NFL PLAYERS THREATEN TO NOT WEAR MANDATED PADS
"If the NFL owners thought they could pass a new rule mandating the use of thigh and knee pads beginning in 2013 -- something
they did Tuesday -- and not draw the wrath of the players, they were incorrect
in that assessment (of course, there's little chance the owners and commissioner
Roger Goodell actually thought the new law would be smooth
Because it sounds like some of the players who will have to
wear the pads are not pleased with the new rule. And it sounds like some of them
don't want to adhere to it (even if they'll be barred from playing the game for
not doing so).
“There'll probably be a lot of fines in 2013,” Chargers cornerback Quentin Jammer told UT San Diego. “A lot of guys won't wear
And by “a lot of guys,” he's referring, at the minimum, to Quentin
Jammer. Asked point-blank if he would wear leg pads, Jammer said
“It's dumb,” Jammer said. “Ridiculous to me. I don't think anybody
should be required to wear (them). I don't get hit, so I don't need to worry
about pads. Offensive players should wear them because we hit them, but I don't
think it should be mandatory.</p>
“You play this game because you want to play this game, and the risks you take
are the risks you take. If you don't want to wear hip pads, knee pads or thigh
pads, you shouldn't have to. It should be a choice.”
Then, Jarret Johnson, new
Chargers linebacker, got in on the act, playing the old “the owners have never
played the game before" card (just one time, I'd like to hear the owners retort,
“Oh yeah, well, you've never been worth hundreds of millions of dollars and
you've never been able to buy, sell and trade players.”).
saying, 'Why do players always complain about player safety if they're not going
to wear thigh pads?' Well, thigh bruises and knee bruises aren't ending
careers,” Johnson said.
“This, to me, is a PR stunt … If you get hit in the
legs, you're doing something wrong. You're either getting cut or standing there.
Usually, when guys are aggressive and they're hitting back, the legs aren't
usually getting hit.”
Oakland's Ron Bartell, meanwhile,
has begun financial planning, because he also says he will decline the pads.
"I'd better put some fine money away,” Bartell told the Contra Costa Times.
"It takes away from the
speed of the game," Bartell said. "Hip pads, knee pads, thigh pads. They're not
going to stop you from tearing an ACL. It may stop a couple of soft-tissue
injuries, but a knee pad isn't going to stop a guy from blowing out a
No word, though, on how players who refuse to wear leg pads will
respond when they're told they can't play the game without them.
record, the NFLPA already has weighed in on the issue, releasing a statement in
which the union said, “Any change in working conditions is a
collectively-bargained issue. While the NFL is focused on one element of health
and safety today, the NFLPA believes that health and safety requires a
comprehensive approach and commitment. We are engaged in and monitor many
different issues, such as players' access to medical records, prescription usage
and the situation with professional football's first responders, NFL referees.
We always look forward to meeting with the NFL to discuss any and all matters
related to player health and safety."
Meanwhile, the owners say that any
safety precaution -- even if it's not going to help with concussions -- is
better than not making any safety adjustments at all.
The saga, I
imagine, only has just begun. If only for this reason."