Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

    Hey Fans,

    Just posted our new "ALL IN" graphic on our Official Facebook Page HERE! We are asking those who are on FB to share the photo to all your friends!

    Thanks!

  • #2
    Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

    I would use it, except my facebook pic has been the Empire State Building lit up in all blue and has been since just before Atlanta. I aint jinxing it!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

      yeah. i ain't touching anything. i haven't even shaved since the last Dallas game.


      Gonna miss the big guy. rofl.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

        I have a Giants helmet that I put above my brothers TV during the Jets game and well needless to say it aint moving!!!
        Go Giants!!!

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

          Not to offend anyone that created this but shouldn't it read, "NYG ARE ALL IN" ?

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic



            [quote user="BigBlue D"]Not to offend anyone that created this but shouldn't it read, "NYG ARE ALL IN" ?
            [/quote]




            Actually, one can refer to a team in the singular. Even though it sounds awkward, it isn't incorrect.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

              [quote user="NYGModerator"]Hey Fans,

              Just posted our new "ALL IN" graphic on our Official Facebook Page HERE! We are asking those who are on FB to share the photo to all your friends!

              Thanks![/quote]

              Thanks. It's now my profile pic.

              All In!

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

                [quote user="Drez"]

                [quote user="BigBlue D"]Not to offend anyone that created this but shouldn't it read, "NYG ARE ALL IN" ?
                [/quote]




                Actually, one can refer to a team in the singular. Even though it sounds awkward, it isn't incorrect.

                [/quote]

                New York Giant is all in.

                Really? Use the team in the singular, give an example.

                Show class, be a Giants fan.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

                  [quote user="NYG216"][quote user="Drez"]


                  [quote user="BigBlue D"]Not to offend anyone that created this but shouldn't it read, "NYG ARE ALL IN" ?
                  [/quote]




                  Actually, one can refer to a team in the singular. Even though it sounds awkward, it isn't incorrect.




                  [/quote]

                  New York Giant is all in.

                  Really? Use the team in the singular, give an example.
                  [/quote]




                  New York Giants is all in.




                  It all depends on if you view the team as a single entity or as a collection of indivduals. Like I said, it sounds awkward, as most of the time we refer to teams in plural, but that doesn't make it grammatically incorrect.




                  It's no different than saying, "I hope Congress is seriously considering voting down SOPA." (Sorry for the political reference, but it was one of the easier comparisons I could make). Congress is made up of hundreds of people, yet you refer to in the singular.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

                    [quote user="Drez"][quote user="NYG216"][quote user="Drez"]


                    [quote user="BigBlue D"]Not to offend anyone that created this but shouldn't it read, "NYG ARE ALL IN" ?
                    [/quote]




                    Actually, one can refer to a team in the singular. Even though it sounds awkward, it isn't incorrect.




                    [/quote]

                    New York Giant is all in.

                    Really? Use the team in the singular, give an example.
                    [/quote]




                    New York Giants is all in.




                    It all depends on if you view the team as a single entity or as a collection of indivduals. Like I said, it sounds awkward, as most of the time we refer to teams in plural, but that doesn't make it grammatically incorrect.




                    It's no different than saying, "I hope Congress is seriously considering voting down SOPA." (Sorry for the political reference, but it was one of the easier comparisons I could make). Congress is made up of hundreds of people, yet you refer to in the singular.

                    [/quote]

                    I'm not an English major, but the big difference I would say is the "s" on the end of Giants. It's not "I hope Congresses is". Since it is NY Giants and not NY Giant, I would say that it can not be taken as a single entity.

                    Show class, be a Giants fan.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

                      [quote user="NYG216"][quote user="Drez"][quote user="NYG216"][quote user="Drez"]


                      [quote user="BigBlue D"]Not to offend anyone that created this but shouldn't it read, "NYG ARE ALL IN" ?
                      [/quote]




                      Actually, one can refer to a team in the singular. Even though it sounds awkward, it isn't incorrect.




                      [/quote]

                      New York Giant is all in.

                      Really? Use the team in the singular, give an example.
                      [/quote]




                      New York Giants is all in.




                      It all depends on if you view the team as a single entity or as a collection of indivduals. Like I said, it sounds awkward, as most of the time we refer to teams in plural, but that doesn't make it grammatically incorrect.




                      It's no different than saying, "I hope Congress is seriously considering voting down SOPA." (Sorry for the political reference, but it was one of the easier comparisons I could make). Congress is made up of hundreds of people, yet you refer to in the singular.




                      [/quote]

                      I'm not an English major, but the big difference I would say is the "s" on the end of Giants. It's not "I hope Congresses is". Since it is NY Giants and not NY Giant, I would say that it can not be taken as a single entity.
                      [/quote]




                      It doesn't matter if there is an s at the end of the word, because the term, "New York Giants," refers to one team which means you can refer to it in the singular.Like I said, it's awkward, but not incorrect. Likewise, wanting to use the plural verb is acceptable, too.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

                        how about just make it " NYG ALL IN "

                        due to the fact that I am from the Woodstock generation ...
                        my opinions may be chemically enhanced and influenced by severe episodes of memory loss

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

                          [quote user="Tony Bruno"]I have a Giants helmet that I put above my brothers TV during the Jets game and well needless to say it aint moving!!![/quote]

                          My profile pic is of me in front of the three Lombardi trophies and four Halas trophies. It's been there since the first Dallas game and I wouldn't dare change it...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: New York Giants "ALL IN" Graphic

                            [quote user="Drez"][quote user="NYG216"][quote user="Drez"][quote user="NYG216"][quote user="Drez"]


                            [quote user="BigBlue D"]Not to offend anyone that created this but shouldn't it read, "NYG ARE ALL IN" ?
                            [/quote]




                            Actually, one can refer to a team in the singular. Even though it sounds awkward, it isn't incorrect.




                            [/quote]

                            New York Giant is all in.

                            Really? Use the team in the singular, give an example.
                            [/quote]




                            New York Giants is all in.




                            It all depends on if you view the team as a single entity or as a collection of indivduals. Like I said, it sounds awkward, as most of the time we refer to teams in plural, but that doesn't make it grammatically incorrect.




                            It's no different than saying, "I hope Congress is seriously considering voting down SOPA." (Sorry for the political reference, but it was one of the easier comparisons I could make). Congress is made up of hundreds of people, yet you refer to in the singular.




                            [/quote]

                            I'm not an English major, but the big difference I would say is the "s" on the end of Giants. It's not "I hope Congresses is". Since it is NY Giants and not NY Giant, I would say that it can not be taken as a single entity.
                            [/quote]




                            It doesn't matter if there is an s at the end of the word, because the term, "New York Giants," refers to one team which means you can refer to it in the singular.Like I said, it's awkward, but not incorrect. Likewise, wanting to use the plural verb is acceptable, too.

                            [/quote]

                            All of you need to get it right, the name of the team is the" New York Football Giants." One Entity.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X