Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11



    said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.




    on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.

    Football has been very, very good to us.
    After losing seasons 2013-15, the giants put up 11 wins in 16.. they are on way Back
    But for now we can console ourselves with this fact-

    # of Super Bowl victories since 1985:

    1-Chicago, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Indianapolis, New Orleans, Seattle
    2-Washington, Green Bay, Pittsburgh, Baltimore
    3-San Francisco, Dallas, Denver
    4-New York Giants!!!
    5-NE
    Let's make it 5 in 2016 so we can be on a LINE NE again!!!

    ***Stat provided by "Schloss22"***

  • #2
    Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

    [quote user="miked1958"]


    said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.




    on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.




    [/quote]




    That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm.




    That will be called every time...


    Giants fan since the early 80s

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

      What are you saying?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

        People need to stop blaming the refs. Our Dbs were VERY physical down the field all game. We could have been called for a lot more than we were.

        Take Drivers corner endzone TD catch, Cweb gave him a good thump trying to push him out of bounds, the ref could have easily called that as it was textbook illegal contact.
        sigpic

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

          Agree, but there were a lot of questionable calls. Another I thought could have been called was the play on Nicks in the endz one where he had the ball until Peprah hit him and knocked it out. Looked like Peprah led with his helmet to Nicks's face mask. Suprised that one wasn'tcalled.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11



            [quote user="BlueSanta"]People need to stop blaming the refs. Our Dbs were VERY physical down the field all game. We could have been called for a lot more than we were.

            Take Drivers corner endzone TD catch, Cweb gave him a good thump trying to push him out of bounds, the ref could have easily called that as it was textbook illegal contact.
            [/quote]




            But, they let those players play, unlike Williams where they threw the flag. Very inconsistant, That call was horrible. Just let them play.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

              [quote user="ny06"][quote user="miked1958"]


              said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.




              on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.




              [/quote]




              That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm.




              That will be called every time...

              [/quote]

              Nah. He hit him in the chest with his forearm. Poor call.
              My 5 year old son right before the kickoff of the Super Bowl 46: Dad, are the Giants gonna win?

              Burier: Yes.

              My 5 year old son right before the kickoff of Super Bowl 46: Do you promise?

              Burier: Yes. I promise.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

                [quote user="TuckYou"]


                [quote user="BlueSanta"]People need to stop blaming the refs. Our Dbs were VERY physical down the field all game. We could have been called for a lot more than we were.

                Take Drivers corner endzone TD catch, Cweb gave him a good thump trying to push him out of bounds, the ref could have easily called that as it was textbook illegal contact.
                [/quote]




                But, they let those players play, unlike Williams where they threw the flag. Very inconsistant, That call was horrible. Just let them play.




                [/quote] I agree.....let them play...




                the call on JW was a bad call but they wound up punting anyway.....

                "Measure Twice......Cut Once"
                You couldn't be more full of **** if you were break dancing in a Port-a-Potty.......Kruunch

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

                  [quote user="burier"][quote user="ny06"][quote user="miked1958"]


                  said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.




                  on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.




                  [/quote]





                  That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm.




                  That will be called every time...

                  [/quote]


                  Nah. He hit him in the chest with his forearm. Poor call.[/quote]


                  Ummmm....you do realize that most, if not all, NFL players have 2 arms, right? Because one of his arms clearly grazed Elis helmet.

                  Now don't get me wrong, the rule is garbage and that really shouldn't be called......however the rules what it is and its cost us in the past so ill gladly take the 15.

                  Again though, his head was clearly hit if you re-watch.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: talking about the illeagle chuck on 3rd and 11

                    [quote user="Manning2Niks"][quote user="burier"][quote user="ny06"][quote user="miked1958"]


                    said that was huge in why GB won. Said it is the rule and u have to call it but it didnt disrupt the route and there was on after that way worse that was not called. Also they are all saying the the jennings td was not a td.




                    on the otherside of it they said the the late hit on eli by woodson should have not been called.




                    [/quote]





                    That was an easy call, Woodson hit Eli in the area of his head with his forearm.




                    That will be called every time...

                    [/quote]


                    Nah. He hit him in the chest with his forearm. Poor call.[/quote]


                    Ummmm....you do realize that most, if not all, NFL players have 2 arms, right? Because one of his arms clearly grazed Elis helmet.

                    Now don't get me wrong, the rule is garbage and that really shouldn't be called......however the rules what it is and its cost us in the past so ill gladly take the 15.

                    Again though, his head was clearly hit if you re-watch.[/quote]

                    Yes, agreed, contact was made. Argue with the rulebook not with the ref.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X