TE or BPA at 32?

[DaveBrown]

Most mock drafts have Reese taking one of the 3 TE's - what's the consensus out there? Best player available or drafting a position of need this year?

[bLuereverie]

BPA involves team needs

[Drez]

We'll probably draft for highest value.

[TheEnigma]

I think the best value for TE is around rounds 3-5 myself but I wouldn't be too upset with either Fleener or Allen at #32.

[myles2424]

I think fleener & Allen had very good chances of becoming early 2nd rounders even prior to their unimpressive combines......I highly doubt either of them will be BPA

[tonyt830]

If Reese has Fleener as his BPA at 32, great. If not I would not be surprised to see the best available DE or DT drafted.

[BlueSanta]

clue: whoever we pick, no matter if he was a need or not, Reese will say he was the highest rated remaining player on his board.

[slipknottin]

They always try to find the mix of the highest rated player and biggest need.

[Morehead State]

[quote user="DaveBrown"]Most mock drafts have Reese taking one of the 3 TE's - what's the consensus out there? Best player available or drafting a position of need this year?[/quote]</P>


I would be shocked if we took a TE with our first round pick to play in an offense that doesn't use the TE much. Makes no sense at all.</P>

[JJC7301]

ALWAYS take BPA, especially if its one that surprisingly dropped like Prince did last year.

Personally, I don't want a TE drafted that high. I just don't think it's necessary and this whole "this is a TE league now" is completely blown out of proportion. We just won a SB with an unheralded TE with an injured knee.

I've always loved the TE position, but I think that experts and others are completely pushing this TE bandwagon ridiculously far.

I'm hoping the BPA will be on the o-line, secondary, d-line or WR.