+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: TE COACH POPE ON COBY FLEENER

  1. #11

    Re: TE COACH POPE ON COBY FLEENER

    [quote user="gmen0820"][quote user="Spedracer"]Dwayne Allen has better hands than Fleener, and reportedly has worked hard on his blocking. Just go watch his tape...guy is a hands catcher.[/quote]Allen has natural hands. He just plucks the ball out of the air. He is a hard working blocker, and he is great at it.

    Bennett and Allen would be two mauling inline blockers, with a lot of upside in the pass game. I've said this a while, but we could run a 22/21 offense every week, and it would be so tough to stop.[/quote]

    Would Allen be a reach at the end of the 2nd?

  2. #12

    Re: TE COACH POPE ON COBY FLEENER

    [quote user="gmen0820"]BTW, the article this was pulled out of has nothing to do with Fleener.[/quote]

    Exactly.. i read this in a peter king excerpt about the giants.

    cute little attempt by the OP

  3. #13

    Re: TE COACH POPE ON COBY FLEENER

    [quote user="LT_was_good"][quote user="gmen0820"][quote user="Spedracer"]Dwayne Allen has better hands than Fleener, and reportedly has worked hard on his blocking. Just go watch his tape...guy is a hands catcher.[/quote]Allen has natural hands. He just plucks the ball out of the air. He is a hard working blocker, and he is great at it.

    Bennett and Allen would be two mauling inline blockers, with a lot of upside in the pass game. I've said this a while, but we could run a 22/21 offense every week, and it would be so tough to stop.[/quote]

    Would Allen be a reach at the end of the 2nd?*
    [/quote]

    no. in fact, we'd be lucky if he fell to that pick.

    and we already have a great blocking TE in Bennett...

  4. #14

    Re: TE COACH POPE ON COBY FLEENER

    Dude we are NOT getting FLEENERRRRRRRR!

  5. #15

    Re: TE COACH POPE ON COBY FLEENER

    If Fleener is there we don't need him, bro we can draft Egnew from Missouri in the 4th round. He is bigger faster and catch better why waste a pick on Fleener when you can get the same type of player in the 4th round. Egnew stats dropped this year because he had a new QB and still had over 500 yards. Also the year before he had 900+ with Gabbert at QB who is now with Jacksonville Jags.

  6. #16
    All-Pro gmen0820's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Audubon, New Jersey
    Posts
    18,897

    Re: TE COACH POPE ON COBY FLEENER

    [quote user="NewYorkSwagg"]If Fleener is there we don't need him, bro we can draft Egnew from Missouri in the 4th round. He is bigger faster and catch better why waste a pick on Fleener when you can get the same type of player in the 4th round. Egnew stats dropped this year because he had a new QB and still had over 500 yards. Also the year before he had 900+ with Gabbert at QB who is now with Jacksonville Jags.[/quote]I don't like Egnew at all.

    I think Coffman was even a better prospect than Egnew.

  7. #17
    All-Pro slipknottin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    36,674

    Re: TE COACH POPE ON COBY FLEENER

    [quote user="gmen0820"]BTW, the article this was pulled out of has nothing to do with Fleener.[/quote]

    exactly.

    This absolutely means nothing about Fleener.

    First, you have to make the conclusion that this article is implying the giants dont think Fleener can block.

    Second you have to make the conclusion that this article means Beckum was at some point a wonderful blocker.

    Third you have to make the conclusion that Pope believes Fleener can never become a good blocker.

  8. #18

    Re: TE COACH POPE ON COBY FLEENER

    [quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="gmen0820"]BTW, the article this was pulled out of has nothing to do with Fleener.[/quote]

    exactly.

    This absolutely means nothing about Fleener.

    First, you have to make the conclusion that this article is implying the giants dont think Fleener can block.

    Second you have to make the conclusion that this article means Beckum was at some point a wonderful blocker.

    Third you have to make the conclusion that Pope believes Fleener can never become a good blocker.[/quote] I think Fleener gets picked before the Giants anyway.

  9. #19

    Re: TE COACH POPE ON COBY FLEENER

    [quote user="gmen0820"][quote user="NewYorkSwagg"]If Fleener is there we don't need him, bro we can draft Egnew from Missouri in the 4th round. He is bigger faster and catch better why waste a pick on Fleener when you can get the same type of player in the 4th round. Egnew stats dropped this year because he had a new QB and still had over 500 yards. Also the year before he had 900+ with Gabbert at QB who is now with Jacksonville Jags.[/quote]I don't like Egnew at all.

    I think Coffman was even a better prospect than Egnew.[/quote]Michael "Bubble Screen " Egnew. He has the most padded numbers of any player in this draft. Im not even exaggerating by saying at least half of his catches are bubble screens. Why do u think Fleeners YPC doubles Egnews. I dont even know how u can grade Egnew properly. All he does is stand in the slot catches a bubble screen runs 5 yards and gets tackled. At least with Fleener I see him running the route tree getting separation on CB's at 6'6 247.Fleener is so much more fluid and explosive its not even close

  10. #20
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,876

    Re: TE COACH POPE ON COBY FLEENER

    [quote user="Redeyejedi"][quote user="slipknottin"][quote user="gmen0820"]BTW, the article this was pulled out of has nothing to do with Fleener.[/quote]

    exactly.

    This absolutely means nothing about Fleener.

    First, you have to make the conclusion that this article is implying the giants dont think Fleener can block.

    Second you have to make the conclusion that this article means Beckum was at some point a wonderful blocker.

    Third you have to make the conclusion that Pope believes Fleener can never become a good blocker.[/quote] I think Fleener gets picked before the Giants anyway.[/quote]

    Id say Houston takes him in the first, Allen on the other hand should NOT be taken with our first. He would be decent value at then end of round 2

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts