Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

    rewatch it. there was some helmet to helmet. it was just a small small klink but it was nonetheless correct.

    I also think the Jennings fumble was not as clear cut as everyone is saying. it is unclear when exactly the ball came out and when his calf/ankle touched the ground (webster was blocking the view of his ankle in the best camera angle).

    The spot on the ware play is a different story although fox did not show a replay as far as I can remember.

  • #2
    Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

    Ive watched the Osi hit plenty, there is ABSOLUTELY NO helmet to helmet.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

      Sorry.....but you are completely wrong. It happens.
      I stopped fighting my inner demons. We're on the same side now.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

        No there wasn't. It was a bad call. I've watched that replay a dozen times. Nothing.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

          If you believe that call was correct, explain to me why Packers D-line late hit on Eli wasn't called.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.



            [quote user="M0rbid"]If you beleive that call was correct, explain to me why Packers D-line late hit on Eli wasn't called.
            [/quote]




            TWICE!!

            I stopped fighting my inner demons. We're on the same side now.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

              [quote user="miken609"]rewatch it. there was some helmet to helmet. it was just a small small klink but it was nonetheless correct. I also think the Jennings fumble was not as clear cut as everyone is saying. it is unclear when exactly the ball came out and when his calf/ankle touched the ground (webster was blocking the view of his ankle in the best camera angle). The spot on the ware play is a different story although fox did not show a replay as far as I can remember.[/quote]Gregg is that you?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

                Are you on Crack?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

                  [quote user="miken609"]rewatch it. there was some helmet to helmet. it was just a small small klink but it was nonetheless correct.

                  I also think the Jennings fumble was not as clear cut as everyone is saying. it is unclear when exactly the ball came out and when his calf/ankle touched the ground (webster was blocking the view of his ankle in the best camera angle).

                  The spot on the ware play is a different story although fox did not show a replay as far as I can remember.[/quote]The Osi hit was not spot on because he did not lead with his helmet wich needs to happen inorder for the refs can call it.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ts--xqbNIWI

                    go to 720p, full screen it, and watch the view starting at 4:58

                    its not a lot but it is something

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

                      Clay Matthews' hit was more dirty!!! And that's a start.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

                        YOUR WRONG THERE WAS NO HIT TO THE HEAD!!!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

                          [quote user="M0rbid"]If you believe that call was correct, explain to me why Packers D-line late hit on Eli wasn't called.[/quote]

                          The Eli call was a bad no-call. That is why it wasn't called.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.

                            we aren't playing flag football here. Osi was half a step away from hitting rodgers before he passed the ball. There is no way he could have stopped himself, watch it in gametime, not slowmo. Ontop of that, was a "clean shot"...no helmet to helmet.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Refs were correct on at least the Osi hit.



                              [quote user="miken609"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ts--xqbNIWI go to 720p, full screen it, and watch the view starting at 4:58 its not a lot but it is something[/quote]




                              It's not enough to make the call.

                              I stopped fighting my inner demons. We're on the same side now.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X