Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What EXACTLY is PF's game plan on 3rd and excessive ?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What EXACTLY is PF's game plan on 3rd and excessive ?

    Because we must have some sort of record for consistantly giving up MASSIVE 3rd down yardage for the past few seasons.

    And last was no difference, I was actually laughing at their huge 3rd down gains, and was there anyone out there apart from PF that DIDN'T
    think it was going to happen ?

    PF what exactly is your plan ? its like groundhog day, rush 3 or 4, QB sits, has a coffee, surveys the field and then effortlessly completes to a wide open receiver...

    again and again and again....

  • #2
    Please explain what your plan would be for such situations.

    Comment


    • #3
      Not sure the plan was the issue. Our corners need to cover...It really just boils down to that.

      Comment


      • #4
        Rush 3, give huge gaps......His bend philosophy is hey we can super bend this one give them 15 yards when they need 20...but not account for the possibility of them getting yac.... or i hate when they are in our territory just out of FG range and he still plays prevent...pretty much giving them at least 3 points points on the drive

        Comment


        • #5
          You obviously didnt see what they and other teams do to us then....overload, come after him so he is pressured into throwing early, dumping to a rb who would not make such long yardage with the ball or putting the qb on his backside for a loss...

          The fact that he has all day to wait for an open reciever and then completes beyond the 1st down marker shows that lack aggression in going after him....

          so...what would you do ?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ukgiantstyke View Post
            You obviously didnt see what they and other teams do to us then....overload, come after him so he is pressured into throwing early, dumping to a rb who would not make such long yardage with the ball or putting the qb on his backside for a loss...

            The fact that he has all day to wait for an open reciever and then completes beyond the 1st down marker shows that lack aggression in going after him....

            so...what would you do ?
            You're the one that started a thread that is critical of what he is doing, yet you have no ideas for what he should be doing.

            Comment


            • #7
              i assume you read my reply ? or did you just post with your eyes shut ?

              so i guess your happy with the defenses performance, well good on you, I however am not...

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ukgiantstyke View Post
                so...what would you do ?
                Pressure, man underneath, 2 deep safeties
                8-Time NFL Champions - 1927 1934 1938 1956 1986 1990 2007 2011

                "You win close games because you're prepared to do it. It doesn't just come down to luck." -- Bill Parcells

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ukgiantstyke View Post
                  i assume you read my reply ? or did you just post with your eyes shut ?

                  so i guess your happy with the defenses performance, well good on you, I however am not...
                  Yeah, I posted with my eyes shut. You really got me there . . . I'll think twice before I mess with you again!

                  Suggesting that a defense can be fixed simply by blitzing more is a sure sign of a fan who really knows nothing about football. Who exactly is going to be covering the other team's WR's, TE's and RB's when all of these guys are blitzing?? Webster? Chase? lol

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by GMENAGAIN View Post
                    Yeah, I posted with my eyes shut. You really got me there . . . I'll think twice before I mess with you again!

                    Suggesting that a defense can be fixed simply by blitzing more is a sure sign of a fan who really knows nothing about football. Who exactly is going to be covering the other team's WR's, TE's and RB's when all of these guys are blitzing?? Webster? Chase? lol
                    we stop t

                    I see what you're saying but denying PF scheme is not the problem is just being in denial.....we had the same problems last year until that late season run.... it took him until we were 7-7 but he actually adjusted the style of defense.... we brought just a LITTLE more pressure and it worked...sadly Fewell isn stubborn and wants his way to work no matter how bad we are getting torched..... the 3rd and longs are horrible game planning.... only rush 3 and put everybody alll the way back...i mean it seems like he wants to catch the ball borderline first down and hope we stop them a yard short...... he does this even with other teams on 3rd and long at the giants 40.... pretty much saying here dont get a first down but take a free fg...its nonsense .........

                    And his stubborn attitude by relying on the front four is flawed.... they are not as elite anymore.....not only is it not working you are burning them out.....thats why spags had the giants defense great....always knew when and where to bring the pressure

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by KillaRich View Post
                      we stop t

                      I see what you're saying but denying PF scheme is not the problem is just being in denial.....we had the same problems last year until that late season run.... it took him until we were 7-7 but he actually adjusted the style of defense.... we brought just a LITTLE more pressure and it worked...sadly Fewell isn stubborn and wants his way to work no matter how bad we are getting torched..... the 3rd and longs are horrible game planning.... only rush 3 and put everybody alll the way back...i mean it seems like he wants to catch the ball borderline first down and hope we stop them a yard short...... he does this even with other teams on 3rd and long at the giants 40.... pretty much saying here dont get a first down but take a free fg...its nonsense .........

                      And his stubborn attitude by relying on the front four is flawed.... they are not as elite anymore.....not only is it not working you are burning them out.....thats why spags had the giants defense great....always knew when and where to bring the pressure
                      They started getting more pressure last year, because the front 4 got healthy and started playing better. Nothing to do with a change in scheme.

                      Let me ask you this . . . how many studs do we have on our defense?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        3 men on Pita haha, Webster diving into the air whiffing on the pass. Classic.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by JimmyTwoTimes
                          According to most of these idiots Prince Aku !
                          You mean the one guy on defense who didn't get torched yesterday?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by GMENAGAIN View Post
                            Please explain what your plan would be for such situations.
                            Typically on third and long a good defense would send the house.
                            I don't always root for the Cowboys but when I do I wear my pink Jessica Simpson edition Romo jersey. (yes I lost a bet)

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Kruunch View Post
                              Typically on third and long a good defense would send the house.
                              Ok, what do you do if you're not a good defense?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X