Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What is the best giants team ever?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by moosedrool View Post
    1986 by a landslide. It's not even close. No miracle catches off a helmet or sideline heroics. Simply dominated.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_Ne..._Giants_season

    Divisional playoffs 49-3 over Montana's 49ers
    Conference playoffs shutout the Redskins 17-0
    Super Bowl 39-20 over Denver

    Roster included 5 stud LB's
    You realize there's more to a defense than Linebackers, right?

    I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite team in the NFL.

    Comment


    • #32
      I went to my first Giant game in 56 they were great more in the trenches and down and dirty no astoturf half the time is was mud.It was a different game then different rules I think for pure football skills the 86 Giants were the best I have everseen.
      "We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.
      Benjamin Franklin

      Comment


      • #33
        The first game i ever watched the Jints play was at the Polo Grounds in 1953. I've seen some of the best and some of the worst Giant years including the teams of the 70's when fans huddled together in the parking lots and burned their tickets to make a statement about the Giants horrible play. The best Giant team I've ever had the pleasure of seeing play was the 1986 Super Bowl Champion New York Giants. They went 17-2 had arguably the best LB corp to ever play the game, Simms threw for 22-25 in the Super Bowl ( still a record today) and in a game that is usually a close contest between 2 excellently paired teams, the Giants throttled the Denver Broncos 39-20. Now that was a game and a fabulous year for Giant football

        Comment


        • #34
          No doubt about it, the 86 Giants by far! That defense would beat teams up and still want more. I wish we still had players like that now....

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Toadofsteel View Post
            You realize there's more to a defense than Linebackers, right?
            That is a ridiculous comment toadofsteel. You obviously missed the point that we had 5 stud LB's on the roster.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Giantslb66 View Post
              No doubt about it, the 86 Giants by far! That defense would beat teams up and still want more. I wish we still had players like that now....
              "KILL'EM ALL AND LET THE PARAMEDICS SORT'EM OUT!"

              Comment


              • #37
                2011 cause the best team is the team with the best qb and eli is the best qb in giants history by far.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Giantsfan241 View Post
                  2011 cause the best team is the team with the best qb and eli is the best qb in giants history by far.
                  *sigh*
                  Torque it till it breaks, then back off a 1/4 turn.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by bigblue58 View Post
                    The 86 team was great, but how can you say that they were better than the 2011 team when the 86 team didn't make the playoffs the next year?
                    The 2011 team not only made the playoffs but won the division, and were the best team in the NFL.
                    And could we please stop with the "til Plax shot himself" nonsense? It's a myth. Talk about what people remember....do you remember how mediocre a season Burress had been having in 2008, leading up to his shooting? Do you remember how everyone was ragging on Burress for dogging it after signing his new lucrative contract the offseason?
                    Burress was having very little impact on that season in any meaningful or positive way......we weren't one and done because of his absence. He was already done for the season when the Giants won the Division.
                    You got your years mixed up. So which team are you talking about 2007 or 2011? Not that it matters because 86 was better than both of them.

                    We were 14-2 in the reg. season and then stormed through the playoffs to the championship.

                    The 86 Giants dominated the league year. 2007 and 2011 we came together and got hot and lucky at the right time.
                    Torque it till it breaks, then back off a 1/4 turn.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      sigh you roosevelt Eli is the best simms doesn't have anything on eli, simms was v good but eli is elite.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Giantsfan241 View Post
                        2011 cause the best team is the team with the best qb and eli is the best qb in giants history by far.
                        Say what??
                        #80

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Fun topic, although a very subjective one. Not the "86 team, not even close" conclusion that some would have us believe.

                          Some here confuse "best Giants team" with best Giants season, in my view. Understandable, since it can be argued that each season produces a unique team, but that's just one way to look at the question.

                          When the subject of the Niners of the 80s, for example, or the Steelers, Cowboys, Dolphins, Raiders of the 70s, is raised, it inevitably is discussed in terms of a team's general dominance during a sequence of several seasons, not just 1 season. I mean, do we really hear arguments about "the 81 Niners were their best team, not the 89 Niners"? No. Nearly every discussion concerning the Niners dominant years involve useage of "the Walsh Niners" or the Montana Niners". It is a legitimate way to approach this thread's title question, as well.

                          In that context, there is a compelling argument to be made for the Giants teams of the late 50s, early 60s as the "best Giants team".

                          During an 8 year stretch of 1956-63, Giants played in 6 Championship games. They won only 1 of those, true, but how many teams in the history of the league can boast that consistency over that many years? It is an elite club, to be sure.

                          With at least 5 HOF players on some of, if not all 6 of, the Giants teams in that stretch (Gifford, Huff, Rosey Brown, YA, Robustelli), plus the likes of Alex Webster, Charlie Conerly, Grier, Rote, Morrison, and with Landry-Lombardi doing the actual coaching of the first 2-3 championship teams, I submit there's a strong case to be made for that time frame as the "best Giants team, all time"

                          If you want to restrict the debate to only the Super Bowl era, then sure, we are restricted to a much narrower time frame of a single season here and there.

                          And even in that context there are different qualifiers in each of our Super Bowl-winning seasons that make this a very subjective argument---

                          86 team was arguably the most dominant team that year. However, even in the comparison of 86 to 90, it could be argued the 90 team was a better team overall, since 2 crucial players (Jumbo Elliott and Carl Banks) missed 8 and 7 games, respectively, due to injuries, and Simms missed the last 2 and a half games of the reg season and all the post season. We won the last 2 reg season games, 2 post season games and the Super Bowl with a professional back up QB, who was an average QB at best.

                          That could not have been accomplished unless the team was very, very good.

                          So, while there is no question the 86 Giants finished the second half of the regular season by steam-rolling through the competition with 10-11 consecutive wins, and they crushed their opponents throughout the post season culminating in a dominant second half of their Super Bowl victory, I'd say what the players and coaches achieved on the 90 team (they were absolutely dominant the first 10 games of that season, remember) after Simms went down for the season in Game 14, was even more impressive--defeating a very dominant Niners team intent on being the first (only) team to win 3 consecutive SBs, in the NFC Championship game, and defeating the most explosive team in NFL history up to that point, in the Super Bowl.

                          (Anyone who claims they actually believed the Giants hopes for a second SB trophy were not completely crushed when Simms broke his leg in that Dec '90 Buffalo game...is not being honest)

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by nhpgiantsfan View Post
                            Say what??
                            Do you not understand the simple logic of best qb=best team..

                            i think you do

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Giantsfan241 View Post
                              Do you not understand the simple logic of best qb=best team..

                              i think you do
                              That is the dumbest logic I have ever heard. Although I agree that Eli is better than Simms, the idea that it makes the 2011 team better than any other team is craziness. Actually I feel that of the 4 SB teams, the 2011 team was the worst.

                              '86, '90, '07, '11 in that order.

                              If I had to guess I would say that you are to young to have witnessed the Parcells era. If you saw that defense you would never make the argument that the QB is the deciding factor of which team is the best.
                              #80

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                The 86 team might of been the best, but I'll tell you what, the last team they would of wanted to see in the superbowl would be one of these recent Giants teams.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X