Re: Mock 3.16 Trade Back!!
Nice mock.. I agree with trading down from 32 unless a guy like mark Barron falls to 32.. I was very high on us getting Fleener , but after the Bennett signing , it doesn't make sense to pick 1 that high, not this year atlease . Michael Egnew would be GREAT in the third... Doug Martin , I also like in the 2nd, but I'm more a David Wilson guy personally.. I think he has a higher ceiling, but Martin might fit what we want out of backs better.
I love the Chandler Jones pick, if we get him , I'll be crazy hype... He will be a beast in the league in a few years, & learning under Tuck, Osi, JPP, & Kiwi will only speed up that process.. not sure about Burfict in the 3rd , but overall this draft would be a home run!!!
Re: Mock 3.16 Trade Back!!
[quote user="GMenNY21"]Nice mock.. I agree with trading down from 32 unless a guy like mark Barron falls to 32.. I was very high on us getting Fleener , but after the Bennett signing , it doesn't make sense to pick 1 that high, not this year atlease . Michael Egnew would be GREAT in the third... Doug Martin , I also like in the 2nd, but I'm more a David Wilson guy personally.. I think he has a higher ceiling, but Martin might fit what we want out of backs better.
I love the Chandler Jones pick, if we get him , I'll be crazy hype... He will be a beast in the league in a few years, & learning under Tuck, Osi, JPP, & Kiwi will only speed up that process.. not sure about Burfict in the 3rd , but overall this draft would be a home run!!![/quote]
Thanks man. I guess you could call this the "upside" mock. I really feel like that if we can get a guy like Burfict that was a projected first round pick at 96 it would be a huge steal. If he pans out it could be the steal of the century. Besides I don't think he would cause any problems in the locker room because Tuck and Rolle would shut his *** up in a heart beat. Low risk, high reward.
I totally agree with you on the David Wilson part. He definitely has a much higher ceiling but his ball security is very suspect and he doesn't have that size you like to see out of a feature back. He's not small by any means but Martin is huge compared to him.
Re: Mock 3.16 Trade Back!!
Rd 2)
a) LOVE the Doug Martin pick. No.2 back in the draft, IMO
b) Gimme Tyrone Crawford (DE-Boise St.). Basically a high 3rd round selection, and I like him way more than Jones. Chandler Jones never really got me that excited.
Rd 3)
a) Eh, I'll take Egnew. Although, I think I'd be a little diappointed if he's BPA. (I'd rather take Audie Cole or Mike Martin if one of them are there)
b) Hell No. I don't want Burfict period. He certainly can provide more impact than Barden, but rather than making some catches that extend drives to win a game, his impact is more likely an idiotic penalty that will extend an opponent's drive to win the game. Give me James Brown (G/T-Troy).
Re: Mock 3.16 Trade Back!!
[quote user="Raptor22"]Rd 2)
a) LOVE the Doug Martin pick. No.2 back in the draft, IMO
b) Gimme Tyrone Crawford (DE-Boise St.). Basically a high 3rd round selection, and I like him way more than Jones. Chandler Jones never really got me that excited.
Rd 3)
a) Eh, I'll take Egnew. Although, I think I'd be a little diappointed if he's BPA. (I'd rather take Audie Cole or Mike Martin if one of them are there)
b) Hell No. I don't want Burfict period. He certainly can provide more impact than Barden, but rather than making some catches that extend drives to win a game, his impact is more likely an idiotic penalty that will extend an opponent's drive to win the game. Give me James Brown (G/T-Troy).
[/quote]
Audie Cole is a 5-6 round prospect i dont see us taking him in the 3rd. there are alot of other LB prospects b etter then him still available.
I also am not sold on egnew. He looked bad for a Receiving TE at the combine. I would rather them pick up L. Green from Lauis/laf.
also hate Taze in the third wouldnt mind having him as a 5-7-UFA bcx hes got potential.
