Type: Posts; User: tdawg1413
There is a lot of talk that Scherff is very high on the Skins list and could go at 5 if Fowler is gone.
I agree on Gregory. It's possible that someone may grab him at the bottom of round 1 but I think he falls to the second. There are too many red flags on him. The pot, weight and the fact there have...
Snee we drafted. McKenzie was a good FA signing. Still was a third rounder. O'Hara was considered a decent C when signed. He got better as a Giant. Still undrafted FA
Tell me how many of them will be NFL players. Not saying they are not collectively good but Gurley is a stud. So is Nick Chubb who will be a first rounder in 2017.
The OL for our 2007 Super Bowl team. Diehl - 5th round, Seubert -UDFA, OHara - UDFA, Snee, 2nd round, McKenzie - 3rd round.
C'mon, don't you know, no OL equals awful draft. People don't realize there are still pretty good FAs out there and cuts coming in the Summer.
Same here. That is an excellent first three rounds. We can bring in a G like Pollak or Blalock and be ready to go.
+100. Thank you Slip. I don't fathom how this is not understood here.
Gurley doesn't to be successful. He is that good. Jennings and Williams do need a better OL. They are far less talented.
Forsett was a perfect RB for that zone scheme they ran. But that is a very good OL.
Davis a little but even without him that was a very good OL.
I hope you mean in round two. He wasn't a top ten pick IMO before this issue. He may fall into the second.
Both, his legs are shot but he also mailed it in that final season with us. There were times he gave little to no effort.
Also when Jacobs went to SF, he was a backup and injured. That OL was top flight but they also had a top flight RB in Gore. That's a real bad example.
You cite an example. Here is one of mine. Marshawn Lynch on the Seahawks. That is a relatively poor OL yet he runs wild. Why? Because he is that good. And when people look at his numbers, they say he...
Not true. You also need to have a RB with talent. As the OL makes a RB look good, the RB also makes the OL look good.
He was a beast but there is no chance he gets back. He is pretty much done.
I want to use it on Cooper or Shelton but if they are gone yes I would go Gurley. He has been cleared by doctors and will be ready for training camp. I like Jennings but he is always hurt and is not...
There is good amount of RB talent yes. None of them are even close to Gurley except Gordon. I also have Cooper and Shelton as my top two targets right now. I would not mind Gurley at all though.
Yes weakest, so because they will be used that makes them good? I am not counting Vereen because he is a specialist RB. He wont see many carries. Jennings is a 30 year old career backup with injury...
I am speaking the facts on Bradford. These numbers are not what I would call impressive:
As we have said none of those guys are any good. I discount Vereen because he is not a primary ballcarrier. Jennings, 30 year career backup with injury issues. Williams is just unimpressive to say...
Once Kiwi was removed, our pass rush greatly increased. Our main DE had 12.5 sacks. Between Moore and Ayers combined 10.5 sacks. We added a good veteran in Selvie who can rush a bit. We have a...
LOL, RB is our strongest position!!!! We have very little at RB. Take out Vereen who is not a primary ball carrier and you are left with Williams and Jennings who is always hurt. RB is actually one...