If we win another Superbowl would you call us a dynasty?

[AllTuckedUp]

Personally, I wouldn't. I see a dynasty as a dominant team for many years. If you look at our regular season records we haven't been dominant.

[shotcalla39]

Yes ... We would be as close to a dynasty as possible in this salary cap parity era.. we've been pretty Damn consistent... We haven't had a losing season since 04 when losing seasons were every other year

[giantsfan420]

[quote user="AllTuckedUp"]Personally, I don't. I see a dynasty as a dominant team for many years. If you look at our regular season records we haven't been dominant.[/quote]

If we win another one with this group of guys and coaches in the next 3 yrs, wed be a dynasty w/o a doubt,

I personally believe we e already in dynasty mode, 2 sb wins in four yrs with an extremely young n talented roster with an elite qb...
understand if others dont c it the way i do but im confident the world will c us as a dynasty after next season...if we can even simply get to another sb and not necessarily win, itd be amazing in todays fa era

[FBomb]

Yes.

[SweetZombieJesus]

There's no real definition.

The ones that aren't arguable:

60's Packers (5 in 7 years)
70's Steelers (4 in 6 years)
90's Cowboys (3 in 4 years)
00's Patriots (3 in 4 years)

If we can win another one we'd be a lot like the late 70's - early 80's Raiders who won 3 (76 80 83) and the 49ers (81 84 88 89).

I think most people would agree that the Raiders and 49ers were dynasties, right?

[paul007]

I agree

[GMEN023]

[quote user="SweetZombieJesus"]There's no real definition.

The ones that aren't arguable:

60's Packers (5 in 7 years)
70's Steelers (4 in 6 years)
90's Cowboys (3 in 4 years)
00's Patriots (3 in 4 years)

If we can win another one we'd be a lot like the late 70's - early 80's Raiders who won 3 (76 80 83) and the 49ers (81 84 88 89).

I think most people would agree that the Raiders and 49ers were dynasties, right?
[/quote]

The 49ers were def a dynasty. They had the same core group throughout those years. I don't believe that many people consider the Raiders a dynasty they are often forgotten. They were overshadowed by the Steelers mostly and the 49ers a bit. They also had different coaches and starting QBs.
IDK if I would consider us a dynasty. I guess it depends when we win another one and in what fashion we do it. I think many people won't consider us a dynasty because the perception is we got "hot" during our SB titles and had mediocre regular seasons. We’ll see though. Gotta win the 3rd first.

[KidA]

If we won the SB again within the next few years I think it would come down to how we do in the playoffs during the non-SB years. To be a dynasty you ought to be a contender throughout most of your era and we haven't quite lived up to that in recent seasons.

[Jet-Blue]

[quote user="KidA"]If we won the SB again within the next few years I think it would come down to how we do in the playoffs during the non-SB years.* To be a dynasty you ought to be a contender throughout most of your era and we haven't quite lived up to that in recent seasons.
[/quote]

I really think you've summed it up. They need to be consistant for a long period of time, right now they are not. Add a few more years going deep into the playoffs and another SB win in 2 or 3 years then yes.

[gumby742]

Normally, I'd say without a doubt. However, there's one difference between us, if we win another one, and say the Patriots or the Steelers. The Pats and Steelers are good pretty much every year and are a lock to make the playoffs. Since 2007, we've missed the playoffs twice. We aren't what you'd call a convincing team. Dynasties imo, need to be convincing.

There's a reason why we're always getting disrespected.

Consistency is key.