Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bradshaw coming back home?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    [QUOTE=kNicksGiants;751567]uhhh there's a clear disconnect going on here. stop quoting me.[/QUO

    The only disconnect is your inability to say exactly what you mean. And as long as you're ging to post on this board, I reserve my right to quote you.
    I stopped fighting my inner demons. We're on the same side now.

    Comment


    • #17
      As much love as I have for AB. I'd have to say no. I really want to see what the Wilson/Brown combo can do. bringing AB back will only take away snaps from these 2. Bringing AB back would require 5-10 runs per game. God forbid Wilson misses a block. lol

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by FBomb View Post
        the only disconnect is your inability to say exactly what you mean. And as long as you're ging to post on this board, I reserve my right to quote you.
        please brush up on your reading comprehension if you're gonna quote me. perhaps go back and re-read my post slowly if you don't understand it.

        Comment


        • #19
          I think it's time to move forward. Maybe jacobs for situation, but not bradshaw. It will just take carries away from brown and wilson. Let's see what these guys can do. Don't get me wrong, I've loved bradshaws heart and the years he's been here, I just think his better days are behind him.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Eli TO Shockey View Post
            As much love as I have for AB. I'd have to say no. I really want to see what the Wilson/Brown combo can do. bringing AB back will only take away snaps from these 2. Bringing AB back would require 5-10 runs per game. God forbid Wilson misses a block. lol
            This and if wilson fumbles he'll be in the dog house and TC will fall back to bradshaw.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Dave Brown View Post
              I see no harm. Sign him to a one year deal for like $1.5 mio. Wilson will be the feature guy, but Bradshaw can be a situational back, plus it's not like they're exactly deep at the position. Brown could get hurt, like he already has. It will be nice to not feel like they're dependent on Bradshaw for a change. A guy with his toughness could be a difference maker come Dec/Jan, just like he has been in the past. Remember- he's still only 27.
              I think that they would probably sign him for the vet minimum which is about half of that if no one else picks him up, right? Maybe give him a few bucks more out of respect but the Giants cap situation isn't very good.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by kNicksGiants View Post
                please brush up on your reading comprehension if you're gonna quote me. perhaps go back and re-read my post slowly if you don't understand it.
                "And maybe Jacob's too" and "if we can't bring back bradshaw i'd be ok with bringing back jacobs." Those are 2 of your exact quotes in this thread.


                These are what's known as a contradiction of terms ...one means "in addition to" and the other means "instead of"...Please try and keep up with the rest of the class.
                I stopped fighting my inner demons. We're on the same side now.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by FBomb View Post
                  "And maybe Jacob's too" and "if we can't bring back bradshaw i'd be ok with bringing back jacobs." Those are 2 of your exact quotes in this thread.


                  These are what's known as a contradiction of terms ...one means "in addition to" and the other means "instead of"...Please try and keep up with the rest of the class.
                  i should have known from your first response that you were just some clown trying to create an argument. my first post was exactly what i meant. i would be ok with bringing back bradshaw and boley... and maybe jacobs too. very simple to understand. you quoted me saying "who goes wilson or brown" which is completely illogical and assuming we would only keep 3 backs. we would never cut either of them that is obvious. me saying "and jacobs too" was clearly if we were going to carry 4 backs. when i responded to you i was then considering your point that we might only keep 3 backs, which is why i then said if we can't get bradshaw back i'd be ok with jacobs.

                  do i need to explain further or what? did you accomplish what you wanted in this? nitpicking someone's posts about bringing back bradshaw and jacobs? i don't get it at all. do you get off on this type of thing or what?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Found this guy in my back yard....must be yours.

                    I stopped fighting my inner demons. We're on the same side now.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      There were complaints about Bradshaw all last season, and now people want to bring him back.

                      I don't understand this logic.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Flip Empty View Post
                        There were complaints about Bradshaw all last season, and now people want to bring him back.

                        I don't understand this logic.
                        Logic doesn't work on these boards

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          eh, maybe at vet minimum for 3rd down. Have to cut Torain or Scott

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            No thanks. It time to move onto the Wilson era.
                            The only good race is at suicide pace, and today looks like a good day to die

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Bradshaw is good at pass protection, that's only use I can see for him now. Probably not worth a roster spot on second thought

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Dave Brown View Post
                                With the Steelers taking Bell and the Packers taking Lacy, Bradshaw's shot at signing with either of those two teams is basically nil now. Do Reese/TC bring him back to the Giants on the cheap?

                                http://insider.espn.go.com/blog/nfl/rumors/post?id=5623
                                Man, I hope so. Brown is good, but hasn't proven yet that he can stay healthy. and Wilson is good too, but I don't know if he's ready to take the majority of the carries and block for Eli.

                                Bradshaw is tough, knows the offense and still has some gas left in the tank. He belongs here.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X