Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rank Positions on team by order of need

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rank Positions on team by order of need

    Here's my ranks:

    1) OT
    2) MLB
    3) CB
    4) DT
    5) DE
    6) OLB
    7) G
    8) TE
    9) S
    10) C
    11) RB
    12) WR
    13) FB
    14) QB

    EDIT: In light of comments made in this thread i'm dropping C from #2 to #10...
    Last edited by Toadofsteel; 01-14-2013, 01:20 AM.

    I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite team in the NFL.

  • #2
    As good as any. Or you could just start with OL.
    Your is more nuanced and I'll take it.
    No one remembers who came in second.

    Comment


    • #3
      Pretty much the same. Maybe go MLB 2 anc C 3. I'd like a pass rusher over a corner too.
      # 80 (For FBomb)

      Comment


      • #4
        David Baas, the starting Center, is pretty much guaranteed to not going anywhere for next season. The backup Center position could be looked at if that's what you mean.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by BigBlueAllDay View Post
          David Baas, the starting Center, is pretty much guaranteed to not going anywhere for next season. The backup Center position could be looked at if that's what you mean.
          I can dream about having a starting center that isn't utter crap...

          I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite team in the NFL.

          Comment


          • #6
            Do you think Baas will become better next year?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Toadofsteel View Post
              I can dream about having a starting center that isn't utter crap...
              Understandable. It's just that the Giants are financially committed to Baas, who will be one of the highest paid Centers for years to come.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Toadofsteel View Post
                Here's my ranks:

                1) OT
                2) C
                3) MLB
                4) CB
                5) DT
                6) DE
                7) OLB
                8) G
                9) TE
                10) S
                11) RB
                12) WR
                13) FB
                14) QB
                Pretty good, except for center which I would move down after TE.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by BigBlueAllDay View Post
                  Understandable. It's just that the Giants are financially committed to Baas, who will be one of the highest paid Centers for years to come.
                  Fair enough. At least we could try picking one up late in the draft to develop for when Baas's contract is expired...

                  I'm Commander Shepard, and this is my favorite team in the NFL.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    1) RT
                    2) DE
                    3) SLB
                    4) MLB
                    5) WLB

                    C is the least of my worries.
                    Last edited by moosedrool; 01-13-2013, 10:57 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      MLB
                      OLB
                      OLB
                      RT
                      CB
                      DE
                      DT
                      G

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        In my mind, whether or not we sign Beatty will dictate everything else. . .including the draft.

                        If we sign him, it will be for significant $$, and he WILL BE our LT of the future, because he'll be locked up cap space, and he's completely unfit for any other position.

                        If we sign him, then I'd say: 3-down LB, Interior Lineman, CB, workhorse RB
                        If we don't (can't) sign him, then put LT in front of everything else. . .with extreme urgency.
                        Last edited by RagTime Blue; 01-13-2013, 11:20 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Wow! Am I the only one that thought run defense was our biggest problem this year.

                          1) DT
                          2) MLB
                          3) RT
                          4) DE
                          5) CB
                          6) SLB
                          7) OG
                          Because of all of the effort and examination being poured into these predictions, the draft is a robust market that, in the aggregate, does a good job of sorting prospects from top to bottom.1 Yet despite so many people trying to “beat the market,” no single actor can do it consistently. Abnormal returns are likely due to luck, not skill. But that hasn’t stopped NFL executives from behaving with the confidence of traders.

                          http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...eat-the-draft/

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            RT and DE are tied for first then a CB.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by B&RWarrior View Post
                              Wow! Am I the only one that thought run defense was our biggest problem this year.

                              1) DT
                              2) MLB
                              3) RT
                              4) DE
                              5) CB
                              6) SLB
                              7) OG
                              No, you are not alone. However, I think a run stuffing MLB is more important than DTs and DEs. I think we have bodies there that may step up. I don't see any #1 MLB on this club right now.
                              # 80 (For FBomb)

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X