When I see Nicks in his pads before the 49ers game I will believe it. These inside guys have been wrong before. Remember when Eli was supposed to miss some time back in 2007 because of a shoulder injury? How many games did he miss?
Why the Nicks injury is actually a positive
Printable View
-
10-05-2012, 02:33 PMBuddy333
-
10-05-2012, 02:35 PMBuffyBlueII
There is no positive to Hakeem Nicks being hurt no matter how you look at it.
Hakeem Nicks will get top dollar and we will pay him. He is our best receiver and we can't afford to lose him.
I bELIeve. -
10-05-2012, 02:37 PMDiamondringI did. You said it was a positive that he is hurt when it is not. As for signing both players, it can be done cause Osi is not a big factor any more and will be gone so some of that money can go to Nicks. Defense does not have to be perfect and it is hard to find a perfect one. Sometimes offense can be a good defense by keeping the margin high. With Nicks and Cruz together, with some other receiver is all we need. If one of our backs can be a great threat in the passing game, then we don't need a third good wr.Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverboat76
-
10-05-2012, 02:39 PMgiantsfan420u do realize he's just sharing his opinion right? and that he even prefaced that he was aware u both have ur opinions and he feels ur opinion is wrong. u and rollentuck really need to act more mature, this whole mocking ppl with diff opinions is getting old...all i have seen so far is elicruz try to express his opinion and why he feels urs is wrong, and i've seen now several posts where u are attacking him, not his opinion. grow upQuote:
Originally Posted by Riverboat76
-
10-05-2012, 02:41 PMgiantsfan420no, ur use of an exception to the rule is irrelevant. we've all heard the trent dilfer sb argument before. a qb who doesnt have to do anything n win a sb is the exception not the rule. just go by the last 10 sb winning qbs...Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverboat76
-
10-05-2012, 02:42 PMgiantsfan420dont sweat it man. i at least can see how u've just been trying to talk football, while riverboat feels the need to attack u bc u have a diff opinion than him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eliscruzzz
-
10-05-2012, 03:04 PMRiverboat76That's so cute that you are sticking up for folks, good for you. You're doing a terrific job policing the interwebs, keep it up! Anyways, you have really put me in the corner. Thank you for showing me the way.Quote:
Originally Posted by giantsfan420
-
10-05-2012, 03:38 PMEliscruzzz
It's alright, Riverboat got me. I have no idea what I'm talking about.I never attack him once but he felt the need to quickly attack my opinion, when other people in here have had the same opinion as me. Whatever, it's really starting to get annoying trying to talk football here with some people (not you g420), I guess next time I'll just keep my opinion to myself lol. This is the only MB I know where you express your opinion and people attack you like your a moron. It's funny too, cause when people start attacking your grammar, they usually have nothing else to fall back on.
-
10-05-2012, 03:45 PMTuckandRolle
Unfortunate food for thought: Graziano with his opinion on the current WR situation
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post...-giants-future -
10-05-2012, 04:09 PMEliscruzzzWell that is a decision the Giants will have to make but they really don't have to sign Cruz until 2014 he is a RFA and I'm pretty sure that when that time comes a lot of people will be let go. Also I really think when that time comes Eli will make his voice known that he wants to keep both.The Giants will find a way to keep both. They could let KP go, Rolle, or even Canty. who knows what Tuck will be thinking by then.Quote:
Originally Posted by TuckandRolle