Post season success isn't the be all and end all of a great QB. (But it certainly is nice) Manning and Romo are both highly skilled and talented. They are both the pointy end of the spear.
Printable View
Post season success isn't the be all and end all of a great QB. (But it certainly is nice) Manning and Romo are both highly skilled and talented. They are both the pointy end of the spear.
Personally I like Superman better than Batman.
That's about as far as I can go in pretending that these are not some of the stupidest discussion points I've read here in quite some time.
Next up on the subjectivity forum, who seems nicer? Jason Garrett or John Mara?
well then here is a simple fact for you that i think you can understand.....Dallas beat the giants with authority and convincingly weds night. and i will remind you, in case you not thinking about it cause its just game #1, but that win is also a division win. i will also remind you that there are just only 6 division games per yr; making this 1st game of the yr an actually vital one.
just some simple facts for you to ponder over. dont we all just love to grovel over facts?:cool:
If we're going to base everything on Wednesday nights game, then Romo is the better QB all around.
See how silly that sounds?
Romo does not turn the ball over as many times as Eli. One thing that Giants fans overlook is that Eli Manning has turned the ball over 50 times in the last two regular seasons.
And also, if we're going to talk about 'should've been interceptions' Eli threw two of those on Wednesday that you probably just don't remember because of biased hindsight. If Carr doesn't mistime his jump, The Hixon reception is an easy interception and on a separate play where the Cowboys baited Eli, if Barry Church holds onto the ball then you would have seen a pick six.