+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: gmen0820 First Mock

  1. #1
    All-Pro gmen0820's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Audubon, NJ
    Posts
    12,222

    gmen0820 First Mock

    1. Andre Branch, DE
    2. Doug Martin, RB
    3. Nate Potter, OT
    4. Nigel Bradham, LB
    5. Derek Wolfe, DT
    6. Matt Reynolds, OG/OT
    7. Donte Paige-Moss, DE
    "It's a numbers game but **** don't add up somehow." -- Mos Def

  2. #2

    Re: gmen0820 First Mock

    [quote user="gmen0820"]1. Andre Branch, DE
    2. Doug Martin, RB
    3. Nate Potter, OT
    4. Nigel Bradham, LB
    5. Derek Wolfe, DT
    6. Matt Reynolds, OG/OT
    7. Donte Paige-Moss, DE[/quote]

    1) I think we can do better with the #1 pick but being a Giants fan, I can certainly understand why you went the available DE with this pick.

    2) Probably not available by the end of the second. Good pick if he is ... however I'm not sure the Giants are looking to go RB with a Day 1 pick.

    3) Good solid pick and I like Potter. Might be a slight reach since he can probably be had in the 4th.

    4) Bradham probably won't be here at the 4th but a good pick of he is (you could probably realistically reverse your 3 and 4 picks and hit a winner).

    5) Don't like this pick. Doesn't have the size/strength to be a load in the middle and doesn't have the explosiveness to blow past NFL Guards/Centers. And we run a 3 DE spread on passing downs anyway.

    6) Decent choice but we already got Potter in the 3rd and we have a fair amount of depth at OG. I'm thinking TE or WR might make more sense here since you haven't addressed them.

    7) I like this pick as a project ... mental issues aside. However we went DE in the first and we have depth at that position ... bit overkill here (even for the Giants).
    I was told so by Titwio (Cyprien owns me)!

  3. #3

    Re: gmen0820 First Mock

    Dude be realistic Andre Branch is not a first rounder AT ALL.!!!

    1. Dwayne Allen: TE Clemson
    2. Kelechi Osemele: OT/OG Iowa State 6'6 335
    3. Billy Winn, DE/DT, Boise State
    4 Ryan Broyles, WR/PR, Oklahoma
    5. Nigel Bradham, LB Florida State
    6. Robert Turbin, RB, Utah State
    7. Janzen Jackson, S, McNeese State

  4. #4

    Re: gmen0820 First Mock

    [quote user="gmen0820"]1. Andre Branch, DE
    2. Doug Martin, RB
    3. Nate Potter, OT
    4. Nigel Bradham, LB
    5. Derek Wolfe, DT
    6. Matt Reynolds, OG/OT
    7. Donte Paige-Moss, DE[/quote] the Giants will have more picks than just seven,Coefield,Boss,Smith etc.. they should get more picks in the 6 or7th round?

  5. #5
    All-Pro gmen0820's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Audubon, NJ
    Posts
    12,222

    Re: gmen0820 First Mock

    [quote user="Kruunch"][quote user="gmen0820"]1. Andre Branch, DE
    2. Doug Martin, RB
    3. Nate Potter, OT
    4. Nigel Bradham, LB
    5. Derek Wolfe, DT
    6. Matt Reynolds, OG/OT
    7. Donte Paige-Moss, DE[/quote]

    1) I think we can do better with the #1 pick but being a Giants fan, I can certainly understand why you went the available DE with this pick.

    2) Probably not available by the end of the second. Good pick if he is ... however I'm not sure the Giants are looking to go RB with a Day 1 pick.

    3) Good solid pick and I like Potter. Might be a slight reach since he can probably be had in the 4th.

    4) Bradham probably won't be here at the 4th but a good pick of he is (you could probably realistically reverse your 3 and 4 picks and hit a winner).

    5) Don't like this pick. Doesn't have the size/strength to be a load in the middle and doesn't have the explosiveness to blow past NFL Guards/Centers. And we run a 3 DE spread on passing downs anyway.

    6) Decent choice but we already got Potter in the 3rd and we have a fair amount of depth at OG. I'm thinking TE or WR might make more sense here since you haven't addressed them.