Re: Mock 3.16 Trade Back!!
idk why everyone's hating on the Vontaze in the 3rd pick lol. 3rd rounders only have a 30% chance of being starters so why not take a chance on a guy who clearly has emmense potential?? We're the Super Bowl champs! we can take calculated risks.
I haven't watched Crawford I just know that at 64 Jones would be a steal.
Re: Mock 3.16 Trade Back!!
[quote user="GiantPride27"][quote user="Raptor22"]Rd 2)
a) LOVE the Doug Martin pick. No.2 back in the draft, IMO
b) Gimme Tyrone Crawford (DE-Boise St.). Basically a high 3rd round selection, and I like him way more than Jones. Chandler Jones never really got me that excited.
Rd 3)
a) Eh, I'll take Egnew. Although, I think I'd be a little diappointed if he's BPA. (I'd rather take Audie Cole or Mike Martin if one of them are there)
b) Hell No. I don't want Burfict period. He certainly can provide more impact than Barden, but rather than making some catches that extend drives to win a game, his impact is more likely an idiotic penalty that will extend an opponent's drive to win the game. Give me James Brown (G/T-Troy).
[/quote]
Audie Cole is a 5-6 round prospect i dont see us taking him in the 3rd. there are alot of other LB prospects b etter then him still available.
I also am not sold on egnew. He looked bad for a Receiving TE at the combine. I would rather them pick up L. Green from Lauis/laf.
also hate Taze in the third wouldnt mind having him as a 5-7-UFA bcx hes got potential.[/quote]
Almost everywhere I've seen has Cole listed as a mid-3rd rounder... the few exceptions I've seen are one mock had him going late 2nd, and another early 4th.
Re: Mock 3.16 Trade Back!!
[quote user="Raptor22"][quote user="GiantPride27"][quote user="Raptor22"]Rd 2)
a) LOVE the Doug Martin pick. No.2 back in the draft, IMO
b) Gimme Tyrone Crawford (DE-Boise St.). Basically a high 3rd round selection, and I like him way more than Jones. Chandler Jones never really got me that excited.
Rd 3)
a) Eh, I'll take Egnew. Although, I think I'd be a little diappointed if he's BPA. (I'd rather take Audie Cole or Mike Martin if one of them are there)
b) Hell No. I don't want Burfict period. He certainly can provide more impact than Barden, but rather than making some catches that extend drives to win a game, his impact is more likely an idiotic penalty that will extend an opponent's drive to win the game. Give me James Brown (G/T-Troy).
[/quote]
Audie Cole is a 5-6 round prospect i dont see us taking him in the 3rd. there are alot of other LB prospects b etter then him still available.
I also am not sold on egnew. He looked bad for a Receiving TE at the combine. I would rather them pick up L. Green from Lauis/laf.
also hate Taze in the third wouldnt mind having him as a 5-7-UFA bcx hes got potential.[/quote]
Almost everywhere I've seen has Cole listed as a mid-3rd rounder... the few exceptions I've seen are one mock had him going late 2nd, and another early 4th.
[/quote]
ive seen him projected in mocks as a mid 3rd rounder but as far as value goes hes no more than a 5-FA guy
highest ive seen him was late 4th early 5th.
im not saying i dont like the kid i just wouldnt want him in the 3rd where he is overvalued.
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/p...kings/2012/ILB
http://walterfootball.com/draft2012ILB.php
Re: Mock 3.16 Trade Back!!
I think Cole was a projected as a 3rd rounder but his stock has fallen.
Re: Mock 3.16 Trade Back!!
[quote user="Spizi"]idk why everyone's hating on the Vontaze in the 3rd pick lol. 3rd rounders only have a 30% chance of being starters so why not take a chance on a guy who clearly has emmense potential?? We're the Super Bowl champs! we can take calculated risks.
I haven't watched Crawford I just know that at 64 Jones would be a steal.[/quote]
Burfict is the opposite of potential.