Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nicks-Cruz-Manningham vs. Fitzgerald-Boldin-Breaston

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nicks-Cruz-Manningham vs. Fitzgerald-Boldin-Breaston

    Who had the better trio?

  • #2
    Re: Nicks-Cruz-Manningham vs. Fitzgerald-Boldin-Breaston

    I think we did.

    Fitzgerald is a beast, he's obviously the best of all 6. But other than that, Breaston isn't really a name you'd brag about, and I always felt like Boldin was a bit overrated.

    So I'd take our trio.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Nicks-Cruz-Manningham vs. Fitzgerald-Boldin-Breaston

      Kurt Warner just tweeted Breaston is no hall of famer.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Nicks-Cruz-Manningham vs. Fitzgerald-Boldin-Breaston

        Nicks vs. Fitz. While Nicks has shown the ability to be a "do it all" receiver, Fitz proves how beast he is by posting great numbers without the likes of Kurt Warner. Can Nicks do it without Eli? Dunno. I give the nod to Fitz here.

        Cruz vs Boldin. This one is the hardest for me really. While Boldin has had a consistent career, you do see his numbers drop once he arrived in Baltimore and became the #1 guy. Without Fitz being the go to gay, Boldin hasn't been able to reach the 1000 yard mark. Now I think it's also possible Cruz could be in a similar situation but we'll never really know. I think he benefits a lot from Nicks being on the field.

        Breaston has better yardage than MM but with the Superbowl, MM has proved that he can be a top tier #2 receiver in this league.

        I gotta go with our trio since they are all so young and possibly have much more potential to tap.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Nicks-Cruz-Manningham vs. Fitzgerald-Boldin-Breaston

          [quote user="TheEnigma"]Nicks vs. Fitz. While Nicks has shown the ability to be a "do it all" receiver, Fitz proves how beast he is by posting great numbers without the likes of Kurt Warner. Can Nicks do it without Eli? Dunno. I give the nod to Fitz here.

          Cruz vs Boldin. This one is the hardest for me really. While Boldin has had a consistent career, you do see his numbers drop once he arrived in Baltimore and became the #1 guy. Without Fitz being the go to gay, Boldin hasn't been able to reach the 1000 yard mark. Now I think it's also possible Cruz could be in a similar situation but we'll never really know. I think he benefits a lot from Nicks being on the field.

          Breaston has better yardage than MM but with the Superbowl, MM has proved that he can be a top tier #2 receiver in this league.

          I gotta go with our trio since they are all so young and possibly have much more potential to tap.[/quote]

          what is this go to gay you speak of? lmao :P

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Nicks-Cruz-Manningham vs. Fitzgerald-Boldin-Breaston

            [quote user="Spizi"]what is this go to gay you speak of? lmao :P[/quote]...what?

            Oh crap, I better edit that out before Fitz and his lawyers hunt me down!

            Comment

            Working...
            X