    7) I like this pick as a project ... mental issues aside. However we went DE in the first and we have depth at that position ... bit overkill here (even for the Giants).[/quote]I left out supplemental picks. Was gonna wait until those were released to give a more accurate positional plan.

    I do see us drafting a WR, TE and safety as well.
    "It's a numbers game but **** don't add up somehow." -- Mos Def

  6. #6

    Re: gmen0820 First Mock

    [quote user="gmen0820"][quote user="Kruunch"][quote user="gmen0820"]1. Andre Branch, DE
    2. Doug Martin, RB
    3. Nate Potter, OT
    4. Nigel Bradham, LB
    5. Derek Wolfe, DT
    6. Matt Reynolds, OG/OT
    7. Donte Paige-Moss, DE[/quote]

    1) I think we can do better with the #1 pick but being a Giants fan, I can certainly understand why you went the available DE with this pick.

    2) Probably not available by the end of the second. Good pick if he is ... however I'm not sure the Giants are looking to go RB with a Day 1 pick.

    3) Good solid pick and I like Potter. Might be a slight reach since he can probably be had in the 4th.

    4) Bradham probably won't be here at the 4th but a good pick of he is (you could probably realistically reverse your 3 and 4 picks and hit a winner).

    5) Don't like this pick. Doesn't have the size/strength to be a load in the middle and doesn't have the explosiveness to blow past NFL Guards/Centers. And we run a 3 DE spread on passing downs anyway.

    6) Decent choice but we already got Potter in the 3rd and we have a fair amount of depth at OG. I'm thinking TE or WR might make more sense here since you haven't addressed them.

    7) I like this pick as a project ... mental issues aside. However we went DE in the first and we have depth at that position ... bit overkill here (even for the Giants).[/quote]I left out supplemental picks. Was gonna wait until those were released to give a more accurate positional plan.

    I do see us drafting a WR, TE and safety as well.[/quote] Jerry has a plan the drive to go back to back,one for the thumb!

  7. #7

    Re: gmen0820 First Mock

    [quote user="gmen0820"]1. Andre Branch, DE
    2. Doug Martin, RB
    3. Nate Potter, OT
    4. Nigel Bradham, LB
    5. Derek Wolfe, DT
    6. Matt Reynolds, OG/OT
    7. Donte Paige-Moss, DE[/quote]

    Does Doug Martin have any sort of fumbling issue?
    http://boards.giants.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=137356&dateline=13430  81128

    I'm Back, Back in the New York Groove!

  8. #8
    All-Pro gmen0820's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Audubon, NJ
    Posts
    12,222

    Re: gmen0820 First Mock

    [quote user="GmenFan1980"][quote user="gmen0820"]1. Andre Branch, DE
    2. Doug Martin, RB
    3. Nate Potter, OT
    4. Nigel Bradham, LB
    5. Derek Wolfe, DT
    6. Matt Reynolds, OG/OT
    7. Donte Paige-Moss, DE[/quote]

    Does Doug Martin have any sort of fumbling issue?[/quote]8 fumbles in 50 career games, 6 of them lost.

    But with his work ethic, there is no reason Coughlin can't bring that to the absolute minimum.
    "It's a numbers game but **** don't add up somehow." -- Mos Def

  9. #9

    Re: gmen0820 First Mock

    Matt Reynolds was actually one of the guys I was considering for my mock. I like the value he brings to the table that late in the draft.


    Cool story bro

  10. #10

    Re: gmen0820 First Mock

    [quote user="gmen0820"][quote user="GmenFan1980"][quote user="gmen0820"]1. Andre Branch, DE
    2. Doug Martin, RB
    3. Nate Potter, OT
    4. Nigel Bradham, LB
    5. Derek Wolfe, DT
    6. Matt Reynolds, OG/OT
    7. Donte Paige-Moss, DE[/quote]

    Does Doug Martin have any sort of fumbling issue?[/quote]8 fumbles in 50 career games, 6 of them lost.

    But with his work ethic, there is no reason Coughlin can't bring that to the absolute minimum.[/quote]

    Ok, I just asked cause we seem to have a couple backs who have fumbling issues already.

    Just wanted to see if we would be drafting another lol :P
    http://boards.giants.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=137356&dateline=13430  81128

    I'm Back, Back in the New York Groove!

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts