+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: Ntegrase96 Dallas

  1. #21
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,763

    Re: Ntegrase96 Dallas

    [quote user="Giants10Joe"][quote user="Bread"][quote user="jhamburg"][quote user="Bread"][quote user="Axels15"]As long as Vick is injury prone, i can't say Eagles are the team to beat.

    Who do they even have to back him up? A rookie?[/quote]

    Former Starting Quarterback and Stanford Graduate, Trent Edwards.[/quote]

    ...who also wasn't on an NFL roster in 2011[/quote]

    The Dolphins tried to woo him into offering his services to them but he flat out turned them down.[/quote]

    Wow, that's pretty bad if a player would rather sit the year out than play for you.
    [/quote]

    Carson Palmer basically did that with the Bengals also lol

    And people on the boards were complaining that players don't want to play with Coughlin lol

  2. #22

    Re: Ntegrase96 Dallas



    [quote user="ibbill"]Ntegrase96 Thanks for the input. I also really believe and hate to say so Philly is the team to beat this year. Only weak or inconsistent part on that Philly team is the QB. Going to be a lot of fun watching this division lay it on each other this year.[/quote]</P>


    Im going to disagree with you they lost there probowl LT which will hurt them along with Asante who by far was a nightmare for Eli. There secondary will not improve because of one rookie. There D-line and linebackers did improve but rookies are rookies and besides Suh none really will dominate like that. It took JPP a year to develop into the player he is now. I believe there o-line and secondary will be there weakest links on there team especially with our dline and our Wr's.</P>

  3. #23
    All-Pro
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    9,515

    Re: Ntegrase96 Dallas

    The Eagles aint the team to beat this year, we are.

  4. #24
    Veteran
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2,539

    Re: Ntegrase96 Dallas

    [quote user="n420p69"]The Eagles aint the team to beat this year, we are.
    [/quote]

    Seriously I can't believe anyone, much less a Giants fan, would say the Eagles are the team to beat in the NFCE. We're comparing a team that missed the playoffs to a team that won the super bowl here. We are the team to beat for the entire NFL.

  5. #25
    Veteran ibbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Hamilton Canada
    Posts
    2,211

    Re: Ntegrase96 Dallas

    [quote user="Ntegrase96"][quote user="ibbill"]Ntegrase96 Thanks for the input. I also really believe and hate to say so Philly is the team to beat this year.

    Only weak or inconsistent part on that Philly team is the QB.

    Going to be a lot of fun watching this division lay it on each other this year.[/quote]

    Yeah no problem. It seemed a bit quiet around the smack talk thread considering the draft was this weekend.

    I think the biggest problem with Philly may be coaching. The team just needs a change of pace or something. Hard to believe a team that is that consistently loaded with talent, with a high turnover of talent also, can't get over the hump. FO seems to be doing its job; maybe Reid is the problem.

    How do you feel the Giants did? I see a lot of excited posters, but not many people that I'm particularly familiar with. So I'd like to get your take on things.
    [/quote]

    Once they signed Rogers and Osi seemed okay (gulp maybe not) Was looking for a WR to replace Manningham. This may be one of the few times TC starts a rookie.Rueben) With Jacobs gone RB was really nice pick. Seems a lot thought we would pick a O line man in the first 2 rds but we really have a lot of depth there. Hosley pick was great for ST.

    Hixon Wr. is coming off his 2nd acl cant see him ever being 100% again. Very happy with the draft. Reese picked some great players and they ended up filling our holes. Good Luck this year. Should be a lot of fun again.
    Bill Loyal to the NYG logo

  6. #26
    All-Pro giantyankee1976's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    OUT of MARKET
    Posts
    15,109

    Re: Ntegrase96 Dallas

    [quote user="Ntegrase96"] ...How do you feel the Giants did? I see a lot of excited posters, but not many people that I'm particularly familiar with... [/quote]
    the Draft:

    David Wilson: possibly a new type Tiki

    Double
    R: fulfills a NEED at WR and was a steal as he was projected by many as a
    1st Round talent. HOPEFULLY he will have a good Football IQ and not
    need coaching up like Double-M did.

    Hosley: may be a steal as
    well. A little bit of character issue with failed drug test BUT if I
    remember correctly Bradshaw was also a "character issue" and look at him
    now.

    the Tackles, Mosley and McCants? What I understand is that
    most draft experts had the majority of Tackles projected as either
    better suited as NFL Guards or otherwise "projects."

    Never the
    less, O-Line improvement is a need, especially with the pass rushes of
    dallas, philly and washington getting upgrades and such.

    As to Kuhn, with Marvin Austin being a question mark after his injury, this to me was an insurance pick.

    Typical Jerry Reese draft. Nothing flashy, just solid thought-out BPA/Needs picking.

    Grade: A-


    NFL Championships : 1927 1934 1938 1956 Super Bowl Champions: XXI XXV XLII XLVI

  7. #27
    Veteran Ntegrase96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    3,489

    Re: Ntegrase96 Dallas

    [quote user="I Bleed Blue 56"]

    [quote user="ibbill"]Ntegrase96 Thanks for the input. I also really believe and hate to say so Philly is the team to beat this year. Only weak or inconsistent part on that Philly team is the QB. Going to be a lot of fun watching this division lay it on each other this year.[/quote]</p>


    Im going to disagree with you they lost there probowl LT which will hurt them along with Asante who by far was a nightmare for Eli. There secondary will not improve because of one rookie. There D-line and linebackers did improve but rookies are rookies and besides Suh none really will dominate like that. It took JPP a year to develop into the player he is now. I believe there o-line and secondary will be there weakest links on there team especially with our dline and our Wr's.</p>[/quote]

    Von Miller? Sometimes rookies are a force, and with the help surrounding him, I can see Fletcher Cox making some noise with Babin and Cole.

