Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New England -3

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New England -3

    I absolutely cannot belive New England is favored. We have the better WR and RBs, and Eli is playing better right now and is CLUTCH.

    We have the better defense and that's not even close. Eli will be able to pick the NE defense apart. Brady can go to Welker and the TEs, but as long as you dont give up the big play, their drives will fizzle just like in the BAL game. Thoughts?

  • #2
    Re: New England -3

    The packers and hers were favored.
    Look where that got them.






    Talk is cheap.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: New England -3

      if the giants were 13-3 with a 1st seed in their conference, won their two games to get into the SB, and were underdogs to a 9-7 team, i'd be a little cheesed.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: New England -3

        They were -11.5 favorites in 2007

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: New England -3

          Yeah, 13-3 is good, but the AFC East stunk. Oh well... i'm putting my money on us. #booooom

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: New England -3

            [quote user="TennGiant13"]I absolutely cannot belive New England is favored. We have the better WR and RBs, and Eli is playing better right now and is CLUTCH.

            We have the better defense and that's not even close. Eli will be able to pick the NE defense apart. Brady can go to Welker and the TEs, but as long as you dont give up the big play, their drives will fizzle just like in the BAL game. Thoughts?[/quote]

            LOL

            You have the better WR's by a long shot! But RB very close. Eli is playing very well, but when it comes to Clutch not many can touch Brady.

            But mainly the Ravens game was the exception NOT the rule. Brady had an off day he marches the ball like that 90% of the time it is TD's... (I also think the Ravens D OVERALL is better than the Giants but thats just My Opinion.)

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: New England -3

              [quote user="EM=Gladiator"]They were -11.5 favorites in 2007
              [/quote]

              In 2008, the line actually opened as Giants +14 underdogs but it dropped down to +12.5.

              http://www.thespread.com/nfl-article...d-odds-a-total

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: New England -3

                [quote user="bflo23"][quote user="EM=Gladiator"]They were -11.5 favorites in 2007
                [/quote]

                In 2008, the line actually opened as Giants +14 underdogs but it dropped down to +12.5.

                http://www.thespread.com/nfl-article...d-odds-a-total
                [/quote]

                I just used the first one I found. My point was that the spread doesnt really matter.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: New England -3

                  [quote user="PatsFanNH"][quote user="TennGiant13"]I absolutely cannot belive New England is favored. We have the better WR and RBs, and Eli is playing better right now and is CLUTCH.

                  We have the better defense and that's not even close. Eli will be able to pick the NE defense apart. Brady can go to Welker and the TEs, but as long as you dont give up the big play, their drives will fizzle just like in the BAL game. Thoughts?[/quote]

                  LOL

                  You have the better WR's by a long shot! But RB very close. Eli is playing very well, but when it comes to Clutch not many can touch Brady.

                  But mainly the Ravens game was the exception NOT the rule. Brady had an off day he marches the ball like that 90% of the time it is TD's... (I also think the Ravens D OVERALL is better than the Giants but thats just My Opinion.)
                  [/quote]


                  Huh? RBs close? Has any RB on your roster right now ever ran for a 1000yd season? Your RBs may have the edge on pass catching out of the backfield......but not rushing the ball. And Brady can be gotten to, and have more than a "fluke" bad game.Also I noticed you skirted the compariosn of D's. Your is not as good as ours............the Giants D is hot right now......

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: New England -3

                    [quote user="CDN_G-FAN"]if the giants were 13-3 with a 1st seed in their conference, won their two games to get into the SB, and were underdogs to a 9-7 team, i'd be a little cheesed.[/quote]That's ancient history. We were 7-7 and haven't lost a game since and one of those games we won was against The Pats in their own backyard. Brady is absolutely shaking in his boots having to face our pass rush again... he'll be curling up in a fetal position when he senses the pressure getting there.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: New England -3

                      I actually believe the Giants are going to hammer them.We havent see a lopsided Super Bowl in a few years. i expect them to win by more then 2 Touchdowns. How the Pats are Favorited is beyond me.The Giants beat them in there building "Where they r supposed to be Great" when they were playing half as well as they r now. The Pats dont have the Deep threat speed that hurts the Giant defense . I dont see the Giants losing and Im not usually a homer about these things

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: New England -3



                        [quote user="TennGiant13"]I absolutely cannot belive New England is favored. We have the better WR and RBs, and Eli is playing better right now and is CLUTCH. We have the better defense and that's not even close. Eli will be able to pick the NE defense apart. Brady can go to Welker and the TEs, but as long as you dont give up the big play, their drives will fizzle just like in the BAL game. Thoughts?[/quote]







                        actually i prefer the underdog role and i believe the Giants do as well!




                        staying below the radar makes it as normal as possible for the G-Men during this hetic run to the superbowl.




                        im glad the pats are 3 pt favorites. let them answer the questions!

                        sigpic

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: New England -3

                          [quote user="TennGiant13"]I absolutely cannot belive New England is favored. We have the better WR and RBs, and Eli is playing better right now and is CLUTCH.

                          We have the better defense and that's not even close. Eli will be able to pick the NE defense apart. Brady can go to Welker and the TEs, but as long as you dont give up the big play, their drives will fizzle just like in the BAL game. Thoughts?[/quote]

                          That's just how it should be. We are better going in as underdogs especially "on the road."
                          “Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” MB Rule # 1

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: New England -3

                            So what. It shouldn't matter unless you're planning on laying down a bet... on the Pats.
                            You're not right?
                            You're not right?
                            Good ! I didn't think so!!!
                            Go Giants The Pats suck

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: New England -3

                              [quote user="stormin normand"]So what. It shouldn't matter unless you're planning on laying down a bet... on the Pats.
                              You're not right?
                              You're not right?
                              Good ! I didn't think so!!!
                              Go Giants The Pats suck[/quote]

                              Exactly. I think its a good bet to go with the Giants here.... homerism aside. I usually like to bet against my teams, but in this case, I really like NYG +3.

                              You thinking low or high scoring game?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X