Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This KP hates the scheme talk

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by RoanokeFan View Post
    My only problem with the tag is it doesn't guarantee we keep the player. In Cruz's case, if they don't sign him now, and he stays, we will almost surely lise him or Nicks next season.
    But if we lose the guy, we're being compensated pretty well. If we don't, it's 2.8 million.
    My body was sculpted to the proportions of Michelangelo's David.

    Comment


    • #32
      Now if a majority of the defense begins to express their dislike of Fewells scheme... What do you think Coughlin/Reese/Giants do?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by KillaRich View Post
        Now if a majority of the defense begins to express their dislike of Fewells scheme... What do you think Coughlin/Reese/Giants do?
        Stick their fingers in their ears?

        I remember Webster speaking out saying he hated playing soft coverage so much and that was the problems of why they were giving up so many plays. Nothing changed.

        Comment


        • #34
          Slip I agree but i think with all the fa's and jpp and hakeem soon to come we move on from KP. But most of all for this reason - brown excelled and Hill flashed. Im not saying they both play a deep center like KP but a degenerative knee is not something to shrug at. I think getting slightly burned by t2 and the emergence of two other players will keep the gmen from offering a deal that he can't get somewhere else.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by slipknottin View Post
            I can say KP has complained a couple times the past couple years about how frequently he is used deep middle, and how rarely the ball comes his way.

            http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/fo...icle-1.1137329


            But that isnt KP being upset about the scheme, rather being upset how often he was played in that role. Rolle was very poor as a deep safety, so fewell did not use him much there, instead depending really almost exclusively on KP there.

            But with the show Stevie Brown put on this season playing deep middle, Fewell now has a guy who can split those snaps with KP, and let KP spend much more time up involved in the action.

            Of course both KP and Brown are FAs, but them both coming back would be mutually beneficial to both.
            Ideally U cut Rolle and keep Phillips and Brown Will Hill and draft another guy. This is a nice safety class 1 of them is bound to fall. Rambo with his character concerns may drop Giants can pounce

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by RoanokeFan View Post
              Hixon was one of Reese's early "projects." I think both have benefited from the relationship.
              Hixon was a scrap heap guy and has turned it into a productive NFL career

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by primetime View Post
                Kenny Phillps said everything I would want him to say, he want's to make plays and be near the action. He has the ability to be that kind of safety, but as long as Rolle is here I think Fewell will use Phillips as a centerfielder to defend the deep ball and anything over the middle.
                When Phillips was playing and was the deep man the Giants held opponents to 18 ppg . he is the best 1 suited for the role

                Comment


                • #38
                  Hixon started with broncos went to bills - was involved in a very serious helmet to helmet hit and then bounced to gmen. Good scouting by Reese to stick with a guy. WHy does everyone think scouting is for college alone?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by NYG4lifeNYK View Post
                    I guarantee you even Plax wishes he could come back... Shockey as well.
                    Shockey won a Super Bowl with the Saints...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by dave56dj View Post
                      Hixon started with broncos went to bills - was involved in a very serious helmet to helmet hit and then bounced to gmen. Good scouting by Reese to stick with a guy. WHy does everyone think scouting is for college alone?
                      At the risk of being too picky--
                      Hixon was involved in the helmet-to-helmet hit (he was the one who was hit during a kick return but was not injured--the player doing the hitting was the one seriously hurt) as a Bronco in a game against the Bills. He was never a Bill.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        gmen46 that is correct - my bad.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by gmen0820 View Post
                          But if we lose the guy, we're being compensated pretty well. If we don't, it's 2.8 million.
                          Everything's a gamble
                          “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by dave56dj View Post
                            gmen46 that is correct - my bad.
                            No worries. (I said I was being picky!! )

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by jomo View Post
                              Those are 3 guys to keep.............KP, MB and Hixon.
                              You can add Will Beatty to the list.
                              " Success is never final, but failure can be " B.P.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by RoanokeFan View Post
                                +1
                                Originally posted by gmen0820 View Post
                                -1 +2
                                Originally posted by brad View Post
                                x3 -2
                                Originally posted by Rudyy View Post
                                +12 - 5 + (-1) x 2i
                                y = 1-1+2x3-2+12-5+(-1)x2i = 1-1+6-2+12-5-2i = 11-2i

                                Originally posted by gmen0820 View Post
                                dy/dx csc^-1(pi/4)
                                Well my calculus is a little rusty, but i'll give it a shot...

                                d/dx arccsc(x) = - [1/(x * sqrt(x^2-1))]

                                = -[1/(pi/4 * sqrt({pi^2}/16 - 1))]

                                aaand i give up


                                Originally posted by brad View Post
                                Binary: 00110001
                                49




                                ...I went to NJIT, sorry.

                                I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite team in the NFL.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X