what I don't like about this comment is you are suggesting that the 3wr vote has something to do with the flex vote...they are completely separate votes and have nothing to do with one another.Quote:
Originally Posted by JPizzack
we decided as a league that having a flex position is good, period end of story over.
then Matt...being butt hurt over it decided to make up for that he was going to try an add another WR spot to the roster.
that's an entirely different vote that the league also decided was a good idea.
now everyone seems to be angry about 3WR+Flex....fine, whatever...but the point is we agreed on flex we just don't seem to agree on Flex AND 3wr's...since Flex was passed first the only thing up for discussion should be 3 WR's
THEE NYG SWAG THREAD
Printable View
-
08-03-2012, 11:04 AMDavenIII
-
08-03-2012, 11:12 AMJPizzackI dont think anyone is arguing the orignal flex vote. I think that it was a matter of people voting either (3WR + 2RB) vs (2WR + 2RB +flex)......nobody knew 3WR + flex was going to be an additional option after the fact.Quote:
Originally Posted by DavenIII
-
08-03-2012, 11:20 AMDavenIII
Ok, well that's fine but only cause I don't care if it's 2+2+Flex or 3+2+Flex...makes no difference to me.
but I will say that Matt went on and on and on about it 2 or 3 times a page for 6-10 pages in a row....if anyone didn't know about it, it was because they were purposefully ignoring Matt's posts....which I mean I don't blame anyone if that was the case :P -
08-03-2012, 11:52 AMbigblue4417I totally agreeQuote:
Originally Posted by JPizzack
-
08-03-2012, 12:00 PMMorehead State
Lets take a new vote on taking a new vote. Flex has been voted in. Now it should be 3 WR plus flex or 2 WR plus flex.
-
08-03-2012, 12:18 PMImgrate3 wr + flex was not introduced at the beginning. It should not be voted on at all. If 3 wr plus flex was introduced at the beginning (before I made my vote) then I would have voted for 3 wr instead of flex and therefore flex would not have won.Quote:
Originally Posted by Morehead State
-
08-03-2012, 03:17 PMJPizzack
jeez....new forums are even more boring than the old ones....
-
08-03-2012, 04:53 PMKase-1I think everyone wants 2WR with a Flex OR 3WR..... Thats what it seems like to meQuote:
Originally Posted by MattMeyerBud
-
08-03-2012, 05:36 PMbyronI originally voted 3 wr on flex same setup as last year...that was the first vote we took and it passed Matt called it...then somebody changed their vote and all hell broke loose.....lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Kase-1
page:13570
FLEX VOTE UPDATE:
NO FLEX: Me, Amanda, Pappy, Byron, Lando
YES FLEX: Daven, Lawl, Sharick, Kase
waiting on LT and Pats
5-4
LT voted standard....pats voted flex....making the vote 6 to 5 standard......
here is matt calling it....page 13571
The vote is in, it's standard. I say we just try to vote it out to attempt peace
[/quote]
I'm changing my vote to flex......... guess who?
Matt was calling for a compromise vote nearly from the beginning....I guess I didn't realize it would actually go to vote it still wouldn't have changed my original vote had I known....
the vote started on page 13546..........
page 13547 Matt and I talking
[/quote] Matt... WR is deep this year, even for a mandatory 3 receiver starts... i would be okay with a flex if we HAVE to start 3 wrs and 2 rbs and 1 flex.... but people wat 2rbs 2 WRs and 1 flex... it just is weak sauce[/quote] Byron ....make the flex spot rb/te, 3wrs, 2rbs......jk... I'm good with no flex.......
and the rest is history....its a good read if you got the time ;) starts at 13546 -
08-03-2012, 05:54 PMbigblue4417Way to go MH lolQuote:
Originally Posted by byron