    Just goes to show you the difference in point of views. I personally liked the Eagles having Asante Samuel. Garrett was pretty good at scheming against him and playing against his weakensses.

    We all match up differently against each other.

  8. #28
    Veteran Ntegrase96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    3,489

    Re: Ntegrase96 Dallas

    [quote user="giantyankee1976"][quote user="Ntegrase96"] ...How do you feel the Giants did? I see a lot of excited posters, but not many people that I'm particularly familiar with... [/quote]
    the Draft:

    David Wilson: possibly a new type Tiki

    Double
    R: fulfills a NEED at WR and was a steal as he was projected by many as a
    1st Round talent. HOPEFULLY he will have a good Football IQ and not
    need coaching up like Double-M did.

    Hosley: may be a steal as
    well. A little bit of character issue with failed drug test BUT if I
    remember correctly Bradshaw was also a "character issue" and look at him
    now.

    the Tackles, Mosley and McCants? What I understand is that
    most draft experts had the majority of Tackles projected as either
    better suited as NFL Guards or otherwise "projects."

    Never the
    less, O-Line improvement is a need, especially with the pass rushes of
    dallas, philly and washington getting upgrades and such.

    As to Kuhn, with Marvin Austin being a question mark after his injury, this to me was an insurance pick.

    Typical Jerry Reese draft. Nothing flashy, just solid thought-out BPA/Needs picking.

    Grade: A-
    [/quote]

    Good breakdown. How ya been? Still hungover from the superbowl?

  9. #29
    All-Pro giantyankee1976's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    OUT of MARKET
    Posts
    15,109

    Re: Ntegrase96 Dallas

    [quote user="Ntegrase96"][quote user="giantyankee1976"][quote user="Ntegrase96"] ...How do you feel the Giants did? I see a lot of excited posters, but not many people that I'm particularly familiar with... [/quote]
    the Draft:

    David Wilson: possibly a new type Tiki

    Double
    R: fulfills a NEED at WR and was a steal as he was projected by many as a
    1st Round talent. HOPEFULLY he will have a good Football IQ and not
    need coaching up like Double-M did.

    Hosley: may be a steal as
    well. A little bit of character issue with failed drug test BUT if I
    remember correctly Bradshaw was also a "character issue" and look at him
    now.

    the Tackles, Mosley and McCants? What I understand is that
    most draft experts had the majority of Tackles projected as either
    better suited as NFL Guards or otherwise "projects."

    Never the
    less, O-Line improvement is a need, especially with the pass rushes of
    dallas, philly and washington getting upgrades and such.

    As to Kuhn, with Marvin Austin being a question mark after his injury, this to me was an insurance pick.

    Typical Jerry Reese draft. Nothing flashy, just solid thought-out BPA/Needs picking.

    Grade: A-
    [/quote]

    Good breakdown. How ya been? Still hungover from the superbowl?
    [/quote]

    doing well, for the most part. You?
    <font color="#FF0000">
    what SB win ???</font> [:|]


    NFL Championships : 1927 1934 1938 1956 Super Bowl Champions: XXI XXV XLII XLVI

  10. #30
    Veteran Ntegrase96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    3,489

    Re: Ntegrase96 Dallas

    [quote user="giantyankee1976"][quote user="Ntegrase96"][quote user="giantyankee1976"][quote user="Ntegrase96"] ...How do you feel the Giants did? I see a lot of excited posters, but not many people that I'm particularly familiar with... [/quote]
    the Draft:

    David Wilson: possibly a new type Tiki

    Double
    R: fulfills a NEED at WR and was a steal as he was projected by many as a
    1st Round talent. HOPEFULLY he will have a good Football IQ and not
    need coaching up like Double-M did.

    Hosley: may be a steal as
    well. A little bit of character issue with failed drug test BUT if I
    remember correctly Bradshaw was also a "character issue" and look at him
    now.

    the Tackles, Mosley and McCants? What I understand is that
    most draft experts had the majority of Tackles projected as either
    better suited as NFL Guards or otherwise "projects."

    Never the
    less, O-Line improvement is a need, especially with the pass rushes of
    dallas, philly and washington getting upgrades and such.

    As to Kuhn, with Marvin Austin being a question mark after his injury, this to me was an insurance pick.

    Typical Jerry Reese draft. Nothing flashy, just solid thought-out BPA/Needs picking.

    Grade: A-
    [/quote]

    Good breakdown. How ya been? Still hungover from the superbowl?
    [/quote]

    doing well, for the most part. You?
    <font color="#ff0000">
    what SB win ???</font> [:|]
    [/quote]

    Well enjoy the NFCE title while you can because it's gonna be ours!

    ...probably not this year, but next year.

    ...and if not the next year then some year after that!

    Okay so we're rebuilding a bit.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts