+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33
  1. #11
    All-Pro gmen0820's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Audubon, New Jersey
    Posts
    18,382

    Re: Hypothetical Draft Question

    [quote user="myles2424"][quote user="giantsfan420"][quote user="myles2424"][quote user="gmen0820"]Coby Fleener. He can stretch the seams, let Bennett work the underneath route while he comes off chipping a DL, and let Cruz and Nicks do the rest.

    Fleener would give us so much flexibility in our formations. He can play tight to the line, and the slot, and Bennett is a huge factor as well. He will play close to the line, he can light up a DE and go out for a pass in the intermediate range. But that is not to say that Bennett can't do those same things. That is why we can dictate ANYTHING on offense.

    I know you said make the decision without another FA, but what if you add SS12 into the equation as well? We'd literally be unstoppable because we would have an incredible blend of timing and talent, and if anyone doesn't over praise, it is me.[/quote] I highly doubt after bennett we'd go TE in the 1st.....between a 1st round pick,Bennett,Ballard that would indicate one of them not being on the team in 2013......were all hoping that Bennett pans out,Ballard showed great potential & obviously a 1st round pick wouldn't be going anywhere......
    How about egnew in the 4th...[/quote]

    we spent a 3rd on Beckum and we carry Pascoe and Ballard. We carry 3 TE's, and like GMEN said, Fleener is quick and fast enough to obliterate LB's/Safeties out of the slot, and big enough to own nickel corners out of the slot.
    Keep in mind, we also signed Ballard for one year only as well if I'm not mistaken. If Fleener is the BPA, we'll draft him.[/quote] I bet even if fleener is available, we won't draft him....[/quote]It isn't far fetched that we pass on him. Personally, I'd take him just because of the flexibility I speculate could happen.

  2. #12
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    2,038

    Re: Hypothetical Draft Question

    [quote user="gmen0820"][quote user="myles2424"][quote user="gmen0820"]Coby Fleener. He can stretch the seams, let Bennett work the underneath route while he comes off chipping a DL, and let Cruz and Nicks do the rest.

    Fleener would give us so much flexibility in our formations. He can play tight to the line, and the slot, and Bennett is a huge factor as well. He will play close to the line, he can light up a DE and go out for a pass in the intermediate range. But that is not to say that Bennett can't do those same things. That is why we can dictate ANYTHING on offense.

    I know you said make the decision without another FA, but what if you add SS12 into the equation as well? We'd literally be unstoppable because we would have an incredible blend of timing and talent, and if anyone doesn't over praise, it is me.[/quote] I highly doubt after bennett we'd go TE in the 1st.....between a 1st round pick,Bennett,Ballard that would indicate one of them not being on the team in 2013......were all hoping that Bennett pans out,Ballard showed great potential & obviously a 1st round pick wouldn't be going anywhere......
    How about egnew in the 4th...[/quote]I'm not positive we will go TE. I think Stephen Hill is a high prospect on Reese's board because we've shown the ability to coach WRs up, he has all the tangibles, and is a great run blocker for our perimeter game (which has been improved by the Bennett signing as well).

    But Jenkins is a character concern, Wilson is a guy I'd like in the second -- and no earlier, Hightower is better suited for a 34 defense, and Mike Adams is not a favorite of mine.[/quote]

    I find it hard to believe that we would take Hill because I can only imagine the disaster he would be running option routes or any pro style routes for that matter.

  3. #13
    Veteran JJC7301's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    4,915

    Re: Hypothetical Draft Question

    [quote user="JacksGiant76"]If we didn't make any other moves after today and we're picking last in the first round and the following players were available, who you take and why ?

    Stephen Hill - WR
    Donta Hightower - ILB
    Janoris Jenkins - CB
    Mike Adams - OT
    Cody Fleener - TE
    David Wilson - RB


    Gotta say I'd lean towards Stephen Hill and a deep threat reciever to replace Manningham and keeping Cruz in the slot.

    [/quote]
    Geez, I put up almost the same exact thread weeks ago and nobody bit on my thread. No love. ;(

    It would have to be BPA, but if I HAD to choose from the list above, it would be between Adams and Jenkins. I'd have to go with Adams.

