn't like they are? .. Even if we get healthy Jacobs could be still used as a decoy and blocking back to spell Hynoski ....
    Last edited by Mr.TRUEBLUE; 12-16-2012, 08:30 AM.



    https://www.facebook.com/pages/MrTrue-Blue/174427272634629?ref=ts&fref=ts


  • #2
    Since we're past the trading deadline and Jacobs is a vested player, he would need to be waived in which there are several teams that have their chance at Jacobs before the Giants.

    Comment


    • #3
      If they released him BJac would MOST DEF choose N.Y. Even to be used as a blocking back at this point who may get only 3 or 4 looks all game. Still better than how he was used by Harbaugh



      https://www.facebook.com/pages/MrTrue-Blue/174427272634629?ref=ts&fref=ts

      Comment


      • #4
        We don't have any idea whether the team would invite him back. The 49ers are screwing Jacobs, not the Giants
        “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Mr.TRUEBLUE View Post
          If they released him BJac would MOST DEF choose N.Y. Even to be used as a blocking back at this point who may get only 3 or 4 looks all game. Still better than how he was used by Harbaugh
          Again, he has no say as being released is different than being waived. He would have to clear the waiver wire. Only then is he free to negotiate with any team he wishes. And saying he would "MOST DEFINITELY" choose NY is still speculation.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by penguinfarmer View Post
            Again, he has no say as being released is different than being waived. He would have to clear the waiver wire. Only then is he free to negotiate with any team he wishes. And saying he would "MOST DEFINITELY" choose NY is still speculation.
            Any team with a worser ecord than the Giants could claim him
            Last edited by RoanokeFan; 12-16-2012, 12:06 PM.
            “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by penguinfarmer View Post
              Again, he has no say as being released is different than being waived. He would have to clear the waiver wire. Only then is he free to negotiate with any team he wishes. And saying he would "MOST DEFINITELY" choose NY is still speculation.
              He said point blank that the only team he wants to play for is the Giants
              The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd - Bertrand Russell

              Comment


              • #8
                Where and when?

                Comment


                • #9
                  stop with this nonsense already.
                  we let him go for the same reason they weren't using him out there.
                  why would we want to waste a roster spot.
                  he is not even close to being his former self.
                  you BJ homers need to let it go.
                  due to the fact that I am from the Woodstock generation ...
                  my opinions may be chemically enhanced and influenced by severe episodes of memory loss

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Niners don't want to face an angry Jacobs in the playoffs. Neither would I.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by penguinfarmer View Post
                      Where and when?
                      According to Mike Garafolo of USA Today Sports, who provided blanket coverage of the Giants for many seasons, the only team that Jacobs is currently willing to play for is the Giants. By placing Jacobs on their suspended list for the rest of the season, the 49ers have blocked such a move until the 2013 offseason. Jacobs, however, is planning to file an appeal to either be reinstated, receive his remaining pay or his release.
                      http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-sh...1217--nfl.html
                      The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd - Bertrand Russell

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by stormblue View Post
                        stop with this nonsense already.
                        we let him go for the same reason they weren't using him out there.
                        why would we want to waste a roster spot.
                        he is not even close to being his former self.
                        you BJ homers need to let it go.
                        I'm certainly no Jacobs homer, and I was glad to see him go because he STILL can't stop running his mouth, and this time, he has to pay for it. That being said, he's an excellent blocker and an excellent motivator/leader on the field, and with our Oline so banged up, and with so many young, inexperienced guys on this team, we could use a guy like Jacobs just for those reasons alone.
                        The fact that an opinion has been widely held is no evidence whatever that it is not utterly absurd - Bertrand Russell

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Mr.TRUEBLUE View Post
                          Niners are screwing us! ..Instead of simply releasing Jacobs they suspend him knowing full well we could've used him down the stretch ..I mean why not? isn't like they are? .. Even if we get healthy Jacobs could be still used as a decoy and blocking back to spell Hynoski ....
                          this is old news already...Jacobs was let go because he didn't want to meet the Giants where they wanted to be on his contract so they let him go and that was over $500,000 difference...that is all he signed for in SF. He could help out in a full-back role/passing downs. He is not a "hands" guy so he is no more effective as a checkdown than Wilson. I would bring him in at the vet min but thats about it...he doesn't have much left in the twinkle toes role....actually he never had that

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            At the beginning of the season, letting him go made sense. But now we're without Brown or Scott, while Bradshaw is held together by scotch tape... If, God forbid, something were to happen to Wilson, we're SOL on our running game (which is why I now agree he needs to stop doing backflips in the end zone). I guarantee you that had Jacobs not been on the 49ers when Brown got hurt, he would have had a call from JR that very night...

                            I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite team in the NFL.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Die-Hard View Post
                              I'm certainly no Jacobs homer, and I was glad to see him go because he STILL can't stop running his mouth, and this time, he has to pay for it. That being said, he's an excellent blocker and an excellent motivator/leader on the field, and with our Oline so banged up, and with so many young, inexperienced guys on this team, we could use a guy like Jacobs just for those reasons alone.
                              I agree. He also knows the offense, he knows all the protections, etc. Anyone who thinks he would not be a better option for depth than Lumpkin or Torraine is just a BJ hater. Moot point as SF is not going to release him and even if they do we may not be able to get him.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X