I didn't deny if they happened or not. You don't usually see that many penalties on special teams is what I'm driving at. Most of that stuff is let go.
Printable View
We did once last year: Refs sold themselves out to GB last year against us and they win by 3. Rodgers was a hot merchandising commodity last year. Then we come in the playoffs and completely decimate them with the refs still on their side. So you better hope you don't get us in the playoffs at any point... Other than that, good luck for the rest of the season. Slaughter some Eagles for us on the way, would you?
Relax man. We can all play the blame game. If the redskins didn't make so many turnover mistakes in NY, they would've won. So feel proud. Such a ******ed argument.
Just man up and admit you lost a damn game. I'm a redskins fan and can admit when they lose. I came in peace saying both sides had bad calls, and people are just ******bags and then talk **** about every other fanbase in the NFL.
I wont say it was biased, it wasn't. But alot of poor calls all around.
If the Queen had balls she'd be the King. Notice how i didn't use anything that didn't happen in my post. The skins played their best ball (as was stated) the Giants made mistakes. Skins best ball+Giants Mistakes=1 point victory for the Skins. now tell me, how is that flawed logic?
The holding penalties were legit on us. Beatty is usually due for one or two a game anyway so I'm prepared to accept that. I just find it harder and harder these days to find balanced officiating across the board in the NFL even if it doesn't involve the Giants. I'll admit that we could of capitalized past the zebras and didn't take advantage of some opportunities but I don't think you can honestly say this wasn't a little one-sided with the penalties.