    I'd rather spend money (and high picks) on skill positions, but our o-line has a chance of being scary bad this year. I don't THINK it'll be as bad as some think, but it could be potentially terrible so that's why I wouldn't mind a O-lineman (whether it's Adams or someone else) in the 1st this year.

    I'd be happy with any of the names above, but I'm not interested in a TE or RB in the 1st.

  4. #14

    Re: Hypothetical Draft Question

    I say it's between Jenkins, Hightower, and Hill. we just don't value any of the other positions enough to where I see us picking them in the first. We can niver have to many good corners, or weapons for Eli. also Hightower is a good pass rusher and Rolando McClain who we desperately wanted came from the same school and system and is a good MLB for the 4-3 Raiders.

  5. #15

    Re: Hypothetical Draft Question

    [quote user="giantsfan420"][quote user="myles2424"][quote user="gmen0820"]Coby Fleener. He can stretch the seams, let Bennett work the underneath route while he comes off chipping a DL, and let Cruz and Nicks do the rest.

    Fleener would give us so much flexibility in our formations. He can play tight to the line, and the slot, and Bennett is a huge factor as well. He will play close to the line, he can light up a DE and go out for a pass in the intermediate range. But that is not to say that Bennett can't do those same things. That is why we can dictate ANYTHING on offense.

    I know you said make the decision without another FA, but what if you add SS12 into the equation as well? We'd literally be unstoppable because we would have an incredible blend of timing and talent, and if anyone doesn't over praise, it is me.[/quote] I highly doubt after bennett we'd go TE in the 1st.....between a 1st round pick,Bennett,Ballard that would indicate one of them not being on the team in 2013......were all hoping that Bennett pans out,Ballard showed great potential & obviously a 1st round pick wouldn't be going anywhere......
    How about egnew in the 4th...[/quote]

    we spent a 3rd on Beckum and we carry Pascoe and Ballard. We carry 3 TE's, and like GMEN said, Fleener is quick and fast enough to obliterate LB's/Safeties out of the slot, and big enough to own nickel corners out of the slot.
    Keep in mind, we also signed Ballard for one year only as well if I'm not mistaken. If Fleener is the BPA, we'll draft him.[/quote]do you know what fleener's pro day 40 was?

  6. #16

    Re: Hypothetical Draft Question

    i think they'll take a dl..like the dt from penn state if he's still there

  7. #17

    Re: Hypothetical Draft Question

    Fleener for sure.

    But hypothetically speaking, as someone said above, nothing would make me happier if Reese surprised everyone by trading up to get Trent Richardson. If not him, then Monte Ball out of Wisconsin. We'd be heavy favorites if either of those were in our backfield

  8. #18
    Veteran myles2424's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Tampa
    Posts
    4,418

    Re: Hypothetical Draft Question

    [quote user="ShockeyShow"]Fleener for sure.

    But hypothetically speaking, as someone said above, nothing would make me happier if Reese surprised everyone by trading up to get Trent Richardson. If not him, then Monte Ball out of Wisconsin. We'd be heavy favorites if either of those were in our backfield[/quote] I think Ball went back to school.....

  9. #19

    Re: Hypothetical Draft Question

    [quote user="Spizi"][quote user="JacksGiant76"]If we didn't make any other moves after today and we're picking last in the first round and the following players were available, who you take and why ?

    Stephen Hill - WR
    Donta Hightower - ILB
    Janoris Jenkins - CB
    Mike Adams - OT
    Cody Fleener - TE
    David Wilson - RB


    Gotta say I'd lean towards Stephen Hill and a deep threat reciever to replace Manningham and keeping Cruz in the slot.

    [/quote]

    All I can say is that from your list there's no way in hell we take Hill, Jenkins, or Hightower. This leaves Adams, Fleener, and Wilson. I don't see Adams because they like Brewer and seem to take later round linemen. The thing against Wilson is his ball security and once again we like to take RBs later in the draft. So basically I think they would take Fleener out of that list and so would I.[/quote]why would that be, the giants met with hill at his pro day. Hill would be my choice outta those guys. He could stretch the field and open things up for the rest of the offense. He's a bigger faster more athletic better blocking version of manninham. I don't understand y there's no way in hell the giants would take him BC he'd pretty much be bpa and fills a need even if most of the people on this board don't think it is.

  10. #20
    Starter
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    119

    Re: Hypothetical Draft Question

    Stanford pro day is the 22nd